:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從教師認知、教學資源與教學實踐論國語文教育政策之困境與契機
書刊名:教育科學研究期刊
作者:陳茹玲柯華葳 引用關係蔡佩眞
作者(外文):Chen, Ju-lingKo, Hwa-weiTsai, Pei-chen
出版日期:2020
卷期:65:1
頁次:頁47-91
主題關鍵詞:教師認知教學資源教學實踐語文教育政策課程綱要Teacher acknowledgementTeaching resourcesTeaching practiceMandarin education policyLanguage curricula
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:716
  • 點閱點閱:6
本研究以12名中學國語文教師為研究對象,就教師認知、教學資源與教學實踐三個面向,進行結構化深度訪談,將所得資料轉譯為口語報告,再進行編碼與歸類分析。期透過教育理想與教育現場兩方對話,對語文教育政策之落實現況更深入理解,並據此提出國語文教育的政策建議。本研究結果顯示:一、教師最關注教師專業,具備高省思與評鑑能力,期待專業成長,盼望將所學轉化運用於課室。不過,教育單位提供的精進課程未能符合需求,在進行時也欠缺適當配套措施,且未能有足夠時間讓教師轉化所學,影響落實的成效。二、國語文課綱揭示的素養有關概念已內化為教師認知,但高層次概念較少被提及。三、各校硬體資源分配不平均,教學運用上仍可再精進。教學文本趨精美多元,但選文未符整體性、脈絡化與多元化,且教師對教材有較大依賴性,少數自編教材亦較少納入核心素養。四、現場教學活動多元,趨向學習者中心。但學生能力、評量與家長期待等因素,影響新式教學的落實。綜上,本研究對國語文教育建議如下:一、植基於教師專業知能與專業成長期待,規劃精進課程,提供課務協助有關配套措施,並培養轉化能力。二、將教師教學想像與更高層次的課綱目標連結,以有效落實課綱精神。三、善用教師的專業與教學經驗,改善教科書選文,同時鼓勵教師教材編撰,使其更系統、多元,符合學生經驗與課綱精神。四、將課綱揭示的高層次能力與評量結合,使教學朝向政策目標,同時增加素養教學意義之社會宣導,以協助教師更順利達成素養教學的目標。
Structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 12 junior-high school Mandarin teachers to explore their opinions regarding three dimensions of Mandarin Education Policy-teacher acknowledgment, resources, and practices. The obtained data were first transcribed into verbal protocol, and classification and analysis were subsequently conducted according to a coding schema. Through discussion of the concepts and situation of Mandarin education, in-depth insight was obtained about the policy's implementation. Based on the obtained insights, recommendations are proposed for the future Mandarin Education Policy. The study results revealed the following: First, teachers were most concerned about their professional development, demonstrating their strong abilities of reflection and evaluation, anticipation of professional growth, and goal of translating theory into practice. However, according to teachers, the in-service training provided by existing educational institutes is unsatisfactory, involves inadequate follow-up evaluations, and provides insufficient time for practice. These factors influence the policy's effectiveness. Second, the concepts related to literacy presented in the Mandarin curricula were internalized within teachers' schema, but high-level literacy concepts were rarely mentioned in their reports. Third, the distribution of hardware among schools was reported to be unequal and thus can be improved. Teachers reported that the curriculum textbooks are refined and diverse but fail to form a systematic framework. Finally, teachers claimed that teaching activities are diverse and oriented toward a learner-centered teaching method. However, differences in the abilities of students, assessments, expectations of parents influence their teaching. Based on the above observations, suggestions are presented for framing future policies pertaining to Mandarin education: First, in-service training courses should be based on the professional knowledge and growth expectations of teachers. Moreover, a habit of implementing theory into practical scenarios should be cultivated. Second, teachers should be encouraged to be more creative and undertake courses more closely related to the high level objectives of the curricula. Third, the Mandarin literature expertise and teaching experience of teachers should be utilized to improve textbook selection and compiling. Thus, the texts could be more relevant, diverse, and appropriate for students' experiences. Finally, the high-level literacy abilities that are aims of the curricula should be incorporated into teaching materials and assessment, and promoted among parents to gain more support.
期刊論文
1.林美淑(20130300)。九年一貫國語教科書修辭教材編選內容分析之探究--以「南一版」備課教學指引為例。新竹教育大學人文社會學報,6(1),121-151。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.侯一欣(20110600)。學校課程決策的另一層思考:以教師為主體。教師專業研究期刊,1,5-22。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡東鐘(20150800)。電子教科書與傳統教科書對學習影響分析。教科書研究,8(2),39-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.方正一、洪志成(20130300)。指派教師研習與學校對策間的拉扯:教師專業觀點。嘉大教育研究學刊,30,97-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.劉欽敏、張永宗(20020100)。從霸權的學科歧視走向平權的課程統整--九年一貫課程國中教師合理授課節數推估與建議。學校行政,17,94-104。  延伸查詢new window
6.梁鳳珠(20120600)。教師教學信念之影響因素分析。教育研究論壇,3(2),157-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳利銘、王文科(20061200)。制度化文本對課程改革的影響:以九年一貫課程為例。國民教育研究集刊,15,1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.林孟君、孫劍秋(20120500)。從九年一貫國語文課程綱要到教師課程轉化。國文天地,27(12)=324,134-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.吳清山(20181200)。素養導向教師教育內涵建構及實踐之研究。教育科學研究期刊,63(4),261-293。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.林易萱、龔心怡(20170800)。教師信念、專業承諾與班級經營效能比較之研究--以國高中新手與資深教師為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,10(2),111-138。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳文彥、潘慧玲(20190300)。校長領導對教師學習領導的影響:檢視信任關係與學業強調的調節作用。教育科學研究期刊,64(1),119-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.吳忠宏、廖麗卿、林政逸(20131200)。國中國文教科書環境教育議題之內容分析。臺中教育大學學報. 教育類,27(2),1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.李涵鈺、楊國揚(20170600)。數位教科書教學設計之現況與問題探討。清華教育學報,34(1),71-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.周彥君(20130600)。九年一貫課程改革運作狀況之研究。教育學術彙刊,5,103-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.徐佳瑀(20181200)。論校長正向領導對教師教學效能之影響。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(12),47-51。  延伸查詢new window
16.潘麗珠(20130900)。以積極思維面對十二年國教的國文教學示例--格式塔理論融入〈旅夜書懷〉之意象分析。中等教育,64(3),6-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.游美惠(20000800)。內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用。調查研究:方法與應用,8,5-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Supovitz, J. A.、MacGowan, A. III、Slattery, J.(1997)。Assessing agreement: An examination of the interrater reliability of portfolio assessment in Rochester, New York。Educational Assessment,4(3),237-259。  new window
會議論文
1.姚振黎(2006)。從「孔子在哭泣」到〈搶救臺灣中文力〉--臺灣語文教育改革的理念與實施。全國大學語文研究會第十一屆年會。南京市。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳伯璋(1999)。九年一貫課程理念與倫理分析。九年一貫課程發展系列研討會。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.陳茹玲、柯華葳(2017)。我國語文教育政策現況研究(I):國語語文教育政策現況研究 (計畫編號:NAER-106-08-F-1-03-04-1-09)。臺北市:國家教育研究院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kaplan, Robert B.、Baldauf, Richard B. Jr.(1997)。Language Planning: From Practice to Theory。Multilingual Matters。  new window
2.Spolsky, B.(2004)。Language policy。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.黃宣範(1993)。語群、社會與族群意識--台灣語言社會學的研究。台北:文鶴出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Barelson, B.(1952)。Content Analysis in Communication Research。The Free Press。  new window
5.王基倫(2015)。國語文教學現場的省思。萬卷樓圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.張學謙(2011)。語言復振的理念與實務:家庭、社區與學校的協作。臺北:翰蘆。  延伸查詢new window
7.曹逢甫(19970000)。族群語言政策:海峽兩岸的比較。臺北:文鶴出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.陳美如(19980000)。臺灣語言教育政策之回顧與展望。高雄:高雄復文。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Harrison, K. D.(2007)。When language die: The extinction of the world's languages and the erosion of human knowledge。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
其他
1.陳康宜(20050410)。時數不足,國語文教學首要問題。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.楊孝濚(1989)。內容分析法。社會及行為科學研究法。臺北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.曹逢甫(20110000)。語言政策、語言教育的回顧與前瞻。中華民國發展史:教育與文化。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE