臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：家長參與學校教育的社會學分析：英、美與臺灣的教育改革策略之比較
書刊名：教育學刊
作者：楊巧玲 引用關係
作者(外文)：Yang, Chiao-ling
出版日期：2001
卷期：17
頁次：頁199-217
主題關鍵詞：家長參與；教育改革；教育政策；教育社會學；Parental participation；Educational reform；Educational policy；Sociology of education
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(5) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:54
  • 點閱點閱:48
台灣近年來的教育改革逐漸重視學生家長對學校教育的參與，從1980年代民間教育團體的改革倡議，至1990年代教育鬆綁權力下放的政策發展，家長的選擇權與參與權都成為重要的議題，本文主張家長參與學校教育並非中立事件，而是具有某種社會意涵的，透過相關問題的分析以檢視家長參與的意識型態，這些問題包括：誰是家長？何謂參與？為何參與？參與哪些事務？如何參與？參與的結果如何？哪些家長在參與？全文結構如下，首先以家長參與在英、美的發展為例，指出不同的時空背景賦予家長不同的角色，形成特定的參與任務、方式、層面與結果，其次以英、美1980年代以來的主要教育改革策略為例，從家長參與學校決策的複雜性、教育市場的缺失及家庭結構的變遷三方面，分析家長與學校教育的可能與限制；接著以台1990年代以來的教育改革發展為例，根據既有的相關文獻與調查研究，從家長選擇、家長參與、家庭結構三方面，探討家長參與學校教育的政策與實際。家長參與學校教育在英、美的經驗與研究值得借鏡，本文最後針對教育政策的制訂、教育研究的發展與教育實務的推動三方面提出建議。
Having parents participate in schooling has gradually received serious attention among the educational reform issues in Taiwan in the recent years. The right of parents to choose schools for their children and to participate in schools has been a very important agenda, since the reform advocacy proposed by educational groups in the 1980s and the policy development toward educational deregulation and decentralization in the 1990s. This paper argues that parent participation in schools is not neutral but has some social implication. To examine carefully the ideology of parent participation, several questions need to be addressed. Who are the parents？What dose it mean by participation？Why participate？Which affairs do parents participate in ？How do they participate？What is the result of participation？Which parents actually participate？Four parts constitute this paper. First of all, parent participation developed in the USA and UK serves as examples to point out the fact that parents are assigned with different roles to participate in a particular way that varies with the social context. Next, the focus is to analyze the possibilities and limits of parent participation in terms of the complexity of parent participation in decision making, the deficiency of educational market, and the change of family structure, taking the reform strategy employed in the USA and UK since the 1980s as an instance. Then, looking at the development of educational reform taken place in Taiwan since the 1990s, this paper discusses policies and practices regarding parent participation in schooling in terms of parental choice, parental participation and family structure. Based on the experience with and research about parent participation in schooling in the USA and UK, this paper concludes with suggestions for the formulation of educational policies, the development of educational research and the implementation of educational practices.
期刊論文
1.Malen, B.、Ogawa, R. T.(1988)。Professional-patron influence on site-based governance councils: A confounding case study。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis，10(4)，251-270。  new window
2.Wohlstetter, P.、Odden, A.(1992)。Rethinking school-based management policy and research。Educational Administration Quarterly，28(4)，529-549。  new window
3.Leithwood, K.、Menzies, T.(1998)。Forms and effects of school-based management: A Review。Educational Policy，12(3)，325-346。  new window
4.楊巧玲(2000)。教育鬆綁與學校分權的教育改革策略分析。教育研究資訊，8(6)，1-15+a12。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Seeley, D. S.(1989)。A new paradigm for parent involvement。Educational Leadership，47(2)，24-27。  new window
6.Waggoner, K.、Griffith, A.(19980100)。Parent involvement in education: Ideology and experience。Journal for a Just and Caring Education，4(1)，65-77。  new window
7.人本教育札記(1999)。教育大事記。人本教育札記，117，79-80。  延伸查詢new window
8.Brown, F.、Hunter, R. C.(1998)。School-based management: Involving minority parents in shared decision making。Urban Education，33(1)，95-122。  new window
9.Smith, D.(1998)。The underside of schooling: restructuring, privatization, and women's unpaid work。Journal for a Just and Caring Education，4(1)，11-29。  new window
10.Wanat, C. L.(1997)。Conceptualizing parental involvement from parents' perspectives: A case study。Journal for a Just and Caring Education，3(4)，433-458。  new window
學位論文
1.陳良益(1996)。我國國小學生家長參與學校教育之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.王威傑(1997)。國民小學家長會組織及其運用之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.張炳煌(1998)。國中生家長學校選擇權之研究(碩士論文)。國立師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊巧玲(1997)。Alternative schools, educational reform and social movements - An ethnographic study of three elementary schools in Taiwan，0。  new window
圖書
1.David, M. E.(1993)。Parents, Gender, and Education Reform。Polity Press。  new window
2.Merz, C.、Furman, G. C.(1997)。Community and schools: Promise and paradox。New York, NY：Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
3.陳麗珠(20000000)。美國教育財政改革。臺北：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.LeBlanc, P.(1992)。Parent-school interactions。Education and the family。Boston, MA。  new window
5.Lister, R.(1996)。Back to the family: Family policies and politics under the major Government。The politics of the family。England。  new window
6.任晟蓀(2000)。學校行政實務－法規篇。學校行政實務－法規篇。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.Elkind, David、陳姣伶、洪毓瑛(1998)。蕭瑟的童顏--揠苗助長的危機。新竹市：和英。  延伸查詢new window
8.Beattie, N.(1985)。Professional parents: Parent participation in four west European countries。Professional parents: Parent participation in four west European countries。London, UK。  new window
9.Wikeley, F.、Nash, T.、Hughes, M.(1994)。Parents and their children's schools。Parents and their children's schools。Oxford。  new window
10.Perry, W.、Tannenbaum, M. D.(1992)。Parents, power, and the public schools。Education and the family。Boston, MA。  new window
11.Riley, K.、Rowles, D.(1997)。Managing with governors。Choices for self-managing schools: Autonomy and accountability。London, UK。  new window
12.Russell, S.(1997)。A changing context。Choices for self-managing schools: Autonomy and accountability。London, UK。  new window
13.Simkins, T.(1997)。Autonomy and accountability。Choices for self-managing schools: Autonomy and accountability。London, UK。  new window
14.Walford, G.(1994)。Choice and Equity in Education。Choice and Equity in Education。London, UK。  new window
其他
1.行政院主計處(1999)。國情統計通報專題分析：臺灣地區單親家庭概況分析，0。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院主計處(1999)。國情統計通報專題分析：臺灣地區同住夫妻概況，0。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院主計處(1999)。國情統計通報專題分析：臺灣地區現住家庭成年人口之親子狀況，0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Fuller, B.、Elmore, R. F.、Orfield, G.(1996)。Policy-making in the dark: Illuminating the school choice debate。Who Chooses? Who Loses?。New York：Teachers College, Columbia University。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1116（臺灣：1114，外國：2） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1641614 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67442026
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上