:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:社會學習領域教師轉化教科書之研究
書刊名:新竹教育大學教育學報
作者:楊雲龍徐慶宏
作者(外文):Yang, Yun-longHsu, Ching-hung
出版日期:2007
卷期:24:2
頁次:頁1-25
主題關鍵詞:社會學習領域教師教科書教科書轉化Social studies teacherTextbookTextbook transformation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(3) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:12
  • 共同引用共同引用:110
  • 點閱點閱:77
 九年一貫課程實施以來,過去全國統一之課程標準已由課程綱要所取代,雖然學校與 教師的課程設計權已具有相當的彈性與空間,然而教科書的使用仍然相當普遍,許多教師 仍將教科書視為等同於課程,本研究的旨趣就在於探尋社會學習領域教科書對教師的意義, 教師轉化教科書所遭遇的問題,教科書轉化為課程後的差距,以及影響教師轉化教科書以 實施課程的因素。研究設計以內容分析法針對教科書內涵進行分析,並運用訪談法針對三 位國小社會學習領域教師進行資料蒐集,研究結果發現: 一、教科書是教師實施課程的核心工具。 二、教師轉化教科書時遭遇能力限制與壓力束縛等問題。 三、教師的知覺課程、運作課程與教科書之間有差距存在。 四、教育情境、學生狀況、教師特質與課程輔助教材影響教科書的轉化。
The National Curriculum Standard has been displaced by the Grade 1-9 Curriculum Guidelines since the Grade 1-9 Curriculum was implemented in 2001. Although the Guidelines are more flexible for schools and teachers, the textbook-centered phenomenon is still widespread, and many teachers consider the textbooks as curriculum. To inquiry the construction of social studies textbooks for teachers, the dilemma of textbook transformation, the gap produced from textbook transformation, and the factors which affect the curriculum implementation are the interests of the research. The researchers analyzed the content of social studies textbook by using content analysis method, and interviewed with three social studies teachers of elementary school. The results of study include: 1.The textbooks are the inner tools of teachers’ practice in curriculum. 2.The teachers are confronted with the dilemmas of ability and pressure in the process of textbook transformation. 3.There are gaps between teachers’ perception about curriculum and textbooks, and between teachers’ operation of curriculum and textbooks. 4.The educational circumstance, the characteristics of pupils and teachers, and curriculum materials are factors that affected the transformation of textbooks.
期刊論文
1.郭至和(20000700)。國小鄉土教學活動課程轉化之個案研究。課程與教學,3(3),49-72+164。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Brophy, Jere E.(1982)。How teachers influence what is taught and learned in classrooms。The Elementary School Journal,83(1),1-13。  new window
3.鄭世仁(19921000)。揭開「教科書」的面紗。國立教育資料館館訊,18,1-7。  延伸查詢new window
4.Eisner, E. W.(1990)。Creative curriculum development and practice。Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,6(1),62-73。  new window
5.周珮儀(20051000)。我國教科書研究的分析:1979-2004。課程與教學,8(4),91-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.李宗薇(19980100)。教科書的編輯機制。課程與教學,1(1),41-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.黃政傑(20030100)。重建教科書的概念與實務。課程與教學,6(1),1-12+163。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.藍順德(20041200)。二十年來國內博碩士論文教科書研究之分析。國立編譯館館刊,32(4),2-25。  延伸查詢new window
9.周珮儀(20020900)。國小教師解讀教科書的方式。國立臺北師範學院學報. 教育類,15,115+117-137。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Shulman, Lee S.(1987)。Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform。Harvard Educational Review,57(1),1-23。  new window
11.Johnson, M.(1969)。The Translation of Curriculum into Instruction。Journal of Curriculum Studies,1(2),115-131。  new window
12.Klein, M. F.、Wright, J. E.、Tye, K. A.(1979)。A Study of Schooling: Curriculum。Dhi Delta Kappan,61(4),244-248。  new window
13.Schug, M. C., Western, R. D.,、Enochs, L. G.(1997)。Why do social studies teachers use textbooks? The answer may lie in economic theory。Social Education,61(2),97-101。  new window
學位論文
1.黃上芬(1997)。國中理化課程轉化之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張欣儀(2001)。生活領域中社會課程轉化之研究--以兩位九年一貫課程試辦小學之教師為例(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Eisner, E. W.(2002)。The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Education。  new window
2.Eisner, Elliot W.(1985)。The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs。Macmillan。  new window
3.教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要社會學習領域。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
4.施良方(1997)。課程理論:課程的基礎、原理與問題。麗文文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Maxim, G. W.(1991)。Social Studies and the Elementary School Child。New York:Macmillan Publishing.。  new window
6.Beane, J. A.、Toepfer, C. F. Jr.、Alessi, S. J. Jr.(1986)。Curriculum planning and development。Allyn and Bacon。  new window
7.黃政傑(1989)。課程改革。台北:漢文書店。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃政傑(1987)。課程評鑑。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
9.Evans, R. W.(2004)。The social studies wars: What should we teach the children?。Teachers College Press。  new window
10.Bailer, E.、A. Lewy(1991)。The Impact of Textbooks。The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum。Oxford。  new window
11.Marsh, C. J.,、Willis, G.(1995)。Curriculum: Alternative Approaches。Ongoing Issues。New Jersey。  new window
12.Saylor, J. G., Alexander, W. M.,、Lewis, A. J.(1981)。Curriculum Planning for Better Teaching and Learning (4th ed。New York。  new window
13.Tyler, R. W.(1981)。Specific Approaches to Curriculum Development。Curriculum & Instruction。California。  new window
14.Westbury, I.(1991)。Textbooks。The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum。Oxford。  new window
圖書論文
1.Venezky, R. L.(1992)。Textbooks in school and society。Handbook of research on curriculum: A project of the American Educational Research Association。New York, NY:Maxwell Macmillan。  new window
2.Goodlad, J. I.、Klein, M. F.、Tye, K. A.(1979)。The domains of curriculum and their study。Curriculum inquiry: The study of curriculum practice。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE