:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:探索企業主管的親信關係
書刊名:中山管理評論
作者:戚樹誠 引用關係
作者(外文):Chi, Shu-cheng
出版日期:1996
卷期:4:1
頁次:頁1-15
主題關鍵詞:親信關係差序格局親近信任忠誠度Confidant relationshipDifferential matricesClosenessTrustLoyalty
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(4)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:384
  • 點閱點閱:74
  現代的企業組織裡,親信具有相當重要的組織角色。本研究使用便利取樣方式獲得58對主管與親信的有效樣本。研究結果顯示,主管教親信傾向知覺兩人間存在親近關係與信任關係。主管對於其與親信間的親近關係、信任關係之間的相關性並不一致;反之,親信則說其與主管間的親近關係、信任關係之間存在較一致的相關性。其次,對主管而言,親信與主管之間的親近程度並不會與親信的忠誠度有密切關係;然而,對親信而言,親近程度與他的忠識度是息息相關的。至於信任關係與親信的忠誠度之間存在部份關聯性,最後,主管與親信間的親信關係應以情感關係來描述而非以交易關係來描述。
  In modern corporations, confidants play very important organizational roles. Thisstudy uses a convenient sampling technique to investigate confidant relationship. Fifty-eightpairs of superior-confidant dyads of effective samples were obtained. Our results show that,compared to their confidants counterpart, superiors are more likely to perceive closeness andtrusting relationship between them and their confidants. Also, from superiors' viewpoint,closeness is not highly related to trusting relationship, while in confidants' viewpoint, theyare related to each other. In addition, from superiors' perceptions, degree of closeness betweensuperior and confidant is not related to confidants' loyalty. However, from confidants'perceptions, degree of closeness is related to their loyalty. Trusting relationship is found onlypartially related to confidants' loyalty. Finally, relationships between superior and confidantare better described in terms of affective terms than in transactional terms.
期刊論文
1.Deutschi, M.(1958)。Trust and suspicion。Journal of Conflict Resolution,2,265-279。  new window
2.高承恕、陳介玄(1989)。臺灣企業運作的社會秩序--人情關係與法律。社會與經濟,3/4,151-165。  延伸查詢new window
3.Butler, J. K.、Cantrell, R. S.(1984)。A Behavioral Decision Theory Approach to Modeling Dyadic Trust in Superiors and Subordinates。Psychological Reports,55,19-28。  new window
4.Hosmer, Larue Tone(1995)。Trust: The Connecting Link between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics。Academy of Management Review,20(2),379-403。  new window
5.Buchanan, P. C.(1974)。Organizational Commitment。Journal of Alienation and Commitment,88-89。  new window
6.戚樹誠、林行宜(19940700)。企業高階主管親信關係之研究。管理科學學報,11(2),281-312。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳介玄、高承恕(19910600)。臺灣企業運作的社會秩序--人情關係與法律。東海社會科學學報,10,219-231。  延伸查詢new window
8.Zand, Dale E.(1972)。Trust and managerial problem solving。Administrative Science Quarterly,17(2),229-239。  new window
9.鄭伯壎(19950200)。差序格局與華人組織行為。本土心理學研究,3,142-219。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Dansereau, Fred Jr.、Graen, George B.、Haga, William J.(1975)。A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process。Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,13(1),46-78。  new window
會議論文
1.劉兆明(1992)。「報」的概念分析及其在組織研究上的意義。中國人的心理與行為科際學術研討會。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.社仲傑(1990)。大學生人際親密的評量與身心適應--親子、情人、異性朋友、同性朋友四種角色的相關分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.危芷芬(1991)。關係取向、交往原則與道德判斷的文化比較研究(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.趙梅如(1989)。國中學生教師信任感與生活適應、學業成就關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
4.Lapan, S. D.(1976)。The Development and Validation of an Instrument that Measures Student Perceptions of Teacher Credibility(博士論文)。  new window
圖書
1.費孝通(1947)。鄉土中國。香港:鳳凰出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Williamson, Oliver E.(1975)。Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization。Free Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃光國(1990)。人情與面子 : 中國人的權力遊戲。現代化與中國化論集。臺北:桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Adams, John Stacey(1965)。Inequity in social exchange。Advances in experimental social psychology。Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE