:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:醫學院學生主觀我、理想我、投射我之評量研究:Q分類之應用
書刊名:中華輔導學報
作者:王慶福
作者(外文):Wang, Chin-fu
出版日期:1993
卷期:1
頁次:頁72-89
主題關鍵詞:Q分類主觀我自我接受自我概念投射我理想我Q-sortIdeal selfProjective selfSelf-acceptanceSelf conceptSubjective self
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:1701
  • 點閱點閱:33
     本研究以某醫學為419名低年學生實醫Q分類自我概念評量,並針對評量工具及各項自我概念指標進行相關研究。 結果發現,醫學院低年級學生在主觀我方面,傾向以坦白誠實、幽默樂觀、勤奮努力、寬宏大量來描述自己,而比較不認為自己是口才好、學識豐富、情緒穩定、動作敏捷。理想我方面,則希望自已是學識豐富、聰明能幹、健康強壯、幽默樂觀、人緣好,而比較不在乎自己是否動作敏捷、熱心服務、英俊秀麗。投射我方面,傾向認為別人對他們的印象是幽默樂觀、坦白誠實、人緣好、健康強壯、熱心服務,而較不認為別人對他們的印象是口才好、動作敏捷、情緒穩定。 在三個自我概念層面之間,主觀我和投射我較為相近,理想我則與前二者差異很大。醫學院低年級學生在主觀我與理想我之間的負向差距最大的來源在於自覺學識不夠豐富、口才不夠好、不夠堅毅有�琚B情緒不夠穩定等、男女的Q分類結果相當類似;以選擇前五張卡片或第一張卡片來分析,所得到的結果亦無多大差異。 在相關研究方面,以Q分類測量自我概念,所得結果與人格測驗之得分有適度之關連,例如:主觀我情緒穩定一項的分配值與基氏人格測驗上的抑鬱性、感情變異性、自卑感、神經質等分量尺及情緒不穩定的總分呈負相關。理想我與投射我的Q分結果以及整體自我概念指標與自我接受指標I與人格測驗的得分亦出現不少有意義的關聯。研究者並針對Q分類工具之特性及研究,提出討論與建議。
     A Q-sort technique was administered to assess the self concept of 419 students in a medical college. The results indicated that, in choosing and sorting 15 personality traits, college students tended to describe themselves more as frank , humorous-optimistic, diligent, and open-hearted than as persuasive, learned, emotionally stable, and agile. In describing their ideal self, students wanted more to be learned, intelli-gent-competent, healthy, humorous-optimistic, and popular than to be agile, enthu-siastic, and handsome.In describing the self which they feel they project to others, students tended to figure that others see them more as humourous-optimistic, frank, popular, healthy, and enthusiastic than as persuasive, agile, and emotionally stable. Among the three levels of self concept, the subjective self and the projective self were similar to each other but were actually quite different from the ideal self. The main source of difference between the subjective self and the ideal self came from the sorting of the qualities of learnedness, persuasiveness, diligence, and emotion stability. The Q-distributions of male and female students were quite similar to each other. It also made little difference whether the first five cards or the first card was chosen for analysis. The relation between scores of the Q-sort and the Guilford Personality Inventory demonstrated the concurrent validity of the Q-sort technique. For example:the weighted score of emotional stability from the Q-sort was significantly negatively correlated with the the scales of depression. Cyclic tendency, feelings of inferiority, and nervousness found in the inventory. The validity of the total self concept index and self acceptance index I were also supported but this was not the case for idexes II and III. The special characteristics of the Q-sort technique and its utility in the field of counseling and guidance were also examined.
期刊論文
1.林一真、杜淑芬(19860100)。他們真不誠實嗎?:說謊量表初探。測驗年刊,33,95-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林一真、杜淑芬(19870100)。說謊的測量。測驗年刊,34,101-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.歐滄和(1990)。談人格測驗中的自比性量表。測驗與輔導雙月刊,98,1951-1952。  延伸查詢new window
4.簡茂發(1973)。Q方法的新近研究的檢討。中國測驗年刊,20,1146-1152。  延伸查詢new window
5.Hauser, S. T.(1976)。The content and structure of adolescent self-image。Archives of General Psychiatry,33(1),27-32。  new window
6.Kitzinger, C.、Rogers, R. S.(1985)。A Q-methodological study of lesbian identities。European Journal of Social Psychology,15(2),167-187。  new window
7.Sakowitz, M. L.(1975)。Self-ideal congruency and therapeutic skill development in nonpaid paraprofessionals。Journal of Community Psychology,3(3),275-280。  new window
8.Shepard, Lorrie A.(1979)。Self-Acceptance: The Evaluative Component of the Self-Concept Construct。American Education Research Journal,16(2),139-160。  new window
9.Zimpfer, D.、Waltman, D.(1982)。Correlates of effectiveness in group counseling。Small Group Behavior,13(3),275-290。  new window
會議論文
1.楊中芳(1991)。回顧港台「自我」研究:反省與展望。中國本土心理學新紀元研討會,15-92。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Arkoff, A.(1968)。Adjustment and mental health。McGraw-Hill。  new window
2.王慧君(1992)。團體領導者訓練實務。張老師出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.林幸台(1986)。心理測量導論。台北:五南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭生玉(1981)。心理與教育研究法。精華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.賴保禎(1987)。基氏人格測驗指導手冊。中國行為科學社。  延伸查詢new window
6.王文科(1993)。教育研究法。五南出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.郭為藩(1975)。自我心理學。臺南:開山書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE