:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:六位已婚國小女性校長的社會化歷程研究
作者:陳秀玲
作者(外文):Chen, Shiu Ling
校院名稱:國立中正大學
系所名稱:教育學研究所
指導教授:林明地
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2012
主題關鍵詞:國小女性校長社會化社會化歷程紮根理論研究法female elementary principalssocializationthe process of socializationgrounded theory research method
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:75
六位已婚國小女性校長的社會化歷程研究
摘 要
本研究從社會化的角度,探討六位國小女性校長在教育現場下其社會化的經驗和歷程。基於研究目的和研究主題的特性,本研究邀請了六位研究參與者參與此研究,以預先擬好之訪談大綱作為研究工具,對六位研究參與者以滾雪球的方式逐次進行訪談,每位均訪談兩次。將所蒐集之訪談資料以紮根理論研究法進行分析,從原始資料中抽取出概念以至範疇,共得出四大範籌,並將範疇間的關係加以連結,建構出本研究之女性校長的社會化理論。
此四大範疇分別是女性校長知覺的校長角色特徵、女性校長於脈絡中的互動經驗、女性校長社會化過程中的關鍵因素和助力,以及女性校長的社會化轉變。
在女性校長知覺的校長角色特徵中,女性校長擔負著多元、繁重的校長角色,且有關校長角色之知覺主要觀察自男性;而女性校長於脈絡中的互動經驗,則須觀察女性校長所處的組織狀態,在存有性別刻板印象的組織脈絡裡,女性校長會隱藏女性領導特質,而顯現出較為中性之領導行為;至於女性校長在社會化的過程中,雖得到許多關鍵人物和助力之協助與影響,但最具關鍵性因素仍來自於女性校長自己;就在女性校長的社會化轉變的過程中,女性校長經歷連續的社會化歷程,從混沌茫然、試探摸索、調適,而至穩定的階段過程中,最終展現出能顯露真實的女性領導特質、建立起校長角色的認同感,而成為一位真正校長的社會化結果。
就在此四大範疇和範疇所含納的概念間,本研究提出最能代表範疇概念意涵之展現女性領導特質且稱職的扮演校長角色之歷程,作為本研究之核心範疇,並藉由故事線的描述,讓研究所發現之四大範疇和其包含之概念,與此核心範疇相連結,建立起女性校長之社會化理論。
The Study of Six Married Female Elementary Principals’ Socialization Process
Abstract
This research, through the socialization perspective, discussed six female elementary principals’ socialization experience and process in the real educational field. Based on the characteristics of purpose and theme of this research, researchers invited six participants to participate this research. The used research tools are pre-drafted interview outlines. The researcher utilized snowball rolling method to interview each participant one after another. Each participant was interviewed twice. The data collected from the interviewees were analyzed by grounded theory. The concepts were extracted from raw data, then sort into categories. There were four categories. The researcher connected the relation between categories and therefore, constructed the socialization theories of female principals.
Those four categories are: the characteristics of role as a principal under the awareness of female principals, the interaction experience of female principals in context, the key factor and the force in socialization process of female principals and the transformation in female principals’ socialization. In the characteristics of principal’s role under the awareness of female principals, the female principals carried various roles and accentuated load of responsibilities. Also, their role awareness as a principal comes from the observation of those male principals.
In the interaction experience of female principals in context, the female principals need to observe the status of organization which they are in. Within the existing gender stereotypical image of organization in context, female principals tend to hide their female leadership charasteristics and reveal their leadership charasteristics towards neutral. Although under the influence of key person and asisting force along their proces of socialization, the most critical factor comes from female principals themselves. In the process of socialization, female principals continuously experience the process from chaotically confused, exploratory try out, adaption, and finally to reach the stable phase. At last, female principals truly expressed their true selves with female leadership characteristics, established and accepted principal as a role, became a real principal and that was the result of the socialization process.
With the concepts of those four categories, this research revealed the fact that best represented the meaning of explicit female leadership charateristics and the process of appropriately acting out the principals’ roles. Those concepts served as a core category of this research. Also, through the connecting of the descriptive story line, the concepts of the categories were found and the core categories were connected. As a result, the theories of female principals’ process were established.
參考文獻
一、中文部分
內政部(2005)。婦女生活狀況調查報告-調查時期:民國91年8月13日至9月11日。台北:內政部統計處。
王大方(1996)。玻璃天花板:管理女性VS.女性領導。台北市:時報文化。
王秀玲、林新發(2004)。台灣小學教育改革政策:現況、內涵與評析。載於教育政策與教育革新(頁83-118)。台北市:心理。
王秋絨(1991)。教師專業社會化理論在教育實習設計上的蘊義。台北市:師大書苑。
王夢玲(2007)。台北縣國中女性校長領導特質之個案研究。國立台北大學公共行政曁政策學系碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
白亦方(主譯)(2001)。H. F. Wolcott著。校長辦公室裡的那個人:一種民族誌。 台北市:師大書苑。
石小芳(2008)。女性校長領導刻板印象之研究:以一所高職學校為例。國立台灣師範大學教育學系在職進修碩士班碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。
主計處(2011)。與女性議題有關之統計專題分析。2011年11月13日,取自http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=835&ctNode=3259
何麗香(2003)。花蓮縣國小女性校長學校公共關係之研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮縣。
吳芝儀、李奉儒(譯)(1999)。M. Q. Patton著。質的評鑑與研究。台北市:桂冠。
吳芝儀、廖梅花(譯)(2001)。A. Strauss, & J. Corbin著。紮根理論研究方法。嘉義市:濤石。
吳珮菁(2006)。一位國中女性校長領導風格之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
呂玉瑕(1983)。婦女就業與家庭角色、權力結構之關係。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,56,111-143。
呂晶晶(2008)。以女性主義觀點探討國民中、小學女性校長之玻璃天花板。學校行政雙月刊,56,107-123。
李玉惠(1998)。國民小學女性校長工作壓力與社會支持需求之研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
李政賢、廖志恆、林靜如(譯)(2007)。U. Flick著。質性研究導論。台北市:五南。
李莉莉(2003)。國小女性校長領導風格之研究:以北部地區為例。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
李惠茹(2003)。多數的性別、少數的權力。兩性平等教育季刊,21,120-114。
周志宏(1997)。教育法與教育改革。台北縣:稻香。new window
林佳珍(2008)。國民中學女性校長衝突管理策略與學校效能關係之研究。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。
林明地(2002)。校長學-:工作分析與角色研究取向。台北市:五南。
林明地(譯)(1998)。T. E. Deal, & K. D. Peterson著。學校領導-平衡邏輯與藝術。台北市:五南。
林明地、王如哲、江芳盛、何宣甫、李安明、林純雯、張明輝、湯堯、黃宗顯、簡玉敏、謝文豪、魏惠娟(譯)(2003)。W. K. Hoy & C. G. Miskel著。教育行政學:理論、研究與實際。高雄市:麗文。
林瑩(2002)。我國國民中學女性校長學校公共關係處理。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。
林靜慧(2003)。國中初任女校長組織社會化之研究:以六位女校長為例。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
武曉霞(2002)。台北縣國中小女性校長領導行為及生涯發展之研究。國立中正大學教育學研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
侯怡楓(1999)。一位國小女性校長領導實際之個案研究。國立中正大學教育學研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
俞智敏、陳光遠、陳素梅、張君玫(譯)(1995)。P. Abbott, & C. Wallace著。女性主義觀點的社會學。台北市:巨流。
洪瑞璇(2001)。大學女性院長生命故事之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
徐宗國(1994)。紮根理論研究法。香港社會科學學報,4,194-221。
徐宗國(1995)。工作內涵與性別角色。台北縣:稻香。new window
秦夢群(1993)。教育行政理論與應用。台北市:五南。
秦夢群(1999)。我國校長職前教育之分析與檢討。載於現代教育論壇(四)-校長專業教育與專業發展(頁17-25)。1999年5月12日,台北:國立臺北師範學院。new window
秦夢群、劉家維(2011)。教師工會成立發展與相關爭議之探討。教育研究月刊,203,5-16。new window
高淑清(2000)。來自異鄉人的心聲:海外留學生太太的生活世界。論文發表於「家人關係及其心理歷程:第五屆華人心理與行為科際學術研討會」。民國89年12月8日至10日。台北:中央研究院與國立台灣大學心理學系。
張明輝(1998)。學校行政革新專輯。台北市:國立台灣師範大學。
張鈿富(2004)。量化研究在教育上的應用與實例。載於潘慧玲(主編),教育研究方法論:觀點與方法(頁73-102)。台北市:心理。
教育部(1999)。高級中等以下學校教師評審委員會組織與運作功能之檢討研究。台北市:編者。
教育部(2001)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱程暫行綱要。台北市:編者。new window
。教育部(2010)。性別統計指標。2010年6月3日,取自http://www.edu.tw/ statistics/content.aspx?site-content-sn=8168
陳秀玲(2010)。一位女性初任校長領導信念的形塑因素與實踐困境之研究。台中教育大學學報:教育類,24(1),155-176。new window
陳秀珍(2008)。國民小學女性校長領導行為與領導效能相關之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
陳宜宣(2001)。國中女校長溝通行為之研究:以兩位女校長為例。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。new window
陳奎憙(2006)。教育社會學的發展與主要理論。載於陳奎憙(主編),現代教育社會學(二版)(頁15-40)。台北市:師大書苑。
陳啟榮(2005)。校園危機管理機制之建構。教育研究與發展期刊,1(2),117-134。new window
陳添丁(2004)。高中初任校長專業發展需求與職前培育制度建構之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
陳媺慈(2006)。我在太興的日子:一位初任女性校長學校經營之自傳俗民誌研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
曾秀鳳(2004)。女校長的教育伸展台:一位小學女校長領導風格之個案研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究學報,13,147-181。new window
游美惠、柯伯昇(2004)。台灣地區國小校長職位晉遷的性別分析。教育研究集刊,50(4),45-77。new window
湯志民(2002)。中小學校長遴選制度之評議。2012年3月8日,取自http://www3.nccu.edu.tw/~tangcm/doc/2.htm/article/D50.pdf
馮秋桂(2004)。三位女性國小校長生涯發展歷程之研究:傾聽生命長河的真情告白。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
馮麗珍(2005)。國小女性校長領導風格與教職員組織承諾關係之研究。國立屏東師範學院教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
黃昆輝(1972)。視導工作的新趨勢。師友月刊,65,8-12。
黃振球(1992)。績優學校。台北市:師大書苑。
黃德祥、林穎欣(2011)。教師會經驗與教師工會展望。教育研究月刊,203,40-48。new window
黃麗蓉(1996)。組織中的女性領導。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
楊振昇(1997)。教學領導理念之探討。載於高強華(主編),學校教育革新專輯(頁236-263)。台北市:師大書苑。
楊陳傑(2005)。國小女性校長領導特質與教師文化之研究:以桃竹苗四縣市為例。國立新竹教育大學進修部學校行政碩士班碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
葛立慈(2001)。國民小學教師評審委員會現況及意見之調查研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
銓敘部(2010)。銓敘統計年報。2010年6月11日,取自http://www.mocs.gov.tw/html/pubinfo.htm
潘慧玲(2004a)。緒論:轉變中的教育研究觀點。載於潘慧玲(主編),教育研究的取徑:觀念與應用(頁1-34)。台北市:高等教育。
潘慧玲(2004b)。緒論:學術探究的典範與新興取徑。載於潘慧玲(主編),教育研究方法論:觀點與方法(頁1-26)。台北市:心理。
鄭瑞隆(2000)。符號互動論及其在教育研究上之應用。載於中正大學教育學研究所(主編),質的研究方法(頁135-146)。高雄市:麗文。
謝臥龍、駱慧文(1996)。由教育平等觀點檢視當前大學教育。載於謝臥龍(主編),兩性、文化與社會(頁247-264)。台北市:心理。
謝維和(2002)。教育社會學。台北市:五南。
瞿智怡(2001)。高中職女性校長生涯發展歷程之研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
顏寧、黃詠光、吳欣隆(譯)(2009)。K. Charmaz著。建構紮根理論。台北市:五南。
嚴振農(2010)。女性校長職業生涯困境與轉折:批判俗民誌的應用。國立暨南大學教育政策與行政學系博士論文,未出版,南投縣。new window
二、英文部分
Abbott, P., & Wallace, C. (1997). An introduction to sociology: Feminist perspectives (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Adler, S., Laney, J., & Packer, M. (1993). Managing women: Feminism and power in educational management. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Alexander, R., Rose, J., & Woodhead, C. (1992). Curriculum organization and classroom practice in primary schools: A discussion paper. Oxford: Blackwell.
Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.
Alvy, H. B. (1984). The problems of new principals (Doctoral dissertation, University of Montana, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, 1979A.
Andersen, M. L., & Taylor, H. F. (2000). Sociology: Understanding a diverse society. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Baker, L. D., DiMarco, N., & Scott, W. E., Jr. (1975). Effects of supervisor’s sex and level of authoritarianism on evaluation and reinforcement of blind and sighted workers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 28-32.
Barth, R. S. (1980). Reflections on the principalship. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 9(5), 12-17.
Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial application (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Beck, L. G., & Murphy, J. (1993). Understanding the principalship: Metaphorical themes, 1920s-1990s. New York: Teacher College Press.
Bennis, W. (1984). Transformative power and leadership. In T. J. Sergiovanni & J. E. Corbally (Eds.), Leadership and organizational culture (pp.64-71). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Bernard, J. (1964). Academic women. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.
Bolam, R., McMahon. A., Pocklington, K., & Weindling, D. (1993). Effective management in schools: A report from the department of education via the school management task force professional working party. London: HMSO.
Bowling, R. P. (1981). Factors that limit the entry of woman into the elementary principalship. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 2380A.
Bradbury, L., & Gunter, H. (2006). Dialogic identities: The experiences of women who are headteachers and mothers in English primary schools. School Leadership and Management, 26(5), 489-504.
Bredeson, P. V. (2004). Letting go of outlived professional identities: A study of role transitions and role strain for principal in restructured schools. In H. Tomlinson (Ed.), Educational management (3rd ed., pp. 3-33). New York: Routledge.
Bridges, E. (1965). Bureaucratic role and socialization: The influence of experience on the elementary school principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 1(2), 19-28.
Butterfield, D. A., & Powell, G. N. (1981). Effect of group performance leader sex, and rater sex on ratings of leader behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 129-141.
Byrd, M. (1999). A study of the differences among African- American, Hispanic, and Anglo women on the perceived barriers and strategies to career advancement in public school administration. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(03), 1241A. (University Microfilms No. AAT 9923126)
Calas, M. B., & Smircich, L. (1996). From the women’s point of view: Feminist approach to organization studies. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 218-257). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
Chin, J. L. (2007). Overview: Women and leadership: Transforming visions and diverse voices. In J. L. Chin, B. Lott, J. K. Rice & J. Sanchez-Hucles (Eds.), Women and leadership: Transforming visions and diverse voices (pp. 1-17). Victoria, Australia: Blackwell Publishing.
Coleman, M. (2001). Achievement against the odds: The female secondary headteachers in England and Wales. School Leadership & Management, 21(1), 75-100.
Coleman, M. (2002). Women as headteacher: Striking the balance. Stoke on Trent, UK: Trentham Books.
Coleman, M. (2003). Gender and the orthodoxies of leadership. School Leadership & Management, 23(3), 325-339.
Coleman, M. (2007). Gender and educational leadership in England: A comparison of secondary headteachers’ views over time. School Leadership & Management, 27(4), 383-399.
Coulson, A. A. (1976). The role of the primary head. In T. Bush, R. Glatter, J. Goodey & C. Riches (Eds.), Approaches to school management (pp.274-292). London: Harper & Row.
Coulson, A. A. (1986). The managerial work of primary school headteachers. Sheffield papers in Education Management, n.48, Sheffield City Polytechnic, Sheffield.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Coyle, A. (1984). Redundant women. London: The Women’s Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Crompton, R., & Sanderson, G. (1986). Credentials and careers: Some implications of the increase in professional qualifications amongst women. Sociology, 20, 24-42.
Davies, L. (1987). The role of the primary school head. Educational Management and Administration, 15(1), 43-47.
Day, C., & Bakioghu, A. (1996). Development and disenchantment in the professional lives of headteachers. In I. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers’ professional lives (pp. 123-139). London: Falmer Press.
Day, C., Harris, A., & Hadfield, M. (2004). Grounding knowledge of schools in stakeholder realities. In H. Tomlinson (Ed.), Educational management (3rd ed., pp. 34-57). New York: Routledge.
Deaux, K. (1976). The behavior of women and men. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Duke, D. (1987). Why principals consider quitting. Phi Delta Kappan, 68, 308-312.
Duke, D. L., Isaacson, N. S., Sagor, R., & Schmuck, P. A. (1984). Transition to leadership: An investigation of the first year of the principalship. Portland, OR: Lewis and Clark College, Educational Administration Program.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Eagly, A. H. (2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 1-12.
Eagly, A. H., & Diekman, A. B. (2005). What is the problem? Prejudice as an attitude-in-context. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick & L. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after allport (pp. 19-35). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233-256.
Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569-591.
Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M., & Konsky, B. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125-145.
Estler, S. E. (1975). Women as leaders in public education. Signs, 1, 363-386.
Fletcher, J. (1994). Castrating the female advantage: Feminist standpoint research and management science. Journal of Management Inquiry, 3(1), 74-82.
Flowers, L. R. (2006). Exploration of the socialization process of female leaders in counselor education. Unpublished doctoral disseration, University of New Orleans.
Forsyth, D. R., Heiney, M. M., & Wright, S. S. (1997). Biases in appraisals of women leaders. Group Dynamics, 1(1), 98-103.
Funk, C. (1986, May). The female executive in school administration: Profiles, pluses, and powers. Paper presented at the annual conference on woman and work, Arlinton, TX.
Grant, J. (1986). Women as managers: What they can offer to organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 56-63.
Greenfield, W. D. (1985, April). Being and becoming a principal: Responses to work context and socialization process. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Greetz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basics Books.
Grimm, J. W., & Stern, R. N. (1974). Sex roles and internal labor market structures: The female semi-professions. Social Problems, 21, 690-705.
Gussner, W. P. (1974). The socialization of a school administrator (Doctoral dissertation Washinton University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 1910A.
Gutmann, D. L. (1987). Reclaimed powers: Toward a new psychology of men and women in later life. New York: Basic Books.
Hall, V. (1996). Dancing on the ceiling: A study of women managers in education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Hall, V., & Southworth, G. (2004). Headship. In H. Tomlinson (Ed.), Educational management (3rd ed., pp. 73-93). New York: Routledge.
Hammersley, M. (1989). The dilemma of qualitative method: Hebert Blumer and the Chicago tradition. London: Routledge.
Harding, S. (1987). Introduction: Is there a feminist method? In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology: Social science issues (pp.1-14). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hart, A. W. (1995). Women ascending to leadership: The organizational socialization of principals. In D. M. Dunlap & P. A. Schmuck (Eds.), Women leading in education (pp.105-124). Albany, NY: State University Of New York Press.
Heck, R. H. (2003). Examining the impact of professional preparation on beginning school administrators. In P. Hallinger (Ed.), Reshaping the landscape of school leadership development (pp.237-256). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Heinen, J. S., McGlauchin, D., Legeros, C., & Freeman, J. (1975). Developing the woman manager. Personnel Journal, 54, 282-286.
Helgesen, S. (1990). The female advantage: Women’s ways of leadership. NY: Doubleday Currency.
Hennig, M., & Jardim, A. (1977). The managerial woman. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Hill, M. S., & Ragland, J. C. (1995). Women as educational leaders: Opening windows, pushing celings. CA: Corwin Press.
Indvik, J. (2004). Women and leadership. In P. G. Northouse (Ed.), Leadership: Theory and practice (pp. 265-299). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jacobs, R. L., & McClelland, D. C. (1994). Moving up the corporate ladder. Consulting Psychology Journal Practice and Research, 46, 32-41.
James, A., & Prout, A. (1997). A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood?Provenance, promise and problem. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood (pp.7-33). London: Routledge Falmer.
Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 901-910.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Larwood, L., & Gutek, B. A. (1987). Working toward s theory of women’s career development. In B. A. Gutek & L. Larwood (Eds.), Women’s career development (pp.170-183). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28(1), 27-42.
Lloyd, K. (1985). Management and leadership in the primary school. In M. Hughes, P. Ribbins & H. Thomas (Eds.), Managing education: The system and the institution (pp. 291-307). London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Lockheed, M. E. (1975). Female motive to avoid success: A psychological barrier or a response to deviancy? Sex Roles, 1, 41-50.
Loden, M. (1985). Feminist leadership, or how to succeed in business without being one of the boys. New York: Times Books.
Lord, R. G., DeVader, C. L., & Alliger, G. M. (1986). A meta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership perceptions: An application of the validity generalization procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 402-410.
Louis, M. R. (1980). Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 226-251.
Marshall, J. (1984). Women managers: Travellers in a male world. Chichester, NY: Wiley.
Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative researching. London: Sage.
McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw Hill.
Miller, J., & Garrison, H. H. (1982). Sex roles: The division of labor at home and in the workplace. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 237-262.
Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.
Muldrow, T. W., & Bayton, J. A. (1979). Men and women executives and processes related to decision accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 99-106.
Neville, M. (1988). Promoting women: Successful women in educational management. Auckland: Longman Paul.
Nias, J. (1980). Leadership styles and job satisfaction in primary schools. In T. Bush, R. Glatter, J. Goodey & C. Riches (Eds.), Management and the school (pp.255-273). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Nias, J., Southworth, G., & Campbell, P. (1992). Whole school curriculum development in primary schools. Lewes: Falmer Press.
Ollenburger, J. C., & Moore, H. A. (1992). A sociology of women: The intersection of patriarchy, capitalism & colonization. NJ: Prentice- Hall, Inc.
Oplatka, I. (2001). I changed my management style: The cross-gender transition of women headteachers in mid-career. School Leadership & Management, 21(2), 219-233.
Paolillo, J. G. P. (1981). Manager’s self assessment of managerial roles: The influence of hierarchical level. Journal of Management, 7, 43-52.
Parkay, F., Currie, G., & Rhodes, J. (1992). Professional socialization: A longitudinal study of first-time high school principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(2), 43-75.
Ragins, B., Townsend, B., & Mattis, M. (1998). Gender gap in the executive suite: CEOs and female executives report on breaking the glass ceiling. Academy of Management Executive, 12(1), 28-42.
Rawlings, D. (2000). Collaborative leadership teams: Oxymoron or new paradigm? Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice & Research, 52(1), 36-48.
Rosener, J. B. (1990). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), November-December, 119-125.
Schein, E. H. (1971). Occupational socialization in the professions: The case of the role innovator. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 8, 521-30.
Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
Schein, E. H. (1988). Process consultation (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Schmuck, P. A. (1996). Women’s place in educational administration: Past, present, and future. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp.337-367). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Schmuck, P. A., & Schubert, J. (1995). Women principals’ views on sex equity: Exploring issues of integration and information. In D. Dunlap & P. A. Schmuck (Eds.), Women leading in education (pp.274-287). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Scott, W. R. (1987). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Shakeshaft, C. (1989). Women in educational administration. CA: Corwin Press.
Smith, D. M. (1997). Women and leadership. In P. G. Northouse (Ed.), Leadership: Theory and practice (pp. 204-238). London: Sage.
Southworth, G. W. (1993). School leadership and school development: Reflections from research. School Organisation, 13, 73-87.
Southworth, G. W. (1995a). Looking into primary headship: A research based interpretation. London: Falmer Press.
Southworth, G. W. (1995b). Talking heads: Voices of experience, an investigation into primary headship in the 1990’s. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Institute of Education.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Van Maanen, J. (1978). People processing. Organizational Dynamics, 7, 18-36.
Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organization socialization. In B. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior ( 1st ed., pp. 209-264). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Vinacke, W. E. (1969). Variables in experimental games: Toward a field theory. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 293-318.
Walder, B. (2000). Career perspectives of female superintendent in the state of Arizona. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(03), 1241A. (University Microfilms No. AAT 9964038)
Watson, S. T., & Scribner, J. P. (2005, November). Emergent reciprocal influence: Toward a framework for understanding the distribution of leadership within collaborative school activity. Paper presented at Annual Conference of the University Council for Educational Administration, Nashville, TN.
Webb, R., & Vulliamy, G. J. (1996). A deluge of directives: Conflict between collegiality and managerialism in the post-era primary school. British Educational Research Journal, 22, 441-458.
Weindling, D. (2004). Stages of headship. In H. Tomlinson (Ed.), Educational management (3rd ed., pp. 226-236). New York: Routledge.
Westin, A. F. (1967). Privacy and freedom. New York: Atheneum.
Wild, R. (1994). Barriers to women’s promotion in FE. Journal of Future and Higher Education, 18(3), 83-95.
Wolcott, H. F. (1973). The man in the principal’s office: An ethnography. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Yoder, J. D. (2001). Making leadership work more effectively for women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 815-828.
Zheng, H. Y., & Carpenter-hubin, Julie. (1999). Exploring gender difference in America’s school administrator workforce: Statistical evidence from national surveys. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED432817)
Zimmer, L. (1987). How women reshape the prison guard role. Gender and Society, 1(4), 415-431.







 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE