:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學生關懷自身之探討:3W的分析
書刊名:教育心理學報
作者:郭丁熒 引用關係
作者(外文):Guo, Ding-ying
出版日期:2014
卷期:46:1
頁次:頁1-26
主題關鍵詞:大學生自身關懷CareSelfUndergraduate
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:521
  • 點閱點閱:132
本研究旨在透過大學生關心自己什麼事(What)、從何時開始關心(When)、及為何關心(Why)之探討,來了解大學生關懷自身的現況。本研究係以40位大學生為對象進行訪談,並將訪談資料進行編碼。研究結果發現:一、大學生關心在意的事項相當多元且全面,從微觀個人內在信念到鉅觀生態環境。二、大學生最關心「工作/家庭」、「休閒/環境」、「學習」等向度,並以「就業機會」一事項為最。三、大學生覺察自己關心在意事項的時間分布在各教育階段,其中大一是重要的關鍵期。四、大學生關心在意事情的原因廣泛,從事項本身到社會環境影響,其中以自我因素最為關鍵,家庭與學校的影響緊接在後。五、大學生關心在意事項的原因呈現多因盤錯及生態差異性。
The purpose of this study is to investigate the phenomenon of undergraduates' care-for-self. Forty undergraduates were interviewed to understand their care-for-self by assessing what they cared about, when they became aware of the events they cared about, and why they cared about those events. Data obtained from interviews were coded and analyzed. The findings of this study are summarized as the following. 1. The types of events undergraduates cared about were diverse, ranging from individual beliefs to environmental ecosystems. 2. The major dimensions undergraduates cared about were "job/family, recreation/environment", and "learning". Moreover, "job-opportunity" received the highest priority. 3. The time in which undergraduates began to become aware of their self-care-events varied at each academic stage. However, "the freshman stage" was a crucial time in which undergraduates become aware of their self-care-events. 4. The reasons why undergraduates cared about particular events varied, ranging from the nature of the event itself to its impact upon society. Specifically, "individual factors" were crucial, while "family" and "school factors" were minor. 5. There were a number of reasons why undergraduates cared about particular events, which were influenced by the context undergraduates grew under.
期刊論文
1.De Marzio, D. M.(2006)。The care of the self: Alcibiades I,Socratic teaching and ethics education。Journal of Education,187(3),103-127。  new window
2.邱珍琬(20110600)。首次離家大學女生對家的觀感--初探研究。彰化師大教育學報,19,31-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳一姍(2010)。大學危機1--高等教育退場朝啟動,我的大學不見了!。天下雜誌,444,72-77。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳一姍(2010)。大學危機2--專訪勞委會主委,金融海嘯也許是個轉機。天下雜誌,444,78-80。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳秀蓉、呂碧鴻(2005)。大學生健康認知與心理症狀間的關係。臺灣家庭醫學研究,3(1),15-27。  延伸查詢new window
6.郭丁熒(20120400)。增進大學生品格的教學模式之構建--以「關懷自身」為核心。課程與教學,15(2),21-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Ball, S. J.、Olmedo, A.(2013)。Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities。Critical Studies in Education,54(1),85-96。  new window
8.Burke, L. L.、Williams, M. G.(2011)。Celebrating a commitment to care: Building concernful practices among practitioners。Journal of Nursing Education,50(1),51-54。  new window
9.Foley, L.(2008)。If educators want to educate they have to care。ATA Magazine,88(3),16-17。  new window
10.Gunzenhauser, M. G.(2008)。Care of the self in a context of accountability。Teachers College Record,110(10),2224-2244。  new window
11.Infinito, J.(2003)。Jane Elliot meets Foucault: The formation of ethical identities in the classroom。Journal of Moral Education,32(1),67-76。  new window
12.Marshall, J. D.(2008)。'Developing' the self in the knowledge economy。Studies in Philosophy and Education,27(2/3),149-159。  new window
13.Mayo, C.(2005)。Testing resistance: Busno-cratic power, standardized tests, and care of the self。Educational Philosophy and Theory,37(3),357-363。  new window
14.Mihaly, M.(2005)。When parents divorce。Current Health,128(6),8-11。  new window
15.Moore, M. E. M.(2008)。Stories of vocation: Education for vocational discernment。Religious Education,103(2),218-239。  new window
16.Reay, D.(2003)。A risky business? Mature working-class women students and access to higher education。Gender and Education,15(3),301-317。  new window
17.Robertson, D. R.(2005)。Generative paradox in learner-centered college teaching。Innovative Higher Education,29(3),181-194。  new window
18.Tupper, J. A.(2007)。From care-less to care-full: Education for citizenship in schools and beyond。Alberta Journal of Educational Research,53(3),259-272。  new window
19.Vansieleghem, N.(2011)。Philosophy with children as an exercise in parrhesia: An account of a philosophical experiment with children in Cambodia。Journal of Philosophy of Education,45(2),321-337。  new window
20.Zembylas, M.、Fendler, L.(2007)。Reframing emotion in education through lenses of parrhesia and care of the self。Studies in Philosophy and Education,26(4),319-333。  new window
21.Zhang, L.、Li, X.、Kaljee, L.、Fang, X.、Lin, X.(2009)。I'I felt I have grown up as an adult': Caregiving experience of children affected by HIV/AIDS in China。Child Care, Health and Development,35(4),542-550。  new window
22.McGuire, W. J.、Padawer-Singer, A.(1976)。Trait salience in the spontaneous self-concept。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,33,743-754。  new window
23.Peters, Michael A.(2003)。Truth-telling as an educational practice of the self: Foucault, Parrhesia and the ethics of subjectivity。Oxford Review of Education,29(2),207-224。  new window
24.蔡錚雲(20011100)。傅柯是如何去修補現象學與倫理學之間的缺口--自我照顧與管理自己。哲學雜誌,37,36-59。  延伸查詢new window
25.黃騰(20051200)。從「角色」到「自我」--論教師改變的歷史困境與可能。教育研究集刊,51(4),89-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.劉若蘭、楊昌裕(20091200)。不同身分背景大學生校園經驗與學習成果滿意度之關係模式研究。新竹教育大學教育學報,26(2),1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.王秀槐、黃金俊(20100600)。擇其所愛、愛其所擇:從自我決定理論看大學多元入學制度中學生的科系選擇與學習成果。教育科學研究期刊,55(2),1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.張玉潔、胡志偉(19910000)。中國大學生的自發性自我概念:內容向度及向度重要性研究。中華心理學刊,33,11-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.許宏儒(20071200)。自身、他者與教育:傅柯的「關懷自身」概念與他者之間的關係。臺東大學教育學報,18(2),105-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.張學善、林旻良、葉淑文(20101100)。大學生情緒智慧、人際關係與自我概念之關係探究。輔導與諮商學報,32(2),1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Super, Donald E.(1980)。A Life-Span, Life-Space Approach to Career Development。Journal of Vocational Behavior,16(3),282-298。  new window
32.Whetten, D. A.(1989)。What constitutes a theoretical contribution?。Academy of Management Review,14(4),490-495。  new window
33.蕭佳純(20090900)。家庭社經地位、自我概念、學業表現對大學畢業生就業情形之探討。當代教育研究,17(3),1-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.龔卓軍(2006)。傅柯論釋夢學:關注自我的倫理技術。臺北:中央研究院。1-24。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.于庭萱(2012)。關懷自身與主體化:以傅柯閱讀湯瑪士.德昆西《一個英國鴉片吸食者的自白》之追尋主體的過程(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.勇嘉明(2011)。以傅柯(Michel Foucault)生存美學省思藝術與人文學習領域內涵與實施之研究(碩士論文)。慈濟大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.張秋蘭(2010)。普魯斯特《追憶似水年華》之研究:閱讀、回憶、自我書寫的生存美學實踐(碩士論文)。南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳廷晉(2012)。鏡像階段後,自我生成 — 陳廷晉創作論述(碩士論文)。高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳怡蒨(2008)。國小高年級學生文化資本及關懷自我關係之探討-以臺中縣為例(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃靖淇(2007)。護理人員照顧臨終病人的蛻變歷程(碩士論文)。國立陽明大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉思芬(1999)。滿 與 空:慾望的移動與存在的反思(碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.謝昇佑(2004)。現代人的形象:主體的莫比烏斯環(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.王恭志(2007)。傅柯的生存美學及其對教師課程意識的啟發與蘊義(博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.行政院勞工委員會(2012)。職類別薪資調查報告。臺北:行政院勞工委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Foucault, Michel、佘碧平(2010)。主體解釋學。上海市:上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Mayeroff, M.(1971)。On caring。New York, NY:Harper & Row。  new window
4.吳裕益、侯雅齡(2000)。國小兒童自我概念量表。台北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.林幸台、張小鳳、陳美光(2000)。田納西自我概念量表指導手冊。測驗出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Lewis, H. R.、侯定凱(2007)。失去靈魂的優秀--哈佛如何忘卻其教育宗旨。臺北:張老師文化。  延伸查詢new window
7.Miller, J.、高毅(1999)。傅柯的生死愛慾。臺北:時報。  延伸查詢new window
8.Noddings, Nel(2003)。Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education。University of California Press。  new window
9.Buckingham, David、楊雅婷(2003)。童年之死--在電子媒體時代下長大的兒童。臺北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
10.Derlega, J. V.、Janda, L. H.(1986)。Personal adjustment: the psychology of everyday life。Glenview, IL:Scott, Fores man。  new window
11.Noddings, N.(2005)。The challenge to care in schools: An alternatives approach to education。New York:Teacher College Press。  new window
12.黃毅志(2011)。臺灣的教育分流、勞力市場階層結構與地位取得。臺北市:心理出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.高宣揚(2004)。傅科的生存美學:西方思想的起點與終點。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
14.高宣揚(2002)。魯曼社會系統理論與現代性。台北:五南圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.林生傳(2003)。教育研究法:全方位的統整與分析。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.郭為藩(1972)。自我心理學。台南:開山書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Van Manen, M.(1997)。Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy。New York:State University of New York Press。  new window
18.Foucault, Michel、Lotringer, Sylvère、Hochroth, Lysa、Porter, Catherine(1997)。The Politics of Truth。Los Angels:Semiotext(e)。  new window
19.Patton, Michael Quinn、吳芝儀、李奉儒(1995)。質的評鑑與研究。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
20.Strauss, Anselm L.、Corbin, Juliet M.(1990)。Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedure and techniques。Sage。  new window
21.黃俊傑(20000000)。臺灣意識與臺灣文化。臺北:正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.行政院勞工委員會(2013)。八十九年臺灣地區職類別薪資調查報告,http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/html/svy89/8901menu.htm, 2013/02/02。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院勞工委員會(2013)。職類別薪資調查動態查詢--100-101年職類別薪資資料,https://pswst.cla.gov.tw/psdn/Query/wFrmQuery02.aspx, 2013/02/02。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(2003)。九年一貫課程基本能力,http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC/basic/basic5.php, 2013/01/28。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Foucault, M.(1983)。Afterword by Michel Foucault: the subject and power。Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.何乏筆(20030000)。自我發現與自我創造--關於哈道特和傅柯修養論之差異。後學新論:後現代╱後結構╱後殖民。臺北:左岸文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.楊國樞(1988)。中國人與自然、他人、自我的關係。中國人:觀念與行為。臺北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃瑞祺(2003)。自我修養與自我創新:晚年傅柯的主體/自我觀。後學新論:後現代╱後結構╱後殖民。台北:左岸文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Foucault, Michel(1988)。Technologies of the Self。Technologies Of The Self: A Seminar With Michel Foucault。Amherst, MA:University of Massachusetts Press。  new window
6.歐用生(1991)。內容分析法。教育研究法。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE