:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:啟發大學生批判思考之教學成效探究:以傳播科系為例
書刊名:成人及終身教育學刊
作者:馬雨沛 引用關係
作者(外文):Ma, Yu-pei
出版日期:2014
卷期:22
頁次:頁33-68
主題關鍵詞:大學生成人批判思考傳播教育College studentAdultCritical thinkingCommunication education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:138
  • 點閱點閱:163
本研究主要目的在針對屬於成人前期的大學傳播科系學生,發展融入學科的批判思考智能培訓方案,一則培養未來公民能適應成人生活,敏銳地察覺問題、鑑別資訊的真偽和品質、養成獨立思辨及反省的能力;另一方面,應提供問題導向與資訊處理的知識,訓練學生瞭解情境,並在模擬經驗中學習自我反省。 因此,本研究之教學策略採取批判思考教學模式,以澄清、診斷、練習與評鑑等階段規劃教學活動。教學方法採用講授法、反詰法、問題解決法、合作學習法、模擬情境等,再據以分析課堂討論資料、議題文本回饋學習單、深度報導企劃案與同儕評核等,用以探討學生對應用於新聞學之批判思考技能啟發情形。 研究結果發現,多元的教學策略有助於學生培養與發展─比較質疑、辨認假設、論證評鑑與邏輯推理之批判思考技能,建議未來傳播教育應持續採融入學科的批判思考教學,以促成轉化學習,進而建立批判思考習慣。
The research aims at the training in critical thinking of the university students of early adulthood for the purposes of, on one hand, social adaptation, issue detection, fraudulence prevention and independent thinking and on the other hand, the formation of knowledge about the issues concerned and information digestion, the comprehension of milieu and self-reflection in the simulated experience. The instruction strategy involves the critical thinking that integrates clarification, realization and evaluation. The instruction method accommodates lectures, elenchus, problem solving, teamwork and simulation, through which, the course material, feedback, proposal and peer evaluation are analyzed in the hope of the development in the critical thinking in journalism. The research indicates that the comprehensive instruction strategy benefits the students in the training of the critical thinking in inquiry, identification, assumption, evaluation and logic. Therefore, the future education in the mass communication should be entitled to gowith constant involvement of critical thinking instruction for the anticipation of learning transformation and critical thinking.
期刊論文
1.黃明月(20121000)。網路健康資訊之批判思考技能發展之方案規劃研究。課程與教學,15(4),217-239。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Garrison, D. R.(1991)。Critical thinking and adult education: A concept model for developing critical thinking in adult learners。International Journal of Lifelong Education,10(4),287-303。  new window
3.李瑛(19950700)。成人批判思考發展之探討。臺灣教育,535,36-40。  延伸查詢new window
4.Yang, Y. C.、Newby, T. J.、Bill, R. L.(2005)。Using Socratic questioning to promote critical thinking skills through asynchronous discussion forums in distance learning environments。The American Journal of Distance Education,19(3),163-181。  new window
5.陳韜文(19990400)。傳播教育的知識結構問題:思考分析與實務技術訓練之間的張力。新聞學研究,59,137-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.蘇明勇(20031200)。批判思考之思考批判:科學教育中的批判思考教學與評量。科學教育研究與發展季刊,2003專刊,88-119。  延伸查詢new window
7.Ennis, R. H.(1985)。A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills。Educational Leadership,43(2),45-48。  new window
8.王秋絨(19960600)。葉尼斯、貝爾、馬克貝刻的批判思考觀在成人批判教學上的意義。社會教育學刊,25,89-108。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳麗華(19890700)。國小社會科批判思考教學的省思。現代教育,4(3)=15,121-135。  延伸查詢new window
10.Kramer, D. A.、Woodruff, D. S.(1986)。Relativistic and dialectical thought in three adult age-groups。Human Development,29(5),280-290。  new window
11.鍾蔚文、臧國仁、陳百齡(19960700)。傳播教育應該教些什麼?--幾個極端的想法。新聞學研究,53,107-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Ennis, R. H.(1993)。Critical Thinking Assessment。Theory into Practice,32(3),179-186。  new window
13.Angeli, C.、Valanides, N.(2009)。Instructional effects on critical thinking: performance on ill-defined issues。Learning and Instruction,19,322-334。  new window
研究報告
1.楊雅婷、國立成功大學教育研究所(2005)。我國大學生批判思考能力與批判思考意向關係之實證研究 (計畫編號:NSC93-2520-S-006-001)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林作逸(2006)。國小資優班媒體素養批判思考課程設計與實施之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.李承宇(2003)。閱聽人思考的變革:媒體素養意涵新探(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.林芳瑜(2010)。批判思考教學運用在媒體素養教育之行動研究--以國小高年級學童為例(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.葉玉珠(2005)。批判思考測驗第二級。  延伸查詢new window
2.InhelInhelder, B.、De Caprona, D.、Comu-Wells, A.(1987)。Piaget today。Hove, UK:Psychology Press。  new window
3.McPeck, J. E.(1990)。Teaching critical thinking: Dialogue and dialectic。New York, NY:Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc.。  new window
4.Watson, G.、Glaser, E. M.(1964)。Watson Glaser critical thinking appraisal, form Z-Manual。New York, NY:Harcourt, Brace & World。  new window
5.Paul, R. W.(1990)。Critical thinking: what every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world。Sonoma State University。  new window
6.Brookfield, S. D.(1987)。Developing critical thinkers: Challenging adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and acting。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
7.Paul, Richard W.(1995)。Critical Thinking: How to Prepare Students for a Rapidly Changing World。Santa Rosa, CA:Foundation for Critical Thinking。  new window
8.溫明麗(1997)。批判性思考教學:哲學之旅。臺北市:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.黃政傑(1996)。創思與合作的教學法。師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
10.Norris, Stephen P.、Ennis, Robert H.(1989)。Evaluating critical thinking。Midwest Publications。  new window
11.Beyer, Barry K.(1988)。Developing A Thinking Skills Program。Allyn and Bacon。  new window
12.王石番(1991)。傳播內容分析法--理論與實踐。台北:幼獅文化。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Gillett, A. Y.(1987)。An investigation of critical thinking level and prospective teachers(8729889)。  new window
其他
1.葉玉珠(2009)。批判思考教學:理論與教學設計,http://ctld.ntu.edu.tw/_epaper/news_detail.php?nid=251。  延伸查詢new window
2.冀劍制(2013)。如何學習批判性思考,http://www.hfu.edu.tw/~cchi/critical%20thinking%20web/how-to-leam.htm。  new window
3.沈家平,陳文典(2004)。批判思考智能,http://phy.ntnu.edu.tw/nstsc/pdf/book5/03.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Piaget, J.(1970)。Piaget's theory。Carmichael's Handbook of Child Psychology。New York, NY:Wiley。  new window
2.Van Dijk, T. A.(1985)。Introduction: Levels and dimensions of discourse analysis。Handbook of discourse analysis。London, UK:Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE