:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從人生哲學課程結合服務-學習探討學生獲益之研究
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:林梅琴 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Mei-chin
出版日期:2009
卷期:12:3
頁次:頁27-56
主題關鍵詞:服務-學習學習獲益人生哲學Service-learningLearning attainmentsPhilosophy of life
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:101
  • 點閱點閱:72
本研究以問卷調查、訪談、觀察及文件分析等方法,探討個案大學人生哲學課程融入服務學習活動與學生學習獲益的關係,總計發出793份問卷,有效問卷為743份,並訪談12名實施服務學習的授課教師、16名志工及2名服務學習中心承辦人員,再以次數分配、t檢定、單因子變異數、多元逐步迴歸等統計分析問卷資料。研究結果顯示,師生肯定人生哲學課程納入服務學習的設計,學生給予授課教師引導程度的分數最高,亦能擁有良好的學習獲益,尤以認知和態度的改變為最,且服務學習的運作與學生學習獲益呈現顯著正相關,並以學生個人的認知與投入能有效預測其學習獲益。據此,建議服務學習中心規劃深度志工培訓活動,建立教師設計服務學習的指標,提升志工帶領反思與問題解決能力,且授課教師共同討論服務學習與課程內涵的關連性,具體引導學生瞭解二者結合的學習目標,促發學生的認同及投入,而學生亦須主動積極投入服務學習,開創個人的學習發展及成長。
This study is intended to explore the course of Philosophy of Life applied with immersing service-learning activities with respect to student learning attainments in the subject university. Methods of questionnaire survey, interviews, observations, and documentation analyses were used in the study. There were 793 copies of the questionnaire sent out, with 743 valid returns. There was a total of 30 people interviewed, including 12 teachers who immersed service-learning activities into their courses, 16 student volunteers, and two staff from the Center of Service-Learning. The following statistical methods were adopted to analyze the data collected by the questionnaire survey. These included frequency distribution, t-test, one-way ANOVA, a stepwide multiple regression, etc. The results of the study found that teachers and students in the Philosophy of Life course recognized service-learning when immersed into the courses. From the analyses of the questionnaire survey, students gave the highest score to the teachers in guiding service-learning. Student learning attainments after participating service-learning activities were good with the obvious changes in students' cognition and attitude. A significantly positive relationship was found in the operation both of service-learning and student attainments. Student attainments could be best predicted by the level of students’ perception and involvement of service-learning. According to the findings, the following suggestions are proposed. The Center of Service-Learning needs to plan deeper training courses for the student volunteers. Criteria of designing service-learning in the courses should be established. The student volunteers' abilities of leading reflection and solving problems need to be enhanced. In order to help students have better understanding about the relationship between service-learning and the course, the teachers should discuss the connection between learning outcomes of service-learning and the objectives of the course. With respect to the students, they need to actively take any opportunity involving service-learning in order to gain advanced learning and personal growth.
期刊論文
1.洪櫻純(20040800)。生命的蛻變與成長:服務學習。社教雙月刊,122,59-64。  延伸查詢new window
2.林慧貞(20070600)。美國高等教育服務學習方案設計之研究。通識研究集刊,11,117-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林振春(2003)。社區大學與服務學習。回饋,66,26-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.莊慶信(19961200)。人生哲學教學之研究--以輔仁大學為例。哲學與文化,23(12)=271,2298-2333。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.劉振維(20061200)。論通識教育的課程與教學--以「人生哲學」為例。止善,1,167-184。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Bringle, R. G.、Hatcher, J. A.(1999)。Reflection in service learning: Making meaning of experience。Educational Horizons,77(4),179-185。  new window
7.尹美琪(20020900)。專責單位主導之「服務-學習」課程--以輔仁大學為例。通識教育,9(3),35-72。  延伸查詢new window
8.劉正鳴(20020700)。服務學習與課程的融合及實施。學生輔導,81,32-39。  延伸查詢new window
9.沈六(19970600)。服務學習。公民訓育學報,6,43-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.林慧貞(20061200)。大學生參與服務學習意願初探。通識研究集刊,10,171-192。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.張民杰(20051200)。職前教師培育課程中應用服務學習之設計與實施--師資生焦點團體的意見分析。國民教育研究集刊,14,93-105+107。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.孫效智(20040900)。當前臺灣社會的重大生命課題與願景。哲學與文化,31(9)=364,3-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.黃玉(20011000)。服務學習--公民教育的具體實踐。人文及社會學科教學通訊,12(3)=69,20-42。  延伸查詢new window
14.馮莉雅(20040600)。新加坡高等教育推動服務學習對臺灣的啟示。教育學刊,22,151-176。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.徐文珊(19791100)。天人合一思想與人生--中國的人生哲學探討。東海中文學報,1,1-5。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.李梓楠、王以仁(2006)。臺北巿高中生服務學習現況暨成效分析之個案研究。現代教育論壇,15,210-236。  延伸查詢new window
17.沈清松(1994)。大學生的人生視野與人生哲學課程。通識教育,1(1),21-34。  延伸查詢new window
18.林勝義(2003)。GYSD的意義與精神。社教雙月刊,117,58-60。  延伸查詢new window
19.莊慶信(2005)。導言:人生哲學專題真善美聖的完美人生。哲學與文化,32(6),1-3。  延伸查詢new window
20.莊慶信(2007)。人生哲學課程單元之研究-以輔仁大學人生哲學大綱為主。全人教育學報,創刊號,103-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.楊百川(2004)。能力培養導向之服務學習方案發展模式芻議。社教雙月刊,8,4-22。  延伸查詢new window
22.Ottenritter, N. W.(2004)。Service Learning, Social Justice, and Campus Health。Journal of American College Health,52,189-191。  new window
23.Reising, D. L.(2006)。Service-learning in Undergraduate Nursing Curricula。Journal of Nursing Education,45,95-95。  new window
24.Sax, L. J.、Astin, A. W.(1997)。The Benefits of Service: Evidence from Undergraduate。The Educational Record,78,25-32。  new window
25.Study Group on the Conditions of Excellence in American Higher Education(1984)。Involvement in Learning: Realizing the Potential of American Higher Education。The Chronicle of Higher Education,24,35-49。  new window
會議論文
1.楊百川(2006)。推動服務學習與能力培育成效之研究--以輔仁大學為例。2006台灣高等教育與學生事務國際學術研討會,國立臺灣師範大學教育學院、公民教育與活動領導學系 。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.林振春(2000)。社區服務學習的理論與實務92-111。  延伸查詢new window
3.莊慶信(2003)。「服務-學習」課程執行之省思-以輔仁大學三種模式為主。臺北。110-144。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Stanton, T. K.、Giles, D. E. Jr.、Cruz, N. I.(1999)。Service-learning: A Movement's Pioneers Reflect on Its Origins, Practice, and Future。Service-learning: A Movement's Pioneers Reflect on Its Origins, Practice, and Future。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
2.林麗珊(2010)。人生哲學。台北市:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Pascarella, E. T.、Terenzini, P. T.(2005)。How college affects students: A decade of research。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
4.Eyler, Janet S.、Giles, Dwight E. Jr.(1999)。Where's the Learning in Service-Learning?。Jossey-Bass。  new window
5.黎建球、鄔昆如(1995)。人生哲學。臺北:三民。  延伸查詢new window
6.葉重新(2004)。教育研究法。臺北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
7.Pascarella, E. T.、Terenzini, P. T.(1991)。How college affects students。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
8.Astin, Alexander W.(1993)。What matters in college?: Four critical years revisited。Jossey-Bass。  new window
9.楊紹南(1972)。人生哲學概論。人生哲學概論。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.Campus Compact(2000)。Introduction to Service-learning Toolkit: Readings and Resources for Faculty。Introduction to Service-learning Toolkit: Readings and Resources for Faculty。Providence, RI。  new window
11.Duckenfield, M.、Madden, S. J.(2000)。An Orientation to Service Learning。Service Learning across the Curriculum。Lanham, MD。  new window
12.Eyler, J.、Giles, D. E., Jr.、Gray, C. J.(2000)。Research at a Glance: What We Know about the Effects of Service-learning on Students, Faculty, Institutions and Communities, 1993-1999。Introduction to Service-learning Toolkit: Readings and Resources for Faculty。Providence, RI。  new window
13.Hammer, D. M.(2002)。Building Bridges。Building Bridges。Boston, MA。  new window
單篇論文
1.Fertman, C. I.(1994)。Service learning for all students(ED375249)。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE