The purpose of this study was to develop three different student rating questionnaires for evaluating the instructions of courses offered by the General Education Center of Tzu Chi University (i.e., general courses, art courses and physical education courses) ,and to examine their reliability and validity. Based on relative instruction evaluation theories, and the results of analyzing 62 other universities' student rating questionnaires, this researcher developed these questionnaires, each of which consists of 15 close-ended items and four open-ended questions. The 15 close-ended items can be divided into five dimensions: instruction –design and preparation; teaching method; teaching attitude; achievement evaluation; and overall instruction evaluation. The old student rating instruction questionnaire, with 29 close-ended items, was used as a criterion to examine the concurrent validity of the three new ones; the correlations were 0.86,0.76, and 0.58, respectively, which were all significantly correlated at p<0.01. The results of factor analysis indicated the whole explained variances for the three questionnaires were 83%, 82%, and 85%, respectively. The internal consistency αcoefficients for the three questionnaires were all above 0.90 and for the five dimensions, also above 0.80 for the three questionnaires. The test-retest reliabilities were 0.677, 0.803, and 0.921, respectively. Based on the above results, the three questionnaires have good validity and reliability.