臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：電腦化概念構圖與創意發想關係之研究
書刊名：教育與心理研究
作者：許正妹 引用關係／張奕華 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hsu, Cheng-mei／Chang, I-hua
出版日期：2013
卷期：36:2
頁次：頁25-55
主題關鍵詞：設計教學；設計評量；創意發想；概念圖；電腦化概念構圖；Design instruction；Design assessment；Creative invention；Concept map；Computer-based concept mapping
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:261
  • 點閱點閱:178
電腦化概念構圖是一種圖形化並包含多媒體功能表徵概念之學習工具，其與設計者善於視覺化的思考模式之特質相符，而創意思考能力是設計者首重的設計能力。本研究以40位大學設計科系學生為研究對象，透過內容分析法及統計分析，探討使用電腦化概念構圖做為設計之創意發想工具，是否有助於學生在數位影片作品的表現，以及做為創意發想工具與設計評量方式之合適性。研究結果顯示：一、學生電腦化概念構圖成績與其數位影片作品成績具正向關係；二、電腦化概念構圖係為有效的創意發想工具；三、學生電腦化概念構圖可以做為設計評量的方式。
Computerized concept mapping is a graphic learning tool that includes the concept characterization of multimedia, which is in line with the designers’ visual thinking pattern. On the other hand, the creative thinking ability is a design skill considered of the greatest importance by designers. In this study, with the 40 university students under the design departments as the subjects and using the content analysis method and statistical analysis, the computerized concept mapping adopted as the design and creative thinking tool was explored in order to determine whether or not it contributes to the students’ presentation of digital video works, as well as its appropriateness as a creative thinking tool and design assessment method. The results from research show that: (1) students’ scores on computer-based concept mapping are in direct ratio with their scores on video production; (2) computer-based concept mapping is an effective tool for creative invention; and (3) computer-based concept mapping can be applied in the design assessment.
期刊論文
1.Stuart, H. A.(1985)。Should concept maps be scored numerically?。European Journal of Science Education，7(1)，73-81。  new window
2.于富雲、陳玉欣(2008)。槪念構圖對不同空間能力之國小學童自然科學習成效的影響。教育心理學報，39，83-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林秀美(2010)。槪念構圖法作爲學生知識建構策略硏究--以邏輯設計課程爲例。黃埔學報，58，81-91。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳裕聖、曾玉村(2011)。鷹架式槪念構圖教學策略對學童生物文章的閱讀表徵與情意之影響。教育心理學報，43(1)，1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.洪久賢、林琳、陳立真(2009)。廚藝創造力課程設計與發展之硏究。課程與教學季刊，12(4)，169-190。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.莊謙本、黃議正、沈家伃(20110300)。植基認知負荷取向在課程教材設計及其教學成效分析。屏東教育大學學報，36，169-206。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.鄭憲聰(2006)。槪念構圖教學法運用在國小運輸科技教學活動設計--以「簡易手擲機」製作爲例。生活科技教育月刊，39，7。  延伸查詢new window
8.謝秀艷、賴阿福(2008)。電腦槪念構圖軟體融入國小自然與生活科技領域教學之學習成效--以環保槪念爲例。科學教育研究與發展季刊，50，1-20。  延伸查詢new window
9.嚴貞、許正妹(2006)。電腦化槪念構圖應用在設計教學之硏究。科技學刊，15(3)，227-240。  延伸查詢new window
10.Amundsen, C.、Weston, C.、McAlpine, L.(2008)。Concept mapping to support university academics’ analysis of course content。Studies in Higher Education，33(6)，633-652。  new window
11.Anderson, L. A.、Day, K. L.、Vandenberg, A. E.(2011)。Using a concept map as a tool for strategic planning: The healthy brain initiative。Preventing Chronic Disease，8(5)，1-7。  new window
12.Foster, P.、Carboni, I.(2009)。Using student-centered cases in the classroom an action inquiry approach to leadership development。Journal of Management Education，33(6)，676-698。  new window
13.Graudina, V.(2008)。OWL ontology transformation into concept map。Applied Computer Systems，34，80-91。  new window
14.Green, A. E.、Fettes, D. L.、Aarons, G. A.(2012)。Concept mapping approach to guide and understand dissemination and implementation。The Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research，39，1-12。  new window
15.Hwang, G.-J.、Shi, Y.-R.、Chu, H.-C.(2011)。A concept map approach to developing collaborative mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning。British Journal of Educational Technology，42(5)，778-789。  new window
16.Kok, S.、Domingos, P.(2008)。Extracting semantic networks from text via relational clustering。Lecture Notes in Computer Science，5211，624-639。  new window
17.Liu, P. L.(2011)。A study on the use of computerized concept mapping to assist ESL learners' writing。Computers and Education，57(4)，2548-2558。  new window
18.Meggs, S. M.、Greer, A.、Collins, S.(2012)。Virtual reality in interior design education: Enhanced outcomes through constructivist engagement in second life。International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies，7(1)，19-35。  new window
19.Moor, T.(1995)。Active use of hypertext to aid learning and classroom introduction。ACMSIGCSE Bulletin，27(1)，297-301。  new window
20.Pinto, H. S.、Martins, J. P.(2004)。Ontologies: How can they be built。Knowledge Information System，6(4)，441-464。  new window
21.Reynolds, R.、Walker, K.、Speight, C.(2010)。Web-based museum trails on PDAs for university-level design students: Design and evaluation。Computers & Education，55(3)，994-1003。  new window
22.Powell, K. C.、Kalina, C. J.(2009)。Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom。Education，130(2)，241-250。  new window
23.巫銘昌、張文龍、陳嬋娟(20120400)。臺灣設計教育的回顧與展望。臺灣教育，674，77-80。  延伸查詢new window
24.余民寧、陳嘉成(19961000)。概念構圖：另一種評量方法。國立政治大學學報，73(上)，161-200。  延伸查詢new window
25.梁朝雲、許育齡、劉育東、李元榮(20110300)。促發想像之環境因素的評測工具--以跨域設計教育為例的初探性研究。設計學報，16(1)，65-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Hendler, James(2001)。Agents and the Semantic Web。IEEE Intelligent Systems，16(2)，30-37。  new window
27.Gauci, S. A.、Dantas, A. M.、Williams, D. A.、Kemm, R. E.(2009)。Promoting studentcentered active learning in lectures with a personal response system。Advances in Physiology Education，33(1)，60-71。  new window
28.Hwang, G.-J.、Wu, P.-H.、Ke, H.-R.(2011)。An interactive concept map approach to supporting mobile learning activities for natural science courses。Computers & Education，57(4)，2272-2280。  new window
29.Li, C. C.、Chen, H. S. L.、Shih, J. L.、Huang, G. T.、Liu, B. J.(2011)。An enhanced concept map approach to improving children’s storytelling ability。Computers & Education，56(3)，873-884。  new window
30.Liu, Pei-Lin、Chen, Chiu-Jung、Chang, Yu-Ju(2010)。Effects of a computer-assisted concept mapping learning strategy on EFL college students' English reading comprehension。Computers & Education，54(2)，436-445。  new window
31.Novak, J. D.(1976)。Understanding the learning process and effectiveness of teaching methods in the classroom, laboratory and field。Science Education，60(4)，493-512。  new window
32.Jonassen, D. H.(1984)。Developing a learning strategy using pattern notes: a new technology。Programmed learning and educational technology，21(3)，163-175。  new window
33.邱上真(19890600)。知識結構的評量：概念構圖技巧的發展與試用。特殊教育學報，4，215-244。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.Mintzes, Joel J.、Wandersee, James H.、Novak, Joseph D.(2001)。Assessing Understanding in Biology。Journal of Biological Education，35(3)，118-124。  new window
35.Novak, Joseph D.、Musonda, D.(1991)。A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning。American Educational Research Journal，28(1)，117-153。  new window
36.邱發忠、姚妃宴(20100300)。調整焦點、目標時間距離對創造力表現的影響。教育心理學報，41(3)，497-519。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.劉沛琳(20081000)。概念構圖理解策略在大學英文閱讀教學之成效。課程與教學，11(4)，137-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.王開府(20080600)。心智圖與概念模組在語文閱讀與寫作思考教學之運用。國文學報，43，263-296。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.張蓉峻(2010)。多元評量在數位學習環境中之運用--以Moodle平台實施國小社會領域槪念構圖教學爲例。教育人力與專業發展雙月刊，27(5)，31-40。  延伸查詢new window
40.Laffey, J. M.、Singer, J.(1997)。Using mapping for cognitive assessment in project-based science。Journal of Interactive Learning Research，8(3/4)，363-387。  new window
會議論文
1.王鼎銘、許士遠(200810)。心智圖法合作學習模式運用於高職設計課程探討。2008電腦與網路科技在教育上的應用硏討會。新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
2.林美玲、唐玄輝(200604)。應用「漢字詩歌」於不同設計背景學生之創造力影響初探。2006知識創新與前瞻設計硏討會。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bemaras, A.、Laresgoiti, I.、Corera, J.(1996)。Building and reusing ontologies for electrical network applications。12th ECAI。Budapest, Hungary。  new window
4.Castilho, L. V.、Lopes, H. S.、Tacla, C. A.(200809)。Modeling and building an ontology for neuropediatric physiotherapy domain。8th International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems (HIS 2008)。Barcelona, Spain。  new window
5.DeWeese, S. V.、Randolph, J. J.(201102)。Effective use of correctives in mastery learning。Association of Teacher Educators National Conference。Orlando, FL。  new window
6.Graudina, V.、Grundspenkis, J.(201106)。Algorithm of concept map transformation to ontology for usage in intelligent knowledge assessment system。International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies (CompSysTech'll)。Vienna, Austria。  new window
7.Leith, J. Q.、Zara, J. M.、Mclnnes, M.(201111)。Can e-learning enhance practice-based design courses?。10th European Conference on e-Leaming。Brighton：University of Brighton。  new window
8.Wang, H.(201109)。Research on the model of knowledge representation ontology based on framework in intelligent learning system。2011 International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering (ICECE)。Yichang, China。  new window
研究報告
1.巫銘昌(2010)。高等技職校院思考能力培育課程對於學生問題解決能力提升之效益分析研究。雲林縣：國立雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林達森(2007)。融入概念構圖之學習環教學模式在國中生態系統概念教學之實驗研究。臺南市：嘉南藥理科技大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林曉雯(2008)。科學教學評量的多元形式。科學教師教學評量專業成長與實務。屏東市：國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.七田真、劉天祥(1996)。超右腦革命：心想事成的成功法則。新北市：中國生產力中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.Novak, J. D.、Cañas, A. J.(2009)。The development and evolution of the concept mapping tool leading to a new model for mathematics education。Concept mapping in mathematics: Research into practice。New York, NY：Springer。  new window
4.Babbie, E.(2009)。The practice of social research。Belmont, CA：Wadsworth。  new window
5.Wimmer, R. D.、Dominick, J. R.(1991)。Mass Media Research: An Introduction。Belmont, CA：Wadsworth Publishing Co.。  new window
6.Noy, N. F.、McGuinness, D. L.(2001)。Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology。Stanford, CA：Stanford University。  new window
7.Marlowe, B. A.、Page, M. L.(1998)。Creating and sustaining the constructivist classroom。Thousand Oaks, CA：Corwin Press。  new window
8.Jonassen, D. H.(2000)。Computer as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking。Upper Saddle River, NJ：Prentice-Hall。  new window
9.Novak, J. D.(1998)。Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept map as facilitative tools in schools and corporations。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
10.蕭湘文(20020000)。廣告創意。臺北：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.余民寧(19970000)。有意義的學習：概念構圖之研究。臺北：商鼎文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Ausubel, David Paul(1963)。The psychology of meaningful verbal learning: an introduction to school learning。Grune & Stratton, Inc.。  new window
13.Novak, Joseph D.、Gowin, D. Bob(1984)。Learning How to Learn。Cambridge University Press。  new window
14.Doku, H.、黃心藝(2000)。Download創意。臺北市：海鴒文化。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.教育部(2010)。數位關懷大賽：教育部資訊志工團隊計畫，https://ecare. moe.gov.tw/ecare/files/download/4294967295/2009062278290941.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
2.經濟部工業局(2010)。2010「4C數位創作競賽」，http://www.dcaward.org.tw/4C_Website/index.php?p=regulation。  延伸查詢new window
3.臺北市政府(2010)。2010「第7屆創e盃數位內容競賽」，http://welearning.taipei.gov.tw:8080/taipei2/competitio.htm。  延伸查詢new window
4.臺北市政府產業發展局(2010)。2010「臺北數位創作競賽」，http://www.tdda.org.tw。  延伸查詢new window
5.123test(2012)。Artistic personality type，http://www.123test.com/artistic-personality-type/。  new window
6.Durling, D.(2003)。Horse or cart? Designer creativity and personality，http://www.ub.edu/5ead/PDF/7ZDurling.pdf。  new window
7.Jefferies, E.(2012)。Characteristics of a meaningful visual pedagogy in design education，http://www. northumbria.ac.uk/sd/academic/scd/research/designphd/studentprojectsphd/pgrproject4/。  new window
8.McClure, J. R.，Bell, P. E.(1990)。Effects of an environmental educational related STS approach instruction on cognitive structures of pre-service science teachers(ED341582)。  new window
9.Novak, J. D.，Cañas, A. J.(2008)。The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them，http://cmap.ihmc.us/docs/theory-of-concept-maps.php。  new window
10.OPPapers(2012)。Personality types of graphic designers，http://www.oppapers.com/essays/Person ality-Types-Of-Graphic-Designers/709966。  new window
11.University Campus Suffolk(2010)。BA (Hons) Design，http://www.ucs.ac.uk/study/SchoolsAndCentres/Lowestoft/graphicsspec.aspx。  new window
12.Wojtinnek, P. R.，Pulman, S.(2011)。Semantic relatedness from automatically generated semantic networks，http://www.aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W11/Wll-0149.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Trowbridge, J. E.、Wandersee, J. H.(1998)。Theory-driven graphic organizer。Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view。San Diego, CA：Academic Press。  new window
2.Stewart, J. H.(1984)。The representation of knowledge: Curricular and instructional implications for science teaching。Spatial learning strategies: Techniques, applications, and related issues。San Diego, USA：Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：697（臺灣：674，外國：23） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1931025 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67736623
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上