臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國民小學學校組織結構、教師對組織功能需求與學校衝突研究
書刊名：初等教育學刊
作者：劉春榮 引用關係
作者(外文)：Liu, Chun-rong
出版日期：1999
卷期：7
頁次：頁39-84
主題關鍵詞：國民小學；學校組織；教師；組織功能需求；學校衝突
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:164
  • 點閱點閱:19
本研究旨在瞭解當今國民小學學校組織結構、教師對教師組織功能的需求、教師對學校衝突的知覺、及教師對學校衝突處理意向的現狀；分析學校組織結構與教師對教師組織功能需求的關聯；尋找有效預測教師對學校衝突處理意向的變項。 研究採問卷調查法，樣本包括台間地區，168所公私立國民小學的1604位教師。研究工具包括國民小學組織結構量表、教師組織功能需求量表、教師對學校衝突知覺量表、及教師對學校衝突處理意向量表等四式。回收問卷經統計處理獲得以下結論： 1.國民小學有高度正式化、高度專業化、中度集中化、及中度傳統化的學校組織結構。 2.國民小學教師對教師組織功能有高度的需求。 3.國民小學教師對學校衝突不論角色、人際、團體等衝突均具有中度的知覺。 4.國民小學教師對學校衝突較常採取統合與協妥，較少採用競爭、順應、或退避的衝突處理意向。 5.國民小學的學校組織結構與教師對教師組織功能的需求僅有低度的相關。 6.學校組織結構、教師對教師組織的功能需求、及教師對學校衝突的知覺，能低度的預測教師對學校衝突所採取的處理意向。 根據研究所得，本研究分別對學校行政單位、學校教師、教師組織、及未來研究，提出多項建議。
The purpose of this study were to understand elementary school structures, teachers' expectation and needs for teacher organization, teachers' perception for school conflicts, teachers' intention in treatment for school conflicts; to examine their relationship between elementary school structures and teachers' expectation and needs for teacher organization; to search the forecasted variables of teachers' intention in treatment for school conflicts. Questionnaire survey was used in this study for collecting data. The survey subjects included a total number of 1,604 teachers randomly selected from 168 elementary school in Taiwan area. Four survey instruments were developed/ used by the research including, Elementary School Structure Scale, Need of Teachers Organization Functions Scale, Teachers' Perception for School Conflicts Scale, Teachers' Intention in treatment for School Conflicts Scale. Results of data analysis showed that: 1.elementary school rated high formalization and specialization, while rated medium centralization and traditionalism. 2.elementary school teachers demonstrated high needs to teacher's organization functions. 3.elementary school. teachers indicated medium perception for school conflicts. 4.elementary school teachers prefer to use collaborating and compromising more than competing accommodating and avoiding for school conflicts. 5.low relationship existed between elementary school structures and teachers' expectation and needs for teacher organization. 6.elementary school structures, teachers' expectation and needs for teacher organization, teachers' perception for school conflicts were low predictors to teachers' intention in treatment for school conflicts. Based on the study results, author presents feasible recommendation for the departments of school administration, elementary school teachers, and teachers' organizations. Further research topics are also presented.
期刊論文
1.Bishop, L. K.、George, J. R.(1973)。Organizational structure: A factor analysis of structural characteristics of public elementary and secondary schools。Educational Administration Quarterly，9，66-80。  new window
2.Coombs, C. H.(1987)。The structure of conflict。American Psychologist，42，355-363。  new window
3.Corwin, R. G.(1987)。Patterns of organization conflict。Administrative Science Quarterly，91，507-520。  new window
4.Jackson, S. E.、Schuler, R. S.(1985)。A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings。Organizational behavior and human decision processes，36，16-78。  new window
5.Jaffe, M.(1990)。The road less traveled: An alternative to the bureaucratic model of librarian。Wilson Library Bulletin，65，49-51。  new window
6.Pugh, D. S.、Hickson, D. J.、Hinnings, C. R.(1968)。Dimensions of organizational structure。Administrative Science Quarterly，13，56-105。  new window
7.Sisley, B. L.(1987)。Prevention burnout in teacher coach。Journal of Physical Education Recreation and Dance，58(8)，71-75。  new window
8.Smith, C. G.(1985)。A comparative analysis of some conditions and consequences of intra-organizational conflict。Administrative Science Quarterly，81，504-529。  new window
9.Sousa, D. A.、Hoy, W. K.(1981)。Bureaucratic structure in schools: A refinement and synthesis in measurement。Educational Administration Quarterly，17，21-40。  new window
10.Warren, D. I.(1986)。The effects of power bases and peer group on conformity in formal organization。Administrative Sciences Quarterly，87，544-556。  new window
11.林振春(19930600)。衝突管理理論及其在團體中的應用。社會教育學刊，22，73-105。  延伸查詢new window
12.謝文全(19920800)。美國教師專業組織。臺灣教育，500，25-33。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.劉春榮(1997)。教師組織功能需求與學校衝突研究 (計畫編號：NSC86-2413-H-133-001)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.洪錦沛(1995)。臺灣省中部地區國民小學教育人員工作情境衝突知覺之研究--以衝突理論為途徑(碩士論文)。國立台中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡培村(1985)。國民中小學校長領導特質學校組織結構及組織氣氛與教師工作滿意關係之比較研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.翁豊珍(1995)。我國教師組織專業團體的研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.傅瑜雯(1993)。我國教師組織之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃三吉(1992)。臺北市國民小學組織結構與教師工作倦怠關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳嘉皇(1996)。國民小學學校組織衝突管理之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院，屏東。  延伸查詢new window
7.張鈿富(1986)。我國教師專業組織之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.劉春榮(1993)。國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與學校效能關係研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.American Federation of Teachers(1990)。Constitution of the AFT, AFLCIO。Washington, DC：American Federation of Teachers。  new window
2.Borisoff, D.、David, A. V.(1989)。Conflict management: a communication sells approach。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall。  new window
3.Burrap, P. E.(1972)。The teacher and the public school system。New York：Harper。  new window
4.Gorton, R. A.(1987)。School leadership and administration。IA：W. C. Brown Publishers。  new window
5.Guthrie, J. W.(1982)。Encyclopedia of educational research。New York：Free Press。  new window
6.Hall, R. H.(1987)。Organizations-structures, processes, and outcomes。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall。  new window
7.Hoy, W. K.、Miskel, C. G.(1992)。Mingzberg's structural framework In Educational Administration: Theory research and practice。New York：Random House。  new window
8.Montesano, J. J.(1991)。The structural and functional characteristics of schools that predict effectiveness (Middle schools)。New Jersey：New Brunswick。  new window
9.Moriarty, J. K.(1989)。Leadership, structure, and effectiveness of parochial secondary schools。New Jersey：New Brunswick。  new window
10.National Education Association(1990)。NEA handbook 1990-1991。Washington, DC：National Education Association。  new window
11.Nicolaidis, A. G.(1991)。Complexity, structure, and administrative intensity: a study of the determinants and the solutions to complexity in profit and nonprofit organizations information theory, organizational structure, systems theory。Columbia University。  new window
12.Schrama, G. J. I.(1991)。Freedom of choice in organizational Forms: Strategic choices of organizational structure and information technology at the introduction of personnel information systems。The Netherlands：University Twente。  new window
13.Stoner, J. A.、Freeman, E. R.(1989)。Management。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey：Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
14.Wayne, K. H.、Cecil, G. M.(1978)。Educational administration: Theory, research and practice。New York：Random House。  new window
15.Robbins, S. P.(1992)。Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies, and application。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice Hall。  new window
16.UNESCO(1966)。Recommendation concerning the status of teachers。Paris：UNESCO。  new window
17.Bloomer, Keir(1980)。The teacher as professional and trade unionist。New York：Nichols Publishing。  new window
18.Jessup, D. K.(1985)。Teachers, unions, and change。New York：Praeger。  new window
19.Steers, Richard M.(1991)。Introduction to Organizational Behavior。New York, NY：Harper Collins Publishers Inc.。  new window
20.劉春榮(1996)。國民小學教師專業自主知覺、教師組織功能需求與教師專業承諾研究。高雄：復文。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Winters, L. L.(1984)。A meta-analysis of bureaucratic structure and teacher job satisfaction。  new window
圖書論文
1.吳清山(19951018)。教師組織的定位與展望。現代教育論壇：教師組織的定位與展望引言報告。  延伸查詢new window
2.Jone, K.(1985)。The National Union of Teacher (England and Wales)。The politics of teacher unionism: International perspectives。Washington, DC：Croom Helm。  new window
3.Shavelson, R. J.(1985)。Teachers' organization。The international encyclopedia of education research and studies。New York：Pergamon。  new window
4.Thomas, K. W.(1976)。Conflict and conflict management。Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology。Chicago, IL：Rand MeNally。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1103（臺灣：1089，外國：14） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1908780 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67713258
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上