:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:課程、教學、評量三位一體的專題學習
書刊名:臺南師院學報
作者:鄒慧英 引用關係
作者(外文):Tzou, Hueying
出版日期:2001
卷期:34
頁次:頁155-194
主題關鍵詞:Project-based learningEducational assessmentIntegrated curriculum課程統整教學評量專題學習九年一貫課程改革
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(5) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:130
  • 點閱點閱:96
     這波九年一貫課程改革的浪潮裡,明裡是藉由課程的改革滿足杜會對教育改革的 殷切期盼,實則帶動教學與評量的同步改革,進而對教育產生全面性的質變與量雙,課程、 教學、評量三者實是相互牽動,合為一體的。如此一來,實務工作者不禁要問:有何教學方 式可以協助教師落實九年一貫課程,又能兼顧評量上的需求?在話多可行選項裡,筆者以為 專題學習(project-based larning)不失為一優良選擇,因為專題學習不僅在概念上與這波 課程改革理念相謀合,更是一種集課程、教學、評量三者於一身的學習活動模式。因此,本 文擬先說明九年一貫課程的實施原則-「課程統整」的理念與模式,再提出能從課程、教學 、與評量三方面落實課程統整的具體教學方案-專題學習,最後述及專題學習的評量設計。 盼此論述結果,能為即將上路約九年一貫課程和國小現場教師提供一線曙光,以具體可行的 建議,進而產生實質上的助益。  孩子們的學習需要動機,優質的教學更需要老師的熱情參與。本文嘗試以專題學習方式 做為經營九年一貫課程的一個範例,寄盼集課程、教學、評量於一身的專題學習,能早日實 現二十一世紀的教育願景-主人教育、溫馨校園、與終身學習。
     Over the past decade, the 9-year joint curricula plan for elementary and junior high schools is the most important educational revolution in Taiwan The movement of educational reform shows a fact that we are facing a period of disturbance in education Meanwhile, we have the opportunity to participate the plan of education reconstruction. Externally, the 9-year joint curricula plan only restricts in curriculum area. However, its deep inside extends to instruction and assessment dimensions. On the surface, the curricular reform meets the expectation of the society toward educational revolution. Actually, the 9-year joint curricula plan activates the reform of instruction and assessment simultaneously, and then and overall changes either in qualitative or quantitative dimension. Given the Guidelines for a 9-year joint curricula plan, it's easy to see through that the foci of this reform are the emphasis of integrated knowledge, the learning and application of basic competency, and the activity-and conception-based curricular design, especial in science education. In order to achieve the goals of 9-year joint curricula plan, the author believes that project-based learning is an excellent choice among many possible alternatives Not only the idea of project-based learning matches the thoughts of the curricular reform, but also it is a three-in-one of curriculum instruction, and assessment The project-based learning applies driving questions to encourage children's interest and motivation, thus learn actively Through the project-based learning activities, the more importance is that children learn a lot of scientific inquiry skills and plentiful science information In other words, it is a teaching-learning model which matches the goals of 9-year joint curricula plan in science field . Through the project-based learning, it will integrate instruction and assessment in classrooms, to raise the pedagogical quality of teacher, to foster students' inquiry ability and active learning. The students can apply what they have learned from PBL to daily lives, and know how to communicate with people effectively, to cooperate with other, to think independently, and solve problems The project-based learning can stimulate even children's potential creativity. These are the author's expectations to propose this instructional-leaning model.
期刊論文
1.Martin-Kniep, G. O.、Feige, D. M.、Soodak, L. C.(1995)。Curriculum integration: An expanded view of an abused idea。Journal of Curriculum & Supervision,10(3),227-249。  new window
2.Krajcik, J. S.、Blumenfeld, P. C.、Marx, R. W.、Bass, K. M.、Fredricks, J.、Soloway, E.(1998)。Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students。Journal of the Learning Science,7(3/4),313-350。  new window
3.Share, E.、Rogers, L.(1997)。Get real! Project-based learning, practical advice for getting maximum learning out of class projects。Learning,25(4),61-63。  new window
4.Marx, R. W.、Blumenfeld, P. C.、Krajcik, J. S.、Soloway, E.(1997)。Enacting project-based science。The Elementary School Journal,97(4),341-358。  new window
5.梁雲霞、徐超聖(19991000)。探究與行動:課程統整教師研習規劃。國民教育,40(1),47-54。  延伸查詢new window
6.Krajcik, J. S.、Blumenfeld, P. C.、Marx, R. W.、Soloway, E.(1994)。A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction。The Elementary School Journal,94(5),483-497。  new window
7.Marx, R. W.、Blumenfeld, P. C.、Krajcik, J. S.、Blunk, M.、Crawford, B.、Kelly, B.、Meyer, K. M.(1994)。Enacting project-based science: Experiences of four middle grade teachers。Elementary School Journal,94(5),517-538。  new window
8.Soodak, L. C.、Martin-Kniep, G. O.(1994)。Authentic assessment and curriculum integration: Natural partners in need of thoughtful policy。Educational Policy,8(2),183-201。  new window
9.林達森(19990700)。論析統整性課程及其對九年一貫課程的啟示。教育研究資訊,7(4),97-116+a10。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Beane, J. A.(1996)。On the Shoulders of Giants! The Case for Curriculum Integration。Middle School Journal,28(1),6-11。  new window
11.Mason, T. C.(199609)。Integrated curricula: Potential and problems。Journal of Teacher Education,47(4),263-271。  new window
12.黃譯瑩(19990900)。九年一貫課程中課程統整相關問題探究。教育研究資訊,7(5),60-81+a8。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Beane, J. A.(1991)。The Middle School: Natural Home of Integrated Curriculum。Educational leadership,49(2),9-13。  new window
14.Beane, J. A.(199504)。Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge。Phi Delta Kappan,76(8),616-622。  new window
15.Blumenfeld, Phyllis C.、Soloway, Elliot、Marx, Ronald W.、Krajcik, Joseph S.、Guzdial, Mark、Palincsar, Annemarie(1991)。Motivating Project-based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning。Educational Psychologist,26(3/4),369-398。  new window
16.Brown, John Seely、Collins, Allan、Duguid, Paul(1989)。Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning。Educational Researcher,18(1),32-42。  new window
17.Ames, C.(1992)。Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation。Journal of Educational Psychology,84(3),261-271。  new window
18.歐用生(19990100)。從「課程統整」的概念評九年一貫課程。教育研究資訊,7(1),22-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Barron, B. J. S.、Schwartz, D. L.、Vye, N. J.、Moore, A.、Petrosino, A.、Zech, L.、Bransford, J. D.、The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt(1998)。Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning。The Journal of the Learning Sciences,7(3/4),271-311。  new window
20.Beane, J. A.(1993)。In search of a middle school curriculum。Education Digest,59(2),24-28。  new window
21.Young, K. A.(1994)。Constructing buildings, bridges and minds: Building an integrated curriculum through social studies。Curriculum Review,33(9),25-26。  new window
22.Eisner, E.(1992)。A slice of advice。Educational Researcher,21(5),29-30。  new window
23.Gehrke, N. J.(1991)。Explorations of Teachers' Development of Integrative Curriculums。Journal of Curriculum & Supervision,6(2),107-117。  new window
24.Kotar, M.、Guenter, C. E.、Metzger, D.、Overholt, J. L.(1998)。Curriculum integration: A teacher education model。Science and Children,35(5),40-43。  new window
25.Lonning, R. A.、DeFranco, T. C.(1998)。Development of Theme-based, Interdisciplinary, Integrated Curriculum: A Theoretical Model。School Science & Mathematics,98(6),312-319。  new window
26.Reisberg, L.(1998)。Facilitating inclusion with integrated curriculum: A multidisciplinary approach。Intervention in School and Clinic,33(5),272-277。  new window
27.Shoemaker, B. J. E.、Lewin, L.(1993)。Curriculum and assessment: Two sides of the same coin。Educational Leadership,50(8),55-57。  new window
圖書
1.中華民國課程與教學學會(2000)。課程統整:理論篇。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.Polman, J. L.(2000)。Designing project-based science: Connecting learners through guided inquiry。New York:Teachers College Press。  new window
3.Moursund, David G.(1999)。Project-based learning using information technology。International Society for technology in Education。  new window
4.林佩璇、陳美如、周珮儀、蔡清田、游進年、游家政、王秀玲、黃光雄、單文經、Beane, James A.(2000)。課程統整。臺北:學富文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.Thomas, J. W.、Mergendoller, J. R.、Michaelson, A.(1999)。Project-based learning: A handbook for middle and high school teachers。The Buck Institute for Education。  new window
6.Delisle, R.(1997)。How to use problem-based learning in the classroom。Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
7.Krajcik, J. S.、Czerniak, C. M.、Berger, C. F.(1999)。Teaching Children Science: A Project-Based Approach。Boston, Massachusetts:McGraw-Hill College。  new window
8.Bereiter, C.、Scardamalia, M.(1993)。Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implication of expertise。Open Court。  new window
9.Drake, S. M.(1993)。Planning integrated curriculum: The call to adventure。Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
10.Jones, B. F.、Rasmussen, C. M.、Moffitt, M. C.(1997)。Real-life problem solving: A Collaborative approach to interdisciplinary learning。American Psychological Association。  new window
11.鄒慧英(2000)。從九年一貫課程的統整原則論專題學習。九年一貫課程新思維。臺南:翰林出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.Boud, D.、Feletti, G.(1997)。Changing problem-based learning。The challenge of problem-based learning。London, UK:Kogan Page Limited。  new window
13.Engel, C. E.(1997)。Not Just a Method but a Way of Learning。The Challenge of Problem-based Learning。London, UK。  new window
14.Glaser, R.(1988)。On the nature of expertise。Cognitive functioning and social structure over life course。Norwood, NJ:Ablex。  new window
15.Glasgow, N. A.(1997)。New curriculum for new times。New curriculum for new times。沒有紀錄:Corwin Press, Inc.。  new window
16.Hassard, J.(2000)。Science as inquiry。Science as inquiry。沒有紀錄:Good Year Books。  new window
17.Steinberg, A.(1997)。Real Learning, Real Work。Real Learning, Real Work。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
其他
1.Thomas, J. W.(2000)。A review of research of project-based learning,http://www.autodesk.com/foundation, 2006/11/16。  new window
2.教育部(2000)。二十一世紀教育願景-全人教育、溫馨校園、終身學習,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.鄒慧英(2000)。專題學習的概念介紹與評量設計示例。發展小班教學精神宣導專書(5)--新世紀優質學習的經營。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE