臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：反思意願對學習動機之影響--以使用網路化檔案評量系統為反思工具為例
書刊名：教學科技與媒體
作者：林俊宇／張基成 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lin, Jyun-yu／Chang, Chi-cheng
出版日期：2010
卷期：94
頁次：頁2-24
主題關鍵詞：網路化檔案評量系統；反思機制；反思意願；學習動機；Web portfolio assessment system；Reflective mechanisms；Willingness to reflect；Learning motivation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:1494
  • 點閱點閱:57
網路化檔案評量系統，可視爲新一代輔助反思的工具，因此本研究設計採用「準實驗研究設計之不等組前測－後測控制組設計」，研究對象是中部某技術學院附設學校71位高職生（實驗組35位；控制組36位），進行爲期10週的教學實驗之「網頁設計」課程，兩組反思活動各計7次。實驗組使用本研究自行發展的網路化檔案評量系統之反思機制反思，控制組使用紙本式檔案之學習單反思，並採用相同的反思策略、主題來觀察兩組對學習動機的差異，進一步透過反思內容分析評估學生反思意願，與使用系統之反思機制滿意度在交互影響下對學習動機的影響。本研究發現如下：(1)本研究發展系統之撰寫、編輯、引導等三項反思機制學生使用機制滿意度佳；(2)使用系統之反思機制比紙本式檔案反思更能促進學習動機的調整，其中學習動機子向度影響效果最好爲學科價值，其次爲自我效能；(3)使用系統之反思機制後在學習動機調整優於使用前，且使用後對反思掌握有助益；(4)使用系統之反思學習動機會因反思機制滿意度與反思意願兩者交互影響而影響；(5)使用系統之反思引導與撰寫機制滿意度越高，越易促進學科價值，而反思意願越高，較容易產生學習焦慮。
The study was a quasi-experiment with nonequivalent pretest-posttest control group design aiming to investigate the influence of Web Portfolio assessment system on the learning motivation. The participants were 71 students in a technical college. The treatment group (n=35) reflected on their learning using Web Portfolio assessment system, whereas the control group (n=36) suing traditional paper-based portfolio assessment. After 10 weeks practice, the quantitative analysis was carried out to compare the differences of reflection on the motivation between the groups. A content analysis was performed to evaluate the participants’ willingness for reflection, as well as the satisfaction with the Web Portfolio assessment system. The research results indicated that: (1) Students were satisfied with the mechanism of writing, editing, and guidance on the web system; (2) The Web Portfolio assessment system outperformed the paper-based portfolio assessment system in the observation on learning motivation. The task value exerts the highest motivation, followed by self-efficacy; (3) The learning motivation was enhanced by the using of the Web Portfolio assessment system; (4) Two subscales of motivation, the task value and study anxiety, were not influenced by the willingness for reflection and satisfaction with the system mechanism. However, the satisfaction with the writing and editing mechanism enhanced the task value. The higher the willingness for reflection, the higher the study anxiety; (5) In general, self-efficacy was influenced by the willingness for reflection and satisfaction with the system mechanism. The willingness for reflection had impacts on the satisfaction with system mechanism in terms of writing, editing, and guidance. Meanwhile, students of high willingness for reflection used guidance mechanism more often than writing mechanism.
期刊論文
1.Darling-Hammond, L.(2006)。Assessing teacher education: The usefulness of multiple measures for assessing program outcomes。Journal of Teacher Education，57(2)，120-138。  new window
2.Mansvelder-Longayroux, D. D.、Beijaard, D.、Verloop, N.(2006)。The portfolio as a tool for stimulating reflection by student teachers。Teaching and Teacher Education，23(1)，47-62。  new window
3.Saito, Hitomi、Miwa, Kazuhisa(2007)。Construction of a learning environment supporting learners' reflection: A case of information seeking on the Web。Computers & Education，49(2)，214-229。  new window
4.Struyven, K.、Dochy, F.、Janssens, S.、Schelfhout, W.、Gielen, S.(2006)。The overall effects of end-of-course assessment on student performance: A comparison between multiple choice testing, peer assessment, case-based assessment and portfolio assessment。Studies in Educational Evaluation，32(3)，202-222。  new window
5.Garis, J. W.(2007)。E-portfolios: Concepts, designs, and integration within student affairs。New Directions for Student Services，119，3-16。  new window
6.Zimmerman, Barry J.(2002)。Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview。Theory Into Practice，41(2)，64-70。  new window
7.Yost, D. S.(2006)。Reflection and self-efficacy: Enhancing the retention of qualified teachers from a teacher education perspective。Teacher Education Quarterly，33(4)，59-76。  new window
8.徐綺穗(20090300)。學生反思內涵的分析及其對教學實習課程的啟示。教育研究與發展期刊，5(1)，35-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.張基成、陳政川(2008)。網路化檔案評量中學習者反思行為。教學科技與媒體，83，4-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.彭星瑞、張基成(2008)。網路化檔案評量於國中電腦課程之使用及成效。師大學報.科學教育類，53(2)，31-57。  延伸查詢new window
11.張基成、吳明芳、彭星瑞(2007)。結構式網路化檔案評量系統之建構--兼論數位化學習歷程檔案之分類法。全球華人計算機教育應用學報，5(1/2)，105-133。  延伸查詢new window
12.Chamber, S. M.、Wickersham, L. E.(2007)。The electronic portfolio journey: A year later。Education，127(3)，351-360。  new window
13.Christen, A.、Hofmann, M.(2008)。Implementation of E-Portfolio in the first academic year at the university of teacher education St. Gallen。International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning，3(1)，1-10。  new window
14.Chou, P. N.、Chang, C. C.(2008)。E–portfolios: Review of an innovative tool for reflection and assessment。Educational Technology，48(6)，23-26。  new window
15.Cole, J. S.、Bergin, D. A.、Whittaker, T. A.(2008)。Predicting student achievement for low stakes tests with effort and task value。Contemporary Educational Psychology，33(4)，609-624。  new window
16.Grossman, R.(2009)。Structures for facilitating student reflection。College Teaching，57(1)，15-22。  new window
17.Hadwin, A. F.、Wozney, L.、Pontin, O.(2005)。Scaffolding the appropriation of self-regulatory activity: A socio-cultural analysis of changes in teacher-student discourse about a graduate research portfolio。Instructional Science，33(5/6)，413-450。  new window
18.Kember, D.、Jones, A.、Loke, A.、Mckay, J.、Sinclair, K.、Tse, H.(1999)。Determining the level of reflective thinking form students’ written journals using a coding scheme based on the work of Mezirow。International Journal of Lifelong Education，18(1)，18-30。  new window
19.Silvia, P. J.、Eichstaedt, J.、Phillips, A. G.(200503)。Are rumination and reflection types of self-focused attention?。Personality and Individual Differences，38(4)，871-881。  new window
20.Simpson, E.、Courtney, M. D.(2007)。A framework guiding critical thinking through reflective journal documentation: A Middle Eastern experience。International Journal of Nursing Practice，13(4)，203-208。  new window
21.Sweetland, Y. L.、Hirvela, A.(2005)。Two case studies of L2 writer’ experiences across learning-directed portfolio context。Assessing Writing，10(3)，192-213。  new window
會議論文
1.蔡銘修、簡雅臻(2008)。自訂目標學習搭配Web 2.0概念線上學習平臺之研究。台灣教育傳播暨科技學會2008年學術研討會。高雄。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝佩璇(2009)。軟體設計過程中進行反思式學習的重要性。ICIM2009第二十屆國際資訊管理學術研討會論文集。台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.Gama, C.、Idan, E.(2007)。Electronic portfolios and self-regulated learning in the classroom。30th McGraw-Hill Ryerson National Teaching Learning and Technology Conference。Montreal：Concordia University。  new window
4.Kay, J.、Li, L.、Fekete, A.(2007)。Learner reflection in student self-assessmen。The ninth Australasian Computing Education Conference。Ballarat。89-95。  new window
研究報告
1.Pintrich, Paul R.、Smith, D. A. F.、Garcia, T.、McKeachie, Wilbert J.(1991)。A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ)。Ann Arbor, MI：University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning。  new window
2.王淑玲、林珊如(1998)。我國大學生學習動機與學習策略之應用之研究。行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鄭淑君(2007)。運用學習歷程檔案評量培養學童自然科學習動機與後設認知能力之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.石維婷(2006)。研究 electronic portfolio 系統應用在專案管理課程(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.巫博瀚(2005)。以結構方程模式檢驗自我調整學習對國中生學習成就之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林維倩(2007)。數位化學習歷程檔案內涵與架構分析之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳政川(2005)。網路化檔案評量中學習者自我反思行為對學習成效影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.許又勻(2007)。應用網路化歷程檔案反思模式對增進學前融合班普通教師解決教學困難反思效益之研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.鄭國志(2005)。提供反思機制於網路學習歷程檔案中對學習行為影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Glaser, B. G.、Strauss, A. L.(1967)。Grounded Theory。New York：Aldine。  new window
2.Schunk, D. H.(2004)。Learning theories: An educational perspective。Upper Saddle River, NJ：Prentice-Hall, Inc。  new window
3.王文科、王智弘(2005)。教育研究法。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Bryman, Alan、Cramer, Duncan(1997)。Quantitative data analysis with SPPS for windows: A guide for social scientists。Routledge。  new window
5.李坤崇(2006)。教學評量。台北：心理。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳明隆(2007)。SPSS操作與應用：問卷分析與應用統計。臺北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
7.Tabachnick, Barbara G.、Fidell, Linda S.(2007)。Using multivariate statistics。Pearson/Allyn and Bacon。  new window
8.Aslan, O.、Schmid, R. F.、Abrami, P. C.(2009)。Using an electronic portfolio to develop SRL and writing skills in at-risk students。Lisbon：the International Conference on Multimedia and Information and Communication Technologies in Education (m-ICTE)。  new window
其他
1.Barrett, H. C.(2008)。Reflection in ePortfolio，http://electronicportfolios.com/reflection/index.html。  new window
圖書論文
1.MacArthur, C. A.(2006)。The effects of new technologies on writing and writing processes。Handbook of witing research。New York：The Guilford Press。  new window
2.Singh, O.、Ritzhaupt, A. D.(2006)。Student perspective of organizational uses of eportfolios in higher education。Proceedings of ed-media, 1717-1722。Norfolk, VA：AACE。  new window
3.Wade, A.、Abrami, P. C.、Meyer, E.、White, B.(2008)。ePEARL: Supporting learning using electronic portfolios。e-Portfolio in education: Practices and reflections。Assoçião de Professores de Sintra。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：433（臺灣：423，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2541260 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68349915
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上