臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣原住民優惠政策的支持與抗拒：比較原漢立場
書刊名：臺灣社會學刊
作者：傅仰止 引用關係
作者(外文)：Fu, Yang-chih
出版日期：2001
卷期：25
頁次：頁55-109
主題關鍵詞：臺灣原住民；原住民政策；弱勢族群優惠政策；原漢關係；Taiwan's aborigines；Austronesian peoples；Minority welfare policy；Ethnic relations
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(15) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:13
  • 共同引用共同引用:518
  • 點閱點閱:241
本研究探討原住民優惠政策的支持與抗拒立場，如何在漢人族群與原住民族群當中反映出不同層面的社會心理背景。文中依據1999年的「台灣族群關係的社會基礎調查」與2000年的「社會意向電話調查原住民專題調查」兩筆資料，分析比較漢人樣本(n = 3349)與原住民樣本 (n = 807)各自的特色及差異。研究發現原漢族群在政策立場的背景上有明顯差異：教育程度高的漢人，明顯支持原住民優惠政策，但是收入高的原住民，則不如其他原住民那麼強烈支持這種政策；社會公平感在漢人族群當中有助於支持優惠政策，在原住民族群裡則變成抗拒的來源。最明顯的區別，是跟原住民的接觸經驗或型態，對漢人和原住民產生互異的效果，而在鄉村原住民和都市原住民之間的效應，也不盡相同。在東部多族群環境下的漢人，明顯抗拒原住民優惠政策；這種抗拒難以歸咎於其他相關的主客觀條件，而是由「東部」這項背景單獨發揮強烈的效應。跟其他原住民較常接觸的原住民，則顯然比較支持優惠政策。但是有利於都市原住民支持立場的接觸型態，不是極端的族群聚合，而是中等適度的叢結型態。原漢之間最為一致的趨勢，則是對原住民社經困境所作的歸因解釋，在政策立場的取向上有強烈而明顯的區辨力。研究發現不但在原漢之間的族群接觸與族群位階論述上富重要意涵，對原住民優惠政策與輔導措施之制訂及檢討亦有所啟發。
This study examines how Taiwan's Han and Australasian peoples vary in supporting and resisting the government's efforts in taking extra care of indigenous peoples, and how such variances reflect the social psychological backgrounds of the making of the aboriginal welfare policy. The data include a national Han sample (n=3349), taken from a face-to-face survey on Taiwan's ethnic relationships in 1999, and a national Aboriginal sample (n=807) from a telephone survey with the indigenous peoples in 2000. The ordered probit analyses reveal that Han respondents differ significantly from the aborigines in how they support the aboriginal welfare policy. The well-educated Han support the policy, but wealthier aborigines show notable reservations. While a perception of social justice helps the Han to favor the policy, it becomes a factor for policy resistance among the indigenous peoples. A sharp contrast is seen with people who have greater contact with aboriginals. ln eastern Taiwan, where more than one-fifth of the population are indigenous peoples, the Han people strongly oppose the aboriginal welfare policy. This negative regional effect remains highly significant even after taking the respondent's demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, and general ideology into account. lt is also independent of how much contact the respondents have had with the aborigines, how the respondents perceive the image and the status of this target group, and how they attribute the aborigines' plight. In comparison, the aboriginal respondents who live in a state of ethnic enclosure tend to support the policy more strongly than those who live in a predominantly Han area. For those who move to cities, however, the most favorable contact pattern for policy support is not ethnic enclosure, but a moderate contact with other aborigines in the neighborhood as well as in daily life. Finally, it is evident that consistently attributing aboriginal plight to social and economic deprivation for both the Hans and aborigines leads to a very strong support for the welfare policy. The paper discusses how these major findings shed light on theories of ethnic contact and ethnic group perception. It also proposes several important implications for the minority welfare policy.
期刊論文
1.傅仰止(19961000)。人口比例與族群意象 : 東部原漢關係的結構性與社會心理基礎。臺灣社會學刊，20，125-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Blumer, Herbert(1958)。Race prejudice as a sense of group position。Pacific Sociological Review，1(1)，3-7。  new window
3.洪永泰(19920200)。民意調查的抽樣設計。研考雙月刊，16(1)，22-32。  延伸查詢new window
4.Hasenfeld, Yeheskel、Rafferty, Jane A.(1989)。The Determinants of Public Attitudes Toward the Welfare State。Social Forces，67(4)，1027-1048。  new window
5.傅仰止(19940600)。臺灣東部的族群位階特色。國立臺灣大學社會學刊，23，143-190。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Bobo, L.、Hutchings, V.(1996)。Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer's theory of group position to a multiracial social context。American Sociological Review，61，951-912。  new window
7.Quillian, Lincoln(1995)。Prejudice As a Response to Perceived Group Threat: Population Composition and Anti-Immigrant and Racial Prejudice in Europe。American Sociological Review，60(4)，586-611。  new window
8.Pious, S.(1996)。Ten myths about affirmative action。Journal of Social Issues，52(4)，25-31。  new window
9.傅仰止(19940600)。臺灣原住民困境的歸因解釋比較漢人觀點與原住民觀點。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，77，35-87。  延伸查詢new window
10.傅仰止、簡文吟、伊慶春(20010400)。電訪樣本資料庫的再利用：以社會意向原住民專題調查為例。調査研究：方法與應用，9，109-118。  延伸查詢new window
11.顧玉珍、張毓芬(19990600)。臺灣原住民族的土地危機：山地鄉「平權會」政治經濟結構之初探。臺灣社會研究季刊，34，221-292。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.內政部統計處(1999)。歷年來有關臺灣原住民的重要政策一覽表。山海文化雙月刊，5。  延伸查詢new window
13.Jackman, Mary R.(1973)。Education and Prejudice or Education and Response Set?。American Sociological Review，38，327-339。  new window
14.Carter, Valerie J.、Abrahamson, Mark(1986)。Tolerance, Urbanism and Region。American Sociological Review，51(2)，287-294。  new window
15.Bobo, Lawrence(1988)。Race, Interest, and Beliefs about Affirmative Action。American Behavioral Scientist，41(7)，985-1003。  new window
16.Feagin, Joe R.(1991)。The Continuing Significance of Race: Antiblack Discrimination in Public Places。American Sociological Review，56(2)，101-116。  new window
17.Gilens, Martin、Sniderman, Paul M.、Kuklinski, James H.(1998)。Affirmative Action and the Politics of Realignment。British Journal of Political Science，28，159-183。  new window
18.Hraba, Joseph、Hagendoorn, Louk、Hagendoorn, R.(1989)。The Ethnic Hierarchy in The Netherlands: Social Distance and Social Representation。British Journal of Social Psychology，28，57-69。  new window
19.Jackman, Mary R.、Muha, Michael J.(1984)。Education and Intergroup Attitudes: Moral Enlightenment, Superficial Democratic Commitment, or Ideological Refinement?。American Sociological Review，49，751-769。  new window
20.Kluegel, James R.(1990)。Trends in Whites' Explanations of the Black-White Gap in Socioeconomic Status, 1977-1989。American Sociological Review，55(4)，512-525。  new window
21.Kluegel, James R.、Smith, Eliot R.(1982)。Whites' Beliefs About Blacks' Opportunity。American Sociological Review，47(4)，518-532。  new window
22.Kluegel, James R.、Smith, Eliot R.(1983)。Affirmative Action Attitudes: Effects of Self-Interest, Racial Affect, and Stratification Beliefs on Whites' Views。Social Forces，61(3)，797-824。  new window
23.Kuklinski, James H.、Sniderman, Paul M.、Knight, Kathleen、Piazza, Thomas、Tetlock, Philip E.、Lawrence, Gordon R.、Mellers, Barbara(1997)。Racial Prejudice and Attitudes Toward Affirmative Action。American Journal of Political Science，41(2)，402-419。  new window
24.Levine, Jeffrey、Carmines, Edward G.、Sniderman, Paul M.(1999)。The Empirical Dimensionality of Racial Stereotypes。Public Opinion Quarterly，63，371-384。  new window
25.Lim, Mah Hui(1985)。Affirmative Action, Ethnicity and Integration: The Case of Malaysia。Ethnic and Racial Studies，8(2)，250-276。  new window
26.Powers, Daniel A.、Ellison, Christopher G.(1995)。Interracial Contact and Black Racial Attitudes: The Contact Hypothesis and Selectivity Bias。Social Forces，74(1)，205-226。  new window
27.Quillian, Lincoln(1996)。Group Threat and Regional Change in Attitudes toward African-Americans。American Journal of Sociology，102(3)，816-860。  new window
28.Sigelman, Lee、Welch, Susan(1993)。The Contact Hypothesis Revisited: Black-White Interaction and Positive Racial Attitudes。Social Forces，71(3)，781-795。  new window
29.Sniderman, Paul M.、Hagen, Michael G.、Tetlock, Philip E.、Brady, Henry E.(1986)。Reasoning Chains: Causal Models of Policy Reasoning in Mass Publics。British Journal of Political Science，16(4)，405-430。  new window
30.Fletcher, Joseph F.、Northrup, David A.、Sniderman, Paul M.、Russell, Peter H.、Tetlock, Philip E.(1993)。Psychological and cultural Foundations of Prejudice: The Case of Anti-Semitism in Quebec。Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology，30(2)，242-270。  new window
31.Steeh, Charlotte、Krysan, Maria(1996)。Affirmative Action and the Public: 1970-1995。Public Opinion Quarterly，60(1)，128-158。  new window
32.Tuch, Steven A.(1987)。Urbanism, Region, and Tolerance Revisited: The Case of Racial Prejudice。American Sociological Review，52(4)，504-510。  new window
33.Wilson, Thomas C.(1991)。Urbanism, Migration, and Tolerance: A Reassessment。American Sociological Review，56(2)，117-123。  new window
會議論文
1.Dillion, Yolanda A.(1999)。Does Racism Really Matter? An Analysis of White Americans' Attitudes toward Welfare Spending。Chicago, IL。  new window
2.傅仰止(2000)。Ethnic Enclosure and In-group Favoritism among Taiwan's Indigenous Peoples。Taipei。  new window
研究報告
1.謝高橋、黃維憲、柯瓊芳(1991)。臺灣山胞遷移都市後適應問題之研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.李亦園、石磊、瞿海源、蕭新煌、余光弘(1983)。山地行政政策之研究與評估報告書。臺北：中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.張世佩(1994)。族群競爭情境下的漢人與原住民互動。台北：中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.章英華、傅仰止(2000)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計劃：第四期第一次調查計劃執行報告 (計畫編號：NSC-89-2412-H-001-014-B1)。臺北：中央研究院社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
5.章英華(2000)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計劃：第三期第五次調查計劃執行報告 (計畫編號：NSC-88-2412-H-001-014-B1)。臺北：中央研究院社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
6.傅仰止(1995)。臺灣族群的意象與位階：比較他群和我群 (計畫編號：NSC83-0301-H001-050-B1)。臺北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
7.謝高橋、張清富(1991)。臺北市山胞人口普查報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.(2000)。臺灣族群關係的社會基礎調查研究執行報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.(2000)。社會意向電話調查執行報告，八十八年度至八十九年度。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Sigelman, Lee、Welch, Susan(1991)。Black Americans' Views of Racial Inequality: The Dream Deferred。Cambridge, England：Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Sniderman, P.、Brody, R.、Tetlock, P.(1991)。Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology。Cambridge, Mass：Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Allport, Gordon W.(1979)。The Nature of Prejudice。Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. Inc.。  new window
4.張茂桂、顏愛靜、傅君(1998)。台灣原住民對保留地政策之態度：一般意見調查及原住民菁英調查。台北：原住民族委員會。  延伸查詢new window
5.Hewstone, Miles(1989)。Causal Attribution: From Cognitive Processes to Collective Beliefs。Oxford：Basil Blackwell。  new window
6.許木柱(19910000)。Culture, self, and adaptation: The psychological anthropology of two Malayo-Polynesian groups in Taiwan。臺北：Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica。new window  new window
7.許木柱(1987)。阿美族的社會文化變遷與青少年適應。臺北：中央研究院民族學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.傅仰止(1994)。台灣漢人對原住民社經困境的個人歸因與結構歸因。台灣社會的民眾意向：社會科學的分析 \\ 伊慶春 (主編)。臺北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
9.孫大川(20000000)。夾縫中的族群建構：臺灣原住民的語言、文化與政治。臺北：聯合文學。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.謝世忠(1987)。認同的污名：臺灣原住民的族群變遷。自立晚報社文化出版部。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.山海文化雙月刊(1997)。都市原住民生活狀況調查報告（中華民國八十四年）。都市原住民生活狀況調查報告（中華民國八十四年）。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
12.行政院原住民委員會(2000)。原住民權益手冊。原住民權益手冊。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
13.行政院原住民委員會(2000)。政府採購法與原住民權益。政府採購法與原住民權益。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
14.李朝賢(1990)。臺灣地方經濟發展差異之研究。宏揚臺灣經驗迎接二十一世紀。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
15.張茂桂(2000)。原住民族與國家。社會意向電話調查執行報告（八十八年度至八十九年度）。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.謝高橋(1995)。臺灣大都會原住民的居住隔離：以臺北市為例。中西都會區之發展與面臨的問題。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
17.Blumer, Herbert、Duster, Troy(1980)。Theories of Race and Social Action。Sociological Theories: Race and Colonialism。Paris, France。  new window
18.Hughes, Michael、Tuch, Steven A.(2000)。How Beliefs About Poverty Influence Racial Policy Attitudes。Racialized Politics: The Debate About Racism in America。Chicago, IL。  new window
其他
1.行政院原住民委員會(1998)。中華民國八十七年臺灣原住民生活狀況調查報告，臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：917（臺灣：907，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1586744 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67404414
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上