:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從「結構行動理論」看教學中師生的能動性
書刊名:國民教育研究集刊
作者:許美華 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, Mei-hua
出版日期:2004
卷期:12
頁次:頁91-103
主題關鍵詞:結構行動理論教學能動性The structuration theoryTeachingCapability
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:96
  • 點閱點閱:31
本研究旨在探討Anthony Giddens的結構行動理論以及它對教育場域中的師生之影響,本文採用理論分析法,先是分析結構行動理論的重要成分,包括結構、行動與行動者、結構與行動,然後再探討結構行動理論對課室中的教學實際,尤其是師生能動性的啟示與影響。 經過理論與實際的交互探討之後,筆者發現結構並非只有限制師生的行動,其還能經由資源與權力的運用,促成師生改變結構的能動性。例如,學生雖必須受到教育行政要求、課程與教材、教學中教師的權力之限制,但是學生也可以利用各種方法來展現其能動性,如學生可以成立學生自治組織,來改變學校的行政要求;也可以用自身的經驗、能力,來影響教師及課程設計者等。而教師的能動性來自於其對自身專業能力的轉化與反省,例如,教師可以利用課程發展委員會來使課程更適合自己與學生,教師亦可利用教師專業團體來影響政策的決定。
The purpose of the article was to explore the Structuration Theory of Anthony Giddens and its influence on the teachers and students in the educational field. The method used by the article was the theory analysis method. According to the method, the author first analysis the important components of the Structuration Theory, including structure, action and structuration. Then, discussing the theory's influence on the capability of teachers and students in teaching. After the exploration of theory and practice, the author found that the structure was not only limited the actions of teachers and students, but also could promote, by the way of using resource and power, the capability of teachers and students, For example, students could set up their self-government organizations for working to change the rules established by school administration. Students could also make the teachers and curriculum designers thinking about the students' experience and abilities when they designed the curriculum. The capability of teachers came from teachers' reflection and transforming about their professional abilities. For example, teachers could show their educational opinions when they were members of the Committee if Curriculum Development. Teachers could also influent policies making through their professional organizations.
期刊論文
1.王瑞賢(20011000)。聲音政治與課程知識社會學。教育社會學通訊,32,6-10。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪鎌德(19961100)。紀登士的結構兼行動理論之析評。美歐月刊,11(11)=127,85-105。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃素滿(20011000)。「兩種」課程知識社會學--「之間」與「之內」典範之研究。教育社會學通訊,32,16-19。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡其蓁(20000300)。Giroux後現代主義教育理論之啟示。教育社會學通訊,20,20-25。  延伸查詢new window
5.周珮儀(20010100)。追求社會正義的課程理論--H. A. Giroux課程理論之探究。教育研究集刊,46,1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.許殷宏(19980100)。紀登斯(A. Giddens)「結構化理論」對教育社會學研究的啟示。教育研究集刊,40,93-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.高博銓(20000200)。Giroux課程理論初探。中等教育,51(1),16-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.方永泉(19990300)。教師作為一種轉化的知識份子--教育史角度的考察。國立暨南國際大學學報,3(1),99-126+383。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.周珮儀(2001)。教學創新了嗎?文本權威的省思。九年一貫課程改革下創新教學研討會。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林郡雯(2002)。Anthony Giddens結構行動論及其在教育上的啟示(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Swingewood, Alan、彭懷恩、張力可(2000)。社會學思想史。台北:風雲論壇。  延伸查詢new window
2.Giddens, Anthony(1979)。Central Problems in Social Theory: Actiony Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis。London:Macmillan。  new window
3.Giddens, A.(1976)。New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretive sociologies。London:New York:Hutchins:Basic Books。  new window
4.張立中。西方社會學名著提要。台北:米娜貝爾。  延伸查詢new window
5.Gadamer, H. G.(1975)。Truth and Method。New York:Continuum。  new window
6.Bernstein, B.(1990)。The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse--Volume IV, Class, codes and control。London:Routledge。  new window
7.林生傳(2000)。教育社會學。高雄:復文。  延伸查詢new window
8.Giddens, A.(1984)。The Constitution of Society: Outlines of a Theory of Structuration。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
9.Craib, Ian(1992)。Anthony Giddens。Routledge。  new window
10.Giddens, Anthony、李康、李猛(2002)。社會的構成。臺北縣:左岸文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.洪鎌德(1997)。社會學說與政治理論--當代尖端思想之介紹。臺北:揚智文化事業公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.胡正光(1998)。紀登士。台北:生智出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.高宣揚(1998)。當代社會理論。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.張宏輝(1992)。結構化論的旗手--季登斯。當代社會思想巨擘:當代社會思想家。台北:正中。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bernstein, B.(1996)。Pedagogic Codes and their Modalities of Practice。Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique。London:Taylor & Frances。  new window
3.Giroux, H. A.(1991)。Border pedagogy in the age of postmodernism。Postmodern education: Politics, culture and social criticism。Minneapolis, MN:Westport, CT:University of Minnesota Press:Greenwood Publishing Group。  new window
4.謝小芩、范信賢(1999)。九年一貫課程中的學生主體性。九年一貫課程之展望。臺北:揚智出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bourdieu, Pierre(1977)。Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction。Power and Ideology in Education。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
6.郭實渝(1996)。後現代主義的教育哲學。教育哲學。台北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE