:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從SARS經驗建構重大疫情媒體溝通之標準作業流程
書刊名:臺灣公共衛生雜誌
作者:吳宜蓁 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Yi-chen
出版日期:2007
卷期:26:3
頁次:頁241-249
主題關鍵詞:風險溝通標準作業流程SARSRisk communicationStandard operation process
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:1256
  • 點閱點閱:117
目標:從檢視2003年臺灣SARS疫情的媒體溝通機制與報導失誤問題,建構一套未來發生重大疫情的媒體溝通標準作業流程 (SOP),作為政府與媒體皆可遵循的疫情新聞處理準則。 方法:首先從二手資料及初步訪談中建立本研究的SOP初步架構,再進行深度訪談法與焦點座談法搜集修正意見。從2004年1月到4月訪談實地參與SARS防疫工作的衛生署官員、醫藥記者或主管及專家學者共19人。 結果:根據資料所建構出的重大疫情媒體溝通SOP,包括應變指揮中心、機構發言人、新聞警戒線、媒體監看與新聞更正等重點。新聞警戒線視疫區封鎖情況,分為「媒體拍攝區」、「中央廚房式」及「全面禁止進入」等三層次之採訪準則。新聞更正則可透過與媒體記者與編採部門主管的直接溝通,或引用相關罰則來處理。 結論:一、面對疫情危機,政府宜立即建立緊急應變機制及發言人機制;二、媒體應確實遵守三層次之採訪準則;三、對於錯誤報導,政府應直接與記者及其主管連繫要求立即更正。
Objectives: The aim of this study was to create a standardized operation process for Taiwan government communication with mass media during disease outbreaks. After assessing the government-media communication during the 2003 outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, we built a model with standard information flows. Methods: Our model was developed from a review of the literature and was then modified on the basis of in-depth individual interviews and focus group interviews from January to April 2004. Results: Our proposed standardized operating process consists of three parts: the unified command center and spokesperson; guidance for three-level interviews; and surveillance and corrections of media coverage. Conclusions: First, when facing serious disease outbreaks, government should employ several spokespersons who speak consistently. Second, media reporters should follow the “three-zone rules” -- media reporting zone, central kitchen zone (media representative permitted only), and media prohibition zone--to cover the outbreak. Third, in case of inaccurate news coverage, the government should contact the appropriate reporters or chief editors to request immediate correction.
期刊論文
1.丁學良(20041000)。應對SARS危機的三種體制:強制、法制、弱制。遠景基金會季刊,5(4),1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳德昇(20041000)。兩岸SARS危機管理比較--政經體制面分析。遠景基金會季刊,5(4),71-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.McComas, K. A.(2006)。Defining Moments in Risk Communication Research: 1996-2005。Journal of Health Communication,11(1),75-91。  new window
4.吳宜蓁(20041000)。SARS風暴的危機溝通與現階段宣導策略檢視:以臺灣政府為例。遠景基金會季刊,5(4),107-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Luther, C. A.、Zhou, X.(2005)。Transparency and trust: risk communications and the Singapore experience in managing SARS。Journal Mass Commun Q,82,857-872。  new window
6.Covello, V. T.(2003)。Best Practices in Public Health Risk and Crisis Communication。Journal of Health Communication,8(Suppl 1),5-8。  new window
7.Prue, C. E.、Lackey, C.、Swenarski, L.、Gantt, J. M.(2003)。Communication Monitoring: Shaping CDC's Emergency Risk。Journal of Health Communication,8,35-49。  new window
8.Ratzan, S. C.(2003)。Editor's Note。Journal of Health Communication,8(Suppl),3。  new window
9.O'Brien, M.(2000)。Have Lessons Been Learned from the UK Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Epidemic?。International Journal of Epidemiology,29,730-733。  new window
10.Kempner, M. W.(1995)。Reputation Management: How to Handle the Media during a Crisis。Risk Management,42(3),43-47。  new window
11.Barratt, M. S.(2005)。Spokespersons and Message Control: How the CDC Lost Credibility during the Anthrax Crisis。Qualitative Research Reports in Communication,6,59-68。  new window
12.Zhao, J.(2003)。The SARS Epidemic under China's Media Policy。Media Asia,30,191-194。  new window
13.Menon, K. U.、Gog, K. T.(2005)。Transparency and Trust: Risk Communications and the Singapore Experience in Managing SARS。Journal of Communication Management,9(4),375-383。  new window
14.Robinson, S. J.、Newstetter, W. C.(2003)。Uncertain Science and Certain Deadlines: CDC Responses to the Media during the Anthrax Attacks of 2001。Journal of Health Communication,8,17-34。  new window
會議論文
1.林鶴玲(2003)。SARS新聞的媒體觀察。SARS與臺灣社會研討會。臺北:國立臺灣大學社會學系。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.鄭自隆(2003)。報紙新聞觀察報告。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lerbinger, Otto(1997)。The Crisis Manager: Facing Risk and Responsibility。Mahwah, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
2.陳向明(20020000)。社會科學質的研究。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Marshall, Catherine、Rossman, Gretchen B.(1989)。Designing Qualitative Research。Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE