:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:華人辯證思維與「性格與行為關連性內隱理論」之關係
書刊名:中華心理學刊
作者:許功餘 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, Kung-yu
出版日期:2006
卷期:48:3
頁次:頁291-313
主題關鍵詞:人際互動內隱理論華人性格知覺華人辯證思維Interpersonal behaviorImplicit theoryChinese personality perceptionChinese dialectical thinking
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:389
  • 點閱點閱:83
本研究依據「性格與行為關連性內隱理論」(許功餘,2003)探討這種內隱理論與華人人際互動之關係。在個人認知系統中,將「何種性格的人在人際互動過程中最可能做出何種行為」加以連結的認知基模,即為「性格與行為關連性內隱理論」。此理論認為在人際初識互動發生之前,個人以其對互動對象所知的性格來預測互動對象在互動過程中可能出現的行為,進而能對彼此的互動有所掌握。本研究推斷受到華人對初識者的疑懼心態之影響,在性格與行為關連性的內隱理論中,個人傾向將多數性格與負面行為連結在一起;又受到華人辯證思維之影響,使得個人預測具有正面性格的互動對象可能做出負面的行為,而不至感到矛盾。本文就「精明幹練-愚頓懦弱」、「勤儉恆毅-懶惰逸樂」及「外向活躍-內向沈靜」等性格向度,以兩個研究來探討華人辯證思維對華人性格與行為關連性的內隱理論之影響。在研究一中,以書寫成語意義的方式操弄受試者的辯證思維方式之強弱,在研究二中,則以中庸量表測量受試者的辯證思維。整體而言,研究結果支持本文之主要預測:越具有辯證思維的受試者,越可能預期不同性格的互動對象出現負面的次要行為,特別是對正面性格的互動對象。此外,研究結果亦顯示受試者對不同性格者可能出現的行為預期對其互動行為有顯著的影響。最後,作者討論華人辯證思維對人際知覺與互動之影響。
We conducted two studies, exploring the relationship between Chinese dialectical thinking and the implicit theory of personality-behavior association which refers to the associative schema about a target person with certain kind of personality trait that would lead him to perform certain kinds of interpersonal behavior. Such as when a stranger is feared and his motive is doubted, the obesever would predict this target person having certain specific kind of personality trait, and conclude that this stranger might perform some negative (or harmful) behaviors. However, when using dialectical thinking, people would wind up predicting that persons with positive personalities might behave in negative ways. Hsu (2003) presented a new theoretical conception, coined as the implicit theory of personality behavior association. The relationship between this implicit theory and interpersonal interaction was examined. It was considered that before interacting with a stranger, people tend to predict that the target person will perform some kinds of interpersonal behaviors based on their knowledge about this target's personality information. Dialectical thinking was manipulated by a cognitive task in Study 1, and measured by the "middle way" scale in Study 2. On the whole, the results supported the predictions that people with high dialectical thinking had more negative predictions of targets' behaviors, especially targets with positive personality traits, and that these negative predictions of targets' behavior influenced subjects' interaction behaviors. The results are discussed in terms of the impact of dialectical thinking on personality perception and interpersonal interaction.
期刊論文
1.吳信鳳(19970600)。中國人的假設思維:報紙文字分析研究。本土心理學研究,7,69-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.趙志裕(2000)。中庸思維的測量。香港社會科學學報,18,33-55。  延伸查詢new window
3.Linville, P. W.(1987)。Self-complexity as a Cognitive Buffer against Stress-related Illness and Depression。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52(4),663-676。  new window
4.鄭思雅、李秀麗、趙志裕(19990900)。辯證思維與現代生活。香港社會科學學報,15,1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Peng, K. P.、Nisbett, R. E.(1999)。Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction。American Psychologist,54(9),741-754。  new window
6.De Bruin, E. N.、Van Lange, P. A. M.(1999)。Impression Formation and Cooperative Behavior。European Journal of Social Psychology,29,305-328。  new window
7.Frazier, P. A.、Tix, A. P.、Barron, K. E.(2004)。Testing moderator and mediator effects in counse1ing psychology。Journal of Counseling Psychology,51(1),115-134。  new window
8.Yang, Kuo-Shu(2000)。Monocultural and cross-cultural indigenous approaches: The royal road to the development of a balanced global psychology。Asian Journal of Social Psychology,3(3),241-263。  new window
9.Nisbett, Richard E.、Peng, Kai-Ping、Choi, Incheol、Norenzayan, Ara(2001)。Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition。Psychological Review,108(2),291-310。  new window
10.Greenwald, A. G.、Banaji, M. R.(1995)。Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes。Psychological Review,102(1),4-27。  new window
11.Niedenthal, P. M.、Setterlund, N. B.、Wherry, M. B.(1992)。Possible self-complexity and affective reactions to goal-relevant evaluation。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,63,5-16。  new window
12.陸洛(20031200)。人我關係之界定--「折衷自我」的現身。本土心理學研究,20,139-207。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.鄒川雄(19970600)。和諧型思維與張力型思維:「老子」與「聖經」思維方式之比較。本土心理學研究,7,30-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.汪睿祥(19970600)。三十六計的象思惟。本土心理學研究,7,2-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.吳佳煇、林以正(20051200)。中庸思維量表的編製。本土心理學研究,24,247-300。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Roberts, Brent W.、Robins, Richard W.、Donahue, Eileen M.、John, Oliver P.(1993)。The Divided Self: Concurrent and Longitudinal Effects of Psychological Adjustment and Social Roles on Self-concept Differentiation。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,64(5),834-846。  new window
17.Choi, I.、Nisbett, R. E.、Norenzayan, A.(1999)。Causal Attribution Across Cultures: Variation and Universality。Psychological Bulletin,125,47-63。  new window
18.Ji, L.、Peng, K.、Nisbett, R. E.(2000)。Culture, Control, and Perception of Relationship in the Environment。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,78,943-955。  new window
19.葛晉榮(1996)。中庸之道及其現代價值。哲學雜誌,17,152-170。  延伸查詢new window
20.Choi, I.、Choi, Y.(2003)。Culture and Self-concept Flexibility。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,28,1508-1517。  new window
21.Choi, I.、Dala, R.、Kim-Prieto, C.、Park, H.(2003)。Culture and Judgment of Causal Relevance。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,84,46-59。  new window
22.Freitas, A. L.、Gollwitzer, P.、Trope, Y.(2004)。The Influence of Abstract and Concrete Mindsets on Anticipating and Guiding Others' Self-regulatory Efforts。Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,40,739-752。  new window
23.Gollwitzer, P.、Heckhausen, H.、Steller, B.(1990)。Deliberative and Implemental Mind-sets: Cognitive Tuning Toward Congruous Thoughts and Information。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,59,1119-1127。  new window
24.Gollwitzer, P. M.、Kinney, R. F.(1989)。Effects of Deliberative and Implemental Mind-sets on Illusion of Control。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,56(4),531-542。  new window
25.Lee, Y.-T.(2000)。What Is Missing in Chinese-Western Dialectical Reasoning?。American Psychologist,55,1065-1067。  new window
26.Masuda, T.、Nisbett, R. E.(2001)。Attending Holistically Versus Analytically: Comparing the Context Sensitivity off Japanese and Americans。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,81,922-934。  new window
27.Norenzayan, A.、Choi, I.、Nisbett, R. E.(2002)。Cultural Similarities and Differences in Social Inference: Evidence from Behavioral Predictions and Lay Theories of Behavior。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,28(1),109-120。  new window
28.Peng, K.、Nisbett, R. E.(2000)。Dialectical Responses to Questions about Dialectical Thinking。American Psychologist,55,1067-1068。  new window
29.Showers, C. J.、Kling, K. C.(1996)。Organization of Self-knowledge: Implications for Recovery from Sad Mood。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,70,578-590。  new window
30.張德勝、金耀基、陳海文、陳健民、楊中芳、趙志裕、莎伊白(2001)。论中庸理性:工具理性、价值理性和沟通理性之外。社会学研究,2,33-48。  延伸查詢new window
31.Gara, M. A.、Woolfolk, R. L.、Allen, L. A.(2002)。Social Cognitive Complexity and Depression: Cognitive Complexity Moderates the Correlation between Depression Self-ratings and Global Selfevaluation。The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease,190,670-676。  new window
學位論文
1.許功餘(2003)。華人性格與行為關連性的內隱理論(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.楊國樞(1999)。中國人之性格知覺向度的系統性研究(-)。國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.董根洪(2001)。儒家中和哲學通論。濟南:齊魯書社。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊中芳(2001)。中國人的世界觀 : 中庸實踐思維初探。如何理解中國人:文化與個人論文集。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
3.許烺光(1981)。Americans and Chinese: Passage to differences。Honolulu, HI:University of Hawaii Press。  new window
4.Nisbett, Richard E.(2003)。The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently... and Why?。New York:Free Press。  new window
5.Aguinis, H.(2004)。analysis for categorical moderators。New York, NY:Guilford Press。  new window
6.Cohen, J.(1988)。Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
7.Nunnally, Jum C.、Bernstein, Ira H.(1994)。Psychological theory。MacGraw-Hill。  new window
8.Wegner, D. M.、Vallacher, R. R.(1977)。Implicit Psychology: An Introduction to Social Cognition。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
9.Cohen, Jacob、Cohen, Patricia、West, Stephen G.、Aiken, Leona S.(2003)。Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
10.Aiken, Leona S.、West, Stephen G.、Reno, Raymond R.(1991)。Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions。Sage。  new window
11.方立天(1999)。中國先秦哲學與人類生存智慧。中國哲學的詮釋與發展。北京。  延伸查詢new window
12.朱伯崑(2000)。易學基礎課程。易學基礎課程。北京。  延伸查詢new window
13.朱伯崑(2001)。易學中邏輯思維與辯證思維傳統。燕園耕耘錄-朱伯崑學術論集,下冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.侯玉波、朱瀅、彭凱平(2004)。思維方式如何影響管理者對他人行為的歸因。人格與社會心理學論叢(一)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
15.Norenzayan, A.、Choi, I.、Nisbett, R. E.(1999)。Eastern and Western Perceptions of Causality for Social Behavior: Lay Theories About Personalities and Situations。Cultural Divides: Understanding and Overcoming Group Conflict。New York, NY。  new window
16.Peng, K.、Ames, D.、Knowles, E.(2001)。Culture and Human Inference: Perspectives from Three Traditions。Handbook of Culture and Psychology。New York, NY。  new window
17.Wyer. R. S., Jr.、Lambert, A. J.(1994)。The Role of Trait Constructs Inn Person Perception: A Historical Perspective。Social Cognition: Impact on Social Psychology。New York, NY。  new window
18.张德胜、陳海文、陳健民、金耀基、楊中芳、趙志裕(2001)。当代华人有几儒-儒人理念型的构造及大陆、港、台三个地区的调查分析。社会理论论丛,第一辑。南京市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.楊國樞(1993)。中國人的社會取向:社會互動的觀點。中國人的心理--理念與方法篇。台北:桂冠圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Wolf, Arthur P.(1974)。Gods, Ghosts, and Ancestors。Religion and Ritual in Chinese Society。Stanford University Press。  new window
3.楊中芳(2004)。中庸實踐思維研究--邁向建構一個全新心理學知識體系。人格與社會心理學論叢。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE