:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:營造社區意識活絡農村社區:以嘉義市圓林仔志工參與社區營造為例
書刊名:成人及終身教育學刊
作者:賴昭志何青蓉 引用關係
作者(外文):Lai, Chao-chihHo, Ching-jung
出版日期:2009
卷期:12
頁次:頁81-116
主題關鍵詞:社區營造社區意識志工Community empowermentCommunity consciousnessVolunteers
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:101
  • 點閱點閱:112
本研究個案── 圓林仔社區位於嘉義市西北邊陲,為百年古農村部落型態,研究者因應政府推動「新故鄉社區營造計畫」,提出「圓林仔『古厝新貌』工程計畫」社區營造案,經由此一營造過程,終使該地被指定為「生態社區」,居民並自組「圓林仔社區發展協會」,至今仍繼續向內政部爭取提案,賡續營造社區成可居和可遊的自為社區。本研究探究此一社區營造計畫中,志工社區意識發展歷程。本研究係採個案研究方法,透由訪談、活動及會議觀察和相關文件的分析,發現志工社區意識發展經過以下的歷程:(一)藉由田野調查,覺察認識社區;(二)透過問卷調查、實地訪談,以擴大社區關懷;(三)引進資源凝聚社區文化共識;(四)創設活動爭取社區尊榮;(五)媒體報導文史尋根,衍生社區榮耀;(六)藉由宗族耆宿經驗發展社區認同;以及(七)參訪觀摩教育研習,有助培養社區自覺。進一步,並針對研究發現提出以下建議:首先,在對社區工作者方面:做好資源調查、借重社區經驗修正計畫,以貼近社區、推動社區成人教育與自發性行動的連結、參訪覺察與澄清營造概念;其次,就營造的社區而言:社區生活層次的提升,藉以將原生文化與特色文化連結;以及從純產業到文化產業,以免社區特色物化或流於形式。
Yuan Lin Zai Community is a century-old agricultural village on the northwest side of Chiayi City. The community is a treasure trove of old trees, historic monuments and cultural relics. As of today, the committee is seeking the support of the Ministry of the Interior to become a “livable” and “travelable” autonomous community. In accordance with the government’s launching of the “New Homeland Community Empowerment” project, one of the authors proposed the “Reshaping Yuan Lin Zai” plan. With in-depth interviews with locals, participation in activities and meetings, and relevant literature references, it was found that the community empowerment project could help residents in Yuan Lin Zai community to construct a diversified community consciousness: (1) community cognition was built with experts’ participation in field research; (2) problem clarification and on-site interviews strengthened residents’ community concern; (3) media coverage created a sense of pride among residents; (4) activities helped to create the community’s self-respect; (5) the experiences of revered seniors helped to enhance residents’ identification with the community; (6) the introduction of resources forged a cultural consensus; and (7) visits to other communities or workshops helped to cultivate community self-consciousness. Yuan Lin Zai was finally designated as an “ecological community” and residents formed the Yuan Lin Zai Community Development Committee. The authors, witnessing the community’s empowerment process, proposed the two suggestions. First, community workers engage in a thorough investigation of resources, learn from other communities’ experiences to make suitable plans, promote connections between adult education and spontaneous activities, and clarify the empowerment plan to local people. Second, communities in the process of empowerment retain their traditions and culture to avoid their special features from being considered as mere objects or lacking in substance.
期刊論文
1.陳其南(1998)。社區總體營造的永續發展策略。社教資料雜誌,241,5-7。  延伸查詢new window
2.王秋絨(19970100)。從終身教育的觀點--論社區成人教育人才的培育。臺灣教育,553,6-15。  延伸查詢new window
3.莊瀚華、吳郁萍(2000)。社區總體營造之釋。社區發展季刊,90,170-181。  延伸查詢new window
4.廖正宏(19900900)。人的因素與社區發展。社區發展季刊,51,7-9。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡培村(1997)。從終身教育論析社區營造的理念與策略。成人敎育雙月刊,35,16-22。  延伸查詢new window
6.賴昭志(2003)。社會變遷中的農村社區營造--以嘉義市圓林仔社區爲例。嘉義市政,179,4-12。  延伸查詢new window
7.Cochrun, S. E.(1994)。Understanding and enhancing neighborhood sense of community。Journal of Planning Literature,9,92-100。  new window
8.Lovett, T.(1971)。Community Adult Education。Studies in Education,3(1),2-14。  new window
9.梅高文(19940300)。公民意識與志願服務。社區發展季刊,65,57-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.黃富順(1996)。推展社區成人教育加強社區意識。成人教育,30,5-15。  延伸查詢new window
11.夏鑄九(19990900)。市民參與和地方自主性:臺灣的社區營造。城市與設計學報,9/10,175-185。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.McMillan, David W.、Chavis, David M.(1986)。Sense of Community: A Definition and Theory。Journal of Community Psychology,14(1),6-23。  new window
13.陳其南、陳瑞樺(19980100)。臺灣社區營造運動之回顧。研考報導,41,21-37。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王政彥(2002)。終身學習社區合作網絡的發展。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林振春(1999)。臺灣社區敎育發展之研究。臺北:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.黃光雄、簡茂發(2000)。敎育研究法。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭晃二、陳亮全(2003)。社區動力遊戲:工作坊使社區活起來。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃世輝(2001)。社區自主營造的理念與機制。台北:建築情報季刊雜誌社。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃瑞琴(2003)。質的教育研究方法。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
7.Jarvis, P. J.(1992)。Paradoxes of learning: On becoming an individual in society。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
8.徐震(1985)。社區發展--方法與研究。臺北:中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.Freire, Paulo(1970)。Pedagogy of the Oppressed。New York:Seabury Press。  new window
10.黃煌雄、郭石吉、林時機(2001)。社區總體營造總體檢調查報告書。台北:遠流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.蔡宏進(1993)。鄉村發展的理論與實際。東大。  延伸查詢new window
12.曾旭正(2007)。台灣的社區營造。台北:遠足文化。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.蔡長庚(20030405)。聽蛙鳴圓林仔生態豐富。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡長庚(2003)。美化家園從清潔開始。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳其南(19950219)。經營大台灣從小社區做起。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.李丁讚(2005)。臺灣社會的誕生與轉型。凝聚臺灣生命力。臺北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
2.Caffarella, R.、Merriara, S. B.(2000)。Linking the individual learner to the contest of adult learning。Handbook of adult and continuing education。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE