:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:為弱勢者發聲:高中生之偏見察覺力與旁觀者介入知能課程探究
書刊名:當代教育研究季刊
作者:李佩珊謝百淇
作者(外文):Lee, Pei-shanShein, Pat Paichi
出版日期:2020
卷期:28:1
頁次:頁39-73
主題關鍵詞:多元文化多元文化素養旁觀者介入偏見察覺性別刻板印象MulticulturalismMulticultural literacyBystander interventionPrejudice awarenessGender stereotypes
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:199
  • 點閱點閱:6
研究目的:隨著社會民主與多元發展,弱勢者的教育權益逐受重視,但隱性的弱勢族群仍倍受忽略。為了能培養學生對不同文化及隱性弱勢群體發展正向且積極態度,本研究整合多元文化教育學家Banks的「減少偏見」構念和社會心理學家Darley和Latané的「旁觀者介入模式」,設計「為弱勢者發聲」課程,目的在探討參與者對於偏見覺察力與旁觀者介入知能的學習內涵與歷程。研究設計/方法/取徑:本研究取向為詮釋現象學,採立意取樣邀請10位高中生接受6個課程模組共12小時的「為弱勢者發聲」課程,並蒐集課堂討論、作業文本和訪談資料。研究發現或結論:本研究發現旁觀者介入模式當中的「注意」與「衡量」適合運用偏見察覺方法來進行培力,其後才能啟動旁觀者介入之「承擔」、「方法」和「行動」。而本研究設計「為弱勢者發聲」課程的學習內涵包括:洞悉日常生活的偏見、破除刻板印象、偏見覺察力、旁觀者介入行動的知與行;課程的學習歷程包括:發展旁觀者介入的思維、建構旁觀者介入的策略、維持旁觀者介入的作為。研究原創性/價值:本研究發現性別、外貌、身材、個性等因素經常造成青少年在同儕團體中的弱勢處境,此種隱性弱勢在教育領域當中的資源少於族群或身心障礙等多元文化群體,值得教育者與研究者關注。最後,本研究提出教育實踐之建議,並提出未來研究方向之建議。
Purpose: With the recent increase in social support for democracy and diversity, the educational rights of disadvantaged groups have received more attention, but there are other groups that are still marginalized in the society. To cultivate positive and proactive attitudes in students towards diverse cultures and multicultural groups, this study designed the "Speaking Up for the Disadvantaged (SUD)" course by integrating the "prejudice reduction" concept proposed by Banks, a multicultural education researcher, and the "bystander intervention model" proposed by Darley and Latané, social psychologists. The purpose of the study is to explore the learning processes and outcomes of participants' prejudice awareness and bystander intervention. Design/methodology/approach: This study adopted the approach of interpreting phenomenology. Ten high school students were selected via convenient sampling to take 12 hours of the SUD course that consisted of 6 units. Classroom discussions, homework and interview data were collected. Findings/results: The study found that the learning outcomes of the SUD course included understanding of everyday prejudice, stereotype deconstruction, prejudice awareness, and the knowing and doing of bystander intervention. The learning processes included developing the perspectives of bystanders, formulating the strategies of bystander intervention, and maintaining the willingness to act as bystanders. Originality/value: This study found that factors such as gender, appearance, physique, and personality often position adolescents at a disadvantage by their peers. Some of these factors are often overlooked in the field of education and require more attention to ensure educational equity for all. This study also proposes educational practices and directions for future research.
期刊論文
1.Garcia, S. M.、Weaver, K.、Moskowitz, G. B.、Darley, J. M.(2002)。Crowded Minds: The Implicit Bystander Effect。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,83(4),843-853。  new window
2.O'connell, P. A. U. L.、Pepler, D.、Craig, W.(1999)。Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention。Journal of adolescence,22(4),437-452。  new window
3.Paciello, M.、Fida, R.、Cerniglia, L.、Tramontano, C.、Cole, E.(2013)。High cost helping scenario: The role of empathy, prosocial reasoning and moral disengagement on helping behavior。Personality and Individual Differences,55(1),3-7。  new window
4.張建成(20140900)。再論多元文化教育的困境。教育研究集刊,60(3),111-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.McLeod, Jack M.(2000)。Media and Civic Socialization of Youth。Journal of Adolescent Health,27(2),45-51。  new window
6.王泰升(20151200)。臺灣法律史上的原住民族:作為特殊的人群、地域與法文化。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,44(4),1639-1704。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Lopez, E. C.、Bursztyn, A. M.(2013)。Future challenges and opportunities: Toward culturally responsive training in school psychology。Psychology in the Schools,50(3),212-228。  new window
8.Vago, D. R.、Silbersweig, David A.(2012)。Self-awareness, self-regulation, and self-transcendence (S-ART): A framework for understanding the neurobiological mechanisms of mindfulness。Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,6(296),1-30。  new window
9.Van Cleemput, K.、Vandebosch, H.、Pabian, S.(2014)。Personal characteristics and contextual factors that determine "helping," "joining in," and "doing nothing" when witnessing cyberbullying。Aggressive Behavior,40(5),383-396。  new window
10.潘慧玲、謝文全、陸偉明、方永泉、謝伸裕、黃慕萱、李詠絮、紀雅玲、蘇易廷、張瓊文(20070900)。教育學門調查計畫成果報告:初步分析。人文與社會科學簡訊,8(4),45-55。  延伸查詢new window
11.Darley, John M.、Latané, Bibb(1968)。Bystander Intervention in Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,8(4),377-383。  new window
12.Amel, E. L.、Manning, C. M.、Scott, B. A.(2009)。Mindfulness and sustainable behavior: Pondering attention and awareness as means for increasing green behavior。Ecopsychology,1(1),14-25。  new window
13.Awang-Shuib, A.-R.、Sahari, S.-H.、Ali, A.(2012)。Multicultural awareness and Urban communities: Validating a multicultural awareness scale。Journal of ASHAN Behavioural Studies,2(6),50-62。  new window
14.Gudykunst, W. B.、Nishida, T.(2001)。Anxiety, uncertainty, and perceived effectiveness of communication across relationships and cultures。International Journal of Intercultural Relations,25(1),55-71。  new window
15.Hortensius, R.、Schutter, D. J.、de Gelder, B.(2016)。Personal distress and the influence of bystanders on responding to an emergency。Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,16(4),672-688。  new window
16.Patil, I.、Zanon, M.、Novembre, G.、Zangrando, N.、Chittaro, L.、Silani, G.(2017)。Neuroanatomical basis of concern-based altruism in virtual environment。Neuropsychologia,116,34-43。  new window
17.Pattnaik, J.(2003)。Multicultural literacy starts at home: supporting parental involvement in multicultural education。Childhood Education,80(1),18-24。  new window
18.Wagner, U.、Zick, A.(1995)。The relation of formal education to ethnic prejudice: Its reliability, validity and explanation。European Journal of Social Psychology,25(1),41-56。  new window
19.York, C.、Scholl, R. M.(2015)。Youth antecedents to news media consumption: Parent and youth newspaper use, news discussion, and long-term news behavior。Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,92(3),681-699。  new window
20.何青蓉(20041200)。閱讀、對話、書寫與文化理解:一個多元文化教育方案的實踐經驗。高雄師大學報. 教育與社會科學類,17,1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.鄔佩麗(20050900)。性騷擾/性侵害與性別歧視--談校園性騷擾/性侵害之樣態與現況分析。學生輔導,98,149-161。  延伸查詢new window
22.羅燦煐(20141000)。校園性別事件調查處理之近憂與遠慮。婦研縱橫,101,45-53。  延伸查詢new window
23.Salmivalli, C.、Lagerspetz, K.、Björkqvist, K.、Österman, K.、Kaukiainen, A.(1996)。Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group。Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression,22(1),1-15。  new window
24.Stables, A.(2005)。Multiculturalism and moral education: individual positioning, dialogue and cultural practice。Journal of Moral Education,34(2),185-197。  new window
25.劉美慧(20110900)。多元文化教育研究的反思與前瞻。人文與社會科學簡訊,12(4),56-63。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.吳齊殷、李珮禕(2001)。友誼網絡對青少年心理健康之影響。青少年生命力成與生活調適研討會,中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處 (會議日期: 2001年6月28-29日)。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.內政部統計處(2018)。民國107年10月戶口統計資料分析。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2018)。新移民子女就讀國中小人數分布概況統計:106學年度。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部統計處(2018)。重要教育統計指標:主要統計表--歷年。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部統計處(2018)。性別統計指標彙總性資料(學生):109-4國中小特殊教育身心障礙類學生人數按性別分。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉見至(2002)。原/漢族群關係課程方案在高雄市國中實施成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Coloroso, B.(2003)。The bully, the bullied, and the bystander: From preschool to high school-how parents and teachers can help break the cycle of violence。New York:Harper Resource。  new window
2.Alvesson, Mats、Sköldberg, Kaj(2009)。Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research。SAGE Publications Limited。  new window
3.Freire, P.(2000)。Pedagogy of the oppressed。New York:Continuum。  new window
4.Langer, Ellen J.(1989)。Mindfulness。Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
5.Banks, J. A.(1999)。An introduction to multicultural education。Boston, Massachusetts:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
6.Nieto, S.、Bode, P.(2013)。Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education。White Plains, NY:Longman Press。  new window
7.Rigby, K.(2010)。Bullying interventions in school: Six basic approaches。Camberwell, London:ACER。  new window
8.譚光鼎(19980000)。原住民教育研究。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Cordeiro, P. A.、Reagan, T. G.、Martinez, L. P.(1994)。Multiculturalism and TQE: Addressing cultural diversity in schools。Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press。  new window
其他
1.劉美慧(20070600)。欣賞文化差異與追求社會正義--重新理解多元文化教育。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.劉美慧(2009)。多元文化教育的抉擇:族群、性別與階級的五種取向。多元文化教育名著導讀。臺北市:學富文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.張茂桂(2002)。多元主義、多元文化論述在臺灣的形成與難題。臺灣的未來。臺北:華泰文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Eisenberg, N.、Eggum, N. D.(2009)。Empathic responding: Sympathy and personal distress。The social neuroscience of empathy。MIT press。  new window
4.游美惠(2012)。多元文化教育的理論基礎。多元文化教育。臺北市:高等教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Banks, J. A.(2016)。Multicultural education: Characteristics and goals。Multicultural education: issues and perspectives。New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
6.Bennett, M.(2004)。Becoming intercultural competent。Toward multiculturalism: A reader in multicultural education。Newton, MA:Intercultural Resource Corporation。  new window
7.Grant, C. A.、Sleeter, C. E.(2009)。Race, Class, Gender, and Disability in the Classroom。Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives。New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
8.Rosenberg, Erika L.(2004)。Mindfulness and consumerism。Psychology and consumer culture: The struggle for a good life in a materialistic world。Washington, DC:American Psychological Association。  new window
9.Whitley, B. E.、Kite, M. E.(2009)。How psychologists study prejudice and discrimination。The psychology of prejudice and discrimination。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth,。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE