:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:成人學習動機、學習行為、創新能力與訓練成效關係之研究-以T公司主管人才培訓班為例
作者:簡福成
作者(外文):Fu-Cheng Chien
校院名稱:國立屏東教育大學
系所名稱:教育行政研究所
指導教授:劉慶中
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2012
主題關鍵詞:創新能力學習行為成人學習動機訓練成效Individual InnovationLearning BehaviorLearning MotivationTraining Effectiveness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:120
本研究旨在探討並驗證企業辦理教育訓練時,成人學習動機、學習行為、創新能力與訓練成效之關係。本研究主要採取「調查研究法」,以T公司主管人才培訓班受訓學員為研究對象,研究工具為研究者自編之「成人學習動機、學習行為、創新能力與訓練成效調查問卷」。採全面調查方式,發出正式問卷835份問卷。回收問卷共702份,剔除無效問卷共15份,有效回收樣本共687份,有效回收率為82.3%。
本研究分別以單因子變異數分析、積差與典型相關、多元迴歸及結構方程模式分析等方法進行驗證各項假設。分析結果顯示,成人學習動機與訓練成效之間存在直接效果、間接效果及整體效果的因果關係模式,並建構成人學習動機、學習行為、創新能力與訓練成效之「訓練成效模式」,且歸納出十點結論,除對教育訓練機構及受訓學員提出以下研究建議外,亦可作為企業辦理教育訓練之準繩,提供後續研究與探討教育訓練之參考。
一、對主管人才培訓機構之建議
(一)針對學員的學習動機,作訓練需求課程規劃
(二)規劃適當考評方式,以強化學員學習行為
(三)結合理論與實務,以強化學員創新能力
(四)針對不同進用方式學員,設計不同課程與班別
(五)加強輔導機制,以提升訓練成效
(六)推廣應用訓練成效之模式,以深化學習效果
二、對受訓學員之建議
(一)對受訓學員而言可結合實務與理論之應用
(二)以學習行為與創新能力為利基,建構高度的訓練成效
(三)改變學習行為,激發個人創新能力
The purpose of this study was to explore and validate the relationship among Learning Motivation, Learning Behavior, Individual Innovation ,and Training Effectiveness. This study adopted survey research methods. The objects were trainee for manager training and development in T-Company, a self-designed research tool questionnaire of Learning Motivation, Learning Behavior, Individual Innovation ,and Training Effectiveness. This study adopted a general survey, using a self-designed quantitative questionnaire. Of the 835 questionnaires sent out, 702 were returned, 15 were invalid, and 687 were valid. The valid return rate was 82.3%.
This empirical study is using the quantitative methods, including One-Way ANOVA, Pearson Correlation Analysis and Canonical Correlation Analysis, Multiple Regression Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling to test and verify each hypothesis. The result show Learning Motivation and Training Effectiveness has direct ,indirect effects and causal relationship model of whole effectiveness. To construct the Learning Motivation, Learning Behavior and Training Effectiveness model of Training Effectiveness. This study will sum up 10 conclusions and propose some concrete suggestions to offer the training organization and trainee for development.
For Training Organization:
1.Planning training needs for Learning Motivation of trainee.
2.Planning appropriate training evaluation to reinforce the Learning Behavior of trainee.
3.Integrating theory with practice to enhance Individual Innovation.
4.Offering diverse courses and classes for Technical staff and Administrative staff.
5.Reinforce guidance to promote Learning Effectiveness.
6.Promoting and applying Training Effectiveness Model to deepen Learning Effectiveness.
For Trainee:
1.Integrating theory with practice.
2.Base on Learning Behavior and Individual Innovation to construct highly Training Effectiveness.
3.Modify Learning Behavior, inspire Individual Innovation.
一、中文部份
丁導民(1996)。空中大學學生自我導向學習準備度、電腦態度與電腦成就關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
王克先(1979)。學習心理學。台北市:桂冠圖書公司。
王瑞弘(1995)。成人基本教育教師教學型態與學生學習行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
王福林(1990)。新制師院學生與師專學生家庭社經地位及其學習行為、學業成就之調查分析 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
沙依仁(1998)。人類行為與社會環境。台北市:五南出版社。
李佩玲(2007)。高科技產業員工的學習動機、訓練成效與工作績效之相關性研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
李淑娟(1992)。訓練移轉之研究—經濟部所屬國營事業機構之個案分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,台北市。
杜郁文(2000)。中國大陸會計系學生學習行為認知之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。
吳若己(2006)。檔案評量對成人英語學習者自我導向學習傾向、學習策略及學習成效影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。new window
吳銘達、鄭宇珊(2010)。教師教學行為、學生學習動機對學習成效之影響:階層線性模式分析。中等教育,61(3),32-51。new window
吳秉恩(1984)。管理才能發展方案實施與成效關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,台北市。new window
吳萬益(2005)。企業研究方法。台北市:華泰文化事業有限公司。
吳瓊汝(1998)。國中學生之學習態度。台灣教育,566,44-50。
邱宏益(1996)。員工培訓成效評估之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園縣。
林芸安(2005)。業務人員之核心能力、學習動機與教育訓練成效相關性之研究-以A壽險公司為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
林靈宏(1994)。消費者行為。台北市:五南出版社。
林澄貴(2001)。知識管理、工程專業人員核心能力與工作績效關係之研究─以中鋼公司為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。
林奕如(2000)。變革管理課程訓練成效之評估與影響訓練成效因素之探討(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園縣。
林麗惠(1997)。成人參與在職進修訓練的自評成效及其相關因素之研究-以職訓局所屬職業訓練中心學員為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
柯正峰(1989)。升大學補習班學生學習態度、對補習班態度及生活型態之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
紀慧如(2003)。組織創新能力與創新績效之研究---以技職校院為例(未出版之碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學,台中市。
秦夢群(1992)。高中教師管理心態、學生內外空與學生學習習慣與態度關係之研究。教育心理與研究,15,129-172。new window
陳文忠(2004)。組織氣候、學習動機與學習行為對人力資源績效影響之研究-以國內企業員工回流教育為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南市。
陳志樺(2002)。成人技職繼續教育參與動機與障礙因素之相關研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。new window
陳東志(2009)。組織氣候對公務人員參與數位學習動機及其學習行為影響之研究-以海巡署為例(未出版之碩士論文)。世新大學,台北市。
陳俊儒(2006)。個人特性、人力資源管理活動與創新績效關係之多層級探討(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南市。
郭慧雯(2000)。英語學習策略對高中英語科低成就生輔導成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
黃玉湘(2002)。我國社區大學學員學習動機與學習滿意度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
黃佑安(1992)。學習動機取向、自重感及個人變因與教育訓練自評成效之相關性研究-以企管顧問公司學員為例(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。
黃明玉(2003)。成人學習者自我導向學習傾向、班級學習氣氛與學習滿意度研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
黃芳銘(2006)。結構方程模式理論與應用。台北市:五南。
黃昌誠(1990)。空中大學學生學習行為與學習困擾之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
黃致凱(2004)。組織創新氣候知覺、個人創新行為、自我效能知覺與問題解決型態關係之研究─以銀行業為研究對象(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。
黃富順(1985)。成人的學習動機。高雄市:復文書局。
黃富順(1992)。成人心理。新北市:國立空中大學。
黃湘淳(2001)。國中生英語學習適應之相關因素研究--以台南地區為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南市。
曾淑惠(2009)。體制性人力資源管理、個人學習能力、個人創新能力對個人工作績效之影響--以保險產業為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南市。
張火燦(1998)。策略性人力資源管理。台北市:揚智。
張允宜(2006)。團隊目標導向對團隊創新與個人創新行為之跨層次分析-以任務反思為中介變數(未出版之碩士論文)。東吳大學,台北市。
張春興(1997)。現代心理學。台北市:東華。
張春興(1998)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市:東華。
張新仁(1982)。國中學生學習行為、學習方法、學習習慣與學習態度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。new window
張新仁(1983)。 國中學生學習行為之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。new window
楊子江(譯)(1997)(原作者:野中裕次郎)。創新求勝。台北市:遠流。
葉長青(2000)。團隊成員認知賦能對個人創新性關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。銘傳大學,台北市。
詹美娟(1994)。大學成人學生及傳統學生學習特性之比較研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
廖玉齡(2007)。成人學習動機、學習行為、學習機會與創新表現關係之研究-以管理碩士在職專班為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。new window
廖述賢、費吳琛、周繼文(2008)。知識取得、知識移轉與創新能力關聯性研究-以台灣知識密集型產業為例。人力資源管理學報,6(2),001-021。new window
蔡淑美(2010)。台中市國中生學習動機與創造力之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
蔡啟通(2001)。組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係。管理學報,18(4),527-566。new window
鄭明韋(1998)。國立空中大學嘉義地區學生學習方式、學習參與程度與學習成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
鄭釗仁(2011)。技職校院學生選修創意課程之學習策略、創意自我效能、創新行為及創意學習成效關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。new window
鄭增財(1995)。台北市國中技藝教育班學生學習態度及其相關因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。
鄭增財(1999)。實用技能班學生價值觀與學習行為之分析研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。new window
鄭凱元((2009)。學習氣候與知識分享對員工知識移轉績效和創新行為影響之研究—以學習動機為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。
鄧運林(1992)。自我導向學習對成人學生學習行為、學業成績影響之實驗研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,台北市。new window
盧美貴(1985)。父母教養方式與國小資優兒童學習行為之比較研究。北市師專學報,16,123-202。
謝宜栴(2007)。師徒功能對壽險業務人員工作績效的影響:職場個人學習為中介效果(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。new window
謝淑惠(2002)。高職商科學生認知型態與學習行為對在校生會計事務技能檢定成效之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學,桃園縣。
戴維舵(2005)。在補救性訓練中內控人格、自我效能、組織承諾與人際公平知覺對學習動機與學習成效之間的交互影響(未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣科技大學,台北市。
羅芙蓉(1994)。學習行為量表。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
二、英文部分
Adult Education Centre.( 2005, December 2). Facilitating skills: Working with adult leaders.Dublin, Ireland : University College Dublin. Retrieved from http://www.ucd.ie/adulted/resources/pages/faci1-adnrogog.htm
Alkin, M. C. (1973). Evaluation Theory Development, Evaluation Comment, 2(1), Oct., Center for the Study of Evaluation, Graduate School of Education UCLA, 2-3.
Alliger, G. M., & E. A. Janak. (1989). Kirkpatrick''s Levels of Training Criteria: Thirty Years Later. Personnel Psychology, 42, 331-342.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: springer-verlag.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58.
Amabile, T.M.,Conti, R.,Coon, H., Lazenby, J.,&Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1154-1184.
Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 1033: 411-423.
Armbrecht, F., Jr., Richard B., Chapas, Cecil C. Chappelow, Farris, Georage F., Friga, Paul N., Hartz, Cynthia A., Mcilvaine, McIlvaine, M. Elizabeth, Postle, Stephen R., and Whitwell, George E. (2001). Knowledge Management in Research and Development. Research Technology Management.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Y. Yi. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models,
Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 76-94.
Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41, 63-105.
Bernard, H.W. (1962). Psychology of learning and teaching. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Berry, J. (2000). Employees cash in on KM: Knowledge management programs pay rewards to share ideas. Internet Week , 45-48.
Bierly, P. (1997). Organizational innovation and strategic choices: A knowledge-based view. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 422-426.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Boshier, R. (1971). Motivational orientations for adult education participants: A factor analytic exploration of Houle''s typology. Adult Education Journal, 21(2), 3-26.
Boshier, R., & Riddell, G. (1978). Education participation scale factor structure for older adults. Adult Education, 28, 165-175.
Brinkerhoff, R . O. (1988). An Integrated Evaluation Model for HRD, Training and Development Journal, 42(2), 66-68.
Brown,W. F. and W.H. Holtzman. (1968). Survey of study habits and attitudes, College level, NY: Psychological Corporation.
Cavusgil, S. T., Calantone, R.J., & Zhao, Y. (2003). Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 18(1), 6–21.
Cervantes, M. (1997), Diffusing technology to industry, OECD Observer, (207), 20-23.
Chan, C.C.A., Lim, L. (2003). Keasberry, S.K., Examining the linkage between team learning behavior and team performance, The Learning Organization, 10 (4-5), 228-236
Cookson, P.S. (1986). A framework for theory and research on adult education participation. Adult Education Quarterly, 36(3), 130-141.
Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42: 693-716.
Damanpour, F. (1991), Organizational innovation :a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators, Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
Damanpour, F. and Evan, W. M., (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of organizational lag, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 392-409.
Dansereau, D. F. (1978). “The development of a learning strategies curriculum”, In H.F. O’Neill, Jr., (Ed.), Learning strategies. New York: Academic Press.
DeSimone, Randy L. and Harris, David M.(1998). Human Resource Development. Fort Worth, Tex. : Dryden Press. 407-408.
Deutsch, W. (2000). It''s (im)possible to become a genius! The development of drawing, In C.F.M. van Lieshout & P.G. Heymans (Eds.), Developing talent across the life span , Hove: Psychology Press, 185-199.
Donald. JW. (1984). Education the Entrepreneur: understanding Adult Learning Behavior, Journal of Small Business Management, 22(2), 32.
Drazin, R., Glynn, M.A., & Kazanjian, R.K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: sensemaking perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 286-307.
Drucker, Peter, (1985), Innovation and Entrepreneurship, New York: Harper and Row.
Elsbach, K. D., & Kramer, R. M. (2003). Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments. Academy of Management, 46: 289-301.
Garnett, T. (2005). Leadership development training. In J. J. Phillips & P. P. Phillips (Eds.), ROI at work (pp.23-35). Alexandria, VA:ASTD Press.
Germain, R.,Cornelia, D.,William, C. (2001). The mediating role of operations knowledge in the relationship of context with performance, Journal of Operations Management, 19, 453-469.
Goldsmith, R. (1986), Convergent validity of four innovativeness scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 81-87.
Goldstein, Avery. (1993). Great Expectations: Interpreting China`s Approval.International Security, 22(3), 36-73.
Grant R. M. (1996). Prospering in Dynamically-competitive Environment: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration. Organization Science, 7(4): 375-387.
Hair, J. F., R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham & W.C. Black, (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis(5), New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
Han, J.K., Kim, N., Srivastava, R.K., 1998. Market orientation and organisational performance: is innovation the missing link? Journal of Marketing 62 (4), 30-45.
Holton, E. F. III (1996). The flawed four-level evaluation model. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7, 5-21.
Houle, C. O. (1961). The Inquiring Mind. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Hunter, L., Beaumont, P., & Lee, M. (2002). Knowledge management practice in Scottish law firms, Human resource management journal, 12(2), 4-21.
Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, maker orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42-54.
Hurt, H. T., Joseph, K., & Cook, C. D. (1977). Scale for the measurement of innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 58-65.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., N. Tractinsky, & M. Vitale, (2000). Consumer Trust in an Internet Store, Information Technology & Management, 1(1), 45-71.
Joseph, G. (1980), The Many Sciences and the One World, Journal of Philosophy, 77, 773-791.
Kanter, R. M. (1988), When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169-211.
Kaufman R. and Keller J. M. (1994), Levels of Evaluation: Beyond Kirkpatrick, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 5(4), 371-380.
Kay, S.I. (2000). On the nature of expertise in visual art. In R.C. Friedman & B.M. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development, 217- 232. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
King, N., & Anderson, N.(1990). Innovation in working groups. In M. A. West&J. L. farr (Eds.). Innovation and creativity at aork: 81-100. Chichester, England: Wiley.
Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1959). Techniques for evaluating training program, Training And Development Journal, 13(11), 3-9.
Kirkpatrick, D. L, (1959a).Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of the American society of Training Directors, 13, 3-9.
Kirkpatrick, D. L, (1959b).Techniques for evaluating programs: Part 2-Learning.Journal of the American society of Training Directors, 13(12), 21-26.
Kirkpatrick, D. L, (1960a).Techniques for evaluating programs: Part 3-Behavior.Journal of the American society of Training Directors, 14(1), 13-18.
Kirkpatrick, D. L, (1960b).Techniques for evaluating programs: Part 4-Results. Journal of the American society of Training Directors, 14(1), 28-32.
Kirkpatrick, D. L, (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Kirkpatrick, D. L, (1998). Evaluating training programs(2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Kleysen Robert F; Street Christopher T. (2001). Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284.
Knowles. (1970). The modern practice of adult education. N. Y.: Association Press.
Kotler (1997), Marketing Management, Analysis, Implementation and Using the Servoual Model, The Service Industries Journal, l(11-3), 324-343.
Kraiger, K., J. K. Ford,&E. Salas.(1993). Application of Cognitive, Skill-Based, and Affective Theories of Learning Outcomes to New Methods of Training Evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311-328.
Lepak, D. P., Snell, S. A. (2002). Examining the human resource architecture: the relationships among human capital, employment, and human resource configurations. Journal of Management, 28(4), 5178-543.
Lieb, S. (1991) Principles of Adult Learning.
Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). There’s no place like home? The contribution of work and non-work creativity support to employees’ creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 757-767.
Manuel, L., & James, w. S. (1999). Empowered self-development and continuous learning. Human Resource Management, 38(1):3-16.
Mayer, R. E. (1988). Learning strategies: An overview? In Learning anad study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation, C.E. Weinstein, E.T. Goetz, and P.A. Alexander (Eds.), Academic Press, California: S.D.
Mayer, R.E. (1998). Learning strategies: An overview. In Weinstein, C.E., Goets, E. T., & Alexander F. A.(Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation. NY: Academic Press
McDermott, A.G. (1987). A model of training effectiveness: Individual and environment factors influencing training outcomes. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Houston.
Moran, J.J. (1997) Assessing Adult Learning- A Guide for Practitioners. Malabar, Florida, Krieger Publishing Co.
Morstain, B. R. and J. C. Smart, (1974), Reasons for participation in adult education courses: A multivariate analysis of group differences, Adult Education, 24(2), 83-98.
Nelson, K.M. and Cooprider, J.G. (1996), The contribution of shared knowledge to Is group performance, MIS Quarterly, 20(4), 409-429.
Nickols, F. W. (2005). Why a stakeholder approach to evaluating training. Advances in Developing Human Resource, 7(1), 121-134.
Nonaka, I. (1994), A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organization Science, Vo1.5(1), 14-37.
Nystrom, H., (1990). Organizational innovation, In M. A. West and J. L. Farr (Eds.) Innovation and creativity at work (pp. 143-161), NY: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
O’Brien, G. (2004). Principles of Adult learning. Melbourne, Australia Southern Healthy Organization.
Perry-Smith, J. E. & Shalley, C. E.(2003).The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 89-106.
Phillips, J.J.(1997). Handbook of training evaluation and measurement methods (3rd ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
Phillips, J. J. (2003). Return on investment in training and performance improvement program (2nd ed.). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Phillips, J. J. (2005). Measuring the ROI in a coaching program. In J. J. Phillips & P. P. Phillips (Eds.), ROI at work (pp.81-95). Alexandria, VA:ASTD Press.
Phillips, J. J., & Phillips, P. P. (2000). The return-on-investment process:Issues and trends. Training Journal, Oct, 8-12.
Phillips, J. J., & Phillips, P. P. (2002). Measuring ROI in the public sector. Alexandria, VA:ASTD Press.
Phillips, J. J., & Phillips, P. P.(2004). ROI in the public sector: Myths and realities. Public Personnel Management, 33(2): 139-149.
Phillips, J. J., & Phillips, P. P. (2005). An ROI impact study on leadership development. In Phillips, J. J. & Phillips, P. P. (Eds.), ROI at work (pp.143-157). Alexandria, VA:ASTD Press.
Phillips, J.J., & Phillips, P.P.(2005a) Proving the value of HR: How and why to measure ROI. Alexandria, VA: SHRM.
Phillips, J. J., & Phillips, P. P. (2005b). ROI at work. Alexandria, VA:ASTD Press.
Phillips, J. J., Phillips, P. P., & Hodges, T. K. (2004). Make training evaluation work. Alexandria, VA:ASTD press.
Poell, Rob F, Van der Krogt, Ferd J., & Wildemeersch, Danny (1999). Strategies in Organizing Work-Related Learning Projects. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10(1), 43-61.
Quinn, J. B.; Anderson, P. & Finkelstein, S. (1996), Managing Professional Intel-lent: Making the Most of the Best , Harvard Business Review.
Rickards, T. and Moger, S., (1991). Innovation Questionnaire Used in EURPOACE Study, UK: Manchester Business School.
Robbins, S. P. (2001), Organizational Behavior, Prentice Hall International, Inc., New Jer-sey,U.S.A
Robinson, A. G., & Stern, S., (1997). Corporate creativity: How innovation and improvement actually happen. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Santomero, A. M. and Trester, J. J. (1998), ”Financial innovation and bank risk taking,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,35(1), 25-37.
Schick , H.,& Phillipson, S. N.(2009). Learning motivation and performance excellence in adolescents with high intellectual potential: what really matters? High Ability Studies, 20( 1),15-37.
Schroeder, R., Van de Ven, A ., Scudder, G. & Polley, D. (1989). The development of innovation ideas. In A. Van de Ven, H. Angle & M. Poole (Eds.), Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota studies. New York : Harper & Row, 107-134.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1934), The theory of economic development. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Schunk, D. H.(1996). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, r. a.(1994).Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37:580-607.
Shalley, G. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2000). Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: Effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave. Academy of Management, 43(2), 215-223.
Sheffiele. S.B. (1964). The Orientation of Adult Continuing Learners, In D.
Smith,C.A.,Organ,D.W.,& Near,J.P.(1983).Organizational citizenship behavior:It’s nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology. 68(3), 653-663.
Stone, R. D. (2004). A study of the leadership accountability institute’s leadership training program.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP model for educational account ability. Joumal of Research and Development in Education, 5(1), 19-25.
Swanson, R.A. (1998). Demonstrating the financial benefit of human resource development: Status and update on the theory and practice. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 9(3), 285-295.
Swanson, R. A., & Holton, E. F. (2001). Foundations of human resource development. San Francisco, CA:Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Tennant, M & Pogson, (1995) Learning and change in the adult years. San Francisco: Jossyey-Bass Publishers.
Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The Processes of Technological Innovation. D. C: Lexington Books.
Tsai, Chi-Tung. (1992). A componential framework of creativity: A synthetic approach. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology,1, 131-153.
Van der Sluis, E. C. (1999), The Interaction of Learning Context and Learning Behaviour: A Cross-section Study of Managerial Learning, in R. Pepermans, I. Flion. J. C. A. Ardts and P. G. W Jansen (eds) Managerial Behavior: Empirical Studies on Management Development and Socialization, 25-42. Leuven: Acco.
Van Gelderen, M. V. d. S., Lidewey E.C. and. (2001). Learning opportunities and learning behavior as keys to entrepreneurial success. Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit.
Van Parreren, C.F. (1989) Learning at School, [Leren op School], Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
Wang, G. G., Foucar-Szocki, D., Griffin, O., O’Connor, C., & Sceifert, E. (2003).Departure, abandonment, and dropout of e-Learning: Dilemma and solutions(Final research report to the E-Learning Consortium, the Masie Center).Harrisonburg, VA: James Madison University.
Wang, G. G., & Wang, J. (2004). Toward a theory of human resource development learning participation. Human Resource Development Review, 3(4), 326-353.
Wang, Y. , Peng, H., Huang, R., Hou, Y., & Wang, J .(2008). Characteristics of distance learners research on relationships of learning motivation, learning strategy, sc lf-efficacy, attribution and learning results. OpeJ1 Learning . 23( 1),17 -28.
Warr, P., Bird, M., & Rackham, N. (1970). Evaluation of management training: A practical framework, with cases, for evaluating training needs and results. London: Gower.
Wieczerkowski , W.. & Prado. T.M. ( 1993). Spiral of disappointment: Decline in achievement among gifted adolescents. European Journal for High Ability. 4 , 126-141.
Winner, E., & Martion, G. ( 1993). Giftedness in the visual arts and music. In K.A. Heller, F.J Monks & A.H. Passow (Eds. ), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 253- 281). Oxford: Pergamum Press.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293–321.
Wu, Se-Hwa, Yan, Lu-Miao,Han, Tzu-shian, and Wang, Mei-Ya, (2000). Relationship between personal creativity and the innovation on the Internet. Paper presented at the Conference of Creativity and Innovation: the Characteristic and Development of Technology Creativity, National Cheng Chi University, Taipei
Yang, J., Rui, M. and Wang, J. J., (2006). Enhancing the firm’s innovation capability through knowledge management: A study of high technology firms in China, International Journal of technology Management, 36(4), 305-317.
Zimmermann, E. (Ed.). (2004). Artistically ; and musically talented students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE