參考文獻：
王如哲 (2001)。全球化的教育改革動向之一：因應知識經濟的國家教育改革策略。教育資料與研究，43，9－１9。
王如哲 (2002)。迎向知識經濟之教育改革方向。中等教育，52(6)，70-87。
王瑞壎 (2002)。知識經濟及其對教育影響的省思。教育政策論壇，5(1)，40-61。
王昌甫 (2003)。當代台灣社會的族群想像。台北：群學。
王政彥(2003)。紀登斯Anthony Giddens 的「第三條路」及其對成人教育的啟示。社教雙月刊，118，34-40。
卯靜儒 (2004)。從新馬克思主義到後結構主義—課程社會學研究的再概念化。教育研究集刊，50-1，119-142。
成中英 (2005)。合內外之道。台北縣：康德出版社。
李丁讚 (2004)。導論：市民社會與公共領域在台灣的發展。載於李丁讚、陳弱水、錢永祥、顧忠華、吳乃德、夏春祥、吳介民 (合著)，公共領域在台灣：困境與契機 (頁1-62)。台北：桂冠書局。
李明 (譯) (2002)。J. E. Stiglitz著。全球化的許諾與失落。台北：大塊文化。
李俊達，張德銳 (2001)。美英兩國的績效責任運動及其對我國中小學教育的啟示。教育資料與研究，43，23-29。
沈清松 (2004)。心靈轉向。台北：土緒。
林佩璇 (2002)。教學知識之研究：從研究典範的轉移到整合理解。課程與教學季刊，5(3)，17-34。
林佩璇(2003)。空言無物、行之無悟?課程行動研究中的實踐反省。教育研究集
刊，49(3)，195-219。
林妮燕(2003)。全球化下國民教育階段和平教育的主要任務。教育研究，114，58-67。
林信華 (2004)。二十一世紀社會學：漂泊的台灣社會。台北：洪葉。
林海清 (2001)。知識管理與教育行政改革。教育資料與研究，43，13-19。
林海清 (2003)。全球化與教育發展的省思。中台學報，14，31-48。
牟宗三 (1971)。智的直覺與中國哲學。台北：商務。
若水（譯）(2000)。李安德 著。超個人心理學(Transpersonal psychology: A new paradigm for psychology)。台北：桂冠。
柯錫杰 (2006)。心的視界。台北：大塊。
高宣揚（1999）。後現代論。台北：五南出版社。
車文博 (2003)。人本主義心理學。杭州：浙江教育出版社。
吳俊憲 (2002)。Giddens 「第三條路」政治哲學及其在教育上的啟示。中等教育，53-1，62-69。
吳程遠 (譯) (1993)。R. P. Feynman著。別鬧了！費曼先生。台北：天下文化。
范信賢 (2005)。敘說課程實踐的故事。教育研究月刊，130，45-55。
武文瑛 (2002)。淺談全球化趨勢下教師應具備的素養。教師之友，43(3)，17-23。
高博銓（2002）。全球化與教育改革。人文及社會學科教學通訊，12，6-22。
施君蘭 (2006)。誰是最佳企業公民。天下雜誌，343，102-110。
胡台麗 (2002)。導論。載於胡台麗、許木柱、葉光輝 (主編)，情感、情緒、與文化 (頁1-16)。北市：中央研究院民族學研究所。
孫治本 (2001)。全球化與民族國家：挑戰與回應。台北：巨流。
陸洛，楊國樞 (2005)。社會取向與個人取向的自我實現觀: 概念分析與實徵初探。本土心理學研究，23，3-70。
許殷宏(1998)。紀登斯(A. Giddens )「結構化理論」對教育社會學研究的啟示。教育研究集刊，40，93-112。
許美華(2004)。從「結構行動理論」看教學中師生的能動性。國民教育研究集刊，12，91-103。
教育部 (2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。台北：教育部。
周佩儀（1999）。從社會批判到後現代。台北：師大書苑。
周淑卿 (2001)。市場自由與國家介入－論全國課程架構的建立。國立台北師範學院學報，14，57-74。
周淑卿 (2004)。課程發展與教師專業。台北：高等教育。
葉啟政 (2004)。進出「結構--行動」的困境。台北：三民。
歐用生 (1999)。課程發展的基本原理。高雄：復文。
歐用生 (2003)。課程典範再建構。台北：麗文。
歐用生 (2006a)。課程理論與實踐。台北：學富文化。
歐用生 (2006b)。建立課程的公共性—課程公共論述的危機與出路。教育研究集刊，52(1)，1-27。
歐用生 (2006c)。課程統整理論與實務之辯證。未出版手稿。
夏春祥 (2004)。尋找公共領域：論台灣社會中的新聞論述。載於李丁讚、陳弱水、錢永祥、顧忠華、吳乃德、夏春祥、吳介民 (合著)，公共領域在台灣：困境與契機 (頁215-298)。台北：桂冠書局。
黃瑞褀 (1996)。批判社會學：批判理論與現代社會學。台北：三民。
黃政傑 (1991)。課程設計。台北：東華。
黃政傑 (2005)。課程理論。載於 黃政傑 (主編)，課程思想(頁1-24)。北縣：冠學文化。
黃政傑、蔡其蓁 (2003)。國家介入教育之合理基礎。南師學報，37(1)，117-127。
黃光國（1998）。知識與行動。台北：心理出版社。
黃光國（2001）。社會科學的理路。台北：心理出版社。
黃 騰 (2003)。紀登斯全球化理論及其對課程研究之啟發。國北師課程與教學研究所碩士論文。未出版：台北。
黃 騰 (2005)。從「角色」到「自我」--論教師改變的歷史困境與可能。教育研究集刊，51(4)，89-116。
黃 騰 (2006a)。國民教育課程之省思：Bauman、Beck及Giddens的全球風險社會觀點。國立台北教育大學學報，19(1)，63-88。
黃 騰 (2006b)。論Z. Bauman個人化社會及其對課程改革之啟發。國立台北教育大學學報，19(2)，27-54。
黃彥霖 (2002)。全球化發展的教育省思與因應。師友月刊，423，32-36。
陳伯璋（1983）。課程研究的第三勢力—美國再概念化學派課程理論的評介。教育研究集刊，25，頁179-226。
陳鈞凱 (2006，10月14日)。升學壓力成重擔 中學生每10人有1人憂鬱。中央日報。2006年，10月14日，取自http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/061014/5/5abn.html
陳寶蓮 (譯) (2004)。小崎哲哉 & Think the Earth Project 編著。百年愚行。台北：先覺。
趙敦華 (2001)。西方哲學簡史。北京：北京大學出版社。
楊玉齡 (譯) (2002)。E. O. Wilson著。生物圈的未來。台北：天下。
楊朝祥 (2001)。知識經濟時代教育新主張。教育資料與研究，41，1-9。
曹衛東 (譯) (2002)。J. Habermas著。包容他者。上海：人民出版社。
張華、石傳平、馬慶發 (2000)。課程流派研究。山東：山東教育出版社。
張美惠 (譯) (2003)。J. M. Schwartz& S. Begley著。重塑大腦( The mind and the brain)。台北：時報出版。
張珍瑋 (2003)。全球化時代中我國高等教育發展模式之研究。國立台北師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。未出版：台北。
張明輝 (2001)。知識經濟與學校經營。教育資料與研究，41，10-16。
張建成（2004）。教育社會學的新視野。載於 張建成 (主編)。文化、人格、與教育 (頁153-180)。台北：心理。
張玉佩 (2005)。從媒體影像觀照自已：觀展/表演典範之初探。新聞學研究，82，41-83。
蔡秀媛 (2002)。全球化趨勢與成人教育—對國小教師專業發展的省思。初等教育學刊，12，171-196。
趙 剛 (2001)。為什麼反全球化？如何反？--關於全球化的一些問題的思考與對話。台灣社會研究季刊，44，49-146。
薛曉華 (2006)。T. S. Popkewitz 當代「社會知識論」代表人物。載於 譚光鼎、王麗雲 (主編)。教育社會學：人物與思想(頁471-505)。台北：高等教育。
龍應台 (2006)。有能力的人，請把你的燭光照的更遠。天下雜誌，343，150-157。
劉慶仁 (2001)。績效責任：美國當前教育改革的趨勢。教育資料與研究，43，33-44。
秦夢群 (2001)。美國一九九○年代之後之教育改革及對我國之啟示。教育資料與研究，43，1-9。
蘇永明 (2006)。主體的爭議與教育。台北：心理出版社。
劉真如 (譯) (2002)。P. F. Drucker著。下一個社會。台北：商周。
劉維公 (2001)。第二現代理論：介紹貝克與季登斯的現代性分析。載於顧忠華 (主編)，第二現代—風險社會的出路(頁1-16)。台北：巨流。
簡守邦 (譯) (2004)。A. Callinicos 著。社會理論思想史導論 (Social theory : a historical introduction)。台北：韋伯。
蕭錦錦 (譯) (2003)。Dalai Lama& F. Ouaki著。達賴新經：達賴喇嘛人間對話。台北：天下文化。
鐘鴻銘（1994）。派納課程研究方法論之探討。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。未出版：台北。
鐘鴻銘（2004）。H. M. Kliebard的課程史研究及其啟示。教育研究集刊，50(1)，91-118。
鐘鴻銘（2005）。美國課程改革的歷史辯證。課程與教學季刊，8(4)，1-18。

Apple, M. W. (2000). Between neoliberalism and neoconservatism: Education and conservatism in a global context. In N. C. Burbules & C. A. Torres(Eds, 2000), Globalization and education: Critical perspective(pp. 57-78). New York: Routlege.
Apple, M. W. (2001). Educating the right way: Markets, standards, God and inequality. New York : Routledge Falmer.
Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and Curriculum(3nd ed.). New York: Routlege.
Archer, M. (1988). Culture and agency: The place of culture in social theory. Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Archer, M. (2000). Being human: the problem of agency. Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Archer, M. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Assagioli, R. (1974). The act of will. Baltimore: Penguin Books Inc.
Atkins, E. (1988) Reframing curriculum theory in terms of interpretation and practice: A hermeneutical approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(5), 437-448.
Barker, C.(2000). Cultural studies: Theory and Practice. London：Sage.
Barnes, B. (2000). Understanding Agency: Social theory and responsible action. London: Sage.
Bauman, Z. (1987) Legislators and interpreters. Oxford: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (1993) Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bauman, Z. (1995) Life in Fragments. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bauman, Z. (1997). Postmodernity and its Discontents. NY: New York University Press.
Bauman, Z. (1998). Work, consumerism, and the new poor. Buckingham: Open university Press.
Bauman, Z. (1999a) Globalization: the human consequences. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bauman, Z. (1999b). In search of politics. Cambridge：Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Oxford: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (2001). The individualized society. Oxford: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z., & Tester, K. (2001). Conversations with Zygmunt Bauman. Oxford: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (1994). The reinvention of politics: Towards a theory of reflexive modernization. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash, Reflexive modernization: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order(pp. 1-55). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences ( P. Camiller, Trans.). London: Sage. (Original work published 2001).
Best, S. & Kellner, D. (1991). Postmodern theory: Critical interrogations. N. Y.: Guilford Press.
Beyer, L. E & Liston, D. P (1996). Curriculum in Conflict. Teachers College, Columbia University.
Bhaskar, R. (2002a). Reflections on Meta-Reality: Transcendence, emancipation, and everyday life. New Delhi: Sage publication.
Bhaskar, R. (2002b). Meta-Reality: The philosophy of meta-reality. New Delhi: Sage publication.
Bobbitt, F. (1918). The curriculum. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bryant, C. G.A. & Jary, D. (Eds. 1997). Anthony Giddens: Critical Assessment Vol IV. London：Routledge.
Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Questioning in Classroom: A Sociolinguistic perspective. Review of Educational Research, 61, 157-178.
Castells, M.(2001). Information technology and global capitalism. In W. Hutton & A. Giddens(Eds), On the edge: Living with global capitalism(pp. 52-74). London: Vintage.
Castells, M.(1997). The power of identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Clandinin, J. & Connelly, M. (1990). Narrative, experience and the study of curriculum. Cambridge Journal of Education, 20(3), 231-254.
Connelly & Clandinin(1991). In E. C. Short (Ed), Forms of Curriculum Inquiry. (pp. 121-154). New York: State University of New York Press.
Cohen I. J. (1997). Review of social theory of modern society: Anthony Giddens and his critics and the consequences of modernity. In C. G.A. Bryant, & D. Jary, (Eds). Anthony Giddens: Critical Assessment Vol IV. (pp. 8-13). London：Routledge.
Coulby, D. (2000). Beyond the national curriculum: curricular centralism and cultural diversity in Europe and USA. London: Routledge.
Craib, I. (1992). Anthony Giddens. London：Routledge.
Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1880-1990. N. Y.: Teachers College Press.
Darling-Hammond, L.& Snyder, J.(1992). Curriculum Studies and the Traditions of Inquiry: The Scientific Tradition. In Jackson, P.W.(ED). Handbook of Research on Curriculum(PP. 41-78). N.Y: AERA.
David, C& Elizabeth, O. (2000). Teacher professionalism: the wrong conversation. Education Canada. 40(1). 4-7.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. N.Y. : Macmillan &Co.
Dillabough, J. A. (1999). Gender policies and conceptions of the modern teacher: Women, identity and professionalism. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(3), 373-394.
Eisner, E. W. & Vallance, E. (1974). Changing conceptions of curriculum. CA: McCutchan.
Elias, N. (1991). The society of individuals. London: The Continuum International Publishing Group.
Elliott, A. (2001). Concepts of the Self. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Emirbayer, M. & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency. American journal of sociology, 103, 962-1023.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative Methods in Research on Teacher. In M. C. Wittrock, (1986). The Handbook of Research on Teaching(119-161). New York: Macmillan.
Faux. J.& Mishel L.(2001). Inequality and the global economy. In W. Hutton & A. Giddens(Eds), On the edge: Living with global capitalism(pp. 93-111). London: Vintage.
Foucault, M(1970). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. (A. M. Sheridan-Smith, Trans.). New York: Random House. (Original work published 1966)
Foucault, M(1983). Subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow, Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208-226). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M(1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self (pp. 16-49). London: Tavistock Publication.
Foshay, A. W. (2000). The curriculum: purpose, substance, practice. Columbia: Teacher College Press.
Frankl, V. E. (1969). The will to meaning: Foundations and applications of logotherapy. N.Y. : The New American Library.
Fraser, N. (1992). Rethink the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109-142). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Freire, P.(1997). Pedagogy of heart. N. Y.: Continuum Publishing.
Freire, P.(1998). Pedagogy of freedom. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
Freire, P.(1999). Pedagogy of hope. N. Y.: Continuum.
Freire, P.(2000). Pedagogy of the Oppressed, 30th Anniversary Edition. N.Y: Continuum.
Fromm, E. (1956). The sane society. N. Y.: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Fuchs, S. (2001). Beyond agency. Sociological theory, 19(1), 24-40.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. London: The MacMillan Press.
Giddens, A.（1984）.The Constitution of Society. Cambridge：Polity Press.
Giddens, A.（1985）.The Nation-State and Violence. Cambridge：Polity Press.
Giddens, A.（1990）.The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge：Polity Press.
Giddens, A.（1991）.Modetnity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. CA: Standford University Press.
Giddens, A.（1993）.New Rules of Sociological Method(2nd ed.). Cambridge：Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a Post-traditional society. In Beck, U., Giddens, A., &Lash, S. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order(pp. 56-109). Cambridge：Polity Press.
Giddens, A.（1999）. Runaway world: how globalization is reshaping our lives. London: Profile books.
Giddens, A. & Pierson, C. (1998). Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making sense of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giroux H. A, Penna A. N. & Pinar W. F. (Eds, 1981). Curriculum& Instruction Alternatives in Education. Berkley: McCutchan.
Giroux H. A. (1983). Ideology and agency in the process of schooling. Journal of Education, 165(1), 12-23.
Giroux, H. A. (1988a). Teachers as In tellectuals: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of Learning. Massachusetts: Bergin& Garvey.
Giroux, H. A. (1988b). Schooling and the struggle for public life: Critical pedagogy in the modern age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Giroux, H. (1997). Pedagogy and the politics of hope: Theory, culture, and schooling: a critical reader. Colorado: Westview Press.
Giroux, H. (2004). Proto-fascism in America: Neoliberalism and the demise of democracy. Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
Goodson, I. F. (1998) Storying the Self: Life Politics and the Study of the Teacher‘s Life and Work. In Pinar, W. F.(ED), Curriculum: Toward New Identities(pp. 3-20). New York& London: Garland.
Goodson, I. F. (1984). Subjects for study: Towards a Social History of Curriculum. In Goodson, I. F& Ball, S. J. (Eds.), Defining the curriculum: Histories and ethnography, (pp. 25-44). London: The Falmer Press.
Goodson, I. F. (1991). History, Context and Qualitative Methods. In Goodson, I. F& Walker, R., Biography, Identity and Schooling: Episodes in educational research, (pp. 114-136). London: The Falmer Press.
Goodson, I. F. (1997). The Changing Curriculum: Studies in Social Construction. New York: Peter Lang.
Goodson, I. F. (1998) Storying the Self: Life Politics and the Study of the Teacher‘s Life and Work. In Pinar, W. F.(Ed.), Curriculum: Toward New Identities(pp. 3-20). New York& London: Garland.
Greene, M. (1975). Curriculum and Consciousness. In Pinar(Ed), Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists(pp. 299-317). Berkeley: McCutchan.
Grove, R. W & Short, E. C. (1991). Theoretical inquiry: Components and Shructure. In E. C. Short (Ed), Forms of Curriculum Inquiry. (pp. 211-224). New York: State University of New York Press.
Grumet, M. R. (1990). Retrospective: Autobiography and the analysis of educational experience. Canbridge Journal of Education, 20(3), 277-282.
Grumet, M. R. (1999). Autobiography and Reconceptualization. In W. F. Pinar (Ed).Contemporary curriculum discourses. (pp 24-31). N.Y.: Peter Lang.
Gough, N. (2000) Globalisation and curriculum inquiry: locating, representing, and performing a transnational imaginary. Globalization and education: integration and contestation across cultures, 77-98, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland.
Gough, N. (2002). The long arm(s) of globalization: Transnational imaginaries in curriculum work. In W. E. Doll & N. Gough (Eds). Curriculum vision, (pp. 167-178). N. Y.: Peter lang.
Hay, C., Brien, M. O. & Penna, S. (1997). Giddens, Modernity and Self-Identity: The hollowing out of social theory. In C. G.A. Bryant, & D. Jary, (Eds). Anthony Giddens: Critical Assessment Vol IV. London：Routledge.
Hargeraves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times. N.Y. : Teachers College Press.
Hargeraves, A., Earl, L., Moore, S., & Manning, S. (2001). Learning to change: Teaching beyond subjects and standards. California: Jossey-Bass.
Hargeraves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: education in the age of insecurity. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Hart, P. (1998). Rethinking educational change with heart & mind: 1997 ASCD Yearbook. Canadian Journal of Education, 23(2), 228-231.
Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hamilton, D. & Weiner, G. (2004). Subjects, not subjects: Curriculum pathways, pedagogies and practices in the united kingdom. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (pp. 623-636). Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Henderson, J. G. & Kesson, K. R. (2001). A review of the lure of the transcendent: Collected essay by Dwayne E. Huebner. Curriculum Inquiry, 31(3), 367-377.
Held, D., & McGrew, A. (2002). Globalization/Anti-Globalization. Cambridge：Polity Press.
Hutton W.& Giddens, A.(Eds)(2001). On the Edge: Living with Global Capitalism. London: Vintage.
Hunkins, F. P. (1976). Building Curriculum: Influences and Mechanisms. In O. L. Davis, Jr. (Ed.). Perspectives on Curriculum Development 1776- 1976. Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Huebner, D. E. (1999). The lure of the transcendent: collected essays by Dwayne E. Huebner. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jackson, P. W. (1992). Conceptions of curriculum and curriculum specialists. In P. W. Jackson (Ed). Handbook of research on curriculum. (pp. 3-40). New York : Macmillam.
Jary, D. & Jary, J. (1997). The transformations of Anthony Giddens. In C. G.A. Bryant, & D. Jary, (Eds). Anthony Giddens: Critical Assessment Vol IV. (pp. 137-152). London：Routledge.
Kanpol, B. (1997). Issues and trends in critical pedagogy. NJ: Hampton Press.
Kincheloe, J. L.(1998). Pinar‘s Currere and Identity in Hyperreality: Grounding the Post-formal Notion of Intrapersonal Intelligence. In Pinar, W. F.(ED), Curriculum: Toward New Identities(pp. 129-142). New York& London: Garland.
Klein, M. F. (1992). A perspective on the gap between curriculum theory and practice. Theory into Practice, 31(3), 191-197.
Kliebard, H. M. (1975). Persistent curriculum issues in historical perspective. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists (pp. 39-50). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Kliebard, H. M. (2002). Changing Course: American Curriculum Reform in the 20th Century. N. Y: Teachers College.
Lash, S. (1994). Reflexivity and its doubles: Structure, aesthetics, community. In Beck, U., Giddens, A., &Lash, S. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order(pp. 110-173). Cambridge：Polity Press.
Lincoln, Y. S.(1992). Curriculum Studies and the Traditions of Inquiry: The Humanistic Tradition. In Jackson, P.W.(ED). Handbook of Research on Curriculum(PP. 79-97). N.Y: AERA.
Lofty, J. S. (2003). Standards and the politics of time and teacher professionalism. English Education, 35(3), 195-222.
Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being(2nd ed). Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Maslow, B. G. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. N. Y.: The Viking Press.
May, R. (1969). Love and will. N. Y.: W. W. Norton & Company.
McNeil, J. D. (1977). Curriculum: A comprehensive introduction. Boston: Little Brown.
Meyer, J. W., & Kamens, D. H. (1992). Conclusion: Accounting for a world curriculum. In J. W. Meyer, D. H. Kamens, & A. Benavot(Eds.), School knowledge for the masses: World models and the national primary curricular categories in the twentieth century (pp.165-179). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
Mestrovic, S. G. (1998). Anthony Giddens: The last modernist. London：Routledge.
Mead, G. H. (1974). Mind, self, and society. Chicage: University of Chicago Press.
Mouzelis, N. (1995). Sociological theory: What went wrong. London：Routledge.
Mouzelis, N. (1997). Social and system integration: Lockwood, Habermas, Giddens, Sociology, 31(1), 111-119.
Munro, P. (1998). Engendering curriculum history. In Pinar, W. F.(ED), Curriculum: Toward New Identities(pp. 263-294). New York& London: Garland.
Parsons, T. (1951). Social system. New York: Free Press.
Peters, M. & Burbules, N. (2004). Poststructuralism and education research. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Popkewitz, T. S. (2001). The Production of Reason and Power. In Popkewitz, T., Franklin, B. M.& Bereyra, M. A. (Eds, 2001), Cultural History and Education. (pp. 151-183). New York: Routlege.
Pinar, W. F. & Grumet, M. (1976). Toward a poor curriculum. Dubuque, IA: Kendall.
Pinar, W. F. (1986). Whole, bright, deep with understanding: Issues in qualitative research and autobiographical method. In P. H. Taylor(Ed, 1986), Recent development in curriculum studies (pp. 16-40). NFERNelson.
Pinar, W. F. (1991). Curriculum as social psychoanalysis: On the significance of place. In J. Kincheloe & W. Pinar (Eds.), Curriculum as social psychoanalysis: Essays on the significance of place (167-186). Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
Pinar, W. F. (1998) (Eds). Curriculum: Toward New Identities. New York& London: Garland.
Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. F., Slattery, P.& Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding Curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.
Pratt, D. (1994). Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, and possibility. N. Y.: Brace College.
Salvio, P. M. (1998). On Using the Literacy Portfolio to Prepare Teachers for “Willful World Traveling”. In Pinar, W. F.(Ed.), Curriculum: Toward New Identities(pp. 41-74). New York& London: Garland.
Schaafsma,D.(1998). Performing the Self: Constructing Written and Curricular Fictions. In Popkewitz, T& Brennan, M.(Eds), Foucault`s Challenge: Discourse, Knowledge, and Power in Education(pp. 255-277). N. Y: Teachers College.
Shiva, V.(2001). The World on the Edge. In Hutton W.& Giddens, A.(Eds), On the Edge: Living with Global Capitalism(pp. 112-129). London: Vintage.
Short, E. C.(1991). Forms of Curriculum Inquiry. New York: State University of New York Press.
Short, E. C.(2000). Shifting Paradigms: Implications for Curriculum Research and Practice. In Glanz, J.& Behar-Horenstein, L. S.(Eds), Paradigm Debates in Curriculum and Supervision: Modern and Postmodern Perspectives(pp. 34-53). Wesport, CT: Bergin&Garvey.
Slattery, P. (1995). Curriculum Development in the Postmodern Era. New York& London: Garland.
Smith, D. G. (2003). Curriculum and teaching face globalization. In W. F. Pinar(ED), International handbook of curriculum research (pp. 35-51). Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
Smith, H. (1982). Beyond the Post-Modern Mind. N.Y.: Crossroads.
Smith, D. (1997). Modernity, Postmodernity and the New Middle Ages. In C. G.A. Bryant, & D. Jary, (Eds). Anthony Giddens: Critical Assessment Vol IV. (pp. 20-35). London：Routledge.
Shiva, V. (2001). The world on the edge. In W. Hutton& A. Giddens(Eds), On the edge: Living with global capitalism(pp. 112-129). London: Vintage.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Paradigms and Research Programs in the study of Teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock, (1986). The Handbook of Research on Teaching(3-36). New York: Macmillan.
Stanley, W. B.(1992). Curriculum for Utopia: Social Reconstructionism and Critical Pedagogy in the Postmodern Era. N.Y.: State University of New York.
Stacey, J. (1990). Brave new families. N.Y.: Basic.
Schutz, A. & Luckmann, T. (1973). The structures of the life world(Volume I) (R. M. Zaner & H. T. Engelhardt Jr. Trans.). Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Taylor, C. (1985). Human agency and language. N. Y.: Cambridge University.
Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. London: Duke University Press.
Tomlinson, J.(1997). A Phenomenology of globalization? Giddens on global modernity. In C. G.A. Bryant, & D. Jary, (Eds). Anthony Giddens: Critical Assessment Vol IV. (pp. 116-136). London：Routledge.
Tomlinson, J.(1999). Globalization and Culture. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Urry, J. (1997a). Duality of structure: Some critical issues. In Bryant, C. G.A. & Jary, D. (Eds.), Anthony Giddens: Critical Assessment Vol II(pp. 68-77). London：Routledge.
Urry, J. (1997b). Time and Space in Giddens’Social Theory. In Bryant, C. G.A. & Jary, D. (Eds.), Anthony Giddens: Critical Assessment Vol III(pp. 128-143). London：Routledge.
Wilber, K (1977). Spectrum of Consciousness. Wheaton: The Theosophical Publishing House.
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to Labour. Farnborough: Saxon House.
Volcker, P. A. (2001). The sea of global finance. In W. Hutton & A. Giddens (Eds), On the edge: Living with global capitalism(pp. 75-85). London: Vintage.
Whitty, G. (2002). Making sense of education policy: Studies in the sociology and politics of education. London: Sage.
Young, M. F. D. (1998). The curriculum of future. London：Routledg