:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:決定臺灣私人教導支出的影響因素--父母時間與金錢投入關係
書刊名:經濟論文
作者:莊奕琦 引用關係陳晏羚
作者(外文):Chuang, Yih-chyiChen, Yeng-ling
出版日期:2012
卷期:40:2
頁次:頁237-268
主題關鍵詞:人力資本私人教導工具變數邊際效果Human capitalPrivate tutoringInstrumental variableMarginal effect
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:385
  • 點閱點閱:122
本文採用「華人家庭動態資料庫」實證檢測各種家庭因素對於子女私人教導支出的影響, 並探討私人教導金錢支出與親力親為的身教究竟為相輔相成, 抑或以金錢取代時間的替代關係。實證結果發現家長教育成就與所處世代、在都市居住、或在公部門工作將顯著影響對子女的私人教導支出; 同時發現父母花費私人教導支出與投入教導時間兩者間呈互補而非替代關係。考慮投入教導時間的內生性並採工具變數法估計後, 平均而言每週多增加一小時的親自私人教導, 一年將增加私人教導支出約 5,400 元。
Using Taiwan’s data from the Panel Study of Family Dynamics (PSFD), this paper empirically tests a variety of family factors on children’s private tutoring expenditure, and further explores the relationship between private tutoring spending and parents’ hands-on tutoring. Empirical results show that parents’ educational achievements, parents’ cohort, and living in the city or working in the public sector will significantly affect their spending on children’s private tutoring; we also found that private tutoring spending and parents’ hands-on tutoring are complements rather than substitutes. Considering the possible endogeneity property of private tutoring spending, we use the instrumental variables method for estimation, and the results show that on average a one hour per week increase in parents’ hands-on tutoring will increase private tutoring spending by about NT$5,400.
期刊論文
1.林大森、陳憶芬(20061200)。臺灣高中生參加補習之效益分析。教育研究集刊,52(4),35-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Becker, Gary S.、Nigel, Tomes(1986)。Human Capital and the Rise and Fall of Families。Journal of Labor Economics,4(3, Part2),S1-S39。  new window
3.Staiger, Douglas、Stock, James H.(1997)。Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments。Econometrica,65(3),557-586。  new window
4.Heckman, J. J.(2000)。Policies to Foster Human Capital。Research in Economics,54(1),3-56。  new window
5.劉正(20061200)。補習在臺灣的變遷、效能與階層化。教育研究集刊,52(4),1-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.駱明慶(20010600)。教育成就的省籍與性別差異。經濟論文叢刊,29(2),117-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.孫清山、黃毅志(19960300)。補習教育、文化資本與教育取得。臺灣社會學刊,19,95-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.陳婉琪(20051200)。族群、性別與階級:再探教育成就的省籍差異。臺灣社會學,10,1-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.吳乃德(19971200)。檳榔和拖鞋,西裝及皮鞋:臺灣階級流動的族群差異及原因。臺灣社會學研究,1,137-167。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Chiang, F.-S.(2006)。國中學生課業補習效果之探討。台北市立教育大學學報,37(1),131-148。  延伸查詢new window
11.Chuang, Y.-C.、Lai, W.-W.(2008)。影響教育成就的因素及九年國民義務教育政策效果評析台灣實證。人文及社會科學集刊,20(1),25-65。  延伸查詢new window
12.Jane, C.-Y.(1995)。正視學前教育的地位--學前教育問題初診。教改通訊,5,7-10。  延伸查詢new window
13.Bray, M.、Kwok, P.(2003)。Demand for Private Supplementary Tutoring: Conceptual Considerations, and Socio-Economic Patterns in Hong Kong。Economics of Education Review,22,611-620。  new window
14.Brown, P.(2002)。Parental Investment in Children’s Human Capital in Rural China。China Education Forum,3(1),6-10。  new window
15.Heckman, J. J.、Masterov, D. V.(2007)。The Productivity Argument for Investing in Young Children。Review of Agricultural Economics,29(3),446-493。  new window
16.Dang, H.-A.(2006)。The Determinants and Impacts of Private Tutoring Classes in Vietnam。Economics of Education Review,26,684-699。  new window
17.Iwata, S.(2001)。Recentered and Rescaled Instrumental Variable Estimation of Tobit and Probit Models with Errors in Variables。Econometric Review,20(3),319-335。  new window
18.Kim, J.-H.(2007)。The Determinants of Demand for Private Tutoring in South Korea。NCSPE Research Publications,143。  new window
19.Knudsen, E. I.、Heckman, J. J.、Cameron, J. L.、Shonkoff, J. P.(2006)。Economic, Neurobiological, and Behavioral Perspectives on Building America’s Future Workforce。Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,103,10155–10162。  new window
20.Tansel, A.、Bircan, F.(2006)。Demand for Education in Turkey: A Tobit Analysis of Private Tutoring Expenditures。Economics of Education Review,25,303-313。  new window
研究報告
1.Dang, H.-A.、Rogers, F. H.(2008)。How to Interpret the Growing Phenomenon of Private Tutoring: Human Capital Deepening, Inequality Increasing, or Waste of Resources?。  new window
2.Kim, T.(2005)。Shadow Education: School Quality and Demand for Private Tutoring in Korea。  new window
3.Lee, K. H.、Jung, J. H.(2009)。Child-Care Services and Private Tutoring: A Substitute for Mother’s Time or Complement?。  new window
學位論文
1.陳怡靖(2004)。臺灣地區高中多元入學與教育階層化關連性之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.謝亞恆(2004)。族群、家庭背景與國中學業成就之研究(碩士論文)。南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃凡(198407)。慈悲的滋味。台北:聯經文化事業出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Schultz, T. W.(1963)。The economic value of education。Columbia University Press。  new window
3.Becker, Gary Stanley(1993)。Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.Schultz, Theodore William(1971)。Investment in Human Capital: The Role of Education and of Research。Free Press。  new window
5.Baum, C. F.、Wiggins, V.、Stillman, S.、Schaffer, M. E.(1999)。OVERID: Stata Module to Calculate Tests of Overidentifying Restrictions after ivreg, ivreg2, ivreg29, ivprobit, ivtobit, reg3。Statistical Software Components。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE