:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:任務性、脈絡性及適應性績效表現與主管獎酬決策影響效果之研究
作者:簡博浩
作者(外文):Chien, Po Pao
校院名稱:國立政治大學
系所名稱:企業管理研究所
指導教授:韓志翔
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2008
主題關鍵詞:適應性績效表現主管獎酬決策任務複雜性任務相互依賴性Adaptive Performancesupervisory reward decisiontask complexitytask interdependence
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:30
本論文的研究目的在探討工作績效理論中任務性、脈絡性及適應性績效表現對主管獎酬決策的影響。研究一以「特定職位或職系適用」的角度,以業務經理為標的,運用實驗法以影片模擬實驗法的三因子實驗設計來進行,以233位企業主管為受試對象。研究二以「跨職位適用」的角度,運用調查法以150位主管選取一位部屬來評量三種工作績效表現。兩個研究結果顯示,任務性及脈絡性績效表現如過去研究結論一致,對主管獎酬決策有影響;適應性績效表現亦對主管獎酬決策有影響。透過實驗法驗證,適應性績效表現與脈絡性績效表現的交互效果對主管獎酬決策有影響;但與任務性績效表現的交互效果則是不存在的。透過調查法驗證,在任務越複雜的工作,脈絡性績效表現及適應性績效表現對主管獎酬決策的正向關係則越強。在研究三中,針對上述研究結論及實務應用,以兩個職務屬性為干擾效果,發現顧客接觸需求程度及任務相互依賴性越高的職位,適應性績效表現與主管獎酬決策的關係就越強。
本論文之研究延伸工作績效內涵,驗證適應性績效表現對主管獎酬決策有其影響。並以三個不同的研究來驗證假說,從不同的職務適用觀點及研究方法的角度,更具理論及實務的價值。
The current research aims to examine how adaptive performance, contextual performance and task performance correlate supervisory reward decision. The study employed the methods of survey and laboratory experiments and virtually comprises three parts. In Part One, from the perspective of specific occupations or job families, 233 manager subjects were recruited to view a previously-videotaped simulated sales executive’s job performance and give rating afterwards in terms of his task performance, contextual performance, and adaptive performance. In Part Two, from the perspective of applicable across jobs, 150 manager subjects randomly chose one of their subordinates and rated his/her task, contextual and adaptive performance. The findings in either Study 1 or Study 2 were congruent with results of previous research, which indicated not only the main effects of task and contextual performance but also (that of) adaptive performance affected supervisory reward decision. In addition, the experiment study justified that the interactional effects of adaptive and contextual performance were crucial factors to modify the supervisory reward decision, while the field study illustrated how employees’ contextual and adaptive performances reinforced supervisory reward decision especially when task complexity were taken into consideration. In Study 3, based on the former findings and practical application, we found that a job position of high customer-contact requirements and high task interdependence significantly strengthened the correlation between adaptive performance and supervisory reward decision.
This study not only endorses the essentiality of job performance but also testifies effect of adaptive performance on supervisory reward decision. Moreover, this study, using different methodologies, has extended theory and provided practical implications.
中文文獻
王勝橋,2006,「中國情景下適應性績效構思研究」,商業研究,19卷7期:頁48-54。
王輝、李曉軒、羅勝強,2003,「任務績效與情境績效兩因素績效模型的驗證」,中國管理科學,11卷4期:頁79-84。
司徒達賢,2006,第一版,管理學的新世界,台北,天下文化。new window
何永福、楊國安,2001,第三版,人力資源策略管理,台北,三民書局。
李銳、葉蓮花、凌文銓,2006,「適應性績效理論及其應用」,現代管理科學,25卷11期:頁27-28。
邱皓政,2003,第一版,結構方程模式:LISREL的理論、技術與應用,台北,雙葉書廊圖書公司。
周厚余、鄭全全,2006,「適應性績效研究及其績效管理的意義」,人類工效學,12卷4期:頁57-59。
馬可一,2003,「適應性績效」,商業研究,22卷:頁15-17。
莊如松,2007,目標導向、前瞻人格與適應性績效之關係,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版之博士論文。
黃家齊,2002,人力資源管理活動認知與員工態度、績效之關連性差異分析-心理契約與社會交換觀點,管理評論,21卷4期:頁101-127。new window
陳順宇,2000,第三版,迴歸分析,台北,華泰書局。
馮明、陶祁,2005,「適應性績效及其在人力資源管理中的應用」,北京市計畫勞動管理幹部學院報,13卷4期:頁51-52。
彭台光、高月琴、林鉦棽,2006,「管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救」,管理學報,23卷1期:頁77-98。new window
溫志毅,2005,「工作績效的四因素結構模型」,首都師範大學學報(社會科學版),5卷:頁105-111。
簡博浩,1999,薪酬策略群組與經營績效之關係研究,國立中興大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
諸承明、戚樹誠、李長貴,1996,「薪資設計之文獻回顧與評論-建立『薪資設計四要素模式』」,人力資源學報,6期:頁57-86。
陶祁,2006,「適應性績效結構分析及在培訓評估中的應用」,管理科學,19卷2期:頁48-54。
陶祁、王重鳴,2006,「管理培訓背景下適應性績效的結構分析」,心理科學,19卷3期:頁48-54。


英文文獻
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Allen, T. D. (2006). Rewarding good citizens: The relationship between citizenship behavior, gender, and organizational rewards. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(1), 120-143.
Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. (1998). The effect of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 247-260.
Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. (2001). The influence of ratee gender on organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(12), 2561-2587.
Allworth, E., & Hesketh, B. (1999). Construct-oriented biodata: Capturing change -related and contextually relevant future performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7(2), 97-111.
Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Bachrach, D. G., Powell, B. C., Bendoly, E., & Richey, R. G. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluations: Exploring the impact of task interdependence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 193-201.
Bachrach, D. G., Wang, H., Bendoly, E., & Zhang, S. (2007). Importance of organizational citizenship behaviour for overall performance evaluation: Comparing the role of task interdependence in China and the USA. Management and Organization Review, 3(2), 255–276.
Bergeron, D. M. (2007). The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost? Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1078 -1095.
Bettencourt, L. A. (2004). Change-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors: The direct and moderating influence of goal orientation. Journal of Retailing, 80(3), 165-180.
Bettencourt, L. A., & Brown, S, W. (1997). Customer-contact employees: Relationships among workplace fairness, job satisfaction and prosocial service behavior. Journal of Retailing, 73(1), 39-61.
Bettencourt L. A., Gwinner, K. P., & Meuter, M. L. (2001). A comparison of attitude, personality, and knowledge prediction of service-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 29-41.
Bitner, M. J. (1990). Evaluation service encounter: The effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 69-82.
Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Mohr, L. A. (1994). Critical service encounter: The employee’s viewpoint. Journal of Marketing, 58(5), 95-106.
Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Tetreault, M. S. (1990). The service encounter: Diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents. Journal of Marketing, 54 (1), 71-84.
Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2002). Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 505-522.
Borman, W. C. (2004). The concept of organizational citizenship. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(6), 238-241.
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt, & W. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71–98). New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99–109.
Borman, W. C., White, L. A., & Dorsey, D. W. (1995). Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 168-177.
Bowen, D. E. & Schneider. B. (1985). Boundary-spanning-role employees and the service encounter: some guidelines for management and research. In J. A. Czepiel, R. S. Michael, R. Solomon, & C. F. Surprenant(Eds.), The service encounter: Managing employee/customer interaction in Service Business (pp. 127-147). Lexington, MA: D. C. Health and Company.
Bridge, W. (1994). The end of the job. Fortune, September 19, 62-74.
Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710-725.
Campbell, D. J. (1988). Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 13(1), 40-52.
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough(Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 687–732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Campbell, J. P. (1999). The definition and measurement of performance in the new age, In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development (pp. 399-429). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Campbell, J. P., Gasser, M. B., & Oswald, F. L. (1996). The substantive nature of job performance variability. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior in organizations (pp.258–299). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cascio, W. F. (1998). Applied psychology in personnel management (5th Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Chan, D. (2000). Conceptual and empirical gaps in research on individual adaptation at work. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol.1, pp. 143-164). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Coleman, V. I., & Borman, W. C. (2000). Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain. Human Resource Management Review, 10(1), 25-44.
Conway, J. M. (1999). Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 3-13.
Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435-462.
Earley, P. C. (1985). Influence of information, choice and task complexity upon goal acceptance, performance, and personal goal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(3), 481-491.
George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mod at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310-329.
George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (1997). Organizational spontaneity in context. Human Performance, 10(2), 153-170.
Glasman L. R., & Albarracin D. (2006). Forming attutide that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 778-822.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Walbourne, T. M. (1988). Compensation strategy: An overview and future steps. Human Resource Planning, 11(3), 173-189.
Goodman, S. A., & Svyantek, D. J. (1999). Person–organization fit and contextual performance: Do shared values matter. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55(2), 254-275.
Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Reasearch in organization behavior (vol. 9, pp. 175-208). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Graham, J. W. (1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4(4), 249-270.
Griffin, B., & Hesketh, B. 2003. Adaptable behaviours for successful work and career adjustment. Australian Journal of Psychology, 55(2), 65-73.
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347.
Hartline, M. D., & Ferrell, O. C. (1996). The management of customer-contact Service employees: En empirical investigation. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 52-70.
Hesketh, B., & Allworth, E. (1997). Adaptive performance: Updating the criterion to cope with change. Paper presented at the Second Australian Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference, Melbourne.
Hesketh, B., & Neal, A. (1999). Technology and performance. In D. R. Ilgen, & D. E. Pulakos(Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implication for staffing , motivation , and development (pp. 21-55). San Francisco,CA:Jossey-Bass.
Higgins, C. A., Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2003). Influence tactics and work outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 89-106.
Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organization Research Methods, 1(1), 104-121.
Howard, A. (1995). The changing nature of work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
Hunt, S. (1996). Generic work behavior: An investation into the dimensions of entry-level, hourly job performance. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 51-83.
Ilgen, D. R., & Pulakos, E. D. (1999). Employee performance in today’s organization. In D. R. Ilgen, & D. E. Pulakos(Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implication for staffing , motivation , and development (pp. 1-20). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Johnson, J. W. (2001). The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimensions to supervisor judgments of overall performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 984-996.
Joung, W., Hesketh, B., & Neal, A. (2006). Using “War stories” to train for adaptive performance: Is it better to learn from error or success? Applied Psychology: An Internatonal Review, 55(2), 282-302.
Katz, D., & Kohn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Weiley.
Kerr, S. 1975. On the folly of rewarding A. While helping for B. Academy of Management Journal, 18(4): 769-783.
Kiker, D. S., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1999). Main and interaction effects of task and contextual performance on supervisory reward decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 602–609.
Klein, G., & Pierce, L. (2001). Adaptive teams: in Proceedings of the 6th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R., & Smith, E. M. (1999). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In D. R. Ilgen, & D. E. Pulakos(Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implication for staffing , motivation , and development (pp. 240-292). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Latham, G., & Yukl, G. (1975). A review of research on the application of goal-setting in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 18(4), 824-845.
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 564-575.
LePine, J. A. (2005). Adaptation of teams in response to unforeseen change: Effects of goal difficulty and team composition in teams of cognitive ability and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1153-1167.
LePine, J. A., Colquitt, J., A. & Erez, A. (2000). Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Personnel Psychology, 53(3), 563-593.
London, M., & Mone, E. M. 1999. Continuous learning. In D. R. Ilgen, & D. E. Pulakos(Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implication for staffing, motivation, and development (pp. 119-153). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organization. New York: Wiley.
Maynard, D. C., & Hakel, M. D. (1997). Effects of objective and subjective task complexity on performance. Human performance, 10(4), 303-330.
MacAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.
Milkovich, G. T. (1988). A strategic perspective on compensation. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 20(2), 263-288.
Moorman, R. H., & Blakely, G. L. (1995). Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(2), 127-143.
Motowidlo, S. J., & Schmit, M. J. (1999). Performance assessment in unique jobs. In D. R. Ilgen ,& E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of job performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development (pp. 56–86). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475-480.
Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10(2), 71–83.
Mueller-Hanson, R., White, S., Dorsey, D., & Pulakos, E. (2005). Training adaptable leaders: Lessons from research and practice (ARI Research Report No. 1844). Arlington, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral Sciences.
Murphy, K. R. 1989. Dimensions of job performance. In R.Dillon, & J. Pellingrino,(Eds.), Testing: Applied and theoretical perspectives (pp. 218-247). New York, NY: Praeger.
Murphy, K. R. (1999). The challenge of staffing a postindustrial workplace. In D. R. Ilgen, & D. E. Pulakos(Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implication for staffing , motivation , and development (pp. 295-324). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Murphy, K. R., & Jackson, S. E. (1999). Managing work role performance: Challenges for twenty-first century organizations and their employees. In D. R. Ilgen, & D. E. Pulakos(Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implication for staffing , motivation , and development (pp. 325-365). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Neale, M. & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A model of self-held work roles and role transitions. Human Performance, 19(1), 23-41.
Newman, J. M., & Krzystofiak, F. J. (1998). Value-chain compensateion. Compensation & Benefits Review, 30(3), 60-66.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10(2), 85-97.
Park, O. S., & Sims, H. P. (1989). Beyond cognition in leadership: Prosocial behavior and affect in managerial judgement. Paper presented at the Annual Academy of Management Meetings, Washington, DC.
Pearlman, K., & Barney, M. F. 1999. Selection in a changing workplace. In J. Kehoe(Eds.), Managing Selection in changing organizations: Human resource strategies (pp. 3-72). San Francicso, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Pfeffer, J. (1998). Seven practices of successful organization. California Management Review, 40(2), 96-125.
Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S, B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestions for future research. Human Performance, 10(2), 133-151.
Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612-624.
Pulakos, E. D., Schmitt, N., Dorsey, D. W., Arad, S., Hedge, J., & Borman, W. C. (2002). Predicting adaptive performance: Further tests of a model of adaptability. Human Performance, 15(4), 299-323.
Rafaeli, A. (1993). Dress and behavior of customer contact employees: A framework for analysis. In T.A. Swartz, D. E., Bowen, & S. W. Brown(Eds.), Advances in services marketing and management (Vol. 2, pp. 175-211). CT: JAI Press.
Reiter-Palmon, R., Young, M., Strange, J., Mannig, R., & James, J. (2006). Occupationally- special skills: Using skills to define and understand jobs and their requirement. Human Resource Management Review, 16(3), 356-375.
Robbins, S. P. (1992). Organization behavior. San Diego, California: Prentice Hall Internation Inc.
Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global rating of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 66-80.
Saavedra, R. P., Earley, C., Van Dyne, L., & Lee, C. (1993). Complex interdependence in task performance groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(1), 61-72.
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1977). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224-253.
Sanchez, J. I., & Levine, E. L. (1999). Is job analysis dead, misunderstood, or both? New forms of work analysis and design. In A. Kraut, & A. Korman(eds.) Evolving practices in human resource management (pp. 43-68). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Schmitt, N., & Chan, D. (1998). Personnel selection: A theoretical approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Schmitt, N., Cortina, J. M., Ingerick, M. J., & Wiechmann, D. (2003). Personnel selection and employee performance. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski(Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 77-105). Hoboken, HJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Schroder, H. M., Driver, M. J., & Streufert, S. (1967). Human information processing. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Sckett, P. R., Berry, C. M., & Laczo, R. M. (2006). Citizenship and counterproductive behavior: clarifying relations between the two domains. Human Performance, 19(4), 441-464.
Smith, C. A., Organ D. W., & Near J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior:It’s nature and antecedents, Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653-663.
Smith, E. M., Ford, J. K., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (1997). Building adaptive expertise: Implications for training design. In M. A. Quinones, & A. Dudda (Eds.), Training for 21th century technology: Applications of psychological research (pp. 89-118). Washionton, DC: APA Books.
Smith, P. C. (1976). Behaviors, results, and organizational effectiveness: The problem of criteria. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 745-775). Chicago, Illinois: Rand McNally College Publishing Co.
Spiro, R. L., & Weitz, B. A. (1990). Adaptive selling: Conceptualization, measurement and nomological validity. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1), 61-69.
Stewart, G. L., & Nandkeolyar, A. K. (2006). Adaptation and intra-individual variation in sales outcomes: Exploring the interactive effects of personality and environmental opportunity. Personnel Psychology, 59(2), 307-332.
Sun, L., Aryee, S., & Law, K. S. (2007). High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior and organizational performance: A relational perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 558-577.
Tucker, J. S., Gunther, K. M., Pleban, R. J., Goodwin, G. A., & Vaughan, A. W. (2007). The appalication of a model of adaptive performance to army leader behaviors (ARI Research Report 1870). Arlington, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral Sciences.
Van De Ven, A. H., Delbecq, A. L., & Koenig, R. J. (1976). Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review, 41(2), 322-338.
Van Der Vegt, G. S., & Janssen, O. (2003). Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29(5), 729-751.
Van Der Vegt, G. S., & Ven De Vliert, E., & Oosterhof, A. (2003). Informational dissimilarity and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of intra-team interdependence and team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 715-727.
Van Dyne, L., Cumming, L. L., & Parks, J. M. (1995). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional charity (A bridge over muddied waters). In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol.17, pp. 215-285). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Van Dyne, L., Graham, J. W., & Dienesch, R. M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construction redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 765-802.
Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 525-531.
Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J., & Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 526–535.
Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 216–226.
Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. (1998). The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 540-555.
White, S.S., Mueller-Hanson, R.A., Dorsey, D.W., Pulakos, E.D., Wisecarver, M.M., Deagle,E.A., & Mendini, K.G.. (2005). Developing Adaptive Proficiency in Special Forces Officers (ARI Research Report 1831). Arlington, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute Behavioral and Social Sciences.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617.
Wood, R. (1986). Task complexity: Definition and construct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37(1), 60-82.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 部屬啊!您有做自己的機會嗎?尚嚴、專權雙元領導與部屬任務績效之關聯性:以情緒調節策略揭開潘朵拉的盒子
2. 部屬難為:領導者利組織不道德行為與部屬離職傾向、越級建言、主管導向組織公民行為與沉默行為之關係:以領導者-部屬交換關係為調節效果
3. 設計思考提升學習動機與問題解決信心--臺灣大學生學習設計思考課程的實證分析
4. 國際觀光旅館職場友誼與工作表現關係之探討--以卓越能力商數為中介變項
5. 青少年社會網絡指標及幽默表現風格之交互作用影響與被霸凌經驗之關係
6. 中高齡職涯未來時間觀、職場成功老化和就業力之關係--探討工作要求與資源的調節式中介作用
7. 居服員留任傾向之研究
8. 國中生所知覺到的教師自主支持、自我效能、任務價值對學習投入之影響
9. 病患不文明行為對情緒調節的影響:壓力心態與顧客導向的調節式中介模式
10. 重度工作投資與工作倦怠:健康促進與心理資本扮演之調節角色
11. 就事論事或將心比心?顧客不當對待與員工身心壓力的情緒歷程:壓力源評估與同理心特質的調節效果
12. 越南臺商外派人員之領導部屬交換對職場偏差行為之影響--以外在工作價值與工作不安全感為調節變項
13. 學校運動教練工作不安全感、組織認同、工作倦怠與工作退縮行為:工作要求-資源模式之觀點
14. 景觀餐廳顧客認知價值對行為意圖與額外願付價格之影響
15. 若即若離?探索TSSCI商管社群網絡結構及知識活動--編輯群重疊的策略觀點
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE