本研究旨在探討2008 北京奧運跆拳道亞洲區資格賽男子第一量級的伊朗 Behzad Khodadad Kanjobeh 選手，在比賽技術表現的慣性與特性，提供2008 年北 京奧運中華隊男子第一量級朱木炎選手及教練團，作為主要假想對手針對性模擬訓 練與教練在比賽指導與策略研擬的參考。本研究利用錄影系統觀察之事件記錄法， 針對攻擊型態的時機與作用腳，攻擊方式與部位，及攻擊步法與技術，其所獲攻擊 次數與得分數，以次數百分比與描述統計進行量化分析後，所獲結論為：一、攻擊 慣性表現：(1)各回合間表現：第一回合被動攻擊高於主動攻擊、第二回合、第三 回合主動攻擊高於被動攻擊；第一回合時Behzad Khodadad Kanjobeh 選手以觀察對 手為主，故採取被動攻擊因應對手來襲。待中場休息時，利用1 分鐘時間與教練進 行戰術模擬，故第二、三回合，採以積極主動攻擊模式。(2)各類攻擊型態表現： 攻擊技術動作全賴以旋踢為主軸，係屬主動攻擊型態的選手，攻擊腳以右後腳為主 體。(3)攻擊方式與部位的表現：攻擊方式以原地單擊正面中端為主。(4)主動右前 腳與被動右前腳攻擊率0%，故無須考慮主被動右前腳之攻擊。二、得分能力以旋 踢為主之被動右後腳為主，並採單一原地正面中端的攻擊方式取得分數。

The main purpose of this study was to analyze the attack type and technique of men’s under 58kg Iran contestant- Behzad Khodadad Kanjobeh-in Asian Qualification Tournament for 2008 Beijing Olympic Games. We’ve investigated comprehensively on this main imaginary contestant’s habits and characteristics of the attack technique performance and hope this could provide useful information for coaches to help Taiwan’s athlete- Zhu, Mu-Yan - win in the future games. The analysis method of this study was the video observational system aimed at recording and analyzing the attack pattern and attack feet, the attack mode and scoring area, the attack step and technique, and the attack figure and the points. It attained all data to carry on the quantified analysis by the attacking rate and the descriptive statistic. The conclusions were: 1.Attacking habits: (1) performances in three rounds: Passive attacks were higher than the active ones in the first. The active attacks were higher than the passive attacks in the second and third. Behzad Khodadad Kanjobeh observed the adversary in the first round, and then he used passive attacks when the adversary had raided. During each one-minute rest period between rounds, he carried on the tactical simulation with his coach. And he took action to attack actively in the second and third round. (2) Performance of each attacking pattern: Attacking technology depended on flying kick mainly. He was an active attacking pattern contestant and the main attacking foot was right rear foot. (3) Attacking mode and scoring area: The main attacking mode was the single kick at the same place on Mid-section of the frontal trunk. (4) The attacking rates of active and passive right front foot were 0% both; therefore, we didn’t need to consider active or passive right front foot attacks in games. 2. The main scoring attack were flying kick of passive right rear foot and single kick at the same place on Mid-section of the frontal trunk.