臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：一位國小六年級學童呼吸作用概念之個案研究
書刊名：屏東師院學報
作者：高慧蓮 引用關係／許茂聰／蘇明洲
作者(外文)：Kao, Huey-lien／Sheu, Mao-tsong／Su, Ming-chou
出版日期：2003
卷期：18(下)
頁次：頁533-569
主題關鍵詞：個案研究；概念；概念圖；國小學童；另有概念；呼吸作用；認知架構；Case study；Concept；Concept map；Students of elementary school；Alternative conceptions；Respiration；Cognitive framework
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:1473
  • 點閱點閱:20
本研究旨在探究一位學業成就中上程度的國小六年級學童對於動植物呼吸作用的另有概念。研究方法是利用進行開放式紙筆測驗、概念構圖、人體呼吸繪圖、綠色植物呼吸繪圖及晤談等方法建構出此位學童對於呼吸作用的認知架構圖。研究發現個案學童對於呼吸作用的定義、氣體的交換、呼吸運動、與光合作用的關係、呼吸的器官(部位)等呼吸作用的主題均具另有概念。個案學童的「呼吸作用」認知架構特色有:(1)溉動模式; (2)維生鄉; (3)人類至上模式; (4)吸入模式; (5)過濾模式; (6)意志力模式; (7)細孔模式。個案學童對於呼吸作用另有概念形成初步分析為:(1)以動物的特性來解釋植物的特性; (2)以「人」為中心來看週遭的環境; (3)以直覺的觀點來解釋呼吸的概念; (4)以自己生活經驗來解釋呼吸的概念; (5)受到日常生活語言的影響。枓研究亦根據研究結果對概念研究與學校科學的教學提出建議。
The purpose of this study was to explore one elementary school 6th grade student’s conceptions on respiration. The level of achievement of the subject was between average and top. The study conducted open paper-and-pencil tests, concept mapping, drawings of human body respiration, drawings of green plant respiration, and interviews to construct congnitive framework maps of the subject on respiration. The results of the study showed that the subject had many alternative conceptions regarding the following theme of respiration: the definition of respiration, gas exchange, respiratory excises, relationships with photosynthesis, and the organs of respiration. The characteristics of subject’s cognitive frameworks on respiration were: (1)activity model, (2)survival model, (3)humankind supremacy model, (4)inhalation model, (5)filtration model, (6)willpower model, and (7)fine hole model. The preliminary analysis of alternative conception formation were: (1)using characteristics of animals to explain characteristics of plants, (2)using humankind as a center to see environment, (3)using intuition to explain conceptions of respiration, (4)using living experiences to explain conceptions of respiration, (5)influencing by everyday living language. Based on above results, the study also propose recommendation for concept research and school science teaching.
期刊論文
1.Gilbert, J. K.、Osborne, R. J.、Fensham, P. J.(1982)。Children's Science and Its Consequences for Teaching。Science Education，66(4)，623-633。  new window
2.Stewart, James(1982)。Two aspects of meaningful problem solving in science。Science Education，66(5)，731-749。  new window
3.Treagust, D. F.(1986)。Evaluating students' misconceptions by means of diagnostic multiple choice items。Research in Science Education，16(1)，199-207。  new window
4.Canal, P.(1999)。Photosynthesis and "Inverse Respiration" in Plants: An Inevitable Misconception?。International Journal of Science Education，21(4)，363-372。  new window
5.Helm, H.(1980)。Misconceptions in physics amongst South African students。Physics Education，15(2)，92-105。  new window
6.Seymour, Jerry、Longden, Bernard(1991)。Respiration--That's Breathing Isn't It?。Journal of Biological Education，25(3)，177-183。  new window
7.Westbrook, S. L.、Marek, E. A.(1992)。A Cross-Age Study of Student Understanding of the Concept of Homeostasis。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，29(1)，51-61。  new window
8.莊嘉坤(19950300)。認知研究在科學教育的省思。屏師科學教育，1，25-29。  延伸查詢new window
9.Tsai, Chin-Chung(2000)。Enhancing science instruction: the use of "conflict maps"。International Journal of Science Education，22(3)，285-302。  new window
10.Tirosh, D.、Stavy, R.、Cohen, S.(1998)。Cognitive conflict and intuitive rules。International Journal of Science Education，20(10)，1257-1269。  new window
11.Tirosh, D.、Stavy, R.(1999)。Intuitive rules: a way to explain and predict students' reasoning。Educational Studies in Mathematics，38(1)，51-66。  new window
12.Rice, P.(1991)。Concepts of health and illness in Thai children。International Journal of Science Education，13(1)，115-127。  new window
13.Osbrone, R. J.、Bell, B. F.、Gilbert, J. K.(1983)。Science teaching and children's views of the word。European Journal of Science Education，5(1)，1-14。  new window
14.Gilbert, J. K.、Watts, M.(1983)。Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conception: Changing perspectives in science education。Studies in Science Education，10，61-98。  new window
15.Forisha, B. D.(1975)。Mental imagery verbal processes: a developmental study。Developmental Psychology，11，259-267。  new window
16.Eisen, Y.、Stavy, R.(1992)。Material cycles in nature: a new approach to teaching photosynthesis in junior high school。American Biology Teacher，54(6)，339-342。  new window
17.Tsai, C. C.(1999)。Content analysis of Taiwanese 14 year olds' information processing operations shown in cognitive structures following physics instruction, with relations to science attainment and scientific epistemological beliefs。Research in Science & Technological Education，17(2)，125-138。  new window
18.Tsai, C. C.(1998)。An analysis of Taiwanese eighth graders' science achievement, scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structure outcomes after learning basic atomic theory。International Journal of Science Education，20，413-425。  new window
19.Tirosh, D.、Stavy, R.(1996)。Intuitive rules in science and mathematics: the case of 'everything can be divided by two。International Journal of Science Education，18(6)，669-683。  new window
20.Stavy, R.、Tirosh, D.(1996)。Intuitive rules in science and mathematics: the case of 'more of A-more of B'。International Journal of Science Education，18(6)，653-667。  new window
21.Gilbert, J. K.、Swift, D. J.(1985)。Towards a Lakatosian analysis of the Piagetian and alternative conceptions research programs。Science Education，69(5)，681-696。  new window
22.許健將、郭重吉、李成康(19920400)。利用二段式測驗探查高三學生有關共價鍵及分子結構之迷思概念。科學教育，3，175-197。  延伸查詢new window
23.Duncan, I. M.、Johnstone, A. H.(1973)。The mole concept。Education in Chemistry，10(6)，213-214。  new window
24.黃台珠(19840100)。概念的研究及其意義。科學教育，66，44-56。  延伸查詢new window
25.郭重吉(19900600)。學生科學知識認知結構的評估與描述。彰化師範大學學報，1，279-320。  延伸查詢new window
26.Abimbola, I. O.(1988)。The Problem of Terminology in the Study of Student Conceptions in Science。Science Education，72(2)，175-184。  new window
27.郭重吉(19920500)。從建構主義的觀點探討中小學數理教學的改進。科學發展月刊，20(5)，548-570。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Cobern, W. W.(1989)。World View Theory and Science Education Research: Fundamental Epistemological Structure as a Critical Factor in Science Learning and Attitude Development。The 62nd Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching，(會議日期: 1989/03/30-04/01)。San Francisco, CA。  new window
2.熊召弟(1996)。學童的生物觀--植物篇。八十四學年度師範學院教育學術論文發表會，國立屏東師範學院 (編) 。屏東市：國立屏東師範學院。61-68。  延伸查詢new window
3.Soyibo, K.(1983)。Selected science misconceptions amongst some Nigerian school certificate students。The International Seminar on Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics，443-445。  new window
研究報告
1.王龍錫(1992)。國小學童光與視覺之概念發展研究 (計畫編號：NSC 81-0111-S153-001-N)。臺北市：行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Catherall, R. W.(1981)。Children's beliefs about the human circulatory system: an aid for teachers regarding the role intuitive beliefs play in the development of formal concepts in 7-14 years olds。Vancouver, B.C.。  new window
3.張惠博(2002)。科學概念學習研究--物理科協調計劃 (計畫編號：NSC90-2511-S-018-038)。臺北：行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.耿正屏、陳瑞鴻、林素華、蔡顯(1991)。我國國中學生生物概念的發展：生物體內物質的運輸。臺北：行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳啟明(1991)。發展紙筆測驗以探究高一學生對直流電路的迷思概念(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.王雪紛(1996)。國小高年級學生光合作用學習困難之探究(碩士論文)。國立台南師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.裘維鈺(1995)。國小學童植物概念及其相關迷思概念之探究(碩士論文)。國立台中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.許健將(1991)。利用二段式測驗探查高三學生有關共價鍵及分子結構之迷思概念(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳麗娟(2002)。國小五年級學童光合作用迷思概念之探討(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Novak, Joseph D.(1977)。A theory of education。Cornell University Press。  new window
2.Novak, J. D.、Gowin, D. B.(1989)。Learning how to learn。Cornell University。  new window
3.Linn, M.(1986)。Cognition and Instruction。New York：Academic press, Inc.。  new window
4.Klausmeier, H. J.、Frayer, D. A.、Ghatala, E. S.(1974)。Conceptual Learning and Development: A Cognitive View。New York。  new window
5.White, Richard Thomas、Gunstone, Richard F.(1992)。Probing Understanding。Falmer Press。  new window
6.王美芬、熊召弟(1995)。國民小學自然科教材教法。臺北：心理。  延伸查詢new window
7.王文科(1999)。教育研究法。臺北市：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.王國華(1995)。自然科概念改變教學策略之探討（八十三學年度台灣中區國民中學數理學科「概念改變教學策略」研習會），國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.樊雪春、陳慧娟(1996)。自然科學的教與學。有效的學習方法。台北市：教育部訓育委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Edmondson, K. M.(1999)。Assessing Science understanding through Concept Maps。Assessing Science Understanding: A Human Constructivist View。San Diego, California：Academic Press。  new window
3.Treagust, D. F.(1995)。Diagnostic assessment of students' science knowledge。Learning science in the schools: research reforming practice。Mahwah, New Jersey：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
4.Novak, J. D.、Mintzes, J. J.、Wandersee, J. H.(2000)。Learning, Teaching, and Assessment: A Human Constructivist Perspective。Assessing Science Understanding A Human Constructivist。San Diego, California：Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：409（臺灣：408，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2096089 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67892459
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上