The issue of educational opportunity equality has often been one of the major concerns. Since regional differences are the major reasons that cause unequalizational education, in order to mitigate the discrepancy, we have to start with equal distribution of educational resources. The purpose of this study is to compare and contrast the distributional differences of education resources of the city and the country in elementary schools, so as to understand whether in city and country schoolings the "input" opportunity is equal. I. Concrete topics to be discussed in this study are: A. On the school distributional differences in city and country schools; B. On the activity space differences in city and country schools; C. On the differences of sports and hygienic equipments in city and country schools; D. On the differences of teaching equipments in city and country schools; E. On the supply differences of books, Journals, and magazines in city and country schools. II. Results of this study A. As far as school distribution is concerned, Kaohsiung city and Kellung city (city) belong to low resourceful regions (below 100) while Kaohsiung county and Hualien county (county) belong to high resourceful regions; B. Activity space of the country students is higher than that of the city students, especially when counting by per students; C. Sports and hygienic equipments: City schools have more than country schools. But in terms of quantity owning by per student, the situation is vice versa; D. Teaching equipments: In terms of modern teaching appliances, like computers and fax machines, differences in city and country do exist; E. Supply of books, journals and magazines: In terms of this supply per school, city schools have more journals and magazines. III. Suggestions A. Increasing educational resources of primary schools B. In metropolitan areas, we should a. decrease the size of school to increase school distribution and activity space per student; b. establish more schools in order to lower the population of class. C. In countries, we should a. continue to give financial aids to countries or cities of low educational resources; b. make best use of educational resources. D. Take the priority of resourceful distribution into consideration in educational policy-making. E. Continue to explore educational opportunity equality in the city and the country in terms of "process" and "input" in further studies.