本文以作者自身的學術報告受審的經歷為基點，探討質性研究報告的可能書寫方式，以及如何寫的重要意義。作者首先藉由自己對書寫方式由無覺、知覺到清醒面對的過程，呈現學術書寫涉及政治力場之角力的現實。其次，作者分享她的質性研究書寫方式，並對預設標準格式的閱讀方式提出批判，對該種閱讀方式造成的後果提出警訊。接著，作者以文本的建構與虛構特質，以及研究者的現身引發的議題，來說明研究者提升書寫自覺的重要性。最後，作者比較質性研究報告書寫和報導文學寫作的異同，呼籲並要求自身提升敘說者的自覺，書寫更能撼動人心的教育質性研究報告。

　　　　　Based on the author's own experiences of how her work was evaluated unfavorably during the process of promotion, this article shares with the readers how a qualitative report can be written and how significant the ways of writing can be. By tracing how her academic writing was appreciated or inappropriately changed, the author realizes and experiences how academic writing can be a political act. Then, the fiction quality of text as well as the problems resulting from the unconscious presence of some researchers in qualitative report are discussed. These issues make it even more important that the researcher attends to her own role as a narrator. Lastly, the author proposes that qualitative researchers learn from the writing of literary journalism, which stresses the grasp of reality and beauty at the same time.