:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小班會學生自治功能探討--兩個六年級班級的觀察
書刊名:臺東師院學報
作者:許巧靜
作者(外文):Sheu, Chau-jin
出版日期:2000
卷期:11(下)
頁次:頁109-135
主題關鍵詞:班會學生自治自治小學民主教育質的研究Class-meetingsStudent-governmentSelf-governingElementary-schoolDemocracy-educationQualitative-research
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:1479
  • 點閱點閱:21
     實施學生自治活動,讓學生直接體驗民主生活,是國小推動民主教育的 重要途徑。但是,教育人員對於應否賦予國小學生自治權,卻抱持著懷疑的態度。 本研究為能深入探討自治功能對國小班會活動的實際意義,以台東縣一所市郊的 小學,作為研究場地,並以該校兩個六年級的班級,作為研究分析的對象,進行 將近一年的實地觀察。 透過對兩個個案的觀察與分析,本研究有三項發現: 一、國小班會的學生自治功能 班會活動中屬於學生自治的部份有:選舉幹部及主席、聽取幹部報告、討論班級 事務、對學校提出建議,及決定班級事務等等。從這些結果可以知道,透過班會 活動,一般小學即可實施國小學生自治。 二、影響國小班會學生自治功能的主要因素 班會自治功能的強弱,與導師的觀念關係最為密切。導師過去就學期間的自治經 驗,則對他的指導方式和態度有很大的影響。 三、國小班會學生自治功能對學生的影響 在自治功能較強的班級,學生的溝通能力、參政意願及政治效能感都明顯較佳, 也有更多人支持民主制度。師生間情感的濃密,與學生執行自訂決策的負責態 度,更令人印象深刻。 這些發現可以消除一般人對學生自治的不信任感,進而肯定學生自治活動的重要 價值。
     According to general educational theories, "student government" is theimportant part of democracy education for the pupils of elementary school. Butin practice most educators don't support student government. Are studentgovernment feasible in general public elementary schools? What is theinfluence of student government on students? If the implement of studentgovernment is difficult, what are the problems? This study focuses on theclass meetings which is the main activity of student government, by observingtwo 6-th classes of a suburban elementary school in Taitung, attempts toexplore the questions above. From the analyses and comparison of the data collected from fieldresearch, the conclusions have been reached as follows: 1.In the class meetings, students can elect class officers and chairman,hear officers' reports, discuss class affairs, suggest school doing something,and decide class affairs. 2.How much power do class meetings have to govern class is decided bytutors' ideal chiefly. 3.In the class of class meetings have more political power, students havebetter communicate ability, higher interest in participating politics, and greatsense of political efficacy. .More students support democracy in that class.Besides, in that class, students are responsible for their decision, a-nd familiarwith their tutors. These fact can debate educators' discredit to student government, andidentify student government is very important for democracy education.
期刊論文
1.Stainback, S.、Staintbck, W.(1984)。Broadening the research perspective in special education。Exceptional Children,50(5),400-408。  new window
2.李建興(19910100)。校園民主法治教育的觀念與推展。臺灣教育,481,1-5。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃政傑(19940600)。民主教育與課程。教師天地,70,2-6。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉緬懷(19920900)。國民小學實施兒童自治活動之課程演進。初等教育學刊,1,97-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.簡毓玲、何春枝、莊志明(19911200)。落實民主法治教育於國民小學。教育研究月刊,22,12-13。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Borg, W. R.(1966)。Student Government and Citizenship。Education, The Elementary School Journal,67(3),154-160。  new window
7.Bumstead, R.(1978)。The Thaler System: A Slice-of-Life Curriculum。Phi-Delta-Kappan,59(10),659-664。  new window
8.Kohl, H.(1980)。Insight: Crime and Punishment。Teacher,97(4)。  new window
9.Shaheen, J.(1980)。Cottage Lane: A Student Government Program That。Works, Social-Education,44(5),387-390。  new window
研究報告
1.黃人傑(1993)。國民小學民主法治教育現況之研究。國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育學系。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黎育玲(1995)。國民小學全校性學生自治組織之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.曾守得(1989)。教育人種誌研究方法論。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.Brennan, Tom(1981)。Political Education and Democracy。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Dawson, Richard E.、Prewitt, Kenneth(1969)。Political socialization: An analytic study。Boston, MA:Little, Brown and Company。  new window
4.Guba, E. G.、Lincoln, Y. S.(1981)。Effective evaluation。San Francisco:Jossey Bass。  new window
5.林玉體(1986)。教育價值論。台北市:文景出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.歐用生(1992)。質的研究。臺北市:師大書苑有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Dewey, John(1966)。Democracy and Education。New York:The Free Press。  new window
8.Merriam, Sharan B.(1988)。Case study research in education: A qualitative approach。Jossey-Bass。  new window
9.朱台翔(1993)。森林日記。台北:書泉。  延伸查詢new window
10.教育部訓育委員會(1993)。教育部推動民主法治教育研討會實錄。  延伸查詢new window
11.劉緬懷、吳清山(1992)。台北市國小兒童自治活動調查研究。台北市政府研究考核發展委員會。  延伸查詢new window
12.Bjerstedt, A.(1974)。Student Democracy-Co-Planning at Different Educational Levels: Project Summary and Report Abstracts。Dept. of Educational and Psychological Research。  new window
13.Cole, P.(1978)。Implications of Cognitive-Developmental Theory for Law Related Curriculum in the Elementary School。American Bar Association Institute for Law and the Humanities。  new window
14.Entwistle, H.(1971)。Political Education in a Democracy。London:Roueledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
15.Froyen, L. A.(1993)。Classroom Management: The Reflective Teacherleader。Columbus:Merril。  new window
16.Hepburn, M. A.(1983)。Democratic Education in Schools and Classrooms。Washington, D.C:National Council for the Social Studies。  new window
17.Snitzer, Herb(1964)。Living at Summerhill。N. Y.:Macmillan。  new window
18.Nakagawa, M.(1991)。A Call for Cooperative Pluralism from Me to We。Olympia:Washington Office of the State Superintendent of Public Instruction。  new window
19.Snitzer, H.(1964)。Living at Summerhill School。New York:Macmillan。  new window
20.王文科(1993)。教育研究法。五南出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.黃瑞琴(1991)。質的教育研究方法。臺北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Wardle, F.(1978)。PACER Model: Education for Democracy [and] Meetings and Student Control(ED182016)。  new window
圖書論文
1.呂亞力(1986)。我國民主教育之發展與檢討。文化變遷與教育發展。嘉義縣:國立中正大學成人教育中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.程運(1984)。如何培養兒童及青少年民主法治的觀念與行為。教育理想與實踐。台北:臺灣書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Benne, K. D.(1987)。The Meanings of Democracy in a Collective World。Society as Educator in an Age of Transition。Chicago:University of Chicago。  new window
4.Stake, R. E.(1981)。Case Study Methodology: An Epistemological Advocacy。Case Study Methodology in Educational Evaluation。Minneapolis:Minnesota Research and Evaluation Center。  new window
5.黃中一(1989)。從政治社會化論加強民主教育的途徑。民主法治與教育。臺北:台灣書店。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE