:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣、中國、馬來西亞華裔大專青年圖像表現形式之比較研究
書刊名:科技學刊. 人文社會類
作者:郭大維何肇喜 引用關係王銘顯 引用關係
作者(外文):Kuo, Ta-weiHo, Chao-hsiWang, Ming-shien
出版日期:2014
卷期:23:1
頁次:頁53-64
主題關鍵詞:符號學符號認知繪圖基模美感認同SemiologyPainting schemaCognitive developmentAesthetic identity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:299
  • 點閱點閱:105
本文以六項繪畫主題執行台灣、中國、馬來西亞三地之華裔大專青年圖像表現形式之差異性比較研究,運用「比較分析法」進行「圖像基模」的符號分析,針對三地華裔學生繪製的圖形問卷進行統計分析,歸納出該主題下對於符號認知與圖像表現形式之共同特徵及差異性;分析三地華裔青年隨社會環境不同而存在之圖像符號與形式表現的認知差異。研究以符號學理論針對收集到的圖像問卷進行「肖像性」 (icon)、「指示性」 (index)、「象徵性」(symbol)等三大類型之符號分類;再將圖像問卷傳達的美感樣態與語彙形式對應於認知心理學的基模 (schema) 概念,檢驗三地華裔青年在相同的主題詞彙是否展現相同認知向度、亦或發現不同地區圖像之間的形式美感差異,作為進一步發展美感評估指標之用。研究結果發現三地華裔青年間確實存在因教育背景與個人能力及品味差異造成的形式風格影響,然而不同地區之間在地文化造成的圖像形式差異則不若生活環境來得顯著。此外,三地華裔青年對於符號認知呈現存有相近的時代性視覺語彙,部分圖像則顯現跨區域的共同符號特徵;並獲得網路符號與動漫風格對此世代的圖像語言影響。本研究結果可作為後續研究基礎,並可進一步探討符號認知及圖形美感呈現的認知研究。
Use six painting themes to execute the study of comparative of pictorial form in Chinese college students of Taiwan, China and Malaysia. Comparative analysis is adopted to analyze the symbol of “pictorial schema.” Research is in accordance with the paintings questionnaire figured by college students from Taiwan, China and Malaysia, to generalize its common features and characteristics of graphic symbol under specific themes; and analysis the difference in cognition of sub-cultural features and aesthetic feelings due to social environment transition. This study is based on semiotics laid by Ferdinand de Saussure, to categorize paintings collected by questionnaires into three group: icon, index and symbol. Corresponds aesthetic feeling and vocabulary form of pictorial semiotics to schema in cognitive Psychology, to inspect if we can generalize common features and characteristics of cognition under the same theme, or distinguish the difference of symbol and aesthetic form on paintings between youths from diverse areas. The result shows the influence of style exactly exist because of different educational background, personal capability, and diverse taste between youths in three countries. Nevertheless, there is no significantly symbolic feature emerged due to the influence of social culture in difference areas. Moreover, visual symbols of youths present similar visual vocabularies in this age. Some paintings reveal cross-over, global cognitive symbols; to learn that internet symbols and animation makes an effect upon young generation. Findings of this study can act as a basis of future researches and imply a trend of investigating cognition schema of symbol and graphic aesthetic presentation.
期刊論文
1.林品章、張照聆(20091200)。圖像傳達系統化之理論基礎。設計學研究,12(2),45-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.劉豐榮(20060700)。視覺符號探討方法之理論探析:由圖像誌到符號學與Lacan的符號學之創新。視覺藝術論壇,1,7-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.王秀如、林明男(20060700)。圖像符號設計基礎與理論之探討。親民學報,12,103-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Armbruster, B. B.(1986)。Schema theory and the design of content-area textbook。Educational Psychologist,21,253-267。  new window
5.顏若映(1993)。先前知識在閱讀理解上之認知研究。教育與心理研究,16,385-412。  延伸查詢new window
6.姚村雄、陳俊宏、邱上嘉(20080600)。日治時期美術設計的「臺灣圖像」符號分析。設計學報,13(2),69-87。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.蘇文清、嚴貞、李傳房(20070600)。符號學與認知心理學基礎理論於視覺設計之運用研究--以「標誌設計」為例。人文暨社會科學期刊,3(1),95-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.郭大維、羅逸玲、何肇喜(2012)。A Preliminary Study on Cognition Schema by Drawing。International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research。澎湖:國立澎湖科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳俊嘉(2001)。以符號學角度探討設計物意義建構及解讀之差異--以轉換機能為生活意義之設計物為例(碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張秀蓉(1998)。口語傳播概論。台北市:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Danesi(1993)。Messages and meanings: An introduction to semiotic。Toronto:Canadian Scholars Press。  new window
3.Terence, Hawkcs、李幼蒸(1997)。結構主義與符號學。上海市:台北:譯文出版社:桂冠圖書。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳懷恩(2007)。圖像學:視覺藝術的意義與解釋。台北市:如果出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Kroehl, H.(1987)。Communication Design, 2000。Zurich:ABCVerlag。  new window
6.Arnheim, Rudolf(1969)。Visual Thinking。Berkeley:Los Angeles:California, CA:University of California Press。  new window
7.杜麗燕(1995)。皮亞傑。台北:東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.Bartlett, Frederic Charles(1932)。Remembering: A Study in Experimental and social Psychology。Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Lakoff, George(1987)。Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind。Chicago, IL:Chicago University Press。  new window
10.Cassirer, Ernst、甘陽(2005)。人論。臺北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.Fiske, John、張錦華(1995)。傳播符號學理論。臺北市:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
12.余民寧(19970000)。有意義的學習:概念構圖之研究。臺北:商鼎文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.De Saussure, Ferdinand、Baskin, Wade(1966)。Course in General Linguistics。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
14.Novak, Joseph D.、Gowin, D. Bob(1984)。Learning How to Learn。Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Chanda, J.(2004)。Learning about culture through visual signs。Semiotics and visual culture: Sights, signs, and significance。VA:NAEA。  new window
2.Smith-Shank, D. L.(2004)。[Semiotics and visual culture: Sights, signs, and significance] Introduction。Semiotics and visual culture: Sights, signs, and significance。VA:NAEA。  new window
3.Rumelhart, D. E.(1980)。Schemata: The Building Block of Cognition。Theoretical issues in reading comprehension。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE