:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:男女幸福大不同?--父母教養、教師管教與同儕關係品質對不同性別國中生幸福感預測之差異分析
書刊名:臺中教育大學學報. 數理科技類
作者:翁敏甄陳嘉成 引用關係
作者(外文):Weng, Min-chenChen, Chia-cheng
出版日期:2018
卷期:32:2
頁次:頁57-77
主題關鍵詞:父母教養同儕關係品質幸福感教師管教ParentingPeer relationship qualityWell-beingTeacher discipline
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:311
  • 點閱點閱:119
青少年的問題是:「種因於家庭、顯現於學校,惡化於社會」本研究從國中教學現場的視角,來探討家庭與學校二個重要層面中,父母教養、教師管教與同儕關係品質對國中學生幸福感的影響程度;此外,此階段的青少年其性別角色行為正逐漸成形,從過去文獻可知不同性別的國中生在社會認知層面的判斷,有許多不同之處,而在過去的相關研究中,幾乎不曾觸及此方面的議題。因此本研究擬從父母教養方式、教師管教方式及同儕關係品質,來探討這些變項對國中生的幸福感之影響為何。本研究以大台北地區(台北市、新北市)公立國民中學七年級至九年級,共計有581位學生為研究樣本,採問卷調查法與多元逐步迴歸進行統計分析。結果顯示為:一、父母教養方式、教師管教方式及同儕關係品質對幸福感有預測力;二、不論性別為何,關懷都是最有預測力的變項;三、不同性別對幸福感的預測變項也有所不同。依影響程度而言,男生最重視的同儕的關懷反應,女生則最重視父母的關懷反應。
The problematic issue for teenagers is that their behaviors are shaped by parenting, exposure in school, and the deterioration society. From the perspective of the writer's teaching setting, in this study, family and school are seen as two important fields. This study used well-being as a dependent variable and three independent variables, parenting styles, teacher disciplines, and peer relationship quality, to discuss the impacts of well-being between different variables. From the literature review, we have realized that there are many differences between females and males, including their thinking and decision making. Teenagers are in a stage that shapes gender roles. However, few studies mention the issue of gender differences. As a consequence, this study further discussed this issue by using a dependent variable, well-being, and the three independent variables in the questionnaire, including parenting styles, teacher disciplines, and the quality of peer relationships. The survey covers a sample in Taipei City and New Taipei City. The number of total effective samples is 518. These quantitative data were analyzed through stepwise regression statistical methods. The main findings of this study were as follows: 1. There are three variables, parenting styles, teacher disciplines, and the quality of peer relationships, which can predict junior high school students' well-being effectively. 2. No matter what the gender is, "response" is the most effective variable. 3. The effective prediction of well-being differs between genders: male teenagers regard peers' response as an important variable while female teenagers take parents' responses as a vital variable.
期刊論文
1.Burk, W. J.、Laursen, B.(2005)。Adolescent perceptions of friendship and their associations with individual adjustment。International Journal of Behavioral Development,29(2),156-164。  new window
2.鄧清如、陳昭儀(20100600)。國中生社團參與態度與幸福感之相關研究--以北縣一所國中為例。教育心理學報,41(4),703-732。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳德嫺(20090600)。青少年同儕影響力之理論探討。諮商與輔導,282,2-5+17。  延伸查詢new window
4.呂朝賢、呂慧玲(20140900)。教養方式與學童幸福感。人文社會科學研究,8(3),79-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.施建彬(20060100)。大學生休閑活動參與對幸福感的影響--以大葉大學為例。研究與動態,13,131-144。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳清山(19961200)。教師管教權責之探討。初等教育學刊,5,123-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Baumrind, Diana(1991)。The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use。The Journal of Early Adolescence,11(1),56-95。  new window
8.王齡竟、陳毓文(20100300)。家庭衝突、社會支持與青少年憂鬱情緒:檢視同儕、專業與家外成人支持的緩衝作用。中華心理衛生學刊,23(1),65-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Parker, J. G.、Asher, S. R.(1993)。Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction。Developmental Psychology,29(4),611-621。  new window
10.趙梅如、王世億(20130600)。大學生同性友誼品質之內涵驗證及性別差異分析。教育心理學報,44(4),829-850+852。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.王恭志(20000300)。教師教學信念與教學實務之探析。教育研究資訊,8(2),84-98+a9。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.許舜賢(20150800)。青少年中途輟學相關因素之探討。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(8),161-178。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳勇祥(2010)。教師管教紅綠燈。臺灣教育,663,41-43。  延伸查詢new window
14.彭菊仙(2017)。不在乎分數的父母,孩子「零壓力」?一個國中生的告白:成績殿後,我會快樂嗎?。商業周刊。  延伸查詢new window
15.簡茂發(1997)。外力介入令人憂心。師說,105,16-17。  延伸查詢new window
16.Gauze, C.、Bukowski, W. M.、Aquan-Assee, J.、Sippola, L. K.(1996)。Interactions between family environment and friendship and associations with self-perceived well-being during early adolescence。Child Development,67(5),2201-2216。  new window
17.Keyes, Corey Lee M.(1998)。Social well-being。Social Psychology Quarterly,61(2),121-140。  new window
18.Diener, Edward(1984)。Subjective well-being。Psychological Bulletin,95(3),542-575。  new window
19.楊國樞(19860600)。家庭因素與子女行為:臺灣研究的評析。中華心理學刊,28(1),7-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.孫旻儀、王鍾和(20081200)。「教師管教方式量表」之編製及模式之驗證研究。測驗學刊,55(3),611-633。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.余民寧、謝進昌、林士郁、陳柏霖、曾筱婕(20110300)。教師主觀幸福感模式建構與驗證之研究。測驗學刊,58(1),55-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Veenhoven, R.(1994)。Is happiness a trait? Tests of the theory that a better society does not make people any happier。Social Indicators Research,32(2),101-160。  new window
學位論文
1.邱錦堂(2002)。國中導師信念、班級經營策略對班級經營效能相關之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.戴淑梅(2005)。國中生的性別、同儕關係、人際壓力因應策略與生活適應之關係(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳薇先(2012)。臺東縣國中學生父母管教方式、同儕關係與霸凌行為之相關性研究(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳美玲(2001)。國小學童父母管教方式、教師期望與習得無助感相關之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.許心儀(2013)。從道德推理、情緒歸因與父母教養方式探討青少年偏差行為(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.李慧強(1989)。家庭結構、母子關係和諧性對子女生活適應及友伴關係影響之比較研究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.林項爵(2010)。父母教養型態、教師管教方式與國小高年級學生霸凌行為之相關探討(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.何建良(2013)。國中生父母管教方式與幸福感之研究--以台中市為例(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.吳青環(2016)。青少年的人格特質、親子關係、師生關係、同儕關係與幸福感之相關性研究--以嘉義區國中為例(碩士論文)。南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.李玲玲(2014)。國中生師生依附、教師管教方式與適應困難之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.施惠馨(2013)。高雄市國中生知覺父母管教態度、同儕互動與學校生活幸福感之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.劉名誼(2014)。國中生網路沉迷情形、同儕關係與性態度之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Gilligan, Carol(1982)。In a different voice: Psychological theory and woman's development。Harvard University Press。  new window
2.蔡秀玲、楊智馨(1999)。情緒管理。臺北:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Moreno, J. L.(1934)。Who shall survive?: A new approach to the problem of human interrelations。Beacon, New York:Beacon House。  new window
4.黃德祥(1994)。青少年發展與輔導。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Sullivan, Harry Stack、Perry, Helen S.、Gawel, M. L.(1953)。The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry。Routledge。  new window
其他
1.田育瑄(2017)。青少年快樂嗎? OECD:青少年主要壓力來源是霸凌,https//flipedu.Parenting.com.tw/article/3422。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Maccoby, E. E.、Martin, J. A.(1983)。Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction。Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development。John Wiley & Sons。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE