:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:結合概念構圖與註記分享線上摘要之寫作學習環境之研究
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:劉遠楨 引用關係黃思華王聖仁
作者(外文):Liu, Yuan-chenHuang, Tzu-huaWang, Sheng-ren
出版日期:2008
卷期:11:3
頁次:頁155-180
主題關鍵詞:概念構圖註記摘要寫作合作學習Concept mapNoteSummary writingCollaborative learning
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:263
  • 點閱點閱:172
本研究建置了概念構圖與註記分享之線上摘要寫作學習環境,以概念構圖做為學習者掌握重點及熟習內容的鷹架,當學習者於構圖中發生困難時,系統會導入同儕合作分享註記,協助完成概念構圖,最後以此概念構圖為架構,進行摘要寫作。本研究以國小五年級學童為對象進行實驗,研究發現,經由對概念構圖的改錯及加入註記的機制,顯著優於僅是閱讀文章後撰寫摘要的受試者;透過對概念圖的改錯,受試者在閱讀理解測驗的得分上,顯著優於自由閱讀文章的受試者;受試者經由具註記機制的改錯式概念構圖,在閱讀理解測驗的得分上,顯著優於自由閱讀文章的受試者。總結而言,本研究針對電腦支援摘要寫作,提供了一種方向的思考與實現。
This study integrated concept map and note sharing for an online summary writing learning environment. The concept map was used as a scaffold for learners to grasp key points and become familiar with the content. When learners encountered difficulties in the mapping, the system would "lead-in" collaborative learning and note sharing to assist learners in completing the concept map. Finally, the completed concept map was employed as the writing framework for summary writing. The subjects of the study were fifth graders. Significant performance differences in summary writing were obtained between the subjects who went through concept map corrections and the subjects who only read the article. Significant differences were also found between the subjects who went through concept map corrections with note mechanisms and the subjects who only read the article. Furthermore, a significant difference in the mean score of the reading comprehension tests was also obtained between those who went through concept map correction and those who only read the article. Similarly, there was also a significant difference in the mean score of the reading comprehension test between the subjects who went through concept map corrections with note mechanisms and the subjects who read the article freely. In conclusion, the present study provided a way of thinking and practicing for computer-based summary writing.
期刊論文
1.羅家駿、曹忠學、葉修文(20050600)。電子文件之線上註記系統發展與閱讀教學應用。中原學報,33(2),193-214。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ruddell, R. B.、Boyle, O. F.(1989)。A study of cognitive mapping as a means to improve comprehension of expository text。Reading Research and Instruction,29(1),12-22。  new window
3.陳密桃(1992)。從認知心裡學的觀點談閱讀理解。教育文粹,21,10-19。  延伸查詢new window
4.Wolfe, J.(2002)。Annotation Technologies: A Software and Research Review。Computers and Composition,19(4),471-497。  new window
5.Hidi, S.、Anderson, V.(1986)。Producing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction。Review of Educational Research,56(4),473-542。  new window
6.Brown, A. L.、Day, J. D.、Jones, R. S.(1983)。The development of plans for summarizing texts。Child Development,54(4),968-979。  new window
7.吳政達、郭昭佑(19971200)。概念構圖法在國民小學教科書評鑑標準建構之應用。教育與心理研究,20(下),217-242。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Stavy, R.、Eisen, Y.、Yaakobi, D.(1987)。How students aged 13-15 understand photosynthesis。International Journal of Science Education,9(1),105-115。  new window
9.Alaiyemola, E. F.、Jegede, O. J.、Okebukola, P. A. O.(1990)。The effect of a metacognitive strategy of instruction on anxiety level of students in science classes。International Journal of Science Education,12(1),95-99。  new window
10.Pankratius, W. J.(1990)。Building an organized knowledge base: Concept mapping and achievement in secondary school physics。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,27(4),315-333。  new window
11.Mayer, R. E.(1996)。Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive procession in knowledge construction。Educational Psychology Review,8(4),357-371。  new window
12.Ovsiannikov, I. A.、Arbib, M. A.、McNeill, T. H.(1999)。Annotation Technology。International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,50,329-362。  new window
13.吳裕聖、曾玉村(20030300)。概念構圖教學策略對小五學生科學文章理解及概念構圖能力之影響。教育研究集刊,49(1),135-169。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Dole, Janice A.、Duffy, Gerald G.、Roehler, Laura R.、Pearson, P. David(1991)。Moving from the Old to the New: Research on Reading Comprehension Instruction。Review of Educational Research,61(2),239-264。  new window
15.Starr, M. L.、Krajcik, J. S.(1990)。Concept maps as a heuristic for science curriculum development: Toward improvement in process and product。Journal of research in science teaching,27(10),987-1000。  new window
16.Novak, Joseph D.、Musonda, D.(1991)。A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning。American Educational Research Journal,28(1),117-153。  new window
17.邱垂昌(20061200)。應用概念構圖學習策略於商業會計學之研究--合作學習抑或個別學習。高雄師大學報. 教育與社會科學類,21,87-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Garner, R.(1982)。Efficient text summarization: Costs and benefits。Journal of Educational Research,75(5),275-279。  new window
19.顏若映(19920800)。教科書內容設計與閱讀理解之認知研究。教育與心理研究,15,101-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Sweller, John、van Merrienboer, Jeroen J. G.、Paas, Fred G. W. C.(1998)。Cognitive architecture and instructional design。Educational Psychology Review,10(3),251-296。  new window
21.王肇邦、許有真(20040900)。應用概念圖於網路教學系統之學習成效診斷。教學科技與媒體,69,4-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Winoagad, P. N.、Winograd, P. N.(1984)。Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts。Reading Research Quarterly,19,404-425。  new window
23.Kiryakov, A.(2005)。Semantic Annotation, Indexing, and Retrieval。Journal of Web Semantics,2,26-41。  new window
24.Johnson, N.(1983)。What Do You Do If You Can't Tell the Whole Story? The Development of Summarization Skills。Children's Language,4,315-383。  new window
25.Kintsch, E.、Steinhart, D.、Stahl, G.、LSA Research Group、Matthews, C.、Lamb, R.(2000)。Developing Summarization Skills through the Use of LSA-based Feedback。Interactive Learning Environments,8,87-109。  new window
26.Rau, P.-L. P.、Chen, S.-H.、Chin, Y.-T.(2004)。Developing Web Annotation Tools for Learners and Instructors。Interacting with Computers,16,163-181。  new window
27.Chalmer, A. P.(2003)。The Role of Cognitive Theory in Human-computer Interface。Computers in Human Behavior,19,593-607。  new window
28.Taylor, K. K.(1983)。Can College Students Summarize?。Journal of Reading,26,524-528。  new window
29.Joanna, K.、Crosier, S. C.、John, R. W.(2002)。Key Lessons for the Design and Integration of Virtual Environments in Secondary Science。Computers & Education,38,77-94。  new window
30.Friend, R.(2000)。Teaching Summarization as a Content Area Reading Strategy。Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy,44,320-329。  new window
31.Anderson, V.、Hidi, S.(1988)。Teaching Students to Summaries。Educational Leadership,46,26-28。  new window
32.饒培倫、陳守賢、秦韻婷、劉光記(2001)。為國小學童開發線上文本註記平臺。教學科技與媒體,56,73-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.Glover, I.、Hardaker, G.、Xu, Z.(2004)。Collaborative Annotation System Environment (CASE) for Online Learning。Campus-wide Information System,21(2),72-80。  new window
34.Novak, J. D.(1984)。Application of Advances Learning Theory and Philosophy of Science to the Improvement of Chemistry Teaching。The Journal of Education,61(7),607-612。  new window
35.Gallego, M.、Hollingsworth, S.(1992)。Multiple Literacies: Teachers' Evolving Perceptions。Language Arts,69(3),206-213。  new window
會議論文
1.Sweany, N. D.、McManus, T. F.、Williams, D. C.、Tothero, K. D.(1996)。The Use of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies in a Hypermedia Environment。0。  new window
2.O'Hara, K.、Sellen, A.(1997)。A Comparison of Reading Paper and On-line Document。The ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems,(會議日期: March 22-27, 1997)。Atlanta, GA:ACM Press。335-342。  new window
研究報告
1.Quade, A. M.(1996)。An Assessment of Retention and Depth of Processing Associated with Note-taking Using Traditional Paper and Pencil and On-line Notepad during Computer-delivered Instruction。0。  new window
圖書
1.余民寧(19970000)。有意義的學習:概念構圖之研究。臺北:商鼎文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王文科(19910000)。認知發展理論與教育:皮亞傑理論的應用。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Novak, Joseph D.、Gowin, D. Bob(1984)。Learning How to Learn。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Binmore, K.、Osborne, M. J.、Rubinstein, A.(1992)。Noncooperative Models of Bargaining。Noncooperative Models of Bargaining。New York, NY。  new window
圖書論文
1.Duke, N. K.、Pearson, P. D.(2002)。Effective Practices for Developing Reading Comprehension。What research has to say about reading instruction。International Reading Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE