丁志權(民88a)。中美英三國教育經費財源與分配制度之研究。台北：師大書苑。
丁志權(民88b)。英國學校自主財政管理制度之研究。嘉義師院國民教育研究學報，5，141頁。
王保進(民80)。台灣地區國民教育發展型態之研究。教育心理與研究，14，209-211頁。王保進(民85)。教育指標基本概念之分析。教育研究資訊，4(3)，14頁。台灣省政府主計處(民87)。八十八年度台灣省總預算編審要點。南投：作者。
行政院教育改革審議委員會(民85)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北：作者。
吳清山(民86)。有效能的學校。台北：國立教育資料館。
吳清山、林天祐、黃旭鈞、張正霖(民85)。全面品質教育研究：以國民小學為例。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(計畫編號：NSC 85-2413-H-133-006)(未出版)。
吳清基等人(民90)。教育行政。台北：五南圖書出版社。
李安明(民88)。台灣地區國民教育資源分配之問題與改進建議。教育政策論壇，2(1)，60-86頁。李勝富(民86)。「委辦學校」構想為美國公立中小學帶來新希望。教育部駐美國休士文化組(未出版)。
杜天佑(民87)。學校經營與教育品質。教育資料與研究雙月刊，19。線上資源：http://www.nioerar.edu.tw/basis3/19/ik5.htm
周明華(民89)。談技職教育經費之分配。技術及職業教育雙月刊，57期，37-42頁。
林全(民86)。中央對國民中小學教育經費補助制度之研究。台北市：行政院教育改革審議委員會，16-30頁。
林全、王震武、林文瑛(民85)。中央對國民中小學教育經費補助制度之研究。台北：行政院教育改革審議委員會。
秦夢群(民90)。教育行政─實務部分。台北：五南圖書出版社。
康自立、蕭錫錡(民84)。工業教育課程基礎之理論研究(社會及經濟基礎)。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。張天津(民82)。技職教育行政與視導。台北：三民書局。
張玉山、鄭英耀與蔡清華(民89)。全國各級各類學校學生合理單位成本研究。教育部委託專題研究成果報告。
張明輝(民88)。學校教育與行政革新研究。台北：師大書苑。張鈿富(民83)。教育資源分配之問題與對策。載於中國教育學會編輯之教育改革。台北：師大書苑。
張鈿富(民85)。教育政策分析─理論與實務。台北：五南圖書出版公司。
教育部(民65)。私立學校會計制度準則。台中：台灣省政府教育廳。
教育部(民89)。中華民國教育統計指標。台北：教育部。
教育部(民90)。中華民國教育統計指標。民國91年2月28日，線上資源：htttp://www2.edu.tw/。
教育廳(民84)。八十五年台灣省政府教育廳主管年度預算報告。台中：台灣省政府教育廳。
教育廳(民85)。八十六年台灣省政府教育廳主管年度預算報告。台中：台灣省政府教育廳。
教育廳(民86)。八十七年度台灣省政府教育廳主管預算報告。台中：台灣省政府教育廳。
教育廳(民87a)。教育廳八十六年度普通公務決算說明。台中：台灣省政府教育廳。
教育廳(民87b)。八十八年度台灣省政府教育廳主管預算報告。台中：台灣省政府教育廳。
教育廳(民87c)。台灣省政府教育廳所屬機關學校八十八年度概算編製注意事項。台中：台灣省政府教育廳。
教育廳(民88a)。教育廳八十七年度普通公務決算說明。台中：台灣省政府教育廳。
教育廳(民88b)。八十八下年度及八十九年度台灣省政府教育廳主管預算報告。台中：台灣省政府教育廳。
梁懷茂(民73)。社會學。台北：黎明文化事業公司。
許添明、吳國銑(民89)。推動教育優先區計劃指標界定與補助方式之調查研究。台北：教育部八十九年度專題研究案。
許添明、張熒書(民89)。教育基本需求與教育基本法。載於教育基本法與教育革新研討會手冊。台北：台北市立師院。
陳文燕(民89)。國民教育經費分配之研究─以北高兩市為例。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。陳麗珠(民82)。國民教育經費分配機會公平之研究：以縣市財政狀況考量。教育學刊，10，225-259頁。陳麗珠(民86)。國民教育經費補助公式之模擬研究。教育研究資訊，5(1)，127-146頁。陳麗珠(民89a)。我國高級中等教育財政之現況與展望。高雄師範大學教育學刊，16，107頁。陳麗珠(民89b)。我國教育財政的危機與轉機：評析教育基本法有關教育經費籌措與分配的理論與實務。載於教育基本法相關議題研討會手冊(未出版)。
陳麗珠(民90)。「教育經費編列與管理法」之評析。未出版。
陳麗珠等人(民88)。我國高級中等教財政改革之研究。台北：行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
陳麗珠等人(民91)。九十二年度地方政府教育經費基本需求試算。教育部委託專題研究計劃(未出版)。陸民仁(民74)。經濟學(八版)。台北：三民書局。
彭文賢(民85)。組織原理(五版)。台北：三民書局。
曾绣雯(民90)。我國公立高級中等學校學生單位成本之研究。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
湯堯(民86)。技職教育的內、外部評鑑模型的建立。技術及職業教育雙月刊，39,1-7頁。
湯堯(民88)。教育指標系統整合型研究-技職教育指標。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(計畫編號：NSC87-2413-H-006-005-F16)。
湯堯(民89)。教育指標系統整合型研究-技職教育指標。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(計畫編號：NSC88-2418-H-006-003-F16)。
黃昆輝(民71)。教育經費運用的原則。載於教育行政與教育問題(再版)。台北：五南圖書出版公司。
黃昆輝(民77)。教育行政學。台北：東華書局。
黃增榮(民86)。政府補助地方國民教育經費指標模型之研究。國立政治大學教育系博士論文(未出版)。葉牧青(民78)。AHP層級結構設定問題之探討。交通大學管科研究所碩士論文。
路約君(民78)。教育心理學。輯於雲五社會科學大辭典(第八版)第九冊心理學。台北：臺灣商務印書館。
蓋浙生(民77)。教育財政學。台北：東華書局。
蓋浙生(民88a)。教育財政與教育發展。台北：師大書苑。
蓋浙生(民88b)。教育經濟與計畫(三版)。台北：師大書苑。
蓋浙生等人(民90)。教育經費計算基準之研究。教育部委託專題研究成果報告。
劉憲通(民83)。我國各級學校教育經費分配之研究。台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
蔡文標(民87)。台灣地區國民中學特殊教育資源分配公平性之研究。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。蕭全政、林鐘沂、江岷欽、黃朝盟(民90)。行政學新論。台北：韋伯圖書公司。
顏玉如(民90)。公立國民中學學校本位預算之分析─以南投縣為例。國立暨南大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
魏鏞(民71)。行政研究與政策的結合，載於行政研究方法論文集。台北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。
羅清水，饒達欽，廖錦文(民88)。職校工業類科實習設備經費補助模式之研究。技術及職業教育，49，43-49頁。
貳、英文部份：
Abu-Duhou, I., Downes, P. & Levaćić, R. (1999). Component 1: Basic student allocation, In Ross, K. N. and Levaćić, R.(Eds.), Needs-based resource allocation in education(pp59-90). Paris:UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning.
Audit Commission. (1986). Towards better management of secondary education. London: Audit Commission.
Barnes, J. H., Lucas, H. (1975). Positive discrimination in education: individuals , groups and institutions. In: J. Barnes (ed.) Education Priority, Vol 3. London: HMSO.
Beme, R. & Stiefel, L. (1984). The measurement of equity in school finance: Conceptual, methodological and empirical dimensions. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University.
Blachford, P., Mortimore, P. (1994). The issue of class size for young children in schools: what can we learn from research? Oxford Review of Education, 20(4), 411-428.
Caldwell, B. J., & Hill, P. W. (1999a). Recent developments in decentralizing school budgers in Australia. In M. E. Goertz & A. Odden(Eds.), School-based Financing(Twentieth Annual Yearbook of the American Education Finance Association)(pp. 102-128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Caldwell, B. J., & Hill, P. W. (1999b). Case study 1: Formula funding of schools in Australia. In K. N. Ross and R. Levaćić (Eds.), Needs-based resource allocation in education(pp. 139-160). Paris, UNESCO.
Caldwell, B. J., Levaćić, R., & Ross, K. N. (1999). The role of formula funding of schools in different educational policy contexts. In K. N. Ross & R. Levaćić(Eds.), Needs-based resource allocation in education via formula funding of schools. (pp. 9-24). Paris: UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning.
Carr, J. G. (1994). Effective financial management in further education and higher education. ACCA Technical Bulletin No. 29. London: Certified Accountants Educational Trust.
Central Advisory Council for Education. (1967). Children and their primary schools (The Plowden Report). London: HMSO.
Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (1997). Education Statistics 1997/1998 Estimates. London: HMSO.
Clay, M. M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann Education.
Clay, M.M., Watson, B. (1982). An inservice programme for Reading Recovery teachers. In M. M. Clay (ed.), Observing young readers: Selected papers (pp. 192-200). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Cohn, E. & Geske, T. G. (1990). Economics of Education. 3rd.ed .Oxford：Pergamon Press.
Department for Education and Science (1988). Education Reform Act: local management of schools. London: DES.
Department for Education. (1994a). Local Management of Schools, circular 2/94. London: HMSO.
Department for Education. (1994b). Code of practice on the identification and assessment of special educational needs. London: DFE.
Direction de l’Evaluation et de la Prospertive. (1993). Geographic de l’ecole. Paris: Ministere de l’Education Nationale er ge la Culture.
Doherty, G.D. (1994). Developing quality systems in education. London: Routledge.
Education Committee. (1994). The school global in Victoria: Matching resources to student learning needs. Report of the Education Committee (Brian Caldwell, Chair), Melbourne: Directorate of School Education.
Education Committee. (1995). The school global in Victoria: Matching resources to student learning needs. Interim Report of the Education Committee (Brian Caldwell, Chair), Melbourne: Directorate of School Education.
Education Committee. (1996). The school global in Victoria: Matching resources to student learning needs. Final Report of the Education Committee (Brian Caldwell, Chair), Melbourne: Directorate of School Education.
Education Week (1997). Quality counts: A report card on the condition of public education in the 50 states. Available:http://www.edweek.org/qc/
Evans, W., Murray, S. & Schwab, R. (1997). State education finance policy after court mandated reform: the legancy of Serrano. 1996 Proceedings of the Eighty Ninth Annual Conference on Taxation. Washington, DC: National Tax Association-Tax Inxtitute of America.
Fashola, O. S. & Slavin, R. E. (1997). Promising programmes for elementary and middle schools: evidence of effectiveness and replicability. Journal
Fuhrman, S. H.(Ed.) (1993). Designing coherent education policy: improving the system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Greenwood, M. S. & Gaunt, H. (1994). Total quality management for schools. London: Cassel.
Gurwitz A. Z.(1982). The Eco nomics of Public School Finance. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger Publishing Company.
Hanushek, E. A. (1994). Making schools work:Improving performance and controlling costs. Washington, DC:Brookings.
Hartman W. T. (1988). School district Budgeting. Massachnsetts: A Division of Simon & Schuster, Inc.
Herman, J.J. , & Herman, J.L. (1994). Education quality management. Lancaster, PA: TECHNOMIC.
Hill, P. W., & Ross, K. N. (1999). Component 3: Student supplementary educational needs. In K. N. Ross and R. Levaćić (Eds.), Needs-based resource allocation in education(pp.91-119). Paris, UNESCO.
Hirth, M. A. & Fulk, B. J. (1994). Perceptions of Special Education Porgram Effectiveness and Attitudestoward Inclusion. (EP374595).
Interim Committee for the Australian Schools Commossion. (1973). Schools in Australia, Report of the Interim Committee for the Australian Schools Commission (Karmel, P. Chair). Canberra: Australia Government Publishing Service.
Knight, B. (1993). Financial management for schools. London: Heienmann.
Levaćić, R. & Ross, K. N.(1993). Principles for designing needs-based school funding formula. .Paris:UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning.
Levaćić, R. & Ross, K. N.(1999). Principles for designing needs-based school funding formula. In K. N. Ross & R. Levacic (Eds.), Needs-based Resource Allocation in Education via Formula Funding of Schools (pp.25-56). Paris:UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning.
Levaćić, R. (1993). Assessing the impact of formula funding on schools, Oxford Review of Education, 19(4), pp. 435-57.
Levaćić, R. (1999). Case study 2: Formula funding of schools in England and Wales. In K. N. Ross and R. Levaćić (Eds.), needs-based resource allocation in education (pp. 139-60; 161-97). Paris, UNESCO.
Marsh, A. (1997). Survey of current pratice for resourcing additional educational needs in LEAS, Education Management Information Exchange. Slough: NFER.
Massell, D., Michael, K. & Hoppe, M. (1997). Persistemce and change: standares-based reform in nine states. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University, Graduate School of Education, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Morgan, C. & Murgatroyd, S.(1995). Total quality management in the public sector. Bristol: Open University Press.
Odden, A. & Busch, C.(1998).Financing schools for high performance: Strategies for improving the use of educational resources. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Odden, A. & Kotowski, N. (1992). Financing public school choice: policy issues and options. In: Odden, A. R. (Ed.) Rethinking school finance: an agenda for the 1990s (pp.225-259). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Odden, A. & Picus, L. (1992). School finance: a policy perspective. New York: McGraw Hill.
Odden, A. & Picus, L. (2000). School Finance: A Policy Perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Odden, A. (1997). How to rethink school budgets to support school transformation. Alexandria: New American Schools.
Online: www.ed.gov/offices/OUS/fedrole.html (2002/6/5)
Osburn, D. D. & Goish, F.(1974). An Analysis of Factors Influencing Costs among Vocational Schools. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 11(4), pp. 48-56.
Riley, K.(1994). Measuring quality. Education indicators. London: Cassel.
Ross, K. (1983). Social area indicators of educational need. Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council of Educational Research.
Ross, K. N. & Flallak, J. (1999). Introduction (Chapter 1). In K. N. Ross and Levaćić, R. (Eds.), Needs-based resource allocation in education(pp. 1-6). Paris: UNESCO, Internaional Institute for Educational Planning.
Ross, K. N. & Levaćić, R. (1999). Needs-based resoure allocation in educationa via formula funding of schools. Paris: UNESCO, Internaional Institute for Educational Planning.
Saaty, Thomas L., (1990). How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operation Research, 48(1), 9-26.
Scheerens, J. (1991). Evaluation studies-process indicators of school functioning: A selection based on the research literature on school effectiveness studies. Educational Evaluation, 17, pp. 371-401.
Scheerens, J. (1992). Effective Schooling-Research. Theory and Practice. London: Cassell.
Schools Council, National Board of Employment, Education and Training. (1993). In the middle: Schooling for young adolescents. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Smith, M. S. & O’Day, J. (1991). System reform. In Fuhrman, Malen, S. B. (Eds.). The politics of curriculum and testing (233-267). Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
Smith, M. S. (1988). Educational Indicator. Phi Delta Kappan, 69, pp. 487-491.
Stringfield, S., Ross, S. & Smith, L. (1996). Bold plans for school restructuring: the new American school designs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1966). The CIPP model for evaluation. In Madaus, G. F., Hartman, W. T. (1988). School district budgeting. Boston, Allyn & Bacon.
Swanson, A.D. & King, R.A.(1997). School finance: Its economics and politics. New York: Longman.
Thomas, H. & Bullock, A. (1992). School size and local management funding formulae. Educational Management and Administration, 20(1), pp. 30-38.
United States Departmnet of Educaion. (2002). The Federal Role in Education.
United States Departmnet of Health, Educaion, and Welfare. (1976). The measure of poverty. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
Warnock Report. (1978). Special educational needs: report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Education of Handicapped Chilfren and Young Prople. London: HMSO.
West, A., Pennell, H. (1994). Activity-led funding: a review of the literature. Stafford: Staffordshire LEA.