臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：從「九年一貫社會學習領域」管窺臺灣公民社會之未來：試論群體生活的當代困境
書刊名：臺灣社會學刊
作者：汪宏倫 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wang, Horng-luen
出版日期：2006
卷期：36
頁次：頁1-64
主題關鍵詞：教育改革；模組性；公民性；道德生活；現代與後現代；Educational reform；Modularity；Civility；Moral life；Modernity and postmodernity
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:396
  • 點閱點閱:90
本文嘗試從教育改革當中極富爭議的「九年一貫課程」，尤其是其中的「社會學習領域」，探討其對台灣的公民社會可能帶來什麼影響。公民社會作為一種現代群體生活的組織原則或「可欲布景」，已為多數論者所預設或接受。公民社會的存在必須以成員所具有的「模組性」與「公民性」為前提，而「模組性」與「公民性」很大一部分是在教育過程中養成。以國民義務教育為骨幹而發展出的現代大眾教育體制，與資本主義及民族國家的發展息息相關，同屬理性主義「現代性計畫」之一部分。在這個現代性計畫之下，公民社會的形成與運作才有可能。相形之下，台灣當前的教育改革，包含九年一貫課程在內，其「後現代性格」是十分明顯的。雖然後現代主義並非九年一貫課程的全部，也不能與教改直接劃上等號，但後現代主義許多成分與特質，例如不再獨尊理性，去中心，反權威，反後設敘事，強調差異、在地、愉悅、欲望等，程度不一地反映在當前的體制改革與教材內容當中。後現代所嘗試召喚的是一種迴異於「現代人」的新主體，其背後隱含的非理性與無理性主義不利公民社會所需的模組性與公民性形成，使得群體生活的道德基礎受到深遠的影響。所謂「教改亂象」反映的其實是一個難以為繼的現代性計畫，未來的群體生活將呈現何種風貌，值得省思。
This article explores the potential impact of recent educational reforms on the future of civil society in Taiwan by examining the "Social Studies Learning Area" in the controversial "Grade 1-9 Curriculum." Widely recognized as a modern model for group life, civil society can only be realized on the preconditions of "modularity"and "civility"as cultivated by education. Mass education, institutionalized by the nation-state is part of the rationalist "modernity project" that makes civil society possible. However, the Grade 1-9 Curriculum in question has been characterized by strong "postmodern" orientations that emphasize such features as anti­rationalism, de-centering, anti-metanarrative, multiplicity, and pleasure, among others. By evoking subjects of new kinds that differ radically from the older model of "modern person," the irrational and non-rational aspects of these post modern orientations are making the preconditions of civil society untenable, while moral foundations of group life are being undermined. What group life will look like in the future deserves further attention.
期刊論文
1.汪宏倫(20021200)。全球化與制度同形化--從拼音爭議看臺灣「國族問題」的後現代情境。政治與社會哲學評論，3，121-178。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Taylor, Charles(1990)。Modes of Civil Society。Public Culture，3(1)，95-118。  new window
3.汪宏倫(20010600)。制度脈絡、外部因素與臺灣之「National Question」的特殊性：一個理論與經驗的反省。臺灣社會學，1，183-239。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.吳介民、李丁讚(20050600)。傳遞共通感受：林合社區公共領域修辭模式的分析。臺灣社會學，9，119-163。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Shils, Edward(1991)。The Virtue of Civil Society。Government and Opposition，26(1)，3-20。  new window
6.蕭新煌(20040300)。臺灣的非政府組織、民主轉型與民主治理。臺灣民主季刊，1(1)，65-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林國明、陳東升(20031200)。公民會議與審議民主：全民健保的公民參與經驗。臺灣社會學，6，61-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Diamond, Larry Jay(1994)。Rethinking Civil Society: Toward Democratic Consolidation。Journal of Democracy，5(3)，4-17。  new window
9.Putnam, Robert D.(1995)。Bowling Alone: American's Declining Social Capital。Journal of Democracy，6(1)，65-78。  new window
10.Chatterjee, Partha(1990)。A Response to Taylor's Modes of Civil Society。Public Culture，3(1)，119-132。  new window
11.Hann, Chris(1997)。The Nation-State, Religion, and Uncivil Society: Two Perspectives from the Periphery。Daedalus，126(2)，27-45。  new window
12.蕭新煌(1990)。Emerging Social Movements and the Rise of a Demanding Civil Society in Taiwan。Australian Journal of Psychology，25，629-641。  new window
13.Kopecky, Pete、Mudde, Cas、Kopecky, P.、Mudde, C.(2003)。Rethinking Civil Society。Democratization，10(3)，1-14。  new window
14.Umland, Andreas(2002)。Toward an Uncivil Society? Contextualizing the Decline of Post-Soviet Russian Parties of the Extreme Right Wing。Demokratizatsiya，10(3)，362-391。  new window
會議論文
1.陳伯璋(1999)。九年一貫課程的理念與理論分析。邁向課程新紀元--九年一貫課程研討會，國立台北師院、中華民國教材研究發展學會 。中華民國教材研究發展學會。10-18。  延伸查詢new window
2.彭明輝(1999)。社會領域的課程規劃與內容。0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Seidman, S.、Wagner, D. G.(1992)。Postmodernism and Social Theory。Oxford：Basil Blackwell。  new window
2.Lévi-Strauss, Claude(1973)。Tristes Tropiques。New York, NY：Jonathan Cape。  new window
3.Scheler, Max(1998)。Ressentiment。Milwaukee, WI：Marquette University Press。  new window
4.塗爾幹、李康(2003)。教育思想的演進。上海：上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Morrow, R. A.、Torres, C. A.(1995)。Social Theory and Education: A Critique of Theories of Social and Cultural Reproduction。Albany, NY：State University of New York Press。  new window
6.Keane, John(1988)。Civil Society and the State: New European Perspectives。Verso。  new window
7.Gellner, Ernest(1996)。Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and Its Rivals。New York, NY：The Penguin Books。  new window
8.Žižek, Slavoj(1999)。The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Center of Political Ontology。Verso。  new window
9.黃光國(2003)。教改錯在哪裡？我的陽謀。臺北市：INK印刻。  延伸查詢new window
10.Durkheim, Emile、陳光金、沈杰、朱諧漢(2001)。道德教育。上海：上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.Terry Eagleton(1996)。The Illusions of Postmodernism。Oxford：Blackwell Publishers。  new window
12.Best, Steven、Kellner, Douglas(1991)。Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogations。London：MacMillan。  new window
13.詹棟樑、國立編譯館(20020000)。後現代主義教育思潮。臺北：渤海堂。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Seligman, Adam B.(1992)。The Idea of Civil Society。Princeton University Press。  new window
15.Willis, P.(1977)。Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs。New York：Columbia University Press：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
16.Ong, Aihwa(1999)。Flexible citizenship: the cultural logics of transnationality。Durham：Duke University Press。  new window
17.Duara, Prasenjit(1995)。Rescuing History from the Nation-State: Questioning Narratives of Modern China。Chicago：The University of Chicago Press。  new window
18.Lyotard, Jean-François、Bennington, Geoff、Massumi, Brian、Jameson, Fredric(1984)。The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge。Manchester：Manchester University Press。  new window
19.Bourdieu, Pierre、Passeron, Jean-Claude、Nice, Richard(1990)。Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture。Sage Publications。  new window
20.Habermas, Jürgen、Burger, Thomas、Lawrence, Frederick(1989)。The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。  new window
21.劉小楓(1996)。現代性社會理論緒論：現代性與現代中國。香港：牛津大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.Doll, William E. Jr.、王紅宇(1999)。後現代課程觀。臺北：桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
23.Elias, Norbert、Jephcott, E.(1978)。The Civilizing Process: The History of Manners。New York：Urizen Books Press。  new window
24.Bauman, Zygmunt(1993)。Postmodern Ethics。Blackwell。  new window
25.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北：行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
26.Dagger, Richard(1997)。Civic Virtues: Rights, Citizenship, and Republican Liberalism。Oxford University Press。  new window
27.Haraway, Donna Jeanne(1990)。Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature。Routledge。  new window
28.Featherstone, Mike(1991)。Consumer culture and postmodernism。Sage Publications。  new window
29.周祝瑛(20030000)。誰捉弄了臺灣教改？。臺北：心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.Gellner, Ernest(1983)。Nations and Nationalism。Cornell University Press。  new window
31.Hardt, Michael、Negri, Antonio(2004)。Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire。Penguin。  new window
32.(1995)。教育：傳統、現代化與後現代化。教育：傳統、現代化與後現代化。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
33.Scott, W. R.(1994)。Institutions and Organizations。Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
34.Mouzelis, N.(1995)。Modernity, Late Development and Civil Society。Civil Society: Theory, History, Comparison。Cambridge。  new window
35.Lemert, C.(1997)。Postmodernism Is Not What You Think。Postmodernism Is Not What You Think。Malden, MA。  new window
36.(1996)。教育改革－從傳統到後現代。教育改革－從傳統到後現代。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
37.王前龍(2003)。九年一貫課程的理念。課程與教學的饗宴。高雄。  延伸查詢new window
38.汪宏倫(2004)。現代共同體當中的怨恨心態：一個對「臺灣經驗」的初步反省。「重建想像共同體－國家、族群、敘述」國際學術研討會。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
39.林國明、陳東升(2003)。教育創新九年一貫課程與解答。教育創新九年一貫課程與解答。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
40.楊洲松(1999)。第二章：國民中小學九年一貫課程網要之哲學分析－後現代的觀點。九年一貫課程之展望。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
41.Agger, Ben(1989)。Fast Capitalism: A Critical Theory of Significance。Fast Capitalism: A Critical Theory of Significance。Urbana, IL。  new window
42.Agger, Ben(1990)。The Decline of Discourse: Reading, Writing and Resistance in Postmodern Capitalism。The Decline of Discourse: Reading, Writing and Resistance in Postmodern Capitalism。New York, NY。  new window
43.(1998)。Real Civil Society: Dilemmas of Institutionalization。Real Civil Society: Dilemmas of Institutionalization。London, UK。  new window
44.Auspitz, Katherine(1992)。Civic Virtue: Interested and Disinterested。Civility and Citizenship in Liberal Democratic Societies。New York, NY。  new window
45.Banfield, Edward C.(1992)。Introductory Note。Civility and Citizenship in Liberal Democratic Societies。New York, NY。  new window
46.Goldwin, Robert A.(1992)。Rights, Citizenship, and Civility。Civility and Citizenship in Liberal Democratic Societies。New York, NY。  new window
47.蕭新煌(2003)。NGOs and Democratization in Taiwan: Their Interactive Roles in Building a Viable Civil Society。Civil Society in Asia。Hampshire, UK。  new window
48.(1998)。Civil Society: Old Images, New Visions。Civil Society: Old Images, New Visions。Stanford, CA。  new window
49.Lisman, C. David(1998)。Toward a Civil Society: Civic Literacy and Service Learning。Toward a Civil Society: Civic Literacy and Service Learning。Westport, CT。  new window
50.Orwin, Clifford(1992)。Citizenship and Civility as Components of Liberal Democracy。Civility and Citizenship in Liberal Democratic Societies。New York, NY。  new window
51.Ramirez, Francisco O.、Boli, John(1987)。Global Patterns of Educational Institutionalization。Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and the Individual。Newbury Park, CA。  new window
52.Ramirez, Francisco O.、Boli, John(1987)。On the Union of States and Schools。Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and the Individual。Newbury Park, CA。  new window
53.馬克斯．謝勒(1958)。Man in the Era of Adjustment。Philosophical Perspectives。Boston, MA。  new window
54.馬克斯．謝勒(1987)。Exemplars of Person and Leaders。Person and Self-value: Three Essays。Dordrecht, Netherlands。  new window
55.Sztompka, Piotr(1998)。Mistrusting Civility: Predicament of a Post-communist Society。Real Civil Societies。London, UK。  new window
其他
1.吳聰敏，駱明慶(2003)。好老師，莫強求--也談教育改革，http://ccms.ntu.edu.tw/ rotect\nobreakspace{}ntut019。  延伸查詢new window
2.Baudrillard, Jean(1996)。Disneyworld Company，0。  new window
圖書論文
1.Fan, Yun(2004)。Taiwan: No Civil Society, No Democracy。Civil Society and Political Change in Asia: Expanding and Contracting Democratic Space。Palo Alto, CA。  new window
2.戴曉霞(1996)。現代與後現代：第一期及第二期教育改革審議委員會諮議報告書之比較研究。教育改革--從傳統到後現代。臺北：師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳柏璋(20030000)。課程統整的迷思與省思。課程與教學的饗宴：黃光雄教授榮退紀念文集。高雄：高雄復文。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.汪宏倫(2001)。台灣為何要「自找麻煩」？：全球化趨勢與台灣的國格需求。民族主義與兩岸關係：哈佛大學東西方學者的對話。台北：新自然主義出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.歐用生(2002)。披著羊皮的狼？--九年一貫課程改革的深度思考。新世紀教育工程--九年一貫課程再造。臺北：揚智。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Harvey, David(1989)。The Condition of Postmodernity: An Inquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change。Mapping the futures: Local culture, global change。Oxford：Blackwell。  new window
7.Shils, Edward(1992)。Civility and Civil Society。Civility and Citizenship in Liberal Democratic Societies。New York, NY：Paragon House。  new window
8.Walzer, Michael(1995)。The Civil Society Argument。Theorizing Citizenship。New York, NY：State University of New York Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
1. 書評：評S. J. Ball的《教育論辯》
2. 中國菁英高中、秀異與全球功績主義：評[Yi-Lin Chiang (姜以琳)著], «Study Gods» (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2022)
3. Content and Language Integrated Learning for Teaching the Theoretical Language of Sociology of Education to Preservice Teachers: A Quasi-Experimental Study
4. 重思學習障礙之定義與鑑定：一個特殊教育社會學的觀點
5. 教育行政作為效率控制或是公義解放？--R. Bates的批判理論對教育行政之啟示
6. 書評：從移動的時空看教育的脈絡：評2018年世界教育年鑑《不平均的教育時空：歷史社會學的概念、方法與實踐》
7. Effects of Social Influence and System Characteristics on Traceable Agriculture Product Reuse Intention of Elderly People: Integrating Trust and Attitude Using the Technology Acceptance Model
8. 評〈戰爭與臺灣的高等教育，1945～1990〉
9. 通識課程之研判思考能力的學習成效在校務研究之應用
10. 由教科書內容看臺灣教育社會學學科架構的發展
11. 高等教育社會學的研究與脈絡
12. 立法院外的春吶：太陽花運動靜坐者之人口及參與圖象
13. 宗教教育的價值哲學思考：宗教教育課程內涵的教化論述
14. 書評：《把知識帶回來：從社會建構主義到社會實在主義的教育社會學》
15. 臺灣高等教育各學門實施前段不分系課程的知識理念探討--全球化知識生產模式轉變之分析
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：467（臺灣：448，外國：19） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2219088 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68032853
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上