:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:屏師附小教師對科技教學活動看法之研究
書刊名:屏東師院學報
作者:吳淑芬
出版日期:1995
卷期:8
頁次:頁429-470
主題關鍵詞:小學科技教育教學活動設計科技認知問題解決教學法Technology education in the elementary schoolTeaching designTechonolgical awarenessProblem solving
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:76
  • 點閱點閱:13
     本研究採用「準實驗研究法」針對研究者所研創之科技教育教學活動設計,作實驗性之研究,並藉此探討屏師附小教師對此類活動之看法。教學實驗在屏師附小進行,有四及五年級各兩個班級的學生176人為教學實驗對象,而附小教師11人參與教學觀摹與評鑑,利用各班之美勞課進行實驗教學及活動評鑑。教學活動方案分別為「家」及「停車場」,而教學策略則為直接或循環問題解決法。教師對於活動之評鑑則分為三個重點方向:(1) 活動之設計在提供學童機會以增加其科技認知程度、(2) 學生之反應與參與程度、及(3) 教學準備工作之負荷及採用之意願。教師意見以Likert五點計分來反應其意見程度,而資料則以無母數統計法處理。結果有以下發現: 1.全體教師對於三項重點之意見大略一致。 2.採用不同活動單元可能影響教師對於三項重點意見之一致性。 3.學生在活動中的反應與參與程度,有同樣熱烈的表現。 4.從事此類教學準備所需之精力與時間兩方面之工作負荷大,而其採用的意願則不高 5.全體女教師顯然較男教師同意「在教學活動中,對教具的使用方式,確實能提供學童機會來增加其科技認知程度」 6.不同問題策略或活動單元似乎並不影響教師對重點一「提供科技認知機會」中各子項的同意程度 7.男女教師觀察學生表現之意見差異,出現在教具使用、採用問題解決法、及製作過程等三方面 8.女教師認為安排與設計此類教學活動所需時間較男教師所認為的多。
     The purposes of this study were to explore teachers's perspectives toward the developed technology classroom activities that were first experimentally implementing in the elementary school in Taiwan. The classroom activities, which were developed by the researcher prior to this study, were carried out in the Affiliated Elementary School of the National Pingtung Teacher's College during a six-week period of Art and Craft course. 176 fourth and fifth graders as well as 11 elementary teachers were involved in this study. Teachers' perspectives were focused on three aspects' the activity is to provide opportunities for increasing technological awareness of pupils; the degrees of reaction and participation toward the activity of the pupils; and, loads for teaching preparation and willingness for adopting such activities. The Liker Scale was used to response teachers' perspectives of interests, while the Non-parameters Statistics were applied to the data analysis. The findings from this study were profound' 1. all teachers appeared to have quite unanimous perspectives toward the three aspects; 2. kinds of technological activity were suspected as elements influencing teachers' perspectives; 3. pupils were found actively responding to and participated in the activities and no differences were found between their participation and responses. 4. the teachers responded that loads for teaching preparation were huge which led to a low willingness for adopting such activities. 5. in terms of providing opportunities to increase technological a,areness of pupils, female teachers seemed to be more positive than male teachers. 6. providing opportunities to increase technological awareness 7. different perspectives, in terms of students responses and participation, between female and male teachers were found in the implementation of the teaching aids, problem solving as teaching strategy, and model producing process. 8. female teachers responded they would need more time than male teachers to prepare for such activity.
期刊論文
1.Savage, E.(1990)。Technology programs: A technology education model for Ohio。The Technology Teacher,49(5),8-12。  new window
2.施惠(1988)。師資培育課程中國民小學自然科教學模式之研究。竹師學報,2,394-315。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Anderson, L. D.(1989)。Problem solving in technology education。The Technology Teacher,49(1),3-7。  new window
4.Hutchinson, J.、Hutchinson, P.(1991)。Process-based technology education。The Technology Teacher,50(8),3-6。  new window
5.Kirkwood, J. J.(1992)。Elementary school math and technology education。The Technology Teacher,51(4),29-31。  new window
6.Deursen, A. V.、Kelty, N.(1989)。Uniting to promote technology education。The Technology Teacher,48(8),23-27。  new window
7.Sittig, L. H.(1992)。Kinder-tech。The Technology Teacher,51(7),7-10。  new window
8.Thode, T.(1989)。Technology education in the elementary school。The Technology Education,49(1),12-15。  new window
9.Barnes, J. L.、Wiatt, C.、Bowen, M. A.(1990)。The NASA/Elementary technology education project。The Technology Teacher,49(4),13-17。  new window
會議論文
1.Lauda, D.(1992)。Technology education philosophy, transition, trends。The Sino-American technology education seminar in the 90's。Kaohsiung Normal University。  new window
2.張美珍、Thomson, Carole J.(1993)。運用科技為小學課程之整合體的研究。國立屏東師範學院技學教育學術研討會。屏東:國立屏東師範學院。105-116。  延伸查詢new window
3.許柏修、張美珍(1993)。科技教育與國民小學自然科教學之整合研究:以問題--解決活動實施傳播科技教學為例。國立屏東師範學院技學教育學術研討會。屏東:國立屏東師範學院。163-176。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳潔君(1993)。小學課程中數學與科技教育的整合教學實例的發展。國立屏東師範學院技學教育學術研討會。屏東:國立屏東師範學院。199-204。  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡東鐘(1993)。技學教育教材設計模式之探討。國立屏東師範學院技學教育學術研討會。屏東:國立屏東師範學院。269-271。  延伸查詢new window
6.Householder, D. I.(1992)。Curriculum design in technology education in the United States of America。九零年代中美科技教育學術研討會,國立高雄師範大學工藝教育研究所主編 。  延伸查詢new window
7.Thomsosn, C.(1993)。Developing technology as an integrator of the primary curriculum。國立屏東師範學院技學教育學術研討會。屏東:國立屏東師範學院。92-104。  延伸查詢new window
8.Thomson, C. J.(1994)。A Scottish Technology Approach,One Year On。56th ITEA Annual Conference。Kansas City。  new window
9.吳淑芬(1993)。科技教育在小學之實施--教學活動設計。國立屏東師範學院技學教育學術研討會。屏東。295-297。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Wu, S. E.(1991)。The Proposal and Partial Validation of Strategies and Components for Eveloping Project-Oriented Activities in Elementary Science Classes in Taiwan(博士論文)。Iowa State University。  new window
圖書
1.Norusis, J. M.(1990)。SPSS/ PC+ statistics 4.0 for the IBM PC/ XT/ AT and PS/2。Chicago, IL:SPSS Inc.。  new window
2.顏月珠(1991)。應用數理統計學。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Siegel, S.、Castellan, N. J. Jr.(1988)。Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral Sciences。Singapore:McGraw-Hill Book Co.。  new window
4.王文科(1988)。認知發展理論與教育。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
5.張厚燦(1991)。心理與教育統計學。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊維哲(1992)。2000年中國的年學技術。台北市:曉園。  延伸查詢new window
7.鍾聖校(1989)。科學教育研究。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
8.Glenister, S. H.(1986)。The Technique of Craft Teaching, 42。London:George G. Hanap Co.。  new window
9.Bailley, I. J.(1985)。Career education for Teachers and Consolers A Practical Approach。Cranston, R. I.:The Caroll Press。  new window
10.Dugger, W. E. Jr.、Dunlap, D.、Croft, V. E.、Brusic, S. A.(1992)。Mission 21: Launching tehchnology across the curriculum. Kids & Technology。New York:Delmar。  new window
11.Crocker, L.、Algina, J.(1986)。Introduction to Classssical & Modern Test Theory。Orlando, Florida:Holt, Rinehart and Winston。  new window
12.林生傳(19880000)。新教學理論與策略:自由開放社會中的個別化教學與後個別化教學。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.黃光雄、簡茂發(1991)。教育研究法。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Miller, W. G.(1989)。Statistics and Measurement Programs Learning Environment,Ames, Iowa。  new window
圖書論文
1.呂書榮、張玉山(1993)。國小美勞實施技學教育的適切性與實務之探討。國立屛東師範學院技學教育學術研討會研討會實錄。屏東:國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.International Technology Education Association(1985)。Technology Education: A Direction for the profession。Technology Education: A Perspective on Implementation。Reston, VA:ITEA。  new window
3.Sellwood, P.、Ward, F.、Davenport, G.。Let's Make It Work: Design and Technology for Primary Schools。Teacher's Guide for Pupils' Introductory Book and Pupiles' Book 1 to Book 3。Edinburgh:Thomas NeIson and Sons Ltd。  new window
4.Technology Education Advisory Council(1988)。Teaching technology in our schools。Technology: A National Imperative。ITEA, Reston, VA:Author。  new window
5.Todd, R. D.(1985)。Technology education: An international perspective。A Perspective on Implementation。Reston, VA:Author。  new window
6.Waetjen, W. B.(1989)。A problem solving framework for technology education。Technological Problem Solving: A Proposal。Reston, VA:Author。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE