:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國中融合教育中身心障礙受凌學生遭受普通班同儕霸凌之經驗及輔導歷程研究─以一所國中為例
作者:羅丰苓
作者(外文):Lo, Fang-Ling
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:特殊教育學系
指導教授:盧台華
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2011
主題關鍵詞:融合教育身心障礙學生同儕霸凌Inclusive educationStudents with disabilitiesSchool bully
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:112
現階段台灣身心障礙國中學生主要是安置在融合教育環境與普通班同儕一起就學,然相較於普通班學生,身心障礙學生有較高的比例遭受同儕霸凌。故本研究旨在探討國中融合教育中身心障礙受凌學生遭受霸凌現況、原因及輔導歷程,以作為未來防制霸凌輔導策略的參考。
本研究採行動研究法,分為兩階段。第一階段主要是透過與身心障礙受凌學生、導師、霸凌學生及較不排斥受凌者的普通班同儕等人訪談,輔以檔案文件及觀察,蒐集資料並進行分析,以能瞭解身心障礙受凌學生遭受霸凌的現況及原因,並初擬防制霸凌輔導架構及內容。第二階段乃是在實務服務現場實施防制霸凌輔導策略,藉以透過實際執行輔導策略的歷程,修正擬定出更為具體可行之防制霸凌輔導架構及內容。
研究結果,主要可分從身心障礙受凌學生遭受霸凌的現況、原因及輔導歷程等三方面,加以說明。
一、 遭受霸凌的現況方面
1、 身心障礙受凌學生主要是遭受到肢體霸凌、言語霸凌及關係霸凌等傳統校園霸凌類型;且身心障礙受凌學生在班上是不受歡迎的人,遭受到班上大多數普通班同儕霸凌。
2、 普通班同儕可依霸凌行為分為顯性霸凌學生及隱性霸凌學生。顯性霸凌學生人數較少、霸凌行為明顯,而隱性霸凌學生則佔全班人數眾多,不僅姑息霸凌行為亦有進行較為隱微霸凌行為(如孤立、排擠)。
二、 遭受霸凌的原因方面
1、 身心障礙學生部份:
身心障礙受凌學生本身學業相關表現不佳、舉止怪異、社交技巧差、干擾上課、未能遵守團體秩序等影響他人行為以致成為班上不受歡迎的人,激發同儕霸凌行為。
2、 導師部份
導師以「弱化身心障礙受凌學生引發同情」的方式處理霸凌問題,可能會貶抑身心障礙受凌學生,使其與普通班同儕的勢力更顯得不均等;而導師有的會以言語責備等負向管教方式,可能成為同學仿效對待身心障礙受凌學生的方式。
3、 資源班部份
資源班所提供服務,無論是以影片賞析或學習單教導社交技巧或是學科加強內容的特教服務,皆未能直接改善身心障礙受凌學生遭受霸凌情形。
除了上述因素,當班上已形成一股冷漠姑息氣氛將身心障礙受凌學生視作圈外人時,普通班同學不想對受凌學生表示友善以免也遭受同儕排擠,讓身心障礙受凌學生在班上更顯得孤立。
三、 防制霸凌輔導架構及內容方面
防制霸凌輔導架構及內容方面,依導師、普通班同儕、霸凌學生及受凌學生等不同角色施以各種輔導策略。
1、 導師部份
透過與導師進行溝通對話以改善管教或是提升處理霸凌能力,並在受凌學生與普通班同儕發生衝突,持續提供導師諮詢,共同輔導以改善受凌學生的人際相處情形。
2、 普通班同儕部份
以班級輔導改正「負向制裁受凌學生」的霸凌行為轉為「正向幫助受凌學生」的友善行為。
3、 霸凌學生部份
以「幫助其與受凌學生和平共處」為輔導重點,並以讚美、銷過等作為霸凌學生持續改進行為的動力。
4、 受凌學生部份
在導師、班級同儕甚至是霸凌學生多方面已共同改善霸凌行為之下,受凌學生也逐漸改進自己的行為,然仍時而發生衝突,故持續提供受凌學生個別輔導以協助其能因應融合教育中各種人際衝突與困難。
最後分別依研究結果應用、未來相關研究及針對眾平國中等三方面提供建議。
The purpose of this thesis was to explore the status, cause and mentoring process for students with disabilities being bullied by the peers in inclusive classes of a junior high school. Action research was used in two phases of this study. Phase I focused on the understanding of bully problems through interviews with bullied students with disabilities, teachers, bullying students and those same class peers of the regular classroom who were not so much excluding those being bullied. Related files, documents and observations were also collected and analyzed for understanding the current status and the causes of being bullied. After that, an draft anti-bully mentoring program was formulated based on the findings. Phase II focused on the implement of the draft anti-bully mentoring program and its revision process for setting up a more concrete and feasible bully prevention mentoring program for them.
The main findings of this study were as follows:
Ⅰ. Current status for students with disabilities being bullied
1. The primary bullying behaviors they concurred were traditional campus types such as physical bullying, verbal bullying and relational bullying.
2. Peers in the inclusive classroom could be divided into students of dominant and latent bullying types. Although dominant bullying type students were just a few but showed obvious bullying behaviors. Majority in the whole class were latent bullying types of tolerating the bullying behaviors and participating in esoteric bullying behaviors (such as isolation and exclusion) as well.
Ⅱ. Causes for students with disabilities being bullied
1. Poor academic performances, bizarre behaviors, poor social skills, interference in the class, failures to comply with community norms were the major causes for being bullied. The above behaviors could cause them becoming dislike persons and could instigate peer bullying behaviors.
2. Teachers applied the approach of “weakening the stance of students with disabilities to incite compassion” to deal with bully issues and it could belittle students with disabilities which would further aggravate the unevenness as opposed to the peer strength in regular classroom. Additionally, teachers using abusive language could also be mimicked by other students toward students with disabilities.
3. The services provided by resource classroom teachers were mainly by showing videos, one-on-one teaching of social skills, or pull out program of remeding academic courses, which could not alter the bullying situations suffered by students with disabilities.
Ⅲ. Implementing process of the anti-bully mentoring program
1. In teacher aspect, I communicated and counselled them to enhance the discipline skills and to raise the level of capability in handling bully.
2. In peer aspect, a transforming of the bully behavior by negatively punishing the bullied students into the friendly behaviors by positively assisting the students being bullied.
3. In the bullying student aspect, the mentoring was focused on assisting the efforts to peacefully coexisting with the bullied students and by praising and erased the mistakes made before as drives of maintaining good behaviors.
4. For the students being bullied, they gradually changed their own behaviors under the premise of joint enhancements towards bully behaviors by the teachers, class peers and even the bullying students. Sometimes the conflicts were still persisted, therefore, it is recommended that continuing student mentoring should be provided in the future.
At last, suggestions were made according to the above findings for future implementation.
中文參考文獻
王致穎(2010)。關懷倫理學道德教育方法在融合教育下的實踐。教師之友,51(3),63-70。
王慶福、洪光遠、程淑華、王郁茗(合譯)(2006)。社會心理學。(Sharon S. Brehm, Saul Kassin, Streven Fein著:Socail psychology, 6th ed.)。臺北:雙葉書廊。
中華民國兒童福利聯盟文教基金會(2009)。反霸凌實驗方案實錄。兒童福利聯盟文教基金會,取自http://www.children.org.tw/
database_p0.php?offset=5&;id=276&;typeid=26。
中華民國兒童福利聯盟文教基金會(2011)。反霸凌、要和平2011年臺灣校園霸凌現象調查報告。兒童福利聯盟文教基金會,取自http://www.children.org.tw/news.php?id=2451。
江文慈(2004)。正視校園中的欺凌事件。諮商與輔導,221,6-10。
李惠怡(2005)。防治國小學童校園欺凌行為教學計劃及其成效之研究。臺北市立師範學院社會科教育研究所碩士論文。
吳清山、林天佑(2005)。校園霸凌。教育研究,130,143。
吳銘祥(2007)。當孩子遇上霸凌。師友月刊,479,45-49。
吳涔溪(2011)。臺灣視角─臺灣校園霸凌動搖國本五大因素釀禍。新紀元周刊,205,取自http://mag.epochtimes.com/
b5/207/8889.htm。
李乙明、李淑貞(譯)(2007)。無霸凌校園-給學校、教師和家長的指導手冊。(Mona O’Moore著:Dealing with Bullying in Schoools:A Training Manual for Teachers, Parents and Other Professionals)。臺北:五南。
邱珍琬(2002)。國小國中校園欺凌行為比較研究。彰化師大教育學報,3,99-128.new window
邱靖惠(2006)。霸凌:臺灣校園的恐怖分子。張老師月刊,347,
52-68。
邱靖惠、蕭慧琳(2009)。臺灣校園霸凌現象與危機因素之解析。兒童福利聯盟文教基金會,2010年4月27日取自http://www.new window
children.org.tw/database_report.php?offset=0&;id=287&;typeid=4。
林金定、嚴嘉楓及陳美花(2005)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究,3(1),122-136。
林俊宏(譯)(2010)。群的智慧。(Peter Miller著:The Smart Swarm:How Understanding Flocks, Schools, and Colonies Can Make Us Better at Communicating, Decision-Making, and Getting Things Done.)。臺北:天下文化。
林進材(2007)。愛與關懷的班級經營理論與策略。教育研究月刊,154,5-15。new window
林麗玉(2008)。生命教育之「虛」與「需」─由目睹校園霸凌現象談起。諮商與輔導,275,19-23頁。
林凱華(譯)(2008)。無暴力校園─教師工作手冊。(Allan L. Beane著:The Bully Free classroom。 over 100 tips and strategies for teachers K-8)。新北市:稻田。
柯俊銘(2009)。目睹霸凌未聲張 沈默孩子罪惡感強烈。自由時報,2009年12月27日,取自http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/
2009/new/dec/27/today-health3.htm。


姚淑文、賴芳玉(2009)。請你不要太過份!─從KUSO到校園霸凌。98性別平等,2010年5月3日,取自http://search.
nioerar.edu.tw/edu_paper/data_image/e0001348/0n0/20091100/p0000033.pdf。
施偉隆(2009)。從現象學的觀點對質性研究的省思。新竹教育大學人文社會學報,2(1),127-152。new window
洪福源(2003)。校園霸凌行為的本質及其防治策略。教育研究月刊,110,88-98。new window
馬英九(2011)。用愛反霸凌 校園好安心。總統府─總統札記【電子郵件清單】。取自http://www.president.gov.tw/
Default.aspx?tabid=1104&;itemid=23890&;rmid=2074。
高淑清(2008)。質性研究的18堂課: 首航初探之旅。高雄:麗文。
孫佩妏、陳雅馨(譯)(2008)。路西法效應。(Philip G. Zimbardo著。The Lucifer Effect.)
莊瑞君(2011)。是強勢還是弱勢:換一副眼鏡看待霸凌者。教育部學生輔導電子報,3,取自http://guidepaper.edu.tw/
?epaper_sn=3。
財團法人惜福文教基金會(2011)。校園霸凌。財團法人惜福文教基金會,2011年5月20日取自http://www.shifu.org.tw/child-02-1-info.asp?CR_ID=CR200808280004&;CR_Kind=2
張如杏、林幸台(2009):特教醫療化現象之探討。特殊教育與復健學報,24,1-17。The Lucifer Effect。臺北:商周出版。new window
張治平(1989)。學校霸凌行為的輔導。諮商與輔導月刊,47,12-13。
張信務(2007)。營造友善校園─「從去霸凌開始」。北縣教育,61,31-35。
張景然(2000)。是質非量,是量非質:研究者在質化研究的主體性,輔導季刊,36(4),47-50。new window
陳茉莉(2009年12月23日)。霸凌影響因素:個人生理缺陷。兒盟瞭望,2。2010年3月2日取自http://www.children.org.tw/
about_service_1.php?id=277。
陳啟榮、張文良(2009)。零體罰教育議題之芻議。教師之友,50(5),47-53。
陳鳳如(1996)。讓學生揮別校園的陰影─談霸凌行為的成因與輔導。測驗與輔導,136,2804-2808。
陳黎;張芬齡(2009)。《詩樂園》現代詩 110 首賞析。臺北,南一書局。
陳瓊如(2010)。霸凌大家都知道 卻旁觀。聯合報,2010年10月7日,取自http://udndata.com/。
教育部。特殊教育通報網(2011a)。2011年4月12日取自http://www.set.edu.tw/sta2/default.asp。
教育部(2011b)。友善校園,霸凌止步【宣傳海報】。
教育部(2011c)。教育部防制校園霸凌專區【線上論壇】。取自http://140.111.1.88/faq/#id_13。
教育部(2009)。特殊教育法(2009年 11 月 18 日)。
教育部(2007)。教育部防制校園暴力、霸凌之作法(2007年8月29日)。
教育部(2004)。高級中等學校就讀普通班身心障礙學生安置原則及輔導辦法(2004 年 07 月 09 日)。
教育部訓委會 (2010)。防制校園霸凌總動員行動。臺北市:教育部。2011年3月7日,取自http://www.edu.tw/military。
教育部訓委會 (2009)。教育部補助推動反霸凌安全學校要點。2010年3月7日,取自http://www.edu.tw/military。
教育部訓委會 (2008)。防制學生將校園霸凌與不雅影片上傳網站散布預防輔導作法暨相關法治教育。2010年3月7日,取自http://www.edu.tw/military。
許惠芳(2010)。欺凌預防方案對兒童社交技巧與自尊之影響。私立大業大學教育專業發展研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
黃光國(2003)。中國人的權力遊戲。臺北:巨流。new window
黃淑苓(2001)。常態編班的學習落後學生。教育科學期刊,1(1),3 - 17。new window
黃婷姍(2008)。少年小說班級讀書治療對國小高年級霸凌學童的影響。國立臺東大學語言教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
黃惠惠(2008)。助人歷程與技巧(新增訂版)。臺北:張老師。詹三源(2009)。校園霸凌,黑數更多。聯合報, 2009
年12月8日,取自http://udn.com/NEWS/DOMESTIC/
DOM2/4900268.Shtml。
董子毅、王麗雲(2007)。拒絕校園霸凌的智慧與勇氣。中等教育,58(6),141-147。
曾文志(2004)。小惡霸與受氣包—如何和孩子談校園霸凌。師友,449期,頁60–67。
鈕文英(2008)。建構生態的融合教育支持模式。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,4,31-56。
彭彥淩(2005)。反校園霸凌之生活技能教學介入成效探討。國立臺灣師範大學健康促進與衛生教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
彭清仁(2011年4月2日)。反霸凌大遊行 許明財:將黑道趕出校園。中廣新聞網, 2011年4月8日,取自http://times.hinet.net/times/article.do?newsid=4922468&;option=graph&;topicid=2010122112d071038092414&;optionType=topic&;cate=focus。
彭瓊慧(2008)。實施探索教育課程對國中生欺凌行為影響之研究。國立東華大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
童嘉(2004):想要不一樣。臺北:遠流。
楊惠芳(2006年11月15日)。校園霸凌問題,全球苦思解決。國語日報社。2011年6月20日,取自http://www.mdnkids.com/info/news/content.asp?Serial_NO=47633。
楊惠芳、諶淑婷(2010年12月22日)。反霸凌如防疫 每週通報兩次。國語日報, 2011年1月8日,取自http://www.mdnkids.com/info/news/content.asp?Serial_NO=70522。
楊琇尊(2009)。淺談校園霸凌。彰化縣九年一貫電子報,243。取自http://enews.trsc.chc.edu.tw/97paper20.htm。
雷新俊(2009)。校園霸凌事件的防治與輔導。國教之友,593,33-41。
廖佳紅(2004)。資源班學生學習困擾與輔導。師說,178,59-60。
蔡敏玲(2004)。我看教育質性研究創塑意義的問題與難題:經歷、剖析與再脈絡。國立臺北師範學院學報,17(1),493-518。new window

管婺媛、陳文信、鄭閔聲、林志成(2011)。杜絕校園霸凌,增聘2221位輔導人員。中國時報,2011年1月13日,取自 http://news.chinatimes.com/life/11051801/112011011300045.html。
蔡聖賢、吳雪綺、吳清明、張雅淨、羅天豪、李詠絮、周仲賢(2011)。國內教育輿情。教育資料與研究,98,194-207。
鄭崇趁(2011)。校園霸凌的成因與對策。教育部學生輔導電子報,3,取自http://guidepaper.edu.tw/?epaper_sn=3。
鄭雅尹(2008)。國小霸凌防治課程設計之研究。臺北市立教育大學心理與諮商學系碩士論文(未出版)。
鄭耀嬋、何華國(2004)。國小融合班學生學習態度及其相關因素之探討。國民教育學報,13,215-260。new window
劉焜輝(1989):星星之火─學校霸凌行為豈是小事。諮商與輔導月刊,47,1。
鄧煌發(2007)。校園安全防護措施之探討─校園槍擊、校園霸
凌等暴行事件之防治。中等教育,58(5),8-29。
鄧煌發(2008):霸凌行為何時休。師友月刊,497,52-57。
潘慧玲(2004)。質性研究典範對從事教育研究的啟示。教育研究月刊,118,16-21。
蕭紫菡(2010)。誰在霸凌?誰被霸凌?座談會。人本教育札記,247,18-28。
薇薇夫人(譯)(1996)。和平在人間(凱薩琳舒勒絲著)。臺北:麥田。
簡世雄(2011)。同儕輔導應用於校園霸凌之輔導策略。諮商與輔導,302,39-43頁。

魏希聖、黃仲楷(2005)。校園霸凌研究之回顧,實徵發現與研究方法。臺東大學教育學報,16(1),69-112。
穆佩芬(1996)。現象學研究法。護理研究,4(2),195-202。new window
羅丰苓、盧台華(2008)。就讀國中普通班級之身心障礙學生遭受同儕霸凌情形之探討。發表於2008年特殊教育學術研討會暨中華民國特殊教育學會40週年年會。臺北:臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系。
譚光鼎、鄭文鵬(2007)。特殊學生與多元文化教育。中等教育,58(4),8-31。new window













西文參考文獻

Andreou, E., Didaskalou, E., &; Vlachou, A.(2007). Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Curriculum-based Anti-bullying Intervention Program in Greek Primary Schools. Educational Psychology, 27(5),693-711.
Baldry, A, C., David. P., &; Farrington, D. P. (2000). Bullies and delinquents: personal characteristics and parental styles. Journal of Community &; Applied Social Psychology, 10(1), 17-31.
Baldry, A, C., &; Farrington, D. P. (2004). Evaluation of an intervention program for the reduction of bullying and victimization in schools. Aggressive Behavior, 30(1), 1-15.
Batsche, G. M., &; Knoff, H. M. (1994). Bullies and their victims:
Understanding a pervasive problem in the schools. School Psychology Review, 23, 165-174.
Beaty, L.A., &; Alexeyev, E.(2008).The problem of school bullies:what the research tells us.Adolescence, 43(169), 1-11.
Berry-Krazmien.C.A.(2006). Bullying behavior and victimization among adolescents in a residential placement.Unpublishment doctoral dissertation. New York ,Buffalo.
Clark, E.A., Kiselica, &; Kiselica, M.S. (1997). A systematic counseling approach to the problem of bullying. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 31, 310-315.
Cohen, L. &; Manion, L.(1994), Research Methods in Education. London: Routeledge.

Crick, N.R., &; Grotpeter, J.K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710-722.
Dillon, J. C., &; Lash, R. M.(2005).Redefining and dealing with bullying. Momentum,36(2),34-37.
Egan, S. K. &; Perry, d. g.(1998). Does low self-regard invite victimization? Developmental Psychology, 34(2),299-310.
Estell, D., Farmer, T., Irvin, M., Crowther, A., Akos, P., &; Boudah, D.(2009). Students with Exceptionalities and the Peer Group Context of Bullying and Victimization in Late Elementary School. Journal of Child &; Family Studies, 18(2), 136-150.
Evers, K. E., Prochaska, J. O., Van, M. D. F., Johnson, J. L. &; Prochaska, J. M.(2007). Transtheoretical-based bullying prevention effectiveness trials in middle schools and high schools. Educational Research, 49(4),397-414.
Feinberg, T. &; Robey, N.(2009). Cyberbullying. Education Digest, 74(7),26-31.
Florian, L. (1998).Inclusive practice What,why and how?in Tilstone ,Christina,Florian Lani and Rose,Richard,Promoting Inclusive Practice.Ch2:13-26.London.Routledge.
Fuerst. D. R., Fisk. J. L. &; Rourke. B. P. (1989). Psychosocial functioning of learning-disabled children: Replicability of statistically derived subtypes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 275-280.
Garrity, C., &; Jens, K.(1997). Bully proofing your school:Creating a positive climate. Intervention in School &; Clinic,32(4),235-243.
Hanish, L. D., &; Guerra, N. G.(2004). Aggressive Victims, Passive Victims, and Bullies: Developmental Continuity or Developmental Change?. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50(1), 17-38.
Hawker, D. S. J. &; Boulton, M. J.(2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 441-455.
Heinrichs, R. R.(2003). A whole-school approach to bullying: special considerations for children with exceptionalities. Intervention in school and clinic,38(4), 195-204.
Hodges, Ernest V. E., Malone, M. J. &; Perry, D. G.. (1997). Individual risk and social risk as interacting determinants of victimization in the peer group. Developmental Psychology, 33, 1032-1039.
Humphrey, N.(2008). Including pupils with autistic spectrum disorders in mainstream schools. Support for Learning, 23(1)1, 41-47.
Jenson, J. M., Dieterich, W. A., Rinner, J. R., Washington, F., &; Burgoyne, K. E. (2006). Implementation and Design Issues in Group-Randomized Prevention Trials: Lessons from the Youth Matters Public Schools Study. Children &; Schools, 28(4), 207-217.
Juvonen, J., &; Gross, E. F.(2008).Extending the school grounds?-bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health.78(9),496-505.
Karen, W. (2011). Teenage bullies: Might not right. Phi Kappa Phi Forum, 91(1), 7-9.

Kavale, K. A., &; Forness, S. R. (1996). Social skills deficits and learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(3),226–237.
Khadaroo, S., T. (2011). Obama takes on bullies at White House anti-bullying summit. The Christian Science Monitor, March 10, 2011, from http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Education/2011/0310/Obama-
takes-on-bullies-at-White-House-anti-bullying-summit.Karen, W. (2011). Teenage bullies: Might not right. Phi Kappa Phi Forum, 91(1), 7-9.
Kochenderfer, B. J., &; Ladd, G. W.(1996). Peer victim victimization in kindergarten: Manifestations and relations to school adjustment. Journal of School Psychology,34,267–283.
Kuhne, M. &; Wiener, J.(2000). Stability of social status of children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly,23(1),64-75.
Losey.R.A.(2009). An Evaluation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program’s Effectiveness in a High School Setting.Unpublishment doctoral dissertation. University of Cincinnati. Cincinnati, Ohio.
Lynne, E. &; Dreuth, L. Z. (2011). Making school bully laws matter. Recalaiming Childre &; Youth, 20(1), 33-38.
Menesini, E., Codecasa, E., Benelli, B., &; Cowie, H.(2003). Enhancing children's responsibility to take action against bullying: Evaluation of a befriending intervention in Italian middle schools. Aggressive Behavior, 29(1),1-14.


Mishna, F.(2003). Learning Disabilities and Bullying: Double Jeopardy. Journal of Learning Disabilities,36(4), 336-347.
Monchy, M. D. Pijl, S. J. &; Zandberg, T.(2004). Discrepancies in judging social inclusion and bullying of pupils with behaviour problems. European .Journal of Special Needs Education,19(3),317-330.
Morrison, C. T.(2009). What Would You Do, What If It’s You?” Strategies to Deal With a Bully. Journal of School Health, 79(4),201-204.
Nabuzoka, D.(2003).Teacher Ratings and Peer Nominations of Bullying and Other Behaviour of Children With and Without Learning Difficulties. Educational Psychology, 23(3), 307-321.
Nancy, M. (2004). Braving the bullies. ASHA Leader, 9(17), 16-17.
Olweus, D.(2001). Bullying at school: tackling the problem. The OECD Observer, 225,24-26.
Olweus, D.(1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell.
O'Moore, M.(2000).Critical issues for teacher training to counter bullying and vic victimisation in Ireland.Aggressive Behavior, 26(1),99-111.
Orpinas, P. &; Horne, A. M.(2003). School bullying:changing the problem by changing the school. School Psychology Review, 32(3), 431-444.
Perry, D. G., Kusel, S. J., &; Perry, L. C. (1988).Victims of peer ggression. Developmental Psychology, 24, 807-814.
Rigby, K.(2003).Consequences of bullying in schools. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry,48(9), 583-590.
Roberts.C.M., &; Smith.P.R.(1999). Attitudes and behaviour of children toward peers with disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education,46(1),35-50.
Sabornie, E. J.(1994). Social-affective characteristics in early adolescents identified aslearning disabled and nondisabled. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 269-279.
Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., &; Voeten, M. (2005). Anti-bullying intervention: Implementation and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 465–487.
Sapouna, M. Wolke, D. Vannini, N. &; Watson, S.(2010)Virtual learning intervention to reduce bullying victimization in primary school: a controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology &; Psychiatry, 51( 1), p104-112.
Savage, R.(2005). Friendship and Bullying Patterns in Children Attending a Language Base in a Mainstream School. Educational Psychology in Practice,21(1),23–36.
Schafer, M. Korn, S. Smith, P. K. Hunter, S. C. Mora-Merchan, J. A. Singer, M. M. & Meulen, K. V. D.(2004).Lonely in the crowd:Recollections of bullying.british Journal of Developmental Psychology,22,379-394.
Schwartz, D., Dodge, K. A., &; Coie,J.D.,(1993). The emergence of chronic peer victimization in boys play groups. Child Development,64, 1755–1772.
Selekman, J. &; Vessey, J. A.(2004). Bullying: It isn’t what it used tobe. Pediatric . Nursing,30(3),246-249.
Siann, G., Callaghan, M., Lockhart, R., &; Rawson, L. (1993). Bullying: Teachers' views and school effects. Educational Studies,19,307-321.
Smith, P. K., Talamelli, L., Cowie, H., Naylor, P., &; Chauhan, P. (2004). Profiles of nonvictims,escaped victims, continuing victims and new victims of school bullying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 565-581.
Suhay, L., C. (2010). How to help a kid beat a bully: soft defense. The Christian Science Monitor, June 21, 2010, from http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2010/0621/How-to-help-a-kki-beat-a-bully-soft-defense.
Swanson、Lee、Malone &; Sharon(1992). Social skills and learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of the literature. School Psychology Review,21(3),427-442.
Thornbberg, R. &; Knutsen, S. (2011). Teenagers’ explanations of bullying. Child Youth Care Forum, 40, 177-192. oi:10.1007/s105660109129z.
Wehrheim, C. A.(2006).Current Research in Learning: The Brain,Intelligences, and Bullying. Clergy Journal,82(4),9-10.
Unnever, J. D.(2005). Bullies, aggressive victims, and victims: Are they distinct groups? Aggressive Behavior,31(2),153-171.
Whitney I., Smith P. K. &; Thompson D.(1994). Bullying and children with special educational needs. In:School Bullying:Insight and Perspectives(eds P.K.Smith &; S. Sharp),pp.213-40.
Routledge,London.
Whitney,I., Nabuzoka,D., &; Smith,P,K.(1992).Bullying in schools:Mainstream and special needs.Support for Learning7(1),3-7.


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE