:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:親師互動之微觀政治素養:教師觀點
書刊名:教育研究月刊
作者:陳玉玫陳幸仁
作者(外文):Chen, Yu-meiChen, Hsin-jen
出版日期:2019
卷期:299
頁次:頁94-110
主題關鍵詞:微觀政治微觀政治素養親師互動Micro-politicMicro-political literacyParent-teacher interaction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:81
  • 點閱點閱:12
本研究主要以國小教師觀點為主,探索親師互動時教師應具備的微觀政治素養內涵及其實踐。研究者採質性研究方式,深度訪談三位國小資深級任教師。研究結果獲致以下結論:親師互動之教師微觀政治素養內涵,認知面包含理解學校的政治隱喻、了解親師權力的來源、解讀利益與意識型態等;技能面包含培養良好的溝通技巧、靈活地運用各種策略等;情意面包含認同教師專業並尊重家長參與、培養批判反省的態度、建立教師的情緒理解等。此外,在教師的微觀政治素養實踐上,在認知面,教師能解讀親師互動之利益、意識型態等政治意涵,但未掌握彼此權力之範疇;在技能面,教師具有效親師溝通能力,並能發展且交互運用各種政治策略以應對家長;教師在親師互動之微觀政治素養情意面上的實踐則有差異,且有些層面教師之實踐略顯不足。
This research was an exploratory study of teachers’ understanding of micro-political literacy of parent-teacher interaction and their practice. The researcher adopted the qualitative approach, interviewing with three senior homeroom teachers in elementary school. The main conclusions of this study were as follows: Firstly, the micro-political literacy of parent-teacher interaction has three dimensions. On cognitive dimension it included understanding the political metaphor of school organization, realizing the parents’ and teachers’ rights of law and reading the interests and ideologies between them. On skill dimension it included skillful communication and various kinds of political means. On affective dimension it included recognizing teacher profession and to respect parents’ participation, fostering the attitude of critical reflection and to establish teachers’ emotional understating. Next, on practice teachers could read the political implication of interests and ideologies of parent-teacher interaction, but they did not realize parents’ and teachers’ rights of law. Teachers communicated effectively with parents and they could use various kinds of political means to cope with parents. Besides, there were differences between teachers’ practice on affective dimension, and teachers seemed not to practice some of the micro-political affective literacies fully.
期刊論文
1.Lasky, Sue(2000)。The cultural and emotional politics of teacher-parent interactions。Teaching and Teacher Education,16(8),843-860。  new window
2.Hargreaves, Andy(2001)。The Emotional Geographies of Teaching。Teachers College Record,103(6),1056-1080。  new window
3.Clement, M.、Vandenberghe, R.(2000)。Teachers' professional development: A solitary or collegial (ad)venture?。Teaching and Teacher Education,16(1),81-101。  new window
4.Achinstein, B.(2006)。New teacher and mentor political literacy: Reading,navigating and transforming induction contexts。Teachers and Teaching: Ttheory and Practice,12(2),123-138。  new window
5.陳幸仁(20070600)。微觀政治學:一個學校行政的新興研究領域。教育行政與評鑑學刊,3,67-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Frost, D.、Harris, A.(2003)。Teacher leadership: Towards a research agenda。Cambridge Journal of Education,33(3),479-498。  new window
7.Addi-Raccah, A.、Arviv-Elyashiv, R.(2008)。Parent empowerment and teacher professionalism: Teachers' perspective。Urban Education,43(3),394-415。  new window
8.陳玉玫(20091200)。親師互動之微觀政治分析:教師專業主義vs.家長彰權益能。中正教育研究,8(2),35-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.王雅玄(20080600)。進入情境與歷史:臺灣原住民教師的多元文化素養及其實踐。臺東大學教育學報,19(1),33-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.蔡清田(20110700)。課程改革中的「素養」。幼兒教保研究期刊,7,1-13。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Kelchtermans, G.、Ballet, K.(2002)。Micropolitical literacy: Reconstructing a neglected dimension in teacher development。Internation Journal of Educational Research,37(8),755-767。  new window
學位論文
1.伍鴻麟(2002)。桃園縣國小家長參與學校教育及親師互動情形之研究(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Blase, J.、Anderson, G.(1995)。The micro-politics of educational leadership: From control to empowerment。Cassell。  new window
2.Ball, S. J.(1987)。The micro-politics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization。Methuen。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hargreaves, Andy、Goodson, Ivon F.(1996)。Teachers professional lives: Aspirations and actualities。Teachers' professional lives。London:Falmer。  new window
2.Kemper, T. K.(1995)。Sociological models in the explanation of emotions。Handbook of emotions。Guilford Press。  new window
3.Malen, B.(1995)。The micropolitics of education: Mapping the multiple dimensions of power relations in school polities。The study of educational politics。London:Falmer。  new window
4.Hargreaves, A.(1995)。Development and desire: A postmodern perspective。Professional development in education new paradigms & perspectives。New York, NY:Teachers College Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE