:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:教育與社會秩序:解析升學主義
書刊名:教育實踐與研究
作者:顏學誠 引用關係
作者(外文):Yen, Hsueh-cheng
出版日期:2014
卷期:27:1
頁次:頁121-143
主題關鍵詞:文明升學主義社會流動社會秩序教育改革Academic elitismCivilizationEducation reformSocial mobilitySocial order
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:673
  • 點閱點閱:130
本文探討教育在中國文明所扮演的功能。文明是一種由陌生人所組成的大規模複雜社會,如何在陌生人之間建立起穩定的互動是必須解決的問題。本文指出先秦諸子已意識到這種問題,並提出尚賢的階梯架構作為建立文明秩序的基礎。透過將人擺放在高低不同的階梯位置,提供陌生人之間分配權力與財富的框架。相對於印度種姓與歐洲封建社會,尚賢強調人可透過自身的努力而改變階梯位置。教育的重要在於提供了評價階梯位置的標準以及資源分配的準則,並指導與鼓勵人們攀爬階梯。尚賢的階梯架構強調社會流動性,但允許下層階級翻身,也意味著當權者的地位可能下降。先秦諸子尚賢的理念,不必然會被當權者所實踐。本文透過科舉制度,說明給予老百姓晉身的機會對君主權威所產生的助益,並指出順暢的階梯流動是帝國得以整合地方社會的重要手段。經過一千多年的薰陶,透過教育翻身成為中國文化的重要成分,也是現今升學主義的源頭。教育改革為解決升學主義所帶來之弊病,一方面試圖瓦解階梯式的評比,另一方面強調每個人皆有不可改變的內在本質,而教育之目的是要針對此本質適性揚才,並非建立起普同的評比來衡量學生的高低。然本文認為,教改當前所面臨的困境正在於人們仍希望透過教育來做為翻身的機制。
The article discusses two issues in Chinese education mobility: The emergence of the meritocracy ideal and its realization through the civil service examination. I propose that a theory of civilization contending a complex society must transcend the concentric model of kinship distance calculation in order to incorporate non-kin strangers into the enlarged social unit. The pre-Qin philosophers saw the problem when they argued against guanxi relationalism for it is ill-suited for organizing a complex society filled with strangers. In its stead, they proposed a ladder structure whereby strangers could be comparatively evaluated based on absolute standards and that one's position on the ladder should be the basis for the distribution of political power and material wealth. However, the upward mobility assumed in meritocracy was a threat to the privileged position of the dominant class. I argue the threat was transformed into an asset to the Chinese emperors through the civil service examination. By recruiting commoners to supplant the old guards in the court, the examination consolidated the power of the ruler at the expense of the reigning bureaucrats. Moreover, by encouraging commoners to compete in the examination, it also provided a low-cost means for the -integration of local societies. Contrary to the view that education mobility is a façade to disguise class reproduction, I argue it was an integral part of the Chinese political system which shaped the Chinese understanding of education.
期刊論文
1.Dill, D. D.、Soo, M.(2005)。Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking system。Higher Education,49(4),495-533。  new window
2.Lewis, O.、Barnouw, V.(1956)。Caste and the Jajmani system in a north Indian village。The Scientific Monthly,83(2),66-81。  new window
3.Elman, Benjamin A.(1991)。Political, social, and cultural reproduction via civil service examinations in Late Imperial China。The Journal of Asian Studies,50(1),7-28。  new window
4.Marginson, S.(2006)。Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education。Higher Education,52(1),1-39。  new window
5.劉正(20061200)。補習在臺灣的變遷、效能與階層化。教育研究集刊,52(4),1-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.余英時(20050600)。試說科舉在中國史上的功能與意義。二十一世紀,89,4-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.李弘祺(20031200)。中國科舉制度的歷史意義及解釋--從艾爾曼(Benjamin Elman)對明清考試制度的研究談起。臺大歷史學報,32,237-267。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.王震武、林文瑛(19981200)。傳統與現代華人的「士大夫觀念」--階級社會的素樸心理學分析。本土心理學研究,10,119-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.王震武(20020600)。升學主義的成因及其社會心理基礎--一個歷史觀察。本土心理學研究,17,3-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.張郁雯、林文瑛(20031200)。升學主義還是升學機會?--升學壓力的社會意涵。教育心理學報,35(2),167-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王瑞邦(2004)。自我比較與互相比較:教改思潮下國小教學評量研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Miyazaki, Ichisada、Schirokauer, Conrad(1981)。China’s Examination Hell: The Civil Service Examinations of Imperial China。New Haven, CT:Yale University Press。  new window
2.閻雲翔(1996)。The Flow of Gifts: Reciprocity and Social Networks in a Chinese Village。Stanford University Press。  new window
3.王政忠(2011)。你會不會回來。台北:時報出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.梁漱溟(1949)。中國文化要義。台北:正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Lewellen, T. C.(2003)。Political anthropology。Westport, CT:Praeger。  new window
6.Li, Jin(2012)。Cultural foundations of learning: East and west。Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Zeng, K.(1999)。Dragon gate: Competitive examinations and their consequences。London, UK:Cassell。  new window
8.Bourdieu, P.、Passeron, Jean-Claude、Nice, R.(1979)。The Inheritors: French Students and Their Relation to Culture。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
9.Yang, Mayfair(1994)。Gifts, Favors, and Banquets: The Art of Social Relationships in China。New York:Cornell University Press。  new window
10.何懷宏(1998)。選舉社會及其終結:秦漢至晚清歷史的一種社會學闡釋。北京:生活.讀書.新知三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
11.Watkins, D.、Biggs, J.(2001)。Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives。Hong Kong:Comparative Education Research Centre, the University of Hong Kong。  new window
12.費孝通(1991)。鄉土中國.鄉土重建。上海:香港:上海書店:三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
13.Dumont, Louis、Sainsbury, Mark、Dumont, Louis、Gulati, Basia(1980)。Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications。Chicago, Illinois:University of Chicago Press。  new window
14.Kipnis, Andrew B.(1997)。Producing guanxi: Sentiment, self, and subculture in a north China village。Durham, North Carolina:Duke University Press。  new window
15.金耀基(1992)。中國社會與文化:人際關係中人情之分析。香港:牛津大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.李兵(2005)。書院教育與科舉關係研究。臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心。  延伸查詢new window
17.鄧嗣禹(1977)。中國考試制度史。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
18.黃光國(20050000)。儒家關係主義:文化反思與典範重建。臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.何炳棣(1962)。The Ladder of Success in Imperial China: Aspects of Social Mobility, 1368-1911。Columbia University Press。  new window
20.劉子健(19871100)。兩宋史研究彙編。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Bourne, E. J.、Shweder, R. A.(1984)。Does Concept of Person Vary Cross-Culturally?。Cultural Theory: Essays on Mind。New York, NY:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Ong, A.(2004)。Higher learning: Education availability and flexible citizenship in global space。Diversity and citizen education: global perspective。San Francisco, CA:John Wiley & Sons. Inc。  new window
3.楊國樞、葉啟政(1979)。升學主義下的教育問題。當前臺灣社會問題。臺北市:巨流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Sahlins, Marshall(1972)。On the Sociology of Primitive Exchange。Stone Age Economics。Chicago:Aldine-Atherton。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE