:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:課綱為本課程設計經驗之研究:以國中教師為對象
書刊名:教育實踐與研究
作者:呂秀蓮
作者(外文):Lu, Hsiu-lien
出版日期:2019
卷期:32:1
頁次:頁1-31
主題關鍵詞:課程設計課綱使用課綱為本學習目標學習評量Curriculum designLearning assessmentsLearning objectivesStandards-basedThe use of curriculum standards
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:70
  • 點閱點閱:9
本研究旨在探究國中教師以課綱為本設計課程的經驗。10名國中教師接受一系列4天共計32小時課綱為本課程設計工作坊培訓並參與此項研究。研究資料包括田野觀察紀錄、非正式訪談、小組學習反思、單元課程設計成品和半結構式的個別訪談等。分析結果顯示,國中教師相信解構課綱內涵的重要性,認為解構課綱和建構學習目標經驗有助跳脫教科書框架的教學思考模式,然而也是痛苦但有成就感的學習階段。在設計學習評量階段,國中教師認為表現任務能引起學習動機和產出學習成效,並能檢測學習目標的達成,然而其設計的難易度跟學科屬性相關聯;另外,他們相信標準評量表是客觀、有效的學習證據收集工具。在發展學習活動階段,國中教師相信發展學習活動須扣緊課綱,以及學習活動是最容易設計的階段。最後,本研究建議有關當局重視教師以課綱為本設計課程的專業基礎能力之養成。因此,除提供在職教師專業發展的機會外,更應從源頭處培育職前教師這項關鍵的專業能力,以促使教育現場能切實回應十二年國教素養課程之期望。
This study examines middle school teachers' experiences of learning standards-based unit design. Ten middle school teachers who received a series of four-day 32-hour three-stage workshops on standards-based unit design participated in the study. The collected data for this study includes field notes, informal conversations, learning reflections, lesson designs, and semi-structured individual interviews. Results indicate that the teachers valued the importance of deconstructing standards, which helped them break the tradition of teaching by the textbooks. This first learning stage was filled with agony but they walked away with a sense of achievement. In the stage of designing learning assessments, the teachers were convinced that performance assignments promote students' learning motivation, positive learning outcomes, and help evaluate the attainment of learning objectives. The difficulty level of performance assignment design is determined by the attributes of each subject. Furthermore, they believed that rubrics are objective and effective student learning data collection tools. In the stage of developing learning activities, the teachers were ascertained that learning activities designs should tie closely with standards and that developing learning activities was the easiest stage. Finally, this study recommends that in addition to teachers' professional development, pre-service teachers need training on standards-based curriculum design to fulfill the curricular expectations of the Twelve-Year Basic Education.
期刊論文
1.唐淑華(20101200)。一國兩「制」?從「一綱多本」與「一綱一本」論爭探討臺美教師對課程發展與教材設計的不同解讀。教科書研究,3(2),63-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.錢富美(20081200)。國小職前教師社會領域課程統整設計與教學實例之研究。社會科教育研究,13,245-263。  延伸查詢new window
3.周珮儀(20051000)。我國教科書研究的分析:1979-2004。課程與教學,8(4),91-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡清田(20140800)。十二年國教課程綱要核心素養。師友月刊,566,17-22。  延伸查詢new window
5.呂秀蓮(20160800)。能力指標導向的課程發展與設計能力:強化教師專業課程能力與信心。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(8),59-65。  延伸查詢new window
6.呂秀蓮(20170300)。十二年國教107課綱核心素養的評量。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(3),1-6。  延伸查詢new window
7.嚴朝寶(20140800)。臺灣課程改革中的幽靈隱喻。教育研究月刊,244,68-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.呂秀蓮(20190300)。有效的課程設計與教學從持久概念開始。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(3),121-127。  延伸查詢new window
9.林孟君、孫劍秋(20120500)。從九年一貫國語文課程綱要到教師課程轉化。國文天地,27(12)=324,134-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.何曄、盛群力(2007)。為促進理解而教--掌握逆向設計。高校教育管理,1(2),21-26。  延伸查詢new window
11.彭煥勝(20140200)。教與學:一個歷史的考察。教育研究月刊,238,5-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.劉新、張永達(20030700)。九年一貫國中「自然與生活科技」領域課程發展、設計、評量之策略。科學教育,260,41-51。  延伸查詢new window
13.Cho, J.、Trent, A.(2005)。"Backward" curriculum design and assessment: What goes around comes around, or haven't we seen this before?。Taboo,9(2),105-122。  new window
14.Davidovitch, N.(2013)。Learning-centered teaching and backward course design--From transferring knowledge to teaching skills。Journal of International Education Research,9(4),329-338。  new window
15.Kahle, J. B.、Meece, J.、Scantlebury, K.(2000)。Urban African‐American middle school science students: Does standards‐based teaching make a difference?。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(9),1019-1041。  new window
16.McTighe, J.、Thomas, R. S.(2003)。Backward design for forward action。Education Leadership,60(5),52-55。  new window
17.Ogawa, R. T.、Sandholtz, J. H.、Martinez-Flores, M.、Scribner, S. P.(2003)。The substantive and symbolic consequences of a district's standards-based curriculum。American Educational Research Journal,40(1),147-176。  new window
18.Reys, R.、Reys, B.、Lapan, R.、Holliday, G.、Wasman, D.(2003)。Assessing the impact of standards-based middle grades mathematics curriculum materials on student achievement。Journal of Research in Mathematics Education,34(1),74-95。  new window
19.蔡清田(20080700)。DeSeCo能力三維論對我國十二年一貫課程改革的啟示。課程與教學,11(3),1-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.歐用生、楊慧文(19990100)。國民教育課程綱要的內涵與特色。師友月刊,379,10-15。  延伸查詢new window
21.Shulman, Lee S.(1987)。Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform。Harvard Educational Review,57(1),1-23。  new window
22.Riordan, J. E.、Noyce, P. E.(2001)。The impact of two standards-based mathematics curricula on student achievement in Massachusetts。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,32(4),368-398。  new window
圖書
1.Earl, Lorna M.、Marzano, Robert J.、Guskey, Thomas R.(2003)。Assessment as learning: using classroom assessment to maximize student learning。Thousand Oaks, Calif.:Corwin Press。  new window
2.Tyler, R. W.(1969)。Basic principles of curriculum and instruction。Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
3.Whitehead, Alfred North(1967)。The Aims of Education and Other Essays。Free Press。  new window
4.Corbin, J.、Strauss, A.(2007)。Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory。Sage。  new window
5.Fullan, M.(1993)。Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform。The Falmer Press。  new window
6.Freidson, E.(1970)。Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied knowledge。New York:Harper and Row。  new window
7.Wiggins, G.、McTighe, J.(2012)。The understanding by design guide to advanced concepts in creating and reviewing units。Alexandria, VA:ASCD。  new window
8.潘慧玲(2016)。十二年國民基本教育普通高中課程規劃及行政準備手冊。新北市:國家教育研究院。  延伸查詢new window
9.Colby, R. L.(2017)。Competency-based education: A new architecture for K-12 schooling。Harvard Education Press。  new window
10.周淑卿、吳璧純、林永豐、張景媛、陳美如(2018)。素養為本教學設計參考手冊。台北:教育部國民及學前教育署。  延伸查詢new window
11.教育部國民及學前教育署(2016)。十二年國民基本教育課綱總綱解析與實施準備。台北:教育部國民及學前教育署。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳佩英、簡菲莉(2015)。高中優質化的藍海航程紀實。台北:教育部國民及學前教育署。  延伸查詢new window
13.Creswell, J. W.(2006)。Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches。London:Sage。  new window
14.Gay, L. R.、Airasian, P.(2008)。Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications。  new window
15.Nagel, D.(2015)。Effective grading practices for secondary teachers: Practical strategies to prevent failure, recover credits, and increase standards-based/referenced grading。Singapore:Corwin。  new window
16.Perkins, D. N.(2010)。Making learning whole: How seven principles of teaching can transform education。Jossey-Bass。  new window
17.Reeves, D.(2016)。Elements of grading: A guide to effective practice。Bloomington, IN:Solution Tree Press。  new window
18.Wiggins, G.、McTighe, J.(2006)。Understanding by design。Pearson。  new window
19.Wiggins, G.、McTighe, J.(2011)。The understanding by design guide to creating high-quality units。ASCD。  new window
20.Creswell, J. W.(2012)。Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research。Pearson Education。  new window
21.呂秀蓮(2017)。課綱使用的理論與實例:素養導向課程設計入門概念。新竹:大衛營文化。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.呂秀蓮(2018)。課綱導向的素養課程設計簡介&解構課綱,新竹:國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.International Society for Technology in Education(2018)。Global reach of the ISTE standards,https://www.iste.org/standards/standards-in-action/global-reach。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE