Purpose: To investigate collegiate male volleyball players' performance in attack after defense. Methods: The participants were 38 college male volleyball players from the top four teams in the finals of the 2007 College Men's Volleyball Tournament. The data was collected by the video analysis of the competition. Results: The team A with significant superior in better ranks also performed better in blocking over the net and in blocking the returned spikes than others. Although the four teams significantly differed in opportunity (p<.05), the teams with higher ranks performed better than those with lower rank in defense performance. In blocking over the net and in blocking the returned spikes, the A team had significant different than other 3 teams. It was better than other 3 team in returned spikes and ranks performance. The team of C was superior to the other 3 teams in blocking the ball and counter-attack after defense. It showed that the better performance in counter-attack factors did not influence the ranks performance; it might reflect at all returned spikes. The fact in defense after blocking and attack after blocking is B was superior to C and D. Conclusion: According to the data analysis, the statistic shows the rank of position and the defense and attack after blocking are the same, and also the all deference proportion will come with the result of the ranks. A ranks number one in its defense, counter-attacking and consequently in the first placement. Without defense, counter-attacking would be difficult to exert; good defense gives opportunity for attacking and thus one complements the other.