臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：效用、基本善與能力發展--論「平等」的多元視野及其教育蘊義
書刊名：教育研究集刊
作者：王俊斌 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wang, Chun-ping
出版日期：2012
卷期：58:2
頁次：頁37-69
主題關鍵詞：效用；基本善；能力取向；社會正義；Sen；Utility；Primary goods；Capabilities approach；Social justice
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:157
  • 點閱點閱:113
本文之目的係在Sen〈什麼樣的平等？〉一文的基礎上，藉由效益論、正義論與能力取向理論等相關文獻之分析，深入探究「效益平等」、「總體效用平等」、「Rawls的基本善平等」，以及「基本能力平等」等四種不同觀點之內涵及其侷限性。相較於能力取向理論在福利經濟學與倫理學領域已累積的大量文獻，能力取向理論之教育應用研究卻仍極為有限。因此，本文最後嘗試提出「平等」的多元思維取向，期待能夠為未來教育公平議題研究提供更妥適的倫理學基礎。
This essay, based on the foundations laid out by Amartya Sen in his article “Equality of what?” as well as other related literature and studies on utilitarianism, theory of justice, and the capabilities approach, delved into the contents and limitations of four different “equality” viewpoints which encompassed “utilitarian equality,” “total utility equality,” the “Rawlsian equality of primary goods,” and the “basic capability equality.” A large amount of research had been previously conducted on the application of the capabilities approach to welfare economics and ethics, but research on the educational applications of the capabilities approach remained comparatively sparse. To address this problem, this essay proposesin its concluding section multiple perspectives on “equality” and attempted to provide an ethical foundation that would better suite the discussions of educational equality in the future.
期刊論文
1.張鈿富、馮丰儀(20100300)。臺灣國民中小學校長倫理傾向及道德領導行為之研究。教育與心理研究，33(1)，73-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王俊斌(20100600)。論M. Nussbaum「能力取向」的正義觀與教育發展。教育研究集刊，56(2)，41-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Saito, M.(2003)。Amartya Sen's Capability Approach to Education: A Critical Exploration。Journal of Philosophy of Education，37(1)，17-33。  new window
4.楊深坑(20081200)。社會公義、差異政治與教育機會均等的新視野。當代教育研究，16(4)，1-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Hammond, P. J.(1979)。Equity in two-person situations。Econometrica，47，1127-1136。  new window
6.Harsanyi, J. C.(1975)。Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality? A critique of John Rawls's theory。American Political Science Review，69，594-606。  new window
7.Holland, B.(2008)。Ecology and the limits of justice: Establishing capability ceilings in Nussbaum' s capabilities approach。Journal of Human Development，9(3)，401-425。  new window
8.Barclay, L.(2003)。What kind of liberal is Martha Nussbaum?。Nordic Journal of Philosophy，4(2)，5-24。  new window
9.Walker, M.、Unternalter, E.(2007)。Amartya Sen's capability approach and society justice in education。  new window
10.Walker, M.(2008)。A human capabilities framework for evaluating student learning。Teaching in Higher Education，13(4)，477-487。  new window
圖書
1.Sen, Amartya K.(1987)。On ethics and economics。Blackwell Publishers。  new window
2.Copleston, Frederick Charles(2003)。A History of Philosophy: Greece and Rome。London：New York：Continuum Publishers：Continuum Publishers。  new window
3.Sen, Amartya、Williams, Bernard(1982)。Utilitarianism and Beyond。Utilitarianism and Beyond。Cambridge, CA：Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Nussbaum, Martha Craven(2006)。Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership。The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
5.林火旺(1999)。倫理學。臺北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Nussbaum, Martha C.(2011)。Creating capabilities: The human development approach。The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
7.Nussbaum, Martha C.(1995)。Poetic Justice: the Literary Imagination and Public Life。Beacon Press。  new window
8.楊瑩(1995)。教育機會均等--教育社會學的探究。台北：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳奎熹(1990)。教育社會學研究。臺北市：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
10.楊深坑(20020000)。科學理論與教育學發展。臺北：心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Rawls, John(2005)。Political liberalism。Columbia University Press。  new window
12.Habermas, Jürgen、Cronin, Ciaran、De Greif, Pablo(1998)。The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory。MIT Press。  new window
13.Rawls, John(1999)。A Theory of Justice。Harvard University Press。  new window
14.Kao, H. -C.、Lin, Z. -J.(1997)。經濟學的世界：總體與個體理論導引。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
15.Huang, H. -H.、Zhao, R. -Y.、Lu, S. -M.(2004)。教育部所屬預算分配結構之檢討。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
16.Alexander, J. M.(2008)。Capabilities and social justice: The political philosophy of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum。Aldershou, UK：Ashgate。  new window
17.Lyons, D.(1965)。The forms and limits of untilitarianism。London, UK。  new window
18.Plowden, B.(1967)。Childern and their primary schools: A report of the central advisory council for education。London, UK。  new window
19.Sumner, L. W.(1996)。Welfare, happiness, and ethics。Oxford, UK。  new window
20.Aristotle、Crisp, R.(2000)。The nichomachean ethics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
21.Sen, A. K.(1989)。Commodities and capability。New Delhi, India。  new window
22.Shih, J. -J.(1991)。論羅爾斯的差異原則。正義及其相關問題。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
23.Harsanyi, J. C.(1977)。Nonlinear social welfare functions: A rejoinder to professor Sen。Foundational problems in the special sciences。Dordercht。  new window
24.Hare, R. M.(1976)。Ethical theory and utilitarianism。Contemporary British Philosophy。London, UK。  new window
其他
1.European Group for Research on Equity in Educational Systems(2005)。Equity in European educational systems，http://www.nefmi.gov.hu/download.php?docID=296， 20110629。  new window
圖書論文
1.Sen, Amartya(1993)。Capability and Well-being。The Quality of Life。Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Sen, Amartya K.(1982)。Equality of what。Choice, welfare and measurement。Cambridge, Massachusetts：Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Cohen, G. A.(1993)。Equality of what? On welfare, goods, and cpapbilities。The quality of life。Oxford：Clarendon Press。  new window
4.Gewirtz, S.(2001)。Rethinking social justice: A conceptual analysis。Sociology of education today。Palgrave。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：944（臺灣：926，外國：18） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67432649
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上