:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:小型學校跨校推動教師專業發展歷程及其成效之研究--以高雄市二所偏鄉小校為例
書刊名:嘉大教育研究學刊
作者:劉鎮寧 引用關係
作者(外文):Liou, Jen-ning
出版日期:2015
卷期:34
頁次:頁61-87
主題關鍵詞:小型學校教師專業發展行動研究Small-scale schoolTeachers' professional developmentAction research
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:51
  • 點閱點閱:32
本研究旨在透過行動研究法的運用,探討高雄市兩所偏鄉小校跨校推動教師專業發展的策略和成效。研究結果發現:1.跨校推動教師專業發展,透過有系統的規劃和執行,有助於持續性的強化教師對教學方案核心能力的關注,以及促進校際之間的相互學習;2.透過學科教學知識產出型的研習課程,有助於提升教師能力本位的專業發展成效,但跨校進行教學方案的研發,受限於校際之間的差異不易形成;3.校內和跨校進行教室觀課有助於提升教師專業知能和教育視野,但跨校部分仍無法避免教師個人因素與校際氛圍所帶來的限制;4.教師領導者在學校教師專業發展的過程中扮演關鍵性的角色,有助於教師學習文化的活絡與紮根。本研究最後分別針對教育行政主管機關、學校校長、教師、以及後續研究提出進一步的建議。
The main purpose of this study is to investigate the strategies and effectiveness of small-scale schools’ promotion of teachers’ professional development, as well as to reflect on the research process and results. The research results showed that: (1) systematic planning and implementation of inter-institutional promotion of teachers’ professional development can help continuously strengthen teachers’ attention to core competences of teaching programs and promote inter-institutional mutual learning; (2) pedagogical content knowledge-based learning courses can help improve effectiveness of teachers’ competence-based professional development. However, it is difficult to implement the R&D of inter-institutional teaching programs due to the differences among schools; (3) in-school and inter-institutional classroom lesson observation can help improve teachers’ professional competences and educational perspectives. However, inter-institutional classroom observation is still restricted by teachers’ personal factors and inter-institutional atmosphere; (4) teacher leaders play a critical role in the process of school teachers’ professional development, which is beneficial to teachers’ activation and rooting of learning culture. In the end, this study proposed suggestions for educational administrative competent authorities, school principals, teachers, and follow-up studies, respectively.
期刊論文
1.Neumerski, C. M.(2013)。Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: what do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here?。Educational Administration Quarterly,49(2),310-347。  new window
2.劉世閔(2012)。績效與平等之風雲又起:小校裁併之我見。臺灣教育評論月刊,1(14),1-4。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳啟榮(20060400)。裁併小班小校教育議題之分析。臺灣教育,638,38-41。  延伸查詢new window
4.張志明(2012)。實施國中小裁併校必頇考量的政策思維。臺灣教育評論月刊,1(14),5-6。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉文通(20091200)。少子化趨勢偏遠學校經營之挑戰與回應。國立空中大學社會科學學報,16,105-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.曾南薰(2004)。小型學校整併必要性之探討。現代教育論壇,11,19-26。  延伸查詢new window
7.Raths, J.、Katz, L. G.(1992)。Six Dilemmas in Teacher Education。Journal of Teacher Education,43(5),376-385。  new window
8.陳麗珠(20061100)。從公平性邁向適足性:我國國民教育資源分配政策的現況與展望。教育政策論壇,9(4),101-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.許振家、吳秋慧(20140300)。偏遠地區教師專業發展的困境與突破。學校行政,90,108-126。  延伸查詢new window
10.鄭同僚、李天健、陳振淦(20130300)。偏遠地區小校再生之研究。另類教育,2,25-59。  延伸查詢new window
11.何肯忞(20040000)。學校合併面臨左右兩難--美國與臺灣的經驗。基礎教育學報,13(2),143-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.教育部(2014)。中華民國教育統計。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Champy, J.、楊幼蘭(2012)。跨組織再造。臺北市:天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Young, P.(2004)。You have to go to school--You're the principal: 101 tips to make it better for your students, your staff, and yourself。Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin。  new window
3.Danielson, C.(2006)。Teacher leadership: That strengthens professional practice。Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
4.蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.翁福元(2014)。我國小型學校廢併校政策之議:社區需求、學校功能與學生學習權維護之必要,http://www.2020ttct.tw/C/ArtDetail.aspx?cate=107&id=100728。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Dimmock, C.(1996)。Dilemmas for school leaders and administrators in restructuring。International handbook of educational leadership and administration。London:Kluwer Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE