:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國中家政科實施批判思考教學之成效研究
書刊名:家政教育學報
作者:洪久賢 引用關係蔡長艷黃鳳雀
作者(外文):Horng, Jeou-shyanTsai, Chang-yenHuang, Feng Chueh
出版日期:1998
卷期:1
頁次:頁1-20
主題關鍵詞:批判思考批判思考教學教學策略家政家政教育Critical thinkingCritical thinking strategyTeaching strategyHome economicsHome economics education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:191
  • 點閱點閱:51
     本研究發展家政批判思考教學方案,驗證批判思考實驗教學方案之成效,探討其對學生批判思考能力與問題解決能力的影響。對師生教學行為的影響,及批判思考與學業成就的相關性。以臺北市敦化國中一年級學生為對象,實驗組83名,控制組81名。實驗組進行十二週家政科批判思考策略教學。主要發現:一、家政科批判思考教學方案對實驗組學生批判思考能力之增進,有顯著效果。實驗組學生在批判思考測驗總分及歸納、演繹、考察訊息的可信度三個分測驗得分,均顯著優於控制組;唯在確認假設此分測驗得分,發現實驗組與控制組無顯著差異。二、實驗教學後,實驗組之低分組及中分組在批判思考測驗總分及各分測驗之進步情形,皆達顯著差異;高分組在考察可信度分測驗之進步情形達顯著差異,但是在總分及歸納、演繹、確認假設各分測驗之進步情形,未達顯著差異。三、家政科批判思考教學方案對實驗組學生問題解決能力之增進,有顯著效果。實驗組學生在問題解決測驗總分及解釋推論、猜測原因、逆向猜測原因、預防問題等分測驗得分,均顯著優於控制組。唯在決定解決方法此分測驗得分,實驗組與控制組無顯著差異。四、實驗教學後,發現實驗組之低分組、中分組及高分組在問題解決測驗總分及各分測驗之進步情形,皆達顯著差異。五、批判思考能力與學業成就表現,有顯著正相關。即批判思考能力愈強者,其學業成就愈高。六、就實驗教學對師生教學的行為而逜,(一) 班級氣氛由沈默、少數人發言轉為踴躍發言、欲罷不能;(二) 學生的反應由被動轉為積極主動,由注重正確答案、全盤接納、無疑,進步到存疑、釋疑,具有辯證性的, 思考,能容多納異、尊重人性,條理分明的表達。分析增進本研究批判思考效能的因素:(一) 教材教法多樣化,給予學生較多元化思考和表達的空間;(二) 提供支持性學習環境,營造安全、自由、積極的學習氣氛,鼓勵學生提出見解,並尊重他人的意見;(三) 教學策略的妥善運用,(四) 安排學生上課座位以U型最佳,利於多向溝通。根據上述發現,本研究提出對國中家政教育之建議。
     The purposes of this study were to develop a critical thinking program (CTP) suitable for junior high students based on the theoretical framework and teaching model of Ennis Critical Thinking, and by undergoing a 12-week teaching experiment to evaluate the effects of CTP instruction on junior high school, students. The subjects of this study totaling 164 students were 7th grade students at Dwun Hwa junior High School (Taipei). Among them, 83 belong to the experiment group and 81 the control group. Critical thinking ability and problem-solving ability were used together to serve as an index to evaluate the teaching effects, while Cornell Critical Thinking Test Level X and Problem Solving Test were adopted as evaluation tools. The major results of CTP instruction indicated that 1.There was significant improvement in students' critical thinking ability by using CTP instruction. Further analysis on the experiment group showed that the effects of using this experimental method on low-score and medium-score teams were significant, however, the improvement of high-score team was less obvious. 2.There was significant improvement in students' problem-solving ability through CTP instruction. Further analysis on the experiment group showed that the effects of this experimental method on low-score, medium-score and high-score teams were all significant. 3.There was significant positive correlation between critical thinking ability and academic achievement. Students with higher critical thinking ability had higher academic achievement while those with lower critical thinking ability had lower academic achievement. 4.Great improvement could be found in the classroom teacher-student interaction and students' reaction by suing CTP instruction. The suggestions based on the process and results of this study in the hope to serve as references for future improvement and research on home economics education were proposed.
期刊論文
1.洪久賢(19931000)。家政科批判思考教學之探討。中等教育,44(5),5-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Jones, J.、Safrit, R. D.(1992)。Critical thinking: Enhancing adolescent decision making。Journal of Home Economics,84(3),4-7+52。  new window
3.詹志禹(1995)。出席第14屆批判性思考暨教育改革國際會議報告。教育研究雙月刊,42,52-55。  延伸查詢new window
4.洪久賢、宋慧娟、蔡長艷(19961200)。批判思考教學在家政教育之應用研究。中華家政,25,15-28。  延伸查詢new window
5.Hudgins, B. B.、Edelman, S.(1986)。Teaching critical skills to fourth and fifth and fifth grades through critical teacher-lead small-group discussions。Journal of Educational Research,79(6),333-342。  new window
6.Way, W. L.、Montgomery, B.(1995)。Hypermedia Technology tools for implementing critical science-based curricula in family and consumer education。J. of Family and Consumer Sciences Education,13(1),1-15。  new window
7.毛連塭、吳清山、陳麗華(19920900)。康乃爾批判思考測驗修訂報告。初等教育學刊,1,1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Baldwin, E. E.(1991)。The home economics movement: A "new" integrative paradigm。Journal of Home Economics,83(4),42-49。  new window
9.Ennis, Robert H.(1985)。Critical thinking and the curriculum。National Forum: Phi Delta Kappan Journal,65(1),28-31。  new window
10.張玉成(19920600)。國小語文科實施批判思考教學之實驗研究。臺北師院學報,5,1-66。  延伸查詢new window
11.毛連塭、劉燦梁、陳麗華(19910100)。康乃爾批判思考測驗之修訂。測驗年刊,38,109-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.張春興(19880600)。知之歷程與教之歷程: 認知心理學的發展及其在教育上的應用。教育心理學報,21,17-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Smith, F. M.、Schlautman, N. R.(1994)。Critical thinking abilities of early adolescents: Enhancement strategies。Journal of Vocational Home Economics Education,12(2),1-12。  new window
學位論文
1.鄭英耀(1992)。國小教師創造思考、批判思考及其相關因素之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學,台北。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Chae, J. H.(1995)。Assessment of korean secondary school home economics curriculum with implications for change(博士論文)。The Ohio State University。  new window
3.Jones, J. M.(1989)。Principles and instructional strategies for fostering critical thinking in adult learners: OHIO Extension home economists perception of importance of the principles and current use of the strategies(博士論文)。The Ohio State University。  new window
4.Reid-Macnevin, S. A.(1994)。Ideology, critical thinking and current crimino-logical issues: Using debates as a pedagogical tool in undergraduate education(博士論文)。University of Toronto。  new window
圖書
1.吳武典、詹秀美(1991)。問題解決測驗。臺北市:心理出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Paul, R. W.(1990)。Critical thinking: what every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world。Sonoma State University。  new window
3.洪久賢(1994)。高中生學習家政需求之研究。臺北:文景書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.Brown, M. M.、Paolucci, B.(1979)。Home economics: A definition。Washington, DC:American home Economics Association。  new window
5.Barnes, C. A.(1992)。Critical thinking: Educational imperative。  new window
6.Mitchell, B. R.(1988)。British historical statistics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.溫明麗(1997)。批判性思考教學:哲學之旅。臺北市:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Brown, M.(1980)。What is home economics education?。St. Paul:University of Minnesota。  new window
9.Paul, R. W.(1993)。Critical thinking: What every person need to survive in a rapidly changing world。CA:Foundation for Critical Thinking。  new window
10.張玉成(1993)。思考技巧與教學。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Chaffee, J.(1992)。Teaching critical thinking across the curriculum。Critical thinking: Educational Imperative。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
2.Brooks, L. W.、Simutis, E. M.、O'Neil, H. F.(1985)。The role of individual difference in learning strategies research。Individual differences in cognition。Orlando, FL:Academic Press。  new window
3.Hultgren, F.(1986)。Value reasoning design: The Pennsylvania State University curriculum project。Vocational home economics curriculum: State of the field。  new window
4.Knight, C. L. H.(1992)。Teaching critical thinking in the social science。Critical thinking: Educational imperative。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
5.Kister, J.(1986)。Mission statement。Home economics concepts: A base for curriculum development。Alexandria, VA:American Home Economics Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE