:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Gadamer「遊戲」概念及其教育內涵
書刊名:教育理論與實踐學刊
作者:游振鵬 引用關係
作者(外文):Yu, Chen-peng
出版日期:2007
卷期:16
頁次:頁99-119
主題關鍵詞:藝術遊戲美學教育ArtPlayAestheticsEducation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:148
  • 點閱點閱:67
本文旨在探究Gadamer的遊戲概念,進而建構Gadamer遊戲概念的教育內涵,獲致以下結論:\r 1. 就Gadamer的遊戲概念而言:根基開顯真理的美國遊戲觀,淵源於人文主義傳統及精神科學,Gadamer遊戲概念的重要內涵為藝術即遊戲、遊戲即往返律動、遊戲即自我呈現、藝術作品的詮釋即傳統與闡釋者相互遊戲、透過遊戲可呈現意義的整體、藝術欣賞具有同時性。 2. 就Gadamer遊戲概念的教育內涵而言:教育過程方面,教育即師生相互創生文化的過程,整體在教育的藝術遊戲中自我轉化,教育即超越與歸屬的動態歷程;教育內容的知識層面,課程知識係學科內容與師生相互遊戲而詮釋拓展,教育內容的美感層面,美育實踐在彰顯藝術或遊戲的特質;教育方法方面,教育即藝術理解辯證性給與取;教育學方法論方面,教育理論與教育實踐的關係則是教育實踐開展教育理論,再從教育實踐中不斷修正教育理論之辯證發展。
The purpose of the study is to analyze “play” concept in Gadamer’s Aesthetics and Its Implications on Education. The results are concluded follows:\r 1. The themes of “play” concept in Gadamer’s Aesthetics are discussed in the following:(1)art as play, (2) play as to─and─fro movement and self─renewing, (3)play as self─representation, (4)play as playing and being─played in between tradition and interpreters, (5)the characteristics of transformation into structure and contemporaneousness in the works of art. 2. Based on Gadamer’s Aesthetics, implications on education and pedagogy are as follows:(1)education facilitating students self─transformation through playing in art, (2)education╱Bildung as dialectical transcendence and appropriation process, (3)the knowledge─content of education expanding within interplaying of teachers’ and students’ horizon, (4)aesthetic education practice illustrating the characteristics of art of play, (5)education as dialectical give and take process of interpreting of art, (6)educational theory and practice as “inter─becoming” and dialectic.
期刊論文
1.游振鵬(2006)。Gadame「美學真理觀在教育研究上之涵義。國立臺中教育大學國民教育研究集刊,15,91-107。  延伸查詢new window
2.van Manen, Max(1982)。Phenomenological pedagogy。Curriculum inquiry,12(3),283-299。  new window
3.游振鵬(20040300)。教育理論與教育實踐的關係及其合理性發展。國民教育研究學報,12,1-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.方永泉(20030900)。從「遊戲」意義的轉折來反思當代遊戲文化的特徵及其引發的教育思考。教育研究集刊,49(3),63-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Gadamer, H. G.、Sullivan, R. R.(1985)。Philosophical Apprenticeships。Massachusetts:Massachusetts Institute of Technology。  new window
2.Gadamer, H. G.、Wachterhauser, B. R.(1994)。Hermeneutics and Truth--Evanston。Illinois:Northwestern University Press。  new window
3.Grondin, J.、J. Weinsheimer(2003)。Hans-Georg Gadamer--A Biography。Yale:Yale University。  new window
4.Kearney, R.、Rasmussen, D.(2001)。Continental Aesthetics: Romanticism to Postmodernism。Blackwell Publishers Inc.。  new window
5.Warnke, G.(1987)。Gadamer--Hermeneutics, Tradition and Reason。Oxford:Polity Press。  new window
6.Cooper, D. E.(1992)。A Companion to Aesthetics。Oxford:Malden, Massachusetts:Blackwell。  new window
7.崔光宙、林逢祺(2000)。教育美學。臺北市:五南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Gadamer, Hans-Georg(1991)。Truth and Method。The Crossroad Publishing Company。  new window
9.Spariosu, M. I.(1989)。Dionysus Reborn-- Play and the Aesthetic Dimension in Modern Philosophical and Scientific Discourse。Ithaca:Cornell University Press。  new window
10.Schiller, Friedrich、Snell, Reginald(1965)。On the Aesthetic Education of Man。New York:Frederick Ungar Publishing。  new window
11.Gallagher, Shaun(1992)。Hermeneutics and education。State University of New York Press。  new window
12.Gadamer, H.-G.、Linge, David E.(1976)。Philosophical Hermeneutics。University of California Press。  new window
13.楊深坑(1997)。溝通理性、生命情懷與教育過程:哈伯瑪斯的溝通理性與教育。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.陳榮華(1992)。海德格哲學:思考與存有。輔仁大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.劉千美(20010000)。差異與實踐:當代藝術哲學研究。臺北:立緖文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Eisner, E.(1985)。Aesthetics modes of knowing。Learning and teaching the ways of knowing。Chicago:NSSE。  new window
2.Stambaugh, J(1997)。Gadamer on the Beautiful. The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer。The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer。Chicago:Open Court。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE