:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:偏遠地區公立國民中小學校績效獎金計畫之建構
書刊名:教育科學研究期刊
作者:許添明 引用關係林慧玲
作者(外文):Sheu, Tian-mingLin, Hui-ling
出版日期:2009
卷期:54:4
頁次:頁115-137
主題關鍵詞:教育財政教育績效偏遠地區學校績效獎金School financeEducational accountabilityRemote areaGroup performance award
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:295
  • 點閱點閱:64
摘要: 教育部透過各項補助計畫以改善偏遠地區國民中小學校學生學業成就低落的問題,甚至以離島、山僻加給吸引教師前往任教,但這些計畫對於提升該地區學生學習成就效果有限。本研究以偏遠地區校長、教師組成的焦點團體訪談與個別訪談,建構以學校為基礎的績效獎金計畫,不僅避免個人績效獎金制度引發的競爭,而且透過團隊合作方式有效提升學生學業成就。本計畫特點如下:採志願參加,教職員工績效獎金額度採同工同酬,學校也會獲得績效獎金,績效評核以學科績效為主,非學科績效為輔,並以平衡計分卡方式計算績效獎金。為了順利實施該計畫,本研究也提出配套措施:充足的經費來源,召開說明會並訂定試辦期,加強偏遠學校成員團隊合作與專業知能。
Abstract: Students in Taiwan’s remote areas have long been recognized for their poor performance in student achievement. To overcome this problem, government subsidies many programs including paying more to teachers who serve in these areas. However, student achievement in these areas has not seen much improvement. This research is to design a school-based performance award (SBPA) program for public schools in remote areas in the hope that this incentive will help to raise student achievement. After interviewing of one focus group and several individual teachers and principals in remote areas, we have developed this SBPA with the following features. First, it is voluntary to join the SBPA and the award applies to anyone who joins the program. Second, both individual teachers and schools are eligible for the performance award. Third, student achievement in five core academic subjects and four nonacademic factors are served as performance measures in the SBPA. Fourth, balanced scorecard is adopted as the bonus payout structure. Certain processes should be thought through for successful implementation of the SBPA.
期刊論文
1.許添明、黃木蘭(20000300)。教師獎勵措施與原住民國小師資結構:以花蓮縣為例。教育研究資訊雙月刊,8(2),99-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Kelley, C.、Conley, S.、Kimball, S.(2000)。Payment for results: The effects of the Kentucky and Maryland group-based performance award program。Peabody Journal of Education,75(4),159-199。  new window
3.Kelley, C.、Heneman, G.、Milanowski, A.(2002)。Teacher motivation and school-based performance award。Educational Administration Quarterly,38(3),372-401。  new window
4.King, R. A.、Mathers, J. K.(1997)。Improving schools through performance-based accountability and financial rewards。Journal of Education Finance,23,147-176。  new window
5.Ladd, H. F.(1999)。The Dallas School accountability and incentive program: An evaluation of its impacts on student outcomes。Economics of Education Review,18(1),1-16。  new window
6.Smith, S. S.、Mickelson, R. A.(2000)。All that glisters is not gold: School reform in Charlotte- Mecklenburg。Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,22(2),101-127。  new window
7.林俊瑩、吳裕益(20071200)。家庭因素、學校因素對學生學業成就的影響:階層線性模式的分析。教育研究集刊,54(4),107-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.洪儷瑜(20010400)。義務教育階段之弱勢學生的補救教育之調查研究。師大學報. 教育類,46(1),45-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.吳清山、蔡菁芝(20060400)。英美兩國教育績效責任之比較分析及其啟示。師大學報. 教育類,51(1),1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.甄曉蘭(20070900)。偏遠國中教育機會不均等問題與相關教育政策初探。教育研究集刊,53(3),1-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳淑麗、曾世杰、洪儷瑜(20061000)。原住民國語文低成就學童文化與經驗本位補救教學成效之研究。師大學報. 教育類,51(2),147-171。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Bullock, R. J.、Tubbs, M. E.。A Case Meta-analysis of Gainsharing Plans or Organization Development Interventions。Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,26(3),383-404。  new window
13.Ramirez, A.。How Merit Pay Undermines Education。Educational Leadership,58(5),16-20。  new window
會議論文
1.Stecher, B. M.、Barron, S.。Test-based Accountability: The Perverse Consequences of Milepost Testing。  new window
研究報告
1.Burnett, G.。The Unfulfilled Mission of Title 1/Chapter 1 Program. Urban Diversity Series No.105。Washington, DC。  new window
圖書
1.Heneman, R. L.、Ledford, G. E., Jr.、Gresham, M. T.(2000)。The changing nature of work。Compensation in organizations。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
2.Odden, A. R.、Kelley, C.(2002)。Paying teachers for what they know and do: New and smarter compensation strategies to improve schools。Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press。  new window
3.Poggio, J. P.(2000)。Statewide performance assessment and school accountability。All children can learn: Lessons from the Kentucky reform experience。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
4.Lawler, Edward E. III(1990)。Strategic pay: Aligning organizational strategies and pay systems。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
5.陳麗珠(20000000)。美國教育財政改革。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Stewart, David W.、Shamdasani, Prem N.、歐素汝(2000)。焦點團體:理論與實務。新北市:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Vaughn, Sharon、Schumm, Jeanne Shay、Sinagub, Jane M.、王文科、王智弘(1999)。焦點團體訪談:教育與心理學適用。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳伯璋、許添明。落實學校本位經營政策之研究-以花蓮縣教育為例。教育改革之未來。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
9.魏惠娟。質性研究。質性研究。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
10.Alexander, K.、Salmon, R. G.。Public School Finance。Public School Finance。Needham Heights, MA。  new window
11.Hanushek, E. A.。Making Schools Work: Improving Performance and Controlling Costs。Making Schools Work: Improving Performance and Controlling Costs。Washington, DC。  new window
12.Mitchell, D. J. B.、Lewin, D.、Lawler, E. E., III.。Alternative Pay Systems, Firm Performance, and Productivity。Paying for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence。Washington, DC。  new window
13.O'Dell, C.。People, Performance and Pay。People, Performance and Pay。Houston, TX。  new window
其他
1.Odden, A. R.,Wallace, M.(2007)。How to achieve world class teacher,http://www.freeloadpress.com, 20070723。  new window
2.OECD(2008)。The PISA International Database,http:// pisa2006.acer.edu.au/, 20081212。  new window
3.U.S. Department of Education(2009)。The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009,http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/leg/recovery/programs.html, 20091002。  new window
4.(McKinsey,Company)。How the World's Best-performing School Systems Come Out on Top。  new window
圖書論文
1.胡幼慧(1996)。焦點團體法。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北:巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE