本文以劉克莊的詩歌選本為起點，通過與真德秀《文章正宗》的對照，重新解讀了他的詩學觀。劉克莊的詩論散見於文集，其前後抵牾、莫衷一是的特點給研究者帶來了很大的困惑。本文在考察晚宋詩壇的標榜風氣和理學語境的基礎上，以詩歌選本為基本依據，通過對照他和理學詩派代表真德秀在詩歌選取範圍和標準上的不同，揭示了劉克莊重視個體情感抒發的個體詩學觀。同時，通過歷史地辨別劉克莊詩論的寫作對象和背景，辨析了他的前後抵牾之論，凸現了他論詩的真實意圖。本文的結論是：與真德秀單純重視倫理教化的群體詩學觀相比，劉克莊更加強調詩歌對個體情感的自然抒發，在詩歌抒寫情感的範圍上他比真德秀開放得多。劉克莊的詩學觀發生在理學盛行的語境下，具有將詩從道學的載體中獨立出來的意義。

This essay reinterprets Liu Kezhuang's poetic theory, based on the comparison between his poem selections and Zhen Dexiu's selection Wen Zhang Zheng Zong. Liu Kezhuang's poetic statements, full of contradictions, which puzzled researchers constantly, have been discussed and explained in the first part of this essay as a result of the flattery mood and the dominance of Zhu Xi School in late Southern Sung dynasty. In the second part, Liu's selections are compared with Zhen Dexiu's selection both in selection range and principles to reveal Liu's poetic disposition theory. Moreover, Liu's statement contradictions are analyzed textually and reinterpreted historically. In the end, a conclusion is drawn that Liu Kezhuang's poetic disposition theory emphasized individual emotions be the essential factor of poems, which should be expressed naturally and widely. To the contrast, Zhen Dexiu stressed the importance of moral principles and education in lyric writing. Liu Kezhuang's individual poetics is a significant effort for defending the essential feature of lyric poetry in the dominance of Zhu Xi School in late Southern Sung dynasty.