:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:家庭危險因子對少年之學業成就、偏差行為與憂鬱情緒發展的影響:累積危險指數模型的探討
書刊名:臺大社會工作學刊
作者:陳杏容 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Hsing-jung
出版日期:2016
卷期:34
頁次:頁41-83
主題關鍵詞:性別差異家庭壓力發展結果Gender differenceFamily stressDevelopment outcome
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:315
  • 點閱點閱:26
本研究旨在透過累積危險指數模型探討家庭風險因子與少年學業成就、偏差行為與憂鬱情緒發展的關聯,並進一步探討性別在其中扮演的角色。運用「台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫」之七年級與九年級學生及其家長資料進行分析。分析結果支持線性關係,憂鬱情緒部分女生比男生嚴重,偏差行為則男生多於女生。當家庭危險因子數目增加時,女生比男生在學業上受到的影響較小,但在憂鬱情緒上更脆弱。建議服務來自多元危險因子家庭的少年時,從能改善之處著手,盡量降低危險因子的數目,強化少年的壓力因應能力,依據性別差異提供適切服務,並提供多元支持與預防性家庭服務方案。
AIM: the aim of this study was to examine the association between cumulative family risks and youth developmental outcomes in relation to academic performance, delinquency and depression. In addition, this study tested the moderating effect of gender by using data from an ongoing nationally representative Taiwanese youth sample. METHODS: The data for this study were drawn from the Taiwan Education Panel Survey. The present research used the data when students were in the 7th and 9th grades. Stata 13.0 was used for data analyses. RESULTS: The findings support a linear model indicating that those students who experience more family risks are more likely to develop negative outcomes. Moreover, girls have higher levels of depressive symptoms than boys do, while boys have higher levels of delinquency than girls do. The effect of cumulative risk on academic performance is lower among girls, in comparison to boys. CONCLUSION: The findings confirm the accuracy of the linear cumulative risk model, highlight the influence of cumulative risk on youths’ de pression, academic and behavior outcomes, and suggest potential gender-based differences, particularly in regard to academic performance. The findings suggest the need for comprehensive family prevention programs as well as stress-coping training for youths in order to reduce the influence of family risks. Secondary prevention requires professionals to assess the family systems and be aware of how the problems facing boys and girls differ, in order to provide needed services as early as is feasible.
期刊論文
1.曾敏傑、林佩瑤(20051200)。我國青少年勞工的失業風險與變遷。東吳社會工作學報,13,1-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.何美瑤(20060100)。從家庭因素探究原住民父母教育觀及學業成就之研究。學校行政,41,199-214。  延伸查詢new window
3.Burchinal, M. R.、Roberts, J. E.、Hooper, S.、Zeisel, S. A.(2000)。Cumulative risk and early cognitive development: A comparison of statistical risk models。Developmental Psychology,36(6),793-807。  new window
4.Forehand, R.、Biggar, H.、Kotchick, B. A.(1998)。Cumulative risk across family stressors: Short- and long-term effects for adolescents。Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,26(2),119-128。  new window
5.Jones, D. J.、Forehand, R.、Brody, G.、Armisted, L.(2002)。Psychosocial adjustment of African American children in single-mother families: A test of three risk models。Journal of Marriage and Family,64(1),105-115。  new window
6.李佩嬛、黃毅志(20110300)。原漢族群、家庭背景與高中職入學考試基測成績、教育分流:以臺東縣為例。教育科學研究期刊,56(1),193-226。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.郭祐誠、陶宏麟(20130900)。高中職多元入學管道選擇與家庭背景及學習表現之關係--兼論多元入學的公平與效率。人文及社會科學集刊,25(3),421-456。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.張純純、陳月枝(20120300)。探討學齡期兒童面對母親罹癌之經驗過程。護理暨健康照護研究,8(1),34-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.吳明隆、林慶信(20041200)。原漢學童學習行為與學業成就之族群、性格因素的比較研究。高雄師大學報.教育與社會科學類,17,37-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.李文傑(20121000)。偏差友伴與偏差行為:友伴的影響效果確實存在嗎?。調查研究,28,119-160。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.王齡竟、陳毓文(20100300)。家庭衝突、社會支持與青少年憂鬱情緒:檢視同儕、專業與家外成人支持的緩衝作用。中華心理衛生學刊,23(1),65-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳毓文(20041200)。少年憂鬱情緒的危險與保護因子之相關性研究。中華心理衛生學刊,17(4),67-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.林俊瑩、吳裕益(20071200)。家庭因素、學校因素對學生學業成就的影響--階層線性模式的分析。教育研究集刊,53(4),107-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.魏琦芳、黃毅志(20110300)。學業成就與心理健康因果順序的貫時性分析:以TEPS資料做分析。中華心理衛生學刊,24(1),97-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.陳婉琪(20140600)。都是為了孩子?父母離婚負面影響之重新評估。臺灣社會學刊,54,31-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Appleyard, K.、Egeland, B.、van Dulmen, M. H. M.、Sroufe, L. A.(2005)。When more is not better: The role of cumulative risk in child behavior outcomes。Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,46(3),235-245。  new window
17.Atzaba-Poria, N.、Pike, A.、Deater-Deckard, K.(2004)。Do risk factors for problem behavior act in a cumulative manner? An examination of ethnic minority and majority children through an ecological perspective。Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,45(4),707-718。  new window
18.Buchmann, C.、DiPrete, T. A.(2006)。The growing female advantage in college completion: The role of family background and academic achievement。American Sociological Review,71(4),515-541。  new window
19.Chen, H.-J.、Kovacs, P.(2013)。Risk and protective mechanisms for children of a parent with depression: A resilience perspective。Families in Society,94(2),29-35。  new window
20.Cui, M.、Conger, R. D.、Lorenz, F. O.(2005)。Predicting change in adolescent adjustment from change in marital problems。Developmental Psychology,41(5),812-823。  new window
21.Chen, H.-J.(2013)。Robust protective factors for Africa American youths who have a parent with depression。Social Work Research,37(2),121-134。  new window
22.Brković, I.、Keresteš, G.、Puklek Levpušček, M.(2013)。Trajectories of change and relationship between parent-adolescent school-related conflict and academic achievement in early adolescence。Journal of Early Adolescence,34(6),792-815。  new window
23.Duckworth, Angela L.、Seligman, Martin E. P.(2006)。Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores。Journal of Educational Psychology,98(1),198-208。  new window
24.Evans, G. W.、Kim, P.(2010)。Multiple risk exposure as a potential explanatory mechanism for the socioeconomic status-health gradient。Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,1186,174-189。  new window
25.Evans, G. W.、Li, D. P.、Whipple, S. S.(2013)。Cumulative risk and child development。Psychological Bulletin,139(6),1342-1396。  new window
26.Gerard, J.、Buehler, C.(2004)。Cumulative environmental risk and youth problem behavior。Journal of Marriage and Family,66(3),702-720。  new window
27.Lee, R. M.、Jung, K. R.、Su, J. C.、Tran, A. G. T. T.、Bahrassa, N. F.(2009)。The family life and adjustment of Hmong American sons and daughters。Sex Roles,60(7/8),549-558。  new window
28.Kenney-Benson, G. A.、Pomerantz, E. M.、Ryan, A. M.、Patrick, H.(2006)。Sex differences in math performance: The role of children's approach to schoolwork。Developmental Psychology,42(1),11-26。  new window
29.Kirk, C. M.、Lewis, R. K.、Brown, K.、Nilsen, C.、Colvin, D. Q.(2012)。The gender gap in educational expectations among youth in the foster care system。Children & Youth Services Review,34,1683-1688。  new window
30.Gassman-Pines, A.、Yoshikawa, H.(2006)。The effects of antipoverty programs on children's cumulative level of poverty-related risk。Developmental Psychology,42(6),981-999。  new window
31.Lanza, S. T.、Rhoades, B. L.、Nix, R. L.、Greenberg, M. T.(2010)。Modeling the interplay of multilevel risk factors for future academic and behavior problems: A person-centered approach。Development and Psychopathology,22(2),313-335。  new window
32.MacKenzie, M. J.、Kotch, J. B.、Lee, L.-C.(2011)。Toward a cumulative ecological risk model for the etiology of child maltreatment。Children and Youth Services Review,33(9),1638-1647。  new window
33.Thomas, L.、Kalucy, R.(2003)。Parents with mental illness: Lacking motivation to parent。Internal Journal of Mental Health Nursing,12(2),153-157。  new window
34.Werner, E. E.(2005)。Resilience and recovery: Findings from the Kauai longitudinal study。Focal Point: Research, Policy, and Practice in Children's Mental Health,19(1),11-14。  new window
35.施教裕、宋麗玉(20060600)。「高風險家庭關懷輔導處遇實施計畫」執行狀況初探。社區發展季刊,114,103-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.郭登聰(20060600)。從高風險家庭關懷輔導處遇實施計畫探討我國家庭政策的問題與對策。社區發展季刊,114,86-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.陳思帆、張高賓(20130600)。國中生知覺家庭功能、社會支持與憂鬱傾向之相關研究。家庭教育與諮商學刊,14,83-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.黃昱得(20140900)。青少年憂鬱情緒與多元風險因子:個別效果與累積效果的驗證。中華心理衛生學刊,27(3),327-355。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.黃曉瑜、吳肖琪、陳李綢(20080600)。高中職學生憂鬱情緒與父母失業及其他相關因素之探討。長庚科技學刊,8,97-114。  延伸查詢new window
40.薛承泰(20000500)。臺灣地區單親戶之貧窮:以1998年為例。臺大社會工作學刊,2,151+153-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.楊孟麗(20050600)。教育成就的價值與青少年的心理健康。中華心理衛生學刊,18(2),75-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.鄭麗珍(20011200)。家庭結構與青少年的生活適應之研究--以臺北市為例。臺大社會工作學刊,5,197+199-270。new window  延伸查詢new window
43.何明晃(20060900)。非行少年之人格特質、父母管教態度與其逃家行為之相關研究。社區發展季刊,115,347-362。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.陳圭如(20061200)。大學生成長於酗酒家庭經驗之初探:數量、個人特質及世代傳遞。東吳社會工作學報,15,37-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.宋麗玉、施教裕、王孟愉、林冠馨(2006)。高風險家庭服務策略與處遇模式之研究成果報告。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.張苙雲(2013)。TEPS問卷內容的理論框架,台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.原住民族委員會(2015)。103年臺灣原住民族經濟狀況調查,http://www.apc.gov.tw/portal/docDetail.html?CID=C5FBC20BD6C8A9B0&DID=0C3331F0EBD318C26CDB64C048198BF8。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊孟麗,譚康榮,黃敏雄(2003)。心理計量報告:TEPS 2001分析能力測驗,http://www.teps.sinica.edu.tw/descriptionZTestingReport2004-2-10.htm, 2014/03/20。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Rutter, M.(2001)。Psychosocial adversity: Risk, resilience and recovery。The context of youth violence: Resilience, risk, and protection。Westport, CT:Praeger。  new window
2.Sameroff, A. J.、Bartko, W. T.、Baldwin, A.、Baldwin, C.、Seifer, R.(1999)。Family and social influences on the development of child competence。Families, risk, and competence。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE