:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:模糊綜合評判運用於國民小學校長領導能力評鑑之研究
書刊名:教育理論與實踐學刊
作者:江鴻鈞 引用關係
作者(外文):Jang, Hong-jun
出版日期:2013
卷期:27
頁次:頁35-72
主題關鍵詞:評鑑指標權重體系模糊綜合評判法Evaluation indicatorsIndicator weightFuzzy synthetic multiple assessment method
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:73
  • 點閱點閱:60
本研究的目的是運用模糊綜合評判法評鑑國民小學校長領導能力。首先以模糊德菲術蒐集專家對國民小學校長領導能力評鑑指標之意見及看法,以擷取取評鑑指標;其次,運用模糊層級分析法建構評鑑指標之權重體系;最後,以三位校長為例,進行校長領導能力之模糊綜合評判。結果:評鑑出三位校長之表現良好指標、領導能力評價水準之模糊分佈及百分制表示法,並將之與傳統加權平均法作比較。研究發現模糊綜合評判法較傳統加權平均法具實用性與客觀性。
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the elementary school principals' leadership competence by applying the fuzzy synthetic multiple assessment method. Firstly, the researcher uses the ”Fuzzy Delphi Method” to collect the experts' opinions and viewpoints on the evaluation indicators of the elementary school principals' leadership competences in order to obtain the effective evaluation indicators. Secondly, the researcher applies the ”Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Proccess” to build the weight of the evaluation indicators. Finally, the author conducts the fuzzy synthetic multiple assessment of principals' leadership competence with examples from three principals.The result shows that the synthetic multiple assessment provides good indicators of the three principals' leadership competence and that fuzzy distribution and percentile system can be used to represent the level of the leadership competence. The researcher compares it with traditional weighted average method.The study demonstrates that the fuzzy synthetic multiple assessment method is more practical and objective than the traditional weighted average method.
期刊論文
1.江志正(2004)。校長學校經營的策略領導能力。現代教育論壇,13,228-237。  延伸查詢new window
2.Khorramshahgol, Reza、Moustakis, Vassilis S.(1988)。Delphic hierarchy process (DHP): a methodology for priority setting derived from the Delphi method and analytical hierarchy process。European Journal of Operational Research,37(3),347-354。  new window
3.黃姿霓、吳清山(2010)。美國證聯會2008年校長領導國家層級新標準及其對我國國民中小學校長培育制度之啟示。教育研究與發展期刊,6(1),199-227。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Buckley, J. J.(1985)。Fuzzy hierarchy analysis。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,17(3),233-247。  new window
5.Butler, F. Coit(1978)。The Concept of Competence: An Operational Definition。Educational Technology,18(1),7-18。  new window
6.陳羿君、朱元祥(19990600)。技術學院行政主管領導能力之研究。樹德科技學報,1(1),199-207。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.葉連祺(2003)。國小校長領導能力理論、評量和分類之研究 (計畫編號:NSC 92-2413-H-260-007)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳遵行(2012)。國民中小學校長領導能力指標權重之建構:以美國ISLLC學校領導者標準為例(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.莊惠文(2000)。大學教學評鑑指標建構之研究(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳淑珍(2004)。應用模糊綜合評判於發展網路教師評鑑系統之研究(碩士論文)。臺中健康暨管理學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳啟榮(2003)。以全面品質管理建構教育行政機關評鑑指標之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.孫志麟(1998)。國民教育指標體系的建立與應用(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張明輝(2004)。從後現代觀點看學校校長的關鍵能力。現代教育論壇--從後現代看校長核心能力的轉變。臺北:國立教育資料館。  延伸查詢new window
2.藎壚(1992)。實用模糊學。臺北:亞東書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Handy, C.(1995)。Beyond certainty: The chinging world of organization。Boston, MA:Harvard business school press。  new window
4.Manhiem, M. L.、Fall, F.(1967)。Abstract representation of goals: A method for making decision in complex problem。New York:Academy of science-American society of mechanical engineerings。  new window
5.淡江大學教育科學研究室(1983)。淡江大學教學評鑑之研究:學生評鑑教師教學。臺北:淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.Moulton, H. W.、Fickel, A. A.(1993)。Executive development: preparing for the 21st century。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Guba, E. G.、Lincoln, Y. S.(1981)。Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approach。Jossey-Bass。  new window
8.秦夢群(1998)。教育行政:理論部份。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
9.鄭燕祥(2004)。教育領導與改革:新範式。高等教育文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.Spencer, L. M. Jr.、Spencer, S. M.(1993)。Competence at work: Model for superior performance。New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
其他
1.Council of Chief State School Officers(2008)。Educational leadership policy standards: ISLLC 2008,http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2008/Educational_Leadership_policy_Stardards_2008.pdf, 。  new window
2.National Policy Board for Educational Administration(2002)。Stardard for advanced Programs in educational leadership for principals, superintendents, curriculum directors, and supervisors,http://www.npbea.org/ELCC/ELCCstandards%20_5-02.pdf, 2013/03/09。  new window
圖書論文
1.鄭崇趁(2004)。校長核心能力的成因與內涵分析。現代教育論壇--從後現代看校長核心能力的轉變論文集。臺北:國立教育資料館。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE