:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:地方補助款制度化政策對國民教育財政影響之研究
書刊名:教育學刊
作者:陳麗珠 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Li-ju
出版日期:2002
卷期:19
頁次:頁91-119
主題關鍵詞:地方補助款制度化整批補助國民教育財政The systematization of local grants policyBlock grantSchool finance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:119
  • 點閱點閱:33
     民國九十年度起,行政院將中央對地方政府的補助政策做了大幅度的改變,包括將中央各部會原編列對地方之經常性支出補助與計畫型補助逐漸調整為一般補助,同時,所有的補助款都直接透列預算撥付地方,由縣市政府自主運用。計畫型的補助僅限訂具有整體性、示範性、跨越縣市及配合中央重大政策等計畫為限,並加強計畫之考核工作。這一套新的補助制度,通稱為「地方補助款制度化政策」。本研究採用焦點團體晤談法,對臺灣地區東部與南部地區七個縣市的國中小校長代表進行座談,以發現地方補助款制度化政策實施以來,對國民中小學教育經費的影響,並探討經費變化之後學校的因應之道。
     Since 2001, the central government has implemented a new policy called "the systematization of local grants policy". The features of this policy include: consolidating categorical aids of all purposes into a general grant, giving full discretion to local government in distribution general funds, and documenting local grants into local governments' annual budget. Categorical aids are approved only for those systemic, model setting, intra-county, and nationally interest projects. After this policy has been implemented for two years, this study examined its impact on school finance. In order to portrait the vivid pictures of school finance in the real situation, this study adopted the focus group interview method with k-9 school principals from seven counties. The panel interviews were centered on the related issues of the new local grants policy, and its impact on school finance. Conclusions were generated from the interviewing records, and suggestions for future policy-making were also made.
期刊論文
1.張秀蓮(20000900)。中央統籌分配稅款制度之探討。主計月報,537,39-49。  延伸查詢new window
2.李安明(1999)。臺灣地區國民教育資源分配之問題與改進建議。教育政策論壇,2(1),60-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.孫克難(20001200)。健全地方財政之全面思考。主計月報,540,11-17。  延伸查詢new window
4.林玉春(20001200)。中央對地方政府補助制度之檢討改進情形。主計月報,540,49-55。  延伸查詢new window
5.周雅容(19970400)。焦點團體法在調查研究上的應用。調查研究:方法與應用,3,51-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.張玉茹(19970800)。臺灣省各縣市國民中學教育資源分配公平性之研究。教育研究(高師),5,249-259。  延伸查詢new window
7.吳淑瓊(19920200)。焦點團體研究法。研考雙月刊,16(1)=167,44-50。  延伸查詢new window
8.李泰興(2000)。九十年度中央對各縣市一般性補助款之核算及分配情形。主計月報,538,71-79。  延伸查詢new window
9.林玉春(2000)。如何提升政府支出效率。主計月報,537,67-75。  延伸查詢new window
10.林全(2000)。九十年度中央政府總預算案編制重點與未來改革。主計月報,537,6-26。  延伸查詢new window
11.徐偉初(2000)。政府再造與租稅改革。主計月報,537,51-58。  延伸查詢new window
12.Hastings, A. H.(1982)。The block grant record: lessons from experience。Phi-Delphi-Kappan,63,330-332。  new window
13.Kearney, C. P.(1985)。Michigan's Experiences with the Federal Education Block Grant。Economics of Education Review,4(3),181-188。  new window
14.許添明(2000)。我國國教經費補助方式與需求本位補助公式。教育學刊,16,139-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.許璋瑤(2002)。政府財政改革應努力之方向-積極從事稅制改革;開闢財源;降低支出規模,期能於五至十年達財政平衡目標。主計月刊,556,9-13。  延伸查詢new window
16.Calder, B. J.(1977)。Focus Group and Nature of Qualitative Market Research。Journal of Market Research,14,353-364。  new window
17.Levin, H. M.(1985)。Are block grants the answer to the federal role in education?。Economics of Education Review,4(3),261-269。  new window
18.Melck, A.(1985)。On Subsidizing Education with Block Grants。Economics of Education Review,4(3),253-259。  new window
19.Vogel, M.(1982)。Education grant consolidation: its potential fiscal and distributive effects。Harvard Educational Review,52,169-188。  new window
20.Wedeman, S. C.、Passman, V. F.、Day, J. M.(1985)。Education Block Grants: Introduction to the Debate。Economics of Education Review,4(3),163-170。  new window
研究報告
1.陳麗珠(1998)。我國國民教育財政改革之研究。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張藝薰(2000)。地方政府補助制度之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.洪世仰(1996)。中央對臺灣省各縣市國民教育經費補助公式之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.歐素如、Stewart, David W.、Shamdasani, P. N.(1999)。焦點團體:理論與實務。臺北市:弘智文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Stewart, D. W.、Shamdasani, P. N.(1990)。Focus Groups: Theory and Practice。London:Sage Publications。  new window
3.陳麗珠(20000000)。美國教育財政改革。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.劉慶中、高敬文(1996)。國民小學日常決策流程及資源分配的研究-以高屏地區為例。國民小學日常決策流程及資源分配的研究-以高屏地區為例。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.Kyle, R. M. J.(1983)。Kaleidoscopes: Emerging Patterns of Response and Action in ECIA Case Studies of Chapter 2 in Selected States。Kaleidoscopes: Emerging Patterns of Response and Action in ECIA Case Studies of Chapter 2 in Selected States。沒有紀錄。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE