臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：實驗創新與十二年國民基本教育
書刊名：課程與教學
作者：詹志禹 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chan, Jason C.
出版日期：2017
卷期：20:4
頁次：頁1-23
主題關鍵詞：實驗教育；教育創新；十二年國教；課程綱要；非傳統教育；Experimental education；Educational innovation；12-year basic education；National curriculum；Non-traditional schools
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:70
  • 點閱點閱:9
本文首先分析實驗創新的意義與內涵，整理出教育上的實驗創新之八大特徵：問題意識、理念基礎、非主流、不確定性、合理冒險的勇氣、有規劃的行動、以多元證據為本的評估和合於專業的倫理。其次，根據杜威的實驗主義去進一步論述為什麼教育可以實驗；杜威認為世間沒有永恆的真理與價值，教育實驗可以採用科學方法來解決問題、檢視理念和追求進步，有助於學習經驗的重建和民主社會的共構。然後，本文指出十二年國教新課綱的彈性架構以及對於實驗創新的期待。最後，本文整理國內十種以及國外五種實驗創新的方向，以供想要推動十二年國教或申請實驗教育者參考。總結來看，每一種實驗創新都在回應當地社會與環境的需求，都在解決新時代所帶來的新問題。
Experimentation and innovation in education have been promoted in Taiwan for just a short period of time. However, the expectation from the general public has been growing since ＂Three Acts for Experimental Education＂ was passed and the new curriculum standard of the 12-year basic education was prepared. This paper analyzed the meaning and connation of educational experimentation and innovation, and summarized eight features: problem awareness, theoretical ideas, non-mainstream, uncertainty, courage to take a reasonable risk, planned action, multi-evidence-based evaluation, and accordance with professional ethics. The question about why education can be experimented is justified by John Dewey's experimentalism, which maintains that no truth or value is eternal and that both educational ideas and scientific methods are subject to re-inspection. In Dewey's belief, educational experimentation can solve problems, investigate ideas, and pursue progress. Such kind of experimental process would lead to reconstruction of learning experiences and co-construction of democratic society. This paper also described the expectation and flexible framework within the new curriculum for the 12-year basic education. Finally, ten innovative directions emerging from Taiwan's education and five types of educational innovation existing in other countries were proposed for consideration by those who will try out experimentation and innovation for the 12-year basic education. In conclusion, every kind of educational experimentation or innovation is not only responding to the needs of local society and environment but also trying to solve the new problems from the new age.
期刊論文
1.蔡清田、陳延興(20110600)。英國自主型中等學校教育革新評析。教育資料集刊，50，125-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林進山(20060900)。特色學校的教育建構與應用--以平溪國小為例。北縣教育，57，17-20。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hlebowitsh, P. S.(2006)。John Dewey and the idea of experimentalism。Education and Culture，22(1)，73-76。  new window
4.林志成、林仁煥(20081100)。增能創價、策略聯盟與特色學校經營。學校行政，58，1-20。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳清山(20151000)。「實驗教育三法」的重要內涵與策進作為。教育研究月刊，258，42-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.林永豐(20170300)。核心素養的課程教學轉化與設計。教育研究月刊，275，4-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Guyotte, K. W.、Sochacka, N. W.、Costantino, T. E.、Kellam, N. N.、Walther, J.(2015)。Collaborative creativity in STEAM: Narratives of art education students' experiences in transdisciplinary spaces。International Journal of Education & the Arts，16(15)，1-39。  new window
8.Henriksen, D.(2014)。Full STEAM ahead: Creativity in excellent stem teaching practices。The STEAM Journal，1(2)，(15)1-(15)9。  new window
9.Kim, S. W.、Lee, Y.(2016)。The analysis on research trends in programming based steam education in Korea。Indian Journal of Science and Technology，9(24)。  new window
10.Stohlmann, M.、Moore, T. J.、Roehrig, G. H.(2012)。Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education。Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research，2(1)，28-34。  new window
11.Weiner, K. G.(2013)。The dirty dozen: How charter schools influence student enrollment。Teachers College Record。  new window
12.Vopat, M. C.(2011)。Magnet schools, innate talent and social justice。Theory and Research in Education，9(1)，59-72。  new window
13.唐忠義、楊慧如(20130300)。敘說校長教學領導實踐：以脫離裁併校壓力的山谷國民小學為例。另類教育，2，93-125。  延伸查詢new window
14.詹志禹(20051200)。從演化觀點看創造力教育政策的推動--以「創意教師成長工程」為例。教育資料集刊，30，113-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.楊振昇(20151000)。從實驗教育三法析論我國中小學教育之發展。教育研究月刊，258，15-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Angrist, J. D.、Dynarski, S. M.、Kane, T. J.、Pathak, P. A.、Walters, C. R.(2012)。Who benefits from KIPP?。Journal of Policy Analysis and Management，31(4)，837-860。  new window
17.Davis, T. M.(2014)。School choice and segregation: "Tracking" racial equity in magnet schools。Education and Urban Society，46(4)，399-433。  new window
18.Connor, A. M.、Karmokar, S.、Whittington, C.(2015)。From STEM to STEAM: Strategies for enhancing engineering & technology education。International Journal of Engineering Pedagogies，5(2)，37-47。  new window
19.Ikpeze, C.(2013)。Increasing urban students, engagement with school: Toward the expeditionary learning model。Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research，9，56-65。  new window
20.Howe, K. R.(2005)。The question of education science: Experimentism versus experimentalism。Educational Theory，55(3)，306-321。  new window
21.Ladd, H. F.、Fiske, E. B.(2003)。Does competition improve teaching and learning? Evidence from New Zealand。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis，25(1)，97-112。  new window
22.Nissani, M.、Hoefler-Nissani, D. M.(1992)。Experimental studies of belief dependence of observations and of resistance to conceptual change。Cognition and Instruction，9(2)，97-111。  new window
23.Peck, S. M.(2010)。Not on the same page but working together: Lessons from an award winning urban elementary school。The Reading Teacher，63(5)，394-403。  new window
24.Piro, J.(2010)。Going from STEM to STEAM。Education Week，29(24)，28-29。  new window
25.Resnik, J.(2015)。The incorporation of the international Baccalaureate in magnet schools in the United States: Survival strategies of low performing schools。Educational Practice and Theory，37(2)，79-106。  new window
26.詹志禹、陳玉樺(20110600)。發揮想像力共創臺灣未來：教育系統能扮演的角色。教育資料與研究，100，23-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Lakatos, I.(1971)。History of science and its rational reconstructions。The Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association。New York, NY：Springer。91-108。  new window
研究報告
1.Cheng, A.、Hitt, C.、Kisida, B.、Mills, J. N.(2015)。No excuses charter schools: A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence on student achievement。  new window
2.Gleason, P. M.(2016)。What's the secret ingredient? Searching for policies and practices that make charter schools successful。  new window
3.教育部(2017)。新住民子女就讀國中小人數分布概況統計。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Heath, A. L.(2013)。We are crew, not passengers: Middle level students' experiences of the expeditionary learning school reform model and its relationship to literacy, agency, and diversity(博士論文)。The Ohio State University。  new window
圖書
1.林幸台、王木榮(1999)。威廉斯創造力測驗指導手冊。臺北市：心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Dewey, John(1902)。The child and the curriculum。Chicago, Illinois：University of Chicago Press。  new window
3.Tuttle, C. C.、Gill, B.、Gleason, P.、Knechtel, V.、Nichols-Barrer, I.、Resch, A.(2013)。KIPP middle schools: Impacts on achievement and other outcomes。Washington, DC：Mathematica Policy Research。  new window
4.Teh, B.、McCullough, M.、Gill, B. P.(2010)。Student achievement in New York City middle schools affiliated with achievement firs t and uncommon schools。Cambridge, Massachusetts：Mathematica Policy Research。  new window
5.Beesley, Andrea、Clark, Tedra、Barker, Jane、Germeroth, Carrie、Apthorp, Helen(2010)。Expeditionary learning schools: Theory of action and literature review of motivation, character, and engagement。Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning。  new window
6.Gonzalez, H. B.、Kuenzi, J. J.(2012)。Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (stem) education: A primer。Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service。  new window
7.Horn, J.(2016)。Work hard, be hard: Journeys through "no excuses" teaching。Lanham, Maryland：Rowman & Littlefield Publishers。  new window
8.Laudan, Larry(1977)。Progress and its problems。University of California Press。  new window
9.Dewey, John(1938)。Experience and Education。New York, NY：Macmillan。  new window
10.Dewey, John(1916)。Democracy and education。Free Press。  new window
11.Kuhn, Thomas Samuel(1970)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。  new window
其他
1.Kahlenberg, R.(20110401)。Myths and realities about KIPP，http://voices.washingtonpost.com/answer-sheet/charterschools/myths-and-realities-about-kipp.html?wprss=answer-sheet。  new window
2.Miron, G.，Urschel, J. L.，Mathis, W. J.，Tomquist, E.(2010)。Schools without diversity: Education management organizations, charter schools and the demographic stratification of the American school system，Boulder and Temper Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit。，http://epicpolicy.org/publication/schools-without-diversity。  new window
3.Siegel-Hawley, G.，Frankenberg, E.(2012)。Reviving magnet schools: Strengthening a successful choice option，http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529163.pdf。  new window
4.U.S. Department of Education(2004)。What do we mean by "innovation"?，https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oii/about/definition.html。  new window
5.Betts, J.，Kitmitto, S.，Levi, J.，Bos, J.，Eaton, M.(2015)。What happens when schools become magnet schools? A longitudinal study of diversity and achievement，American Institutes for Research。，http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED556800.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Popper, K. R.(1973)。Evolutionary epistemology。Popper selections。Princeton, New Jersey：Princeton University Press。  new window
2.Rissmann-Joyce, S.、Nagdi, M. E.(2013)。A case study: Egypt's first STEM schools: Lessons learned。Proceeding of the Global Summit on Education。Kuala Lumpur：WorldConferences.net。  new window
3.Runco, M. A.、Chand, I.(1994)。Conclusions concerning problem finding, problem solving, and creativity。Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity。Norwood, NJ：Ablex Publishing Company。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：832（臺灣：823，外國：9） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1885225 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67687906
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上